-
Lancet (London, England) Jan 2023An improvement in progression-free survival was shown with trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: updated results from DESTINY-Breast03, a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.
BACKGROUND
An improvement in progression-free survival was shown with trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in the progression-free survival interim analysis of the DESTINY-Breast03 trial. The aim of DESTINY-Breast03 was to compare the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine.
METHODS
This open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial was done in 169 study centres in North America, Asia, Europe, Australia, and South America. Eligible patients were aged 18 or older, had HER2-positive unresectable or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and at least one measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan 5·4 mg/kg or trastuzumab emtansine 3·6 mg/kg, both administered by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by hormone receptor status, previous treatment with pertuzumab, and history of visceral disease, and was managed through an interactive web-based system. Within each stratum, balanced block randomisation was used with a block size of four. Patients and investigators were not masked to the treatment received. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by blinded independent central review. The key secondary endpoint was overall survival and this prespecified second overall survival interim analysis reports updated overall survival, efficacy, and safety results. Efficacy analyses were performed using the full analysis set. Safety analyses included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03529110.
FINDINGS
Between July 20, 2018, and June 23, 2020, 699 patients were screened for eligibility, 524 of whom were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan (n=261) or trastuzumab emtansine (n=263). Median duration of study follow-up was 28·4 months (IQR 22·1-32·9) with trastuzumab deruxtecan and 26·5 months (14·5-31·3) with trastuzumab emtansine. Median progression-free survival by blinded independent central review was 28·8 months (95% CI 22·4-37·9) with trastuzumab deruxtecan and 6·8 months (5·6-8·2) with trastuzumab emtansine (hazard ratio [HR] 0·33 [95% CI 0·26-0·43]; nominal p<0·0001). Median overall survival was not reached (95% CI 40·5 months-not estimable), with 72 (28%) overall survival events, in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group and was not reached (34·0 months-not estimable), with 97 (37%) overall survival events, in the trastuzumab emtansine group (HR 0·64; 95% CI 0·47-0·87]; p=0·0037). The number of grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events was similar in patients who received trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine (145 [56%] patients versus 135 [52%] patients). Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis occurred in 39 (15%) patients treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan and eight (3%) patients treated with trastuzumab emtansine, with no grade 4 or 5 events in either group.
INTERPRETATION
Trastuzumab deruxtecan showed a significant improvement in overall survival versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, as well as the longest reported median progression-free survival, reaffirming trastuzumab deruxtecan as the standard of care in the second-line setting. A manageable safety profile of trastuzumab deruxtecan was confirmed with longer treatment duration.
FUNDING
Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca.
Topics: Humans; Female; Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine; Breast Neoplasms; Receptor, ErbB-2; Trastuzumab; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 36495879
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02420-5 -
The New England Journal of Medicine Nov 2012Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is an antibody-drug conjugate incorporating the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted antitumor properties of... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is an antibody-drug conjugate incorporating the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted antitumor properties of trastuzumab with the cytotoxic activity of the microtubule-inhibitory agent DM1. The antibody and the cytotoxic agent are conjugated by means of a stable linker.
METHODS
We randomly assigned patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, who had previously been treated with trastuzumab and a taxane, to T-DM1 or lapatinib plus capecitabine. The primary end points were progression-free survival (as assessed by independent review), overall survival, and safety. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (investigator-assessed), the objective response rate, and the time to symptom progression. Two interim analyses of overall survival were conducted.
RESULTS
Among 991 randomly assigned patients, median progression-free survival as assessed by independent review was 9.6 months with T-DM1 versus 6.4 months with lapatinib plus capecitabine (hazard ratio for progression or death from any cause, 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 0.77; P<0.001), and median overall survival at the second interim analysis crossed the stopping boundary for efficacy (30.9 months vs. 25.1 months; hazard ratio for death from any cause, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.85; P<0.001). The objective response rate was higher with T-DM1 (43.6%, vs. 30.8% with lapatinib plus capecitabine; P<0.001); results for all additional secondary end points favored T-DM1. Rates of grade 3 or 4 adverse events were higher with lapatinib plus capecitabine than with T-DM1 (57% vs. 41%). The incidences of thrombocytopenia and increased serum aminotransferase levels were higher with T-DM1, whereas the incidences of diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia were higher with lapatinib plus capecitabine.
CONCLUSIONS
T-DM1 significantly prolonged progression-free and overall survival with less toxicity than lapatinib plus capecitabine in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech; EMILIA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00829166.).
