-
Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical... 2020We evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine (MTZ) with olanzapine (OLP) for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) following...
We evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine (MTZ) with olanzapine (OLP) for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) following anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (AC) regimen. Eligible participants were chemotherapy-naive early-stage breast cancer patients who were scheduled to undergo adjuvant AC. The patients were randomized to take oral MTZ or OLP in combination with aprepitant (A), dexamethasone (D), and granisetron (G), (ADG). The endpoints included rates of complete response (CR), complete control (CC), total control (TC), and adverse events during the acute, delayed, and overall phases in the two cycles of chemotherapy. The influence of CINV on the quality of life (QoL) was evaluated on day 6 of chemotherapy. Of 82 patients, 60 were randomized. In the first cycle, CR rates in cycle 1 were 83.3% and 76.6% during the acute period, 80% and 86.6% during the delayed period, and 66.6% and 63.3% during the overall period, for the ADG-M and ADG-O, respectively. High efficacy of both groups was maintained over 2 cycles. More patients in the ADG-M group noted minimal or no impact of CINV on daily life in cycle 2 (89.7% 67.9%; 0.044). Incidence of somnolence and fatigue was more frequent with the olanzapine group. In this study, there was no substantial difference between mirtazapine and olanzapine in preventing CINV. Further large randomized trials are essential to demonstrate the anti-emetic effect of mirtazapine in chemotherapy.
PubMed: 33680044
DOI: 10.22037/ijpr.2020.113955.14584 -
Journal of the American Association For... Sep 2022Inappetence is a welfare concern in rabbits (, as it can lead to potentially fatal gastrointestinal stasis. In other species, inappetence is commonly treated with...
Inappetence is a welfare concern in rabbits (, as it can lead to potentially fatal gastrointestinal stasis. In other species, inappetence is commonly treated with appetite stimulants; however, few published studies have evaluated the efficacy of appetite stimulants in rabbits. We performed 2 studies to evaluate the effects of capromorelin and mirtazapine on appetite in New Zealand White (NZW) rabbits. In the first study, healthy rabbits ( = 9) were evaluated using a randomized crossover design and 9 treatments: capromorelin 4 mg/kg oral (PO) once a day (SID), capromorelin 8 mg/kg PO SID, saline control PO SID, capromorelin 4 mg/kg PO twice a day (BID), capromorelin 8 mg/kg PO BID, saline control PO BID, mirtazapine 0.5 mg/kg transdermal (TD) SID, mirtazapine 1 mg/kg TD SID, and saline control TD SID for 3 d with a 1-wk washout period between treatments. Treatment efficacy was assessed by measuring daily feed intake and fecal output and by weighing rabbits twice a week. Overall, feed intake and fecal output were higher for all treatments as compared with controls, except for fecal output in the capromorelin 4 mg/kg and 8 mg/kg PO SID groups. Feed intake and fecal output were significantly higher with mirtazapine as compared with capromorelin. Body weight and erythema/petechia of the pinnae were greater in the mirtazapine 1 mg/kg TD SID group than in the control group. A second study evaluated rabbits that had undergone surgery (castration, = 7) and then received one of 3 treatments: capromorelin 8 mg/kg PO BID, mirtazapine 1 mg/kg TD SID, or saline PO BID for 3 d postoperatively. Feed intake and fecal output in the postoperative mirtazapine group were not significantly different from those of the capromorelin and control groups. Due to its superior efficacy as compared with capromorelin in healthy NZW rabbits, we recommend considering mirtazapine as a treatment for inappetence in NZW rabbits.
Topics: Animals; Rabbits; Appetite; Appetite Stimulants; Mirtazapine; Piperidines; Pyrazoles
PubMed: 35981857
DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000003 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... May 2018Many individuals who have a diagnosis of schizophrenia experience a range of distressing and debilitating symptoms. These can include positive symptoms (such as... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Many individuals who have a diagnosis of schizophrenia experience a range of distressing and debilitating symptoms. These can include positive symptoms (such as delusions, hallucinations, disorganised speech), cognitive symptoms (such as trouble focusing or paying attention or using information to make decisions), and negative symptoms (such as diminished emotional expression, avolition, alogia, and anhedonia). Antipsychotic drugs are often only partially effective, particularly in treating negative symptoms, indicating the need for additional treatment. Mirtazapine is an antidepressant drug that when taken in addition to an antipsychotic may offer some benefit for negative symptoms.
