-
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine May 2018Multiple myeloma (MM) in dogs typically is treated with melphalan. A daily melphalan dosing schedule reportedly is well tolerated and associated with favorable outcome.... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Multiple myeloma (MM) in dogs typically is treated with melphalan. A daily melphalan dosing schedule reportedly is well tolerated and associated with favorable outcome. Although anecdotally a pulse dose regimen has resulted in successful responses, little long-term outcome and safety data is available regarding this dosing regimen for dogs with MM.
HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES
(1) To compare outcome and adverse event profiles between pulse dose and daily dose melphalan schedules and (2) to report prognostic factors in dogs with MM treated with melphalan. We hypothesized that both protocols would have similar outcomes and tolerability.
ANIMALS
Thirty-eight client-owned dogs diagnosed with MM receiving pulse dose (n = 17) or daily dose (n = 21) melphalan.
METHODS
Retrospective cohort study assessing outcome and adverse events in dogs receiving either protocol. Risk factors were evaluated for their prognostic relevance.
RESULTS
Both regimens were well tolerated and similarly effective, with an overall median survival time of 930 days. Renal disease and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were negative prognostic factors, whereas hypercalcemia and osteolytic lesions were not prognostic factors in this study population.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE
Positive results support the use of either dosing regimen for the treatment of dogs with MM, and renal disease and NLR were negative prognostic factors. Prospective, controlled, and randomized studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Male; Melphalan; Multiple Myeloma; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 29566439
DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15084 -
Biology of Blood and Marrow... May 2019In immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, the depth of hematologic response to treatment is associated with improved survival and organ responses. We conducted a... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial
Induction Therapy with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone and Conditioning with High-Dose Melphalan and Bortezomib Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis: Long-Term Follow-Up Analysis.
In immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, the depth of hematologic response to treatment is associated with improved survival and organ responses. We conducted a clinical trial using bortezomib in induction and in conditioning with melphalan before stem cell transplantation (SCT) for AL amyloidosis. The results of this clinical trial with a median follow-up of 36 months have been reported previously. Here we report the long-term results of this clinical trial with a median follow-up of 77 months. We describe survival, durability of hematologic and organ responses, and relapse rates. Thirty-five patients were enrolled between 2010 and 2013. Hematologic complete response and very good partial response (VGPR) were noted in 100% (27 of 27) of the evaluable patients at 6 months post-SCT. Four patients (15%) had hematologic relapse at a median of 42 months, and 1 patient (3.7%) had organ progression despite maintaining a VGPR at 37 months. The median overall survival and progression-free survival have not yet been reached at the time of this report. Renal and cardiac responses occurred in 65% and 88%, respectively, at 5 years post-SCT. The median time to renal and cardiac response was 12 months and 6 months, respectively. In conclusion, incorporating bortezomib into induction and conditioning yielded durable hematologic responses of AL amyloidosis, with corresponding organ responses and prolonged survival.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Bortezomib; Dexamethasone; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunoglobulin Light-chain Amyloidosis; Male; Melphalan; Middle Aged; Myeloablative Agonists; Remission Induction; Transplantation Conditioning; Transplantation, Autologous; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30639823
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.01.007 -
Blood Advances Jul 2023Overall survival after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using alemtuzumab, fludarabine, and melphalan is...
Overall survival after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using alemtuzumab, fludarabine, and melphalan is associated with high rates of mixed chimerism (MC) and secondary graft failure (GF). We hypothesized that peritransplantation alemtuzumab levels or specific patterns of inflammation would predict these risks. We assessed samples from the Bone Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1204 (NCT01998633) to study the impact of alemtuzumab levels and cytokine patterns on MC and impending or established secondary GF (defined as donor chimerism <5% after initial engraftment and/or requirement of cellular intervention). Thirty-three patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (n = 25) and other IEIs (n = 8) who underwent HCTs with T-cell-replete grafts were included. Patients with day 0 alemtuzumab levels ≤0.32 μg/mL had a markedly lower incidence of MC, 14.3%, vs 90.9% in patients with levels >0.32 μg/mL (P = .008). Impending or established secondary GF was only observed in patients with day 0 alemtuzumab levels >0.32 μg/mL (P = .08). Unexpectedly, patients with impending or established secondary GF had lower CXCL9 levels. The cumulative incidence of impending or established secondary GF in patients with a day 14+ CXCL9 level ≤2394 pg/mL (day 14+ median) was 73.6% vs 0% in patients with a level >2394 pg/mL (P = .002). CXCL9 levels inversely correlated with alemtuzumab levels. These data suggest a model in which higher levels of alemtuzumab at day 0 deplete donor T cells, inhibit the graft-versus-marrow reaction (thereby suppressing CXCL9 levels), and adversely affect sustained engraftment in the nonmyeloablative HCT setting. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01998633.