Topics: Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Capecitabine; Deoxycytidine; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Fluorouracil; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lapatinib; Maytansine; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Quinazolines; Receptor, ErbB-2; Survival Rate; Trastuzumab; Young Adult
PubMed: 23020162
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209124 -
International Journal of Molecular... Jun 2023The treatment of cancer patients has dramatically changed over the past decades with the advent of monoclonal antibodies, immune-checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific... (Review)
Review
The treatment of cancer patients has dramatically changed over the past decades with the advent of monoclonal antibodies, immune-checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific antibodies, and innovative T-cell therapy. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have also revolutionized the treatment of cancer. Several ADCs have already been approved in hematology and clinical oncology, such as trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), and sacituzumab govitecan (SG) for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, and enfortumab vedotin (EV) for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma. The efficacy of ADCs is limited by the emergence of resistance due to different mechanisms, such as antigen-related resistance, failure of internalization, impaired lysosomal function, and other mechanisms. In this review, we summarize the clinical data that contributed to the approval of T-DM1, T-DXd, SG, and EV. We also discuss the different mechanisms of resistance to ADCs, as well as the ways to overcome this resistance, such as bispecific ADCs and the combination of ADCs with immune-checkpoint inhibitors or tyrosine-kinase inhibitors.
Topics: Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; Immunoconjugates; Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine
PubMed: 37298631
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24119674 -
Annals of Oncology : Official Journal... Jun 2021Mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) is an antibody-drug conjugate comprising a folate receptor alpha (FRα)-binding antibody, cleavable linker, and the maytansinoid DM4, a... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) is an antibody-drug conjugate comprising a folate receptor alpha (FRα)-binding antibody, cleavable linker, and the maytansinoid DM4, a potent tubulin-targeting agent. The randomized, open-label, phase III study FORWARD I compared MIRV and investigator's choice chemotherapy in patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Eligible patients with 1-3 prior lines of therapy and whose tumors were positive for FRα expression were randomly assigned, in a 2 : 1 ratio, to receive MIRV (6 mg/kg, adjusted ideal body weight) or chemotherapy (paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, or topotecan). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival [PFS, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, blinded independent central review] in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and in the prespecified FRα high population.
RESULTS
A total of 366 patients were randomized; 243 received MIRV and 109 received chemotherapy. The primary endpoint, PFS, did not reach statistical significance in either the ITT [hazard ratio (HR), 0.98, P = 0.897] or the FRα high population (HR, 0.69, P = 0.049). Superior outcomes for MIRV over chemotherapy were observed in all secondary endpoints in the FRα high population including improved objective response rate (24% versus 10%), CA-125 responses (53% versus 25%), and patient-reported outcomes (27% versus 13%). Fewer treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events (25.1% versus 44.0%), and fewer events leading to dose reduction (19.8% versus 30.3%) and treatment discontinuation (4.5% versus 8.3%) were seen with MIRV compared with chemotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with platinum-resistant EOC, MIRV did not result in a significant improvement in PFS compared with chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints consistently favored MIRV, particularly in patients with high FRα expression. MIRV showed a differentiated and more manageable safety profile than chemotherapy.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Immunoconjugates; Maytansine; Ovarian Neoplasms
PubMed: 33667670
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.02.017 -
Cancer Science Jul 2016Antibody-drug conjugates deliver anticancer agents selectively and efficiently to tumor tissue and have significant antitumor efficacy with a wide therapeutic window....
Bystander killing effect of DS-8201a, a novel anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 antibody-drug conjugate, in tumors with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 heterogeneity.
Antibody-drug conjugates deliver anticancer agents selectively and efficiently to tumor tissue and have significant antitumor efficacy with a wide therapeutic window. DS-8201a is a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeting antibody-drug conjugate prepared using a novel linker-payload system with a potent topoisomerase I inhibitor, exatecan derivative (DX-8951 derivative, DXd). It was effective against trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1)-insensitive patient-derived xenograft models with both high and low HER2 expression. In this study, the bystander killing effect of DS-8201a was evaluated and compared with that of T-DM1. We confirmed that the payload of DS-8201a, DXd (1), was highly membrane-permeable whereas that of T-DM1, Lys-SMCC-DM1, had a low level of permeability. Under a coculture condition of HER2-positive KPL-4 cells and negative MDA-MB-468 cells in vitro, DS-8201a killed both cells, whereas T-DM1 and an antibody-drug conjugate with a low permeable payload, anti-HER2-DXd (2), did not. In vivo evaluation was carried out using mice inoculated with a mixture of HER2-positive NCI-N87 cells and HER2-negative MDA-MB-468-Luc cells by using an in vivo imaging system. In vivo, DS-8201a reduced the luciferase signal of the mice, indicating suppression of the MDA-MB-468-Luc population; however, T-DM1 and anti-HER2-DXd (2) did not. Furthermore, it was confirmed that DS-8201a was not effective against MDA-MB-468-Luc tumors inoculated at the opposite side of the NCI-N87 tumor, suggesting that the bystander killing effect of DS-8201a is observed only in cells neighboring HER2-positive cells, indicating low concern in terms of systemic toxicity. These results indicated that DS-8201a has a potent bystander effect due to a highly membrane-permeable payload and is beneficial in treating tumors with HER2 heterogeneity that are unresponsive to T-DM1.
