-
World Journal of Gastrointestinal... Apr 2015It is estimated that half of all patients with cancer eventually develop a syndrome of cachexia, with anorexia and a progressive loss of adipose tissue and skeletal... (Review)
Review
It is estimated that half of all patients with cancer eventually develop a syndrome of cachexia, with anorexia and a progressive loss of adipose tissue and skeletal muscle mass. Cancer cachexia is characterized by systemic inflammation, negative protein and energy balance, and an involuntary loss of lean body mass. It is an insidious syndrome that not only has a dramatic impact on patient quality of life, but also is associated with poor responses to chemotherapy and decreased survival. Cachexia is still largely an underestimated and untreated condition, despite the fact that multiple mechanisms are reported to be involved in its development, with a number of cytokines postulated to play a role in the etiology of the persistent catabolic state. Existing therapies for cachexia, including orexigenic appetite stimulants, focus on palliation of symptoms and reduction of the distress of patients and families rather than prolongation of life. Recent therapies for the cachectic syndrome involve a multidisciplinary approach. Combination therapy with diet modification and/or exercise has been added to novel pharmaceutical agents, such as Megestrol acetate, medroxyprogesterone, ghrelin, omega-3-fatty acid among others. These agents are reported to have improved survival rates as well as quality of life. In this review, we will discuss the emerging understanding of the mechanisms of cancer cachexia, the current treatment options including multidisciplinary combination therapies, as well an update on new and ongoing clinical trials.
PubMed: 25897346
DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v7.i4.17 -
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and... Dec 2015Anorexia is commonly present in persons with cancer and a major component of cancer cachexia. There are multiple causes of anorexia in cancer. Peripherally, these can be... (Review)
Review
Anorexia is commonly present in persons with cancer and a major component of cancer cachexia. There are multiple causes of anorexia in cancer. Peripherally, these can be due to (i) substances released from or by the tumour, e.g. pro-inflammatory cytokines, lactate, and parathormone-related peptide; (ii) tumours causing dysphagia or altering gut function; (iii) tumours altering nutrients, e.g. zinc deficiency; (iv) tumours causing hypoxia; (v) increased peripheral tryptophan leading to increased central serotonin; or (vi) alterations of release of peripheral hormones that alter feeding, e.g. peptide tyrosine tyrosine and ghrelin. Central effects include depression and pain, decreasing the desire to eat. Within the central nervous system, tumours create multiple alterations in neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, and prostaglandins that modulate feeding. Many of these neurotransmitters appear to produce their anorectic effects through the adenosine monophosphate kinase/methylmalonyl coenzyme A/fatty acid system in the hypothalamus. Dynamin is a guanosine triphosphatase that is responsible for internalization of melanocortin 4 receptors and prostaglandin receptors. Dynamin is up-regulated in a mouse model of cancer anorexia. A number of drugs, e.g. megestrol acetate, cannabinoids, and ghrelin agonists, have been shown to have some ability to be orexigenic in cancer patients.