Topics: Humans; Alemtuzumab; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Melphalan; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Tissue Donors; Chemokine CXCL9
PubMed: 37042921
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009478 -
Medicina 2022Immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare disease. Treatment is challenging, justified in part by systemic compromise and limited scientific evidence.
INTRODUCTION
Immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare disease. Treatment is challenging, justified in part by systemic compromise and limited scientific evidence.
OBJECTIVES
Develop evidencebased recommendations that allow adequate treatment of patients with amyloidosis AL.
METHODS
A list of PICO format questions focused on the effectiveness and safety of amyloidosis AL treatment was generated. PubMed, Cochrane and Epistemonikos were searched. The levels of evidence and grades of recommendation were based on the GRADE system.
RESULTS
11 recommendations were generated. In selected patients with amyloidosis AL, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is recommended after induction with bortezomibbased regimens and conditioning with melphalan, since it could deepen the hematological and organ response, its durability and improve survival. In patients not eligible for ASCT, first-line treatment with bortezomib-based regimens is recommended, since it is likely to achieve a higher rate of hematological and organ response and improve survival. In patients with a contraindication or inaccessibility to bortezomib, treatment with alkylating agents and corticosteroids is recommended, since they are likely to achieve haematological and organ response and improve survival.
DISCUSSION
These treatment recommendations are based on the available evidence and the experience of the panel of experts, in a scenario of limited available resources, according to developing countries.
Topics: Amyloidosis; Bortezomib; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunoglobulin Light-chain Amyloidosis; Melphalan; Transplantation, Autologous; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35904916
DOI: No ID Found -
Cell Transplantation 2023High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard of care for selected patients with refractory/relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BeEAM (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) Versus BEAM (Carmustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) as Conditioning Regimen Before Autologous Haematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard of care for selected patients with refractory/relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), and it is also used as first-line clinical consolidation option for some aggressive NHL subtypes. Conditioning regimen prior to ASCT is one of the essential factors related with clinical outcomes post transplant. The conditioning regimen of carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) traditionally is considered the standard of care for patients with lymphoma who are eligible for transplantation. Replacement of carmustine with bendamustine (BeEAM) was described as an alternative conditioning regimen in the autograft setting for patients with lymphoma. Several studies have reported inconsistent clinical outcomes comparing BeEAM and BEAM. Therefore, in the lack of well-designed prospective comparative studies, the comparison of BeEAM versus BEAM is based on retrospective trials. To compare the clinical outcomes between BeEAM and BEAM, we performed a meta-analysis of 10 studies which compared the outcomes between BeEAM and BEAM in patients autografted for lymphoma disease (HL or NHL). We searched article titles and compared transplantation with BeEAM versus BEAM in MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane library, and EMBASE database. Here, we report the results of nine main endpoints in our meta-analysis comparing BeEAM and BEAM, including neutrophil engraftment (NE), platelet engraftment (PE), overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse rate (RR), grade 3 mucositis, renal toxicity, and cardiotoxicity. We discovered that the BeEAM regimen was associated with a slightly better PFS [pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52-0.94, = 0.02], lower RR (0.49, 95% CI, 0.31-0.76, = 0.002), higher mucositis (3.43, 95% CI, 2.29-5.16, = 0.001), renal toxicity (4.49, 95% CI, 2.68-7.51, = 0.001), and cardiotoxicity (1.88, 95% CI, 1.03-3.40, = 0.03). We also discovered that the two groups had equivalent NE (pooled WMD -0.64, 95% CI, -1.46 to 0.18, = 0.13), PE (pooled WMD -0.3, 95% CI, -1.68 to 2.28, = 0.77), OS (0.73, 95% CI, 0.52-1.01, = 0.07), and NRM (1.51, 95% CI, 0.76-2.98, = 0.24). The results of this meta-analysis show that the BeEAM regimen is a viable alternative to BEAM. More prospective comparisons between BeEAM and BEAM are required.