Topics: Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine; Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Breast Neoplasms; Bystander Effect; Camptothecin; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Membrane Permeability; Cell Proliferation; Female; Humans; Immunoconjugates; Maytansine; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mice, Nude; Neoplasms; Receptor, ErbB-2; Stomach Neoplasms; Topoisomerase I Inhibitors; Trastuzumab
PubMed: 27166974
DOI: 10.1111/cas.12966 -
ESMO Open Feb 2022HER2-positive breast cancer represents 15%-20% of breast malignancies and is characterized by an aggressive behavior and high recurrence rates. Anti-HER2-directed agents... (Review)
Review
HER2-positive breast cancer represents 15%-20% of breast malignancies and is characterized by an aggressive behavior and high recurrence rates. Anti-HER2-directed agents represent the mainstay of treatment of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In this review we propose a treatment algorithm for patients with HER2-positive MBC based on the currently available literature on the topic. The combination of trastuzumab, pertuzumab and a taxane (THP) remains the preferred first-line therapy in most scenarios. Results of trials recently presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress 2021 might have direct clinical impact in the second- and later-line settings. The randomized DESTINY-BREAST03 study compared trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane. T-DXd significantly improved progression-free survival and showed a trend towards improved overall survival, establishing this agent as preferred second-line therapy. Treatment with T-DM1, or the combination of tucatinib, trastuzumab and capecitabine, are considered reasonable options after second-line therapy. For subsequent lines, trastuzumab duocarmazine, neratinib plus capecitabine or the continuation of trastuzumab with different chemotherapy partners are valid options. For patients experiencing disease relapse up to 6 months after completion of adjuvant therapy, as well as for those relapsing within 12 months from the completion of pertuzumab-based adjuvant treatment, we recommend T-DXd as preferred first-line option. For those relapsing between 6 and 12 months after non-pertuzumab-based adjuvant treatment, we recommend first-line THP. Finally, for patients with active brain metastasis, tucatinib-based combination represents a suitable second-line option.
Topics: Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Receptor, ErbB-2
PubMed: 34995893
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100343 -
Cancer Communications (London, England) Mar 2023Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a rapidly developing therapeutic approach in cancer treatment that has shown remarkable activity in breast cancer. Currently, there... (Review)
Review
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a rapidly developing therapeutic approach in cancer treatment that has shown remarkable activity in breast cancer. Currently, there are two ADCs approved for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer, one for triple-negative breast cancer, and multiple investigational ADCs in clinical trials. However, drug resistance has been noticed in clinical use, especially in trastuzumab emtansine. Here, the mechanisms of ADC resistance are summarized into four categories: antibody-mediated resistance, impaired drug trafficking, disrupted lysosomal function, and payload-related resistance. To overcome or prevent resistance to ADCs, innovative development strategies and combination therapy options are being investigated. Analyzing predictive biomarkers for optimal therapy selection may also help to prevent drug resistance.