PubMed: 26675762
DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12059 -
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and... Apr 2018We provide a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of cannabinoids in palliative medicine. The Cochrane Central Register of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
We provide a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of cannabinoids in palliative medicine. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and http://clinicaltrials.gov, and a selection of cancer journals were searched up until 15th of March 2017. Of the 108 screened studies, nine studies with a total of 1561 participants were included. Overall, the nine studies were at moderate risk of bias. The quality of evidence comparing cannabinoids with placebo was rated according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation as low or very low because of indirectness, imprecision, and potential reporting bias. In cancer patients, there were no significant differences between cannabinoids and placebo for improving caloric intake (standardized mean differences [SMD]: 0.2 95% confidence interval [CI]: [-0.66, 1.06] P = 0.65), appetite (SMD: 0.81 95% CI: [-1.14, 2.75]; P = 0.42), nausea/vomiting (SMD: 0.21 [-0.10, 0.52] P = 0.19), >30% decrease in pain (risk differences [RD]: 0.07 95% CI: [-0.01, 0.16]; P = 0.07), or sleep problems (SMD: -0.09 95% CI: [-0.62, 0.43] P = 0.72). In human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients, cannabinoids were superior to placebo for weight gain (SMD: 0.57 [0.22; 0.92]; P = 0.001) and appetite (SMD: 0.57 [0.11; 1.03]; P = 0.02) but not for nausea/vomiting (SMD: 0.20 [-0.15, 0.54]; P = 0.26). Regarding side effects in cancer patients, there were no differences between cannabinoids and placebo in symptoms of dizziness (RD: 0.03 [-0.02; 0.08]; P = 0.23) or poor mental health (RD: -0.01 [-0.04; 0.03]; P = 0.69), whereas in HIV patients, there was a significant increase in mental health symptoms (RD: 0.05 [0.00; 0.11]; P = 0.05). Tolerability (measured by the number of withdrawals because of adverse events) did not differ significantly in cancer (RD: 1.15 [0.80; 1.66]; P = 0.46) and HIV patients (RD: 1.87 [0.60; 5.84]; P = 0.28). Safety did not differ in cancer (RD: 1.12 [0.86; 1.46]; P = 0.39) or HIV patients (4.51 [0.54; 37.45]; P = 0.32) although there was large uncertainty about the latter reflected in the width of the CI. In one moderate quality study of 469 cancer patients with cancer-associated anorexia, megestrol was superior to cannabinoids in improving appetite, producing >10% weight gain and tolerability. In another study comparing megestrol to dronabinol in HIV patients, megestrol treatment led to higher weight gain without any differences in tolerability and safety. We found no convincing, unbiased, high quality evidence suggesting that cannabinoids are of value for anorexia or cachexia in cancer or HIV patients.
Topics: Cannabinoids; Humans; Palliative Medicine
PubMed: 29400010
DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12273 -
Advances in Clinical and Experimental... Feb 2018Advanced cancer patients in hospice are at notably increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to age, local and distal advancement of the malignancy and bed... (Review)
Review
Advanced cancer patients in hospice are at notably increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to age, local and distal advancement of the malignancy and bed confinement, among other factors. Asymptomatic VTE prevalence among palliative care patients has been found to reach 50%, whereas the clinically overt form occurs in 10%. Hospice patients are frequently given medications increasing VTE risk, for instance megestrol which is a drug commonly used in cancer cachexia. Many of the available guidelines encourage the implementation of thromboprophylaxis (TPX) in cancer patients, e.g., in the perioperative period or over the course of chemotherapy. However, concerning patients remaining under hospice care where the priority goal is not life extension but assurance of the best possible quality of life (QoL), the main benefit from the TPX would be a decrease in the risk of symptom burden associated with VTE, i.e., pain, edema or dyspnea. Nevertheless, studies performed on a sufficiently large study group, which could unequivocally determine the influence of anticoagulation on VTE symptom burden in hospice patients, are still lacking. VTE prophylaxis is challenging for many reasons: its unknown effect on QoL, vague risk of its discontinuation, and risk of bleeding complications which is additionally increased in conditions prevalent in hospice population, i.e., malnutrition, renal or liver insufficiency. So far, most of the guidelines issued by oncological societies do not precisely refer to the problem of TPX in hospice patients. Therefore, the decisions on the implementation of anticoagulation should be taken individually, with previous assessment of VTE risk, comorbidities and possible hemorrhagic complications.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Hospice Care; Hospices; Humans; Neoplasms; Palliative Care; Quality of Life; Risk Factors; Venous Thromboembolism
PubMed: 29521074
DOI: 10.17219/acem/64593 -
Annals of Translational Medicine Oct 2022A reasonable and effective control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) plays an important role in the comprehensive treatment of cancer. Megestrol belongs...
Megestrol acetate dispersible tablets with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone 5-HT3 receptor antagonist plus dexamethasone, can better control chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a randomized controlled study.