Topics: Humans; Carmustine; Transplantation, Autologous; Bendamustine Hydrochloride; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Cytarabine; Etoposide; Melphalan; Cardiotoxicity; Mucositis; Retrospective Studies; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin
PubMed: 37350429
DOI: 10.1177/09636897231179364 -
Biology of Blood and Marrow... Aug 2020Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is associated with poor survival in older adults, and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) with reduced-intensity...
Long-Term Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant with Fludarabine and Melphalan Conditioning and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus as Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is associated with poor survival in older adults, and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) has been an increasingly used strategy in this population. At City of Hope we conducted a retrospective analysis of 72 patients who underwent allogeneic HCT with fludarabine and melphalan (FluMel) as the conditioning regimen between 2005 and 2018, from either a matched sibling or fully matched unrelated donor while in complete remission. Tacrolimus and sirolimus (T/S) were used as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Overall survival and progression-free survival at 4 years post-HCT were 58% and 44%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse/progression and nonrelapse mortality at 4 years were 34% and 22%, respectively. Patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of relapse/progression (20% versus 48% for patients with Ph-negative status, P = .007). In conclusion, RIC HCT with FluMel conditioning and T/S GVHD prophylaxis was associated with favorable outcomes in patients with Ph+ ALL and should be considered as a viable consolidative therapy for adult patients with ALL.
Topics: Aged; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Melphalan; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Tacrolimus; Transplantation Conditioning; Vidarabine
PubMed: 32416253
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.04.015 -
Biology of Blood and Marrow... Dec 2020High-dose melphalan (Mel) conditioning before autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT) is standard of care for patients with transplantation-eligible...
High-dose melphalan (Mel) conditioning before autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT) is standard of care for patients with transplantation-eligible multiple myeloma. The traditional lyophilized Mel formulation has inadequate solubility and stability after reconstitution, leading to the use of propylene glycol (PG) as a solubilizing agent. A newer PG-free Mel preparation (Evomela) uses beta cyclodextrin captisol as a solubilizing agent and was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration as a conditioning agent based on a single-phase IIb study showing bioequivalence. We compared the outcomes of consecutive patients with myeloma undergoing autoHCT using the 2 formulations of Mel for conditioning as our center switched from using the older formulation (PG-Mel) to the newer one (PGF-Mel). Of 294 autoHCT recipients, 162 received PG-Mel conditioning and 132 received PGF-Mel conditioning. The PGF-Mel group was older and had a lower average Karnofsky Performance Status score. PGF-Mel was associated with faster neutrophil recovery (median, 12 days versus 13 days; P < .001), fewer grade 3-4 infections within 30 days of autoHCT (1.5% versus 8.0%; P = .048), and a lower 30-day rehospitalization rate (6.8% versus 17.9%; P = .04), as confirmed by propensity-weighted analysis. No significant between-group differences were detected in mucositis, organ toxicity, myeloma response, or 100-day mortality.
Topics: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Melphalan; Multiple Myeloma; Myeloablative Agonists; Transplantation Conditioning; Transplantation, Autologous
PubMed: 32920204
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.08.030 -
Biology of Blood and Marrow... Apr 2019Disease relapse and toxicity are the shortcomings of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). We hypothesized...
Reduced-Intensity Conditioning with Fludarabine, Melphalan, and Total Body Irradiation for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: The Effect of Increasing Melphalan Dose on Underlying Disease and Toxicity.
Disease relapse and toxicity are the shortcomings of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). We hypothesized that adding total body irradiation (TBI) to and decreasing melphalan (Mel) from a base RIC regimen of fludarabine (Flu) and Mel would increase cytoreduction and improve disease control while decreasing toxicity. We performed a phase II trial of Flu 160 mg/m, Mel 50 mg/m, and TBI 400 cGy (FluMelTBI-50, n = 61), followed by a second phase II trial of Flu 160 mg/m, Mel 75 mg/m, and TBI 400cGy (FluMelTBI-75, n = 94) as RIC for alloHCT. Outcomes were compared with a contemporaneous cohort of 162 patients who received Flu 125 mg/m and Mel 140 mg/m. Eligibility criteria were equivalent for all 3 regimens. All patients were ineligible for myeloablative/intensive conditioning. The median (range) follow-up for all patients was 51 (15 to 103) months. Day 100 donor lymphoid chimerism and transplant-related mortality, neutrophil and platelet engraftment, acute and chronic graft versus host disease incidence, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were equivalent between FluMel, FluMelTBI-50, and FluMelTBI-75. Stomatitis wasdecreased for FluMelTBI versus FluMel (P < .01). PFS for patients not in complete remission on alloHCT was improved for FluMelTBI-75 versus FluMel (P = .03). On multivariate analysis, OS (P = .05) and PFS (P = .05) were significantly improved for FluMelTBI-75 versus FluMel. FluMelTBI-75 is better tolerated than FluMel, with improved survival and disease control.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Child; Female; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Male; Melphalan; Middle Aged; Transplantation Conditioning; Transplantation, Homologous; Vidarabine; Whole-Body Irradiation; Young Adult
PubMed: 30300731
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.09.042 -
Bone Marrow Transplantation Apr 2019Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains a mainstay in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). While the procedure is generally safe, toxicities associated...