OBJECTIVES
To systematically assess the effects of mirtazapine as adjunct treatment for people with schizophrenia.
SEARCH METHODS
The Information Specialist of Cochrane Schizophrenia searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials (including registries of clinical trials) up to May 2018.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) with useable data focusing on mirtazapine adjunct for people with schizophrenia.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We extracted data independently. For binary outcomes, we calculated risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis. For continuous data, we estimated the mean difference (MD) between groups and its 95% CI. We employed a fixed-effect model for analyses. For included studies we assessed risk of bias and created 'Summary of findings' table using GRADE.
MAIN RESULTS
We included nine RCTs with a total of 310 participants. All studies compared mirtazapine adjunct with placebo adjunct and were of short-term duration. We considered five studies to have a high risk of bias for either incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, or other bias.Our main outcomes of interest were clinically important change in mental state (negative and positive symptoms), leaving the study early for any reason, clinically important change in global state, clinically important change in quality of life, number of days in hospital and incidence of serious adverse events.One trial defined a reduction in the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) overall score from baseline of at least 20% as no important response for negative symptoms. There was no evidence of a clear difference between the two treatments with similar numbers of participants from each group showing no important response to treatment (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.14, 1 RCT, n = 20, very low-quality evidence).Clinically important change in positive symptoms was not reported, however, clinically important change in overall mental state was reported by two trials and data for this outcome showed a favourable effect for mirtazapine (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.92; I = 75%, 2 RCTs, n = 77, very low-quality evidence). There was no evidence of a clear difference for numbers of participants leaving the study early (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.66, 9 RCTs, n = 310, moderate-quality evidence), and no evidence of a clear difference in global state Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI) severity scores (MD -0.10, 95% CI -0.68 to 0.48, 1 RCT, n = 39, very low-quality evidence). A favourable effect for mirtazapine adjunct was found for the outcome clinically important change in akathisia (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.52, 2 RCTs, n = 86, low-quality evidence; I = 61%I). No data were reported for quality life or number of days in hospital.In addition to the main outcomes of interest, there was evidence relating to adverse events that the mirtazapine adjunct groups were associated with an increased risk of weight gain (RR 3.19, 95% CI 1.17 to 8.65, 4 RCTs, n = 127) and sedation/drowsiness (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.68, 7 RCTs, n = 223).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The available evidence is primarily of very low quality and indicates that mirtazapine adjunct is not clearly associated with an effect for negative symptoms, but there is some indication of a positive effect on overall mental state and akathisia. No effect was found for global state or leaving the study early and data were not available for quality of life or service use. Due to limitations of the quality and applicability of the evidence it is not possible to make any firm conclusions, the role of mirtazapine adjunct in routine clinical practice remains unclear. This underscores the need for new high-quality evidence to further evaluate mirtazapine adjunct for schizophrenia.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Antipsychotic Agents; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Humans; Mianserin; Mirtazapine; Patient Dropouts; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Weight Gain
PubMed: 29802811
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011943.pub2 -
Systematic Reviews Mar 2023Major depressive disorder causes a great burden on patients and societies. Venlafaxine and mirtazapine are commonly prescribed as second-line treatment for patients with...
The risks of adverse events with venlafaxine and mirtazapine versus 'active placebo', placebo, or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder: a protocol for two separate systematic reviews with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.
BACKGROUND
Major depressive disorder causes a great burden on patients and societies. Venlafaxine and mirtazapine are commonly prescribed as second-line treatment for patients with major depressive disorder worldwide. Previous systematic reviews have concluded that venlafaxine and mirtazapine reduce depressive symptoms, but the effects seem small and may not be important to the average patient. Moreover, previous reviews have not systematically assessed the occurrence of adverse events. Therefore, we aim to investigate the risks of adverse events with venlafaxine or mirtazapine versus 'active placebo', placebo, or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder in two separate systematic reviews.