Topics: Humans; Female; Breast Neoplasms; Immunoconjugates; Antineoplastic Agents; Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine
PubMed: 36357174
DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12387 -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Feb 2023A novel class of drugs, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), are now rapidly emerging as highly effective treatments for solid tumours. ADCs conjugate conventional... (Review)
Review
A novel class of drugs, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), are now rapidly emerging as highly effective treatments for solid tumours. ADCs conjugate conventional chemotherapeutics with highly selective targeted monoclonal antibodies. Anti-HER2 therapies selectively target cancer cells expressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), among them trastuzumab has been the first HER2-targeting monoclonal antibody to achieve successful results that made it the backbone of anti-HER2 therapies. Trastuzumab drug conjugates (T-DCs), use trastuzumab as a selective antibody to lead cytotoxic drugs inside cancer cells. Trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-Dxd) are the two approved T-DCs. T-Dxd along with other five T-DCs represents "second generation ADCs" that has been firstly tested in HER2 positive breast cancer (BC) and then in HER2-low BC and other cancers showing promising results thanks to extraordinary and innovative pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics. The evidence generated so far are establishing them as a completely new class of agents effective in solid cancer treatments but also warrants physicians against unconventional toxicity profiles. The role of T-DCs in HER2-positive BC has been largely reviewed, while in this review, we provided for the first time in literature an overview of trastuzumab drug conjugates (T-DCs) approved and/or in clinical development with a specific focus on their efficacy and safety profile in HER2-low BC and other solid tumours different from BC. We started by analysing T-DCs biological characteristics that underly the differences in T-DCs pharmacodynamics and safety profile, then presented the main evidence on the activity and efficacy of these emerging T-DCs in HER2-low BC and other HER2 overexpressing and/or mutated solid tumours and lastly, we provided an overview of the complex and still evolving scenario in which these compounds should be allocated. A specific focus on possible combination strategies with other drugs such as immunotherapy, chemotherapy and target therapy, to increase T-DCs activity and eventually overcome future upcoming resistance mechanisms, are here also critically reviewed.
Topics: Humans; Female; Breast Neoplasms; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Trastuzumab; Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine; Receptor, ErbB-2; Antineoplastic Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Immunoconjugates
PubMed: 36587473
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102500 -
Genes Nov 2022Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) receptor tyrosine kinase is overexpressed in 20-30% of breast cancers and is associated with poor prognosis and worse... (Review)
Review
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) receptor tyrosine kinase is overexpressed in 20-30% of breast cancers and is associated with poor prognosis and worse overall patient survival. Most women with HER2-positive breast cancer receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus HER2-targeted therapies. The development of HER2-directed therapeutics is an important advancement in targeting invasive breast cancer. Despite the efficacy of anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies, they are still being combined with adjuvant chemotherapy to improve overall patient outcomes. Recently, significant progress has been made towards the development of a class of therapeutics known as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), which leverage the high specificity of HER2-targeted monoclonal antibodies with the potent cytotoxic effects of various small molecules, such as tubulin inhibitors and topoisomerase inhibitors. To date, two HER2-targeting ADCs have been approved by the FDA for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: Ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1; Kadcyla) and fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (T-Dxd; Enhertu). Kadcyla and Enhertu are approved for use as a second-line treatment after trastuzumab-taxane-based therapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. The success of ADCs in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer provides novel therapeutic advancements in the management of the disease. In this review, we discuss the basic biology of HER2, its downstream signaling pathways, currently available anti-HER2 therapeutic modalities and their mechanisms of action, and the latest clinical and safety characteristics of ADCs used for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer.
Topics: Humans; Female; Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine; Breast Neoplasms; Maytansine; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Immunoconjugates; Antineoplastic Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal
PubMed: 36360302
DOI: 10.3390/genes13112065 -
MAbs 2014Antibody therapeutics have revolutionized the treatment of cancer over the past two decades. Antibodies that specifically bind tumor surface antigens can be effective... (Review)
Review
Antibody therapeutics have revolutionized the treatment of cancer over the past two decades. Antibodies that specifically bind tumor surface antigens can be effective therapeutics; however, many unmodified antibodies lack therapeutic activity. These antibodies can instead be applied successfully as guided missiles to deliver potent cytotoxic drugs in the form of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs). The success of ADCs is dependent on four factors--target antigen, antibody, linker, and payload. The field has made great progress in these areas, marked by the recent approval by the US Food and Drug Administration of two ADCs, brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (Kadcyla). However, the therapeutic window for many ADCs that are currently in pre-clinical or clinical development remains narrow and further improvements may be required to enhance the therapeutic potential of these ADCs. Production of ADCs is an area where improvement is needed because current methods yield heterogeneous mixtures that may include 0-8 drug species per antibody molecule. Site-specific conjugation has been recently shown to eliminate heterogeneity, improve conjugate stability, and increase the therapeutic window. Here, we review and describe various site-specific conjugation strategies that are currently used for the production of ADCs, including use of engineered cysteine residues, unnatural amino acids, and enzymatic conjugation through glycotransferases and transglutaminases. In addition, we also summarize differences among these methods and highlight critical considerations when building next-generation ADC therapeutics.
Topics: Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antibodies, Neoplasm; Antibody Specificity; Brentuximab Vedotin; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Immunoconjugates; Maytansine; Neoplasms; Trastuzumab; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration
PubMed: 24423619
DOI: 10.4161/mabs.27022