BACKGROUND
A reasonable and effective control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) plays an important role in the comprehensive treatment of cancer. Megestrol belongs to the 17α-hydroxyprogesterone derivative and is a highly effective synthetic progesterone. Recorded in the instructions may improve appetite and cachexia in patients with advanced tumors. In recent years, clinical practice and small sample studies have shown that megestrol combined with chemotherapy can improve CINV. This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of megestrol acetate combined with a 5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3) receptor antagonist and dexamethasone in patients with CINV.
METHODS
Patients with malignant tumors who were treated with cisplatin-containing chemotherapy in our hospital from September 2018 to December 2019 were enrolled. A total of 120 patients were selected and randomly assigned to receive either megestrol acetate dispersible tablets with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone (megestrol group) or a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist plus dexamethasone (control group). Megestrol acetate dispersible tablets: 160 mg orally every morning from the day of chemotherapy until it lasts for ten days. Abstract IV of the quality-of-life scale for cancer patients in China was used to assess the quality of life (QOL) of the participants. All adverse reactions during chemotherapy were assessed according to the CTCAE 4.03 evaluation standard issued by the National Cancer Institute and divided into five grades according to severity.
RESULTS
For the control of nausea, the rates of complete prevention were significantly higher in the megestrol group than in the control patients during the delayed [53.3% (31/60) 30.0% (18/60), P=0.012] and overall [40.0% (24/60) 15.0% (9/60), P=0.002] observation periods. Moreover, the megestrol combination treatment group also achieved markedly higher rates of complete remission of vomiting than the control group during the delayed observation period [76.7% (46/60) 51.7% (31/60), P=0.001], achieving an overall higher proportion of remission during the study period [68.3% (41/60) 46.6% (28/60), P=0.0016].
CONCLUSIONS
The triple antiemetic protocol using megestrol acetate with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist plus dexamethasone can improve CINV symptoms caused by highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) with cisplatin, with an excellent control effect and few adverse reactions, especially for delayed CINV.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1800017953.
PubMed: 36388808
DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-4809 -
Cancers Oct 2023Granular cell tumors (GCT) represent 0.5% of all soft tissue sarcomas (STS), and when metastatic, they exhibit aggressive behavior and determine limited survival.... (Review)
Review
Granular cell tumors (GCT) represent 0.5% of all soft tissue sarcomas (STS), and when metastatic, they exhibit aggressive behavior and determine limited survival. Metastatic GCTs are relatively chemo-resistant; however, there is growing evidence of the benefit of using pazopanib and other targeted therapies in this histology. This is a review of the role of pazopanib and other targeted therapies in the treatment of GCTs, along with some insights on pathology and molecular biology described in GCTs. From 256 articles found in our search, 10 case-report articles met the inclusion criteria. Pazopanib was the most employed systemic therapy. The median reported time on therapy with pazopanib was seven months. Eight out of ten patients (80%) experienced disease control with pazopanib, while four out of ten (40%) patients achieved an objective RECIST response. Molecular studies suggested that antitumoral effects of pazopanib in GCT might be due to a loss-of-function of genes which consequently enhance signaling through several molecular pathways, such as SFKs, STAT5a/b, and PDGFR-β. Other reported targeted therapies for malignant GCTs included pazopanib in combination with crizotinib, which showed disease control for four months in one patient, and a PI3K inhibitor which achieved disease control for nine months in another patient. Dasatinib and megestrol were ineffective in two other different patients. Pazopanib has been demonstrated to be active in advanced GCTs and may be considered as a preferable treatment option.