METHODS
This is a protocol for two systematic reviews with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis. The assessments of the effects of venlafaxine or mirtazapine will be reported in two separate reviews. The protocol is reported as recommended by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols, risk of bias will be assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool version 2, clinical significance will be assessed using our eight-step procedure, and the certainty of the evidence will be assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. We will search for published and unpublished trials in major medical databases and trial registers. Two review authors will independently screen the results from the literature searches, extract data, and assess risk of bias. We will include published or unpublished randomised clinical trial comparing venlafaxine or mirtazapine with 'active placebo', placebo, or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder. The primary outcomes will be suicides or suicide attempts, serious adverse events, and non-serious adverse events. Exploratory outcomes will include depressive symptoms, quality of life, and individual adverse events. If feasible, we will assess the intervention effects using random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses.
DISCUSSION
Venlafaxine and mirtazapine are frequently used as second-line treatment of major depressive disorder worldwide. There is a need for a thorough systematic review to provide the necessary background for weighing the benefits against the harms. This review will ultimately inform best practice in the treatment of major depressive disorder.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42022315395.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Mirtazapine; Depressive Disorder, Major; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Quality of Life; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Review Literature as Topic
PubMed: 36991504
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02221-5 -
The International Journal of... Feb 2014We examined whether noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants (NaSSAs: mirtazapine and mianserin), as augmentation therapy, have therapeutic potential for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
We examined whether noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants (NaSSAs: mirtazapine and mianserin), as augmentation therapy, have therapeutic potential for schizophrenia treatment. A systematic review was conducted of PubMed, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO in December 2012 and meta-analyses of double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trials were performed. Standardized mean difference (SMD), risk ratio (RR), number-needed-to-treat (NNT), number-needed-to-harm (NNH) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Results were across 12 studies and 362 patients were included (mirtazapine: seven trials and 221 patients; mianserin: five trials and 141 patients). NaSSA augmentation therapy was superior to placebo in overall symptoms (S.M.D. = -0.75, CI -1.24 to -0.26, p = 0.003, N = 11, n = 301), negative symptoms (S.M.D. = -0.88, CI -1.41 to -0.34, p = 0.001, N = 9, n = 240) and response rate (RR = 0.71, CI 0.57-0.88, p = 0.002, NNT = 4, p<0.00001, N = 6, n = 163). There was no significant difference in positive symptoms, depressive symptoms or discontinuation rate between NaSSAs and placebo treatments. In addition, no patients who received NaSSAs developed worsening psychosis during the study. For individual NaSSAs, mirtazapine was superior to placebo in overall symptoms (S.M.D. = 0.98, CI = -1.74 to -0.22, p = 0.01, N = 7, n = 194), negative symptoms (S.M.D. = -1.25, CI -1.88 to -0.62, p = 0.0001, N = 6, n = 172) and response rate (RR = 0.70, p = 0.04, NNT = 4, p = 0.0004, N = 4, n = 119). Moreover, NaSSAs were associated with reduced akathisia score (p < 0.00001) and extrapyramidal symptom scales (p = 0.01). However, NaSSAs caused drowsiness/sedation/somnolence compared with placebo (RR = 3.52, p = 0.002, NNT = 6, p = 0.01, N = 8, n = 209). Our results indicate that NaSSA (especially mirtazapine) augmentation therapy improved overall and negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. Because the included studies were small, the results should be treated with caution.
Topics: Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists; Antidepressive Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Serotonin Antagonists
PubMed: 23823741
DOI: 10.1017/S1461145713000667 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Jul 2022Conflicting results have been reported regarding the association between antidepressant use and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) risk. We investigated whether the...
UNLABELLED
Conflicting results have been reported regarding the association between antidepressant use and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) risk. We investigated whether the use of antidepressants is associated with OHCA.