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains a mainstay in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). While the procedure is generally safe, toxicities associated with high-dose melphalan conditioning are common and significantly affect patient quality of life. Recently, a propylene glycol-free melphalan formulation (PG-free MEL; Evomela®) was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration as an ASCT-conditioning regimen for MM. PG-free MEL is more soluble and stable than propylene glycol-solubilized melphalan (PG-solubilized MEL; Alkeran®). As such, there is speculation that it could decrease toxicities and increase the efficacy of ASCT. We compared the outcomes of patients conditioned with PG-free MEL (n = 216) to PG-solubilized MEL (n = 200) at our institution. The baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. After Day +0, there were no differences in terms of hospitalizations, neutropenic fevers, intravenous granisetron requirement, World Health Organization grade ≥ 2 oral/esophageal mucositis, intravenous fluid requirement, or narcotic requirement. However, PG-free MEL patients had a higher incidence of diarrhea, which was mostly C. difficile-negative (82% vs. 71%, P = 0.015*). Day + 100 hematologic responses and progression-free survival after ASCT were comparable. In summary, we demonstrate that switching to PG-free MEL did not significantly reduce short-term complications of ASCT or improve outcomes in MM.
Topics: Female; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Male; Melphalan; Multiple Myeloma; Transplantation Conditioning; Transplantation, Autologous; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30116014
DOI: 10.1038/s41409-018-0302-6 -
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Jul 2022Total body irradiation in combination with melphalan for multiple myeloma (MM) has been shown to be prohibitively toxic. To ameliorate toxicity, total marrow irradiation...
Total body irradiation in combination with melphalan for multiple myeloma (MM) has been shown to be prohibitively toxic. To ameliorate toxicity, total marrow irradiation (TMI) has been administered as the sole ablative modality during the second cycle of tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (TASCT) for MM patients on a phase I-II trial. Patients with MM in response or with stable disease and ≤18 months from diagnosis received melphalan 200 mg/m and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) (cycle 1) and then, after recovery, TMI and another ASCT (cycle 2), followed by maintenance with an immunomodulatory drug (ImiD) and dexamethasone for up to 12 months. TMI doses were escalated from 1000 cGy to 1800 cGy in 200-cGy increments. Fifty-four patients were to receive TASCT between 2004 and 2011; 8 patients received single ASCT because of patient or physician preference. The median time between melphalan and TMI was 65 days (range, 47 to 125 days). Thirty patients (55.6%) underwent TASCT at the maximum tolerated dose of 1600 cGy. The complete response and very good partial response rates were 48.1% and 22.2%, respectively, following ASCT and maintenance. The median follow-up among survivors was 12.3 years (range, 9.2 to 15.5+ years). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival at 10 years were 20.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.9% to 31.9%) and 38.8% (95% CI, 25.9% to 51.5%), respectively. Secondary neoplasms included (1 each) acute myelogenous leukemia, papillary thyroid and prostate carcinoma, and melanoma, and there was 1 case of ductal carcinoma in situ and 4 cases of nonmelanoma skin cancers. TMI as part of TASCT was well tolerated, and TASCT was associated with a 20.4% PFS plateau. The inclusion of TMI as a conditioning regiment for MM before ASCT warrants further study in the context of modern induction and maintenance therapies.
Topics: Bone Marrow; Follow-Up Studies; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Male; Melphalan; Multiple Myeloma; Transplantation, Autologous
PubMed: 35534000
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.04.022