PubMed: 37958362
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215187 -
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology Nov 2017We reviewed randomized phase II/III trials comparing first- or second-line endocrine therapy as monotherapy or in combination with targeted therapies for treatment of... (Review)
Review
We reviewed randomized phase II/III trials comparing first- or second-line endocrine therapy as monotherapy or in combination with targeted therapies for treatment of postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. First-line was defined as treatment for endocrine therapy-naïve advanced breast cancer or advanced disease treated with endocrine therapy in the adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting. Second-line was defined as endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer following disease progression on endocrine therapy for advanced disease. Publications reporting progression-free survival (PFS)/time to progression (TTP) or overall survival (OS) for FDA-approved agents anastrozole, exemestane, fulvestrant 250 mg, fulvestrant 500 mg, letrozole (0.5 and 2.5 mg), megestrol acetate, and tamoxifen as monotherapy, or in combination with everolimus, palbociclib or ribociclib, were assessed. First-line monotherapy with anastrozole, fulvestrant 500 mg or letrozole 2.5 mg significantly improved PFS/TTP comparator endocrine therapy; however, only fulvestrant 500 mg improved OS. For endocrine therapy in combination with targeted therapies, palbociclib plus letrozole 2.5 mg, and ribociclib plus letrozole 2.5 mg significantly improved PFS letrozole 2.5 mg alone first-line. For second-line monotherapies, exemestane, fulvestrant 500 mg and letrozole 2.5 mg significantly improved PFS/TTP comparator endocrine therapy; only fulvestrant 500 mg and letrozole 2.5 mg improved OS. For second-line combination therapies, everolimus plus exemestane, and palbociclib plus fulvestrant 500 mg, improved PFS endocrine therapy alone. In both first- and second-line settings, aromatase inhibitors demonstrated PFS benefits comparator endocrine therapy; however, fulvestrant 500 mg was the only endocrine therapy included in our review to show both PFS and OS advantages compared with other endocrine therapies. Targeted agents in combination with endocrine therapy have demonstrated PFS improvements both first- and second-line; OS data are awaited.
PubMed: 29344106
DOI: 10.1177/1758834017728928 -
Cancers Sep 2023(1) Background: The standard first-line therapy for advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is represented by EDP-M (etoposide, doxorubicin, cisplatin + mitotane)....
Feasibility and Activity of Megestrol Acetate in Addition to Etoposide, Doxorubicin, Cisplatin, and Mitotane as First-Line Therapy in Patients with Metastatic/Unresectable Adrenocortical Carcinoma with Low Performance Status.
(1) Background: The standard first-line therapy for advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is represented by EDP-M (etoposide, doxorubicin, cisplatin + mitotane). Progestins have shown cytotoxic activity both in vitro and in vivo on ACC; better EDP-M tolerability and efficacy have been hypnotized due to the association with progestins. (2) Methods: The feasibility and tolerability of EDP-M combined with oral megestrol acetate (EDP-MM) were tested in 24 patients (pts) affected by metastatic ACC with a low performance status (PS); the case group was compared with a 48 pts control group according to the propensity score. The secondary objectives were clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). (3) Results: Thirteen pts (54.2%) in the EDP-MM population experienced progestin-related toxicities; in particular, five pts experienced vaginal bleeding (20.8%); four pts experienced weight gain (16.7%); and thromboembolic events, worsening of hypertension, skin rashes, and hyperglycemia were registered in one patient each (4.2%). This led to the discontinuation of megestrol acetate in four pts (16.7%). EDP-M-related toxicities were similar in both groups. No differences in PFS and OS curves were observed; the CBR was 75.0% and 60.4%, respectively. (4) Conclusions: The association of EDP-M + megestrol acetate in ACC pts with a low PS is feasible and well tolerated; its efficacy appeared to be non-inferior to EDP-M administered to pts with a good PS.