METHODS
We conducted a nationwide nested case-control study to assess the association of individual antidepressant drugs within drug classes with the hazard of OHCA. Cases were defined as OHCA from presumed cardiac causes. Cox regression with time-dependent exposure and time-dependent covariates was conducted to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) overall and in subgroups defined by established cardiac disease and cardiovascular risk factors. Also, we studied antidepressants with and without sodium channel blocking or potassium channel blocking properties separately.
RESULTS
During the study period from 2001 to 2015 we observed 10 987 OHCA cases, and found increased OHCA rate for high-dose citalopram (>20 mg) and high-dose escitalopram (>10 mg; HR:1.46 [95% CI:1.27-1.69], HR:1.43 [95% CI:1.16-1.75], respectively) among selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (reference drug sertraline), and for high-dose mirtazapine (>30; HR:1.59 [95% CI:1.18-2.14]) among the serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors or noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants (reference drug duloxetine). Among tricyclic antidepressants (reference drug amitriptyline), no drug was associated with significantly increased OHCA rate. Increased OHCA rate was found for antidepressants with known potassium channel blocking properties (HR:1.14 [95% CI:1.05-1.23]), but for not those with sodium channel blocking properties. Citalopram, although not statistically significant, and mirtazapine were associated with increased OHCA rate in patients without cardiac disease and cardiovascular risk factors.
CONCLUSION
Our findings indicate that careful titration of citalopram, escitalopram and mirtazapine dose may have to be considered due to drug safety issues.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Case-Control Studies; Citalopram; Humans; Mirtazapine; Norepinephrine; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest; Potassium Channels; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
PubMed: 35001414
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15224 -
Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology... Oct 2021Recent studies suggest that impaired glutathione synthesis and dopaminergic transmission are important factors in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Moreover, some...
Repeated co-treatment with mirtazapine and aripiprazole reversed the schizophrenia-like behaviors and increased the brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA expression in the adult Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to glutathione deficit during early postnatal brain development.
Recent studies suggest that impaired glutathione synthesis and dopaminergic transmission are important factors in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Moreover, some studies have suggested that antidepressants are able to increase the activity of atypical antipsychotics which may efficiently improve the treatment of negative and some cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. In the present study, we investigated the influence of repeated co-treated with mirtazapine and aripiprazole on the schizophrenia-like behavior and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) mRNA expression in adult rats exposed to glutathione deficit during early postnatal development. Between the postnatal days p5-p16, male pups were treated with the inhibitor of glutathione synthesis, BSO (L-buthionine-(S,R)-sulfoximine) and the dopamine uptake inhibitor, GBR 12909 alone or in combination. Mirtazapine and aripiprazole were given repeatedly, once daily for 21 days before the tests. The behavioral and biochemical tests were performed in p90-92 rats. BSO given alone and in combination with GBR 12909 induced deficits in the studied behavioral tests and decreased the expression of BDNF mRNA. Repeated aripiprazole administration at a higher dose reversed these behavioral deficits. Co-treatment with an ineffective dose of aripiprazole and mirtazapine also abolished the behavioral deficits and biochemical changes, especially in the hippocampus in these rats. The present study indicated that the inhibition of glutathione synthesis in early postnatal development induced long-term deficits corresponding to schizophrenia-like behavior and decreased the BDNF mRNA expression in adult rats, and these behavioural and biochemical deficits were reversed by repeated treatment with a higher dose of aripiprazole and also by co-treatment with an ineffective dose of aripiprazole and mirtazapine. The above data suggest that this neurodevelopment rat model of schizophrenia-induced by glutathione deficit evoked by repeated treatment with BSO alone and together with GBR 12909 in early postnatal life may be useful for studies on the pathomechanism of schizophrenia.
Topics: Animals; Aripiprazole; Brain; Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor; Glutathione; Male; Mirtazapine; RNA, Messenger; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Schizophrenia
PubMed: 35158332
DOI: 10.26402/jpp.2021.5.05 -
Bioengineered Jan 2022Mirtazapine is an antidepressant drug that has been proven to possess a cognitive enhancer efficiency