PubMed: 37760461
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184491 -
Cells Mar 2022Cachexia may be caused by congestive heart failure, and it is then called cardiac cachexia, which leads to increased morbidity and mortality. Cardiac cachexia also... (Review)
Review
Cachexia may be caused by congestive heart failure, and it is then called cardiac cachexia, which leads to increased morbidity and mortality. Cardiac cachexia also worsens skeletal muscle degradation. Cardiac cachexia is the loss of edema-free muscle mass with or without affecting fat tissue. It is mainly caused by a loss of balance between protein synthesis and degradation, or it may result from intestinal malabsorption. The loss of balance in protein synthesis and degradation may be the consequence of altered endocrine mediators such as insulin, insulin-like growth factor 1, leptin, ghrelin, melanocortin, growth hormone and neuropeptide Y. In contrast to many other health problems, fat accumulation in the heart is protective in this condition. Fat in the heart can be divided into epicardial, myocardial and cardiac steatosis. In this review, we describe and discuss these topics, pointing out the interconnection between heart failure and cardiac cachexia and the protective role of cardiac obesity. We also set the basis for possible screening methods that may allow for a timely diagnosis of cardiac cachexia, since there is still no cure for this condition. Several therapeutic procedures are discussed including exercise, nutritional proposals, myostatin antibodies, ghrelin, anabolic steroids, anti-inflammatory substances, beta-adrenergic agonists, medroxyprogesterone acetate, megestrol acetate, cannabinoids, statins, thalidomide, proteasome inhibitors and pentoxifylline. However, to this date, there is no cure for cachexia.
Topics: Cachexia; Ghrelin; Heart; Heart Failure; Humans; Obesity
PubMed: 35326490
DOI: 10.3390/cells11061039 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Jan 2019Cancer cachexia (CC) is common in advanced cancer and is accompanied by negative effects on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). However, methods to identify the... (Review)
Review
Cancer cachexia (CC) is common in advanced cancer and is accompanied by negative effects on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). However, methods to identify the impact of CC on HRQOL are limited. Single questionnaire items may provide insight on the effect of CC on HRQOL. Specifically, the use of "feeling of wellbeing" (FWB) on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) questionnaire and the Distress Thermometer (DT) have been explored. Assessing how these two surrogate measures of HRQOL are impacted among CC stages and what drives these negative effects may allow for focused treatments. Five-hundred and twelve patients referred to a Cancer Rehabilitation Program completed the ESAS, with the question on FWB and the DT at baseline. Patients were separated into CC stages: non-cachexia (NC), pre-cachexia (PC), cachexia (C), refractory cachexia (RC). A mixed model ANOVA with post hoc Tukey adjustment was used to compare means of FWB and distress among the CC stages. To understand what was driving the differences between CC stages, a robust regression model was created with either distress or FWB as the outcome measure, dependent on the other measures in ESAS, age and sex. Finally, the use of cannabinoids in treating appetite loss was examined, as it has a detrimental effect on FWB; 54 patients underwent cannabinoid treatment for appetite loss within a community-based, physician-lead, medical cannabis clinic. A t-test to assess changes in ESAS appetite score after 3 months of cannabinoid treatment was examined. RC patients had a significantly poorer sense of wellbeing than the other cachexia stages (RC: 6.07±0.33). Significant differences in distress were identified between RC patients and those with NC and C, but not with PC (RC: 4.87±0.38, NC: 3.35±0.26, PC: 4.11±0.30, C: 3.60±0.28). FWB was negatively affected by worsening appetite in all CC stages except NC (PC: 0.19±0.08, P=0.022; C: 0.26±0.06, P<0.001; RC: 0.23±0.08, P=0.007). ESAS score for lack of appetite significantly improved between baseline (5.07±3.21) and follow-up (3.56±3.15, P=0.003) after cannabinoid treatment, with no significant difference in weight (baseline: 70.7±14.6 kg, 3-month follow-up: 71.0±14.8 kg). Future research should validate both multidimensional and single-item tools to measure HRQOL in patients at different stages of CC. Improvement of HRQOL via appetite stimulation, may be achieved through a multidisciplinary approach, which includes cannabinoid therapy.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Anorexia; Appetite Stimulants; Cachexia; Cannabinoids; Cyproheptadine; Female; Health Status; Humans; Hydrazines; Male; Megestrol Acetate; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Oligopeptides; Quality of Life; Serotonin Antagonists; Severity of Illness Index; Stress, Psychological; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 30525763
DOI: 10.21037/apm.2018.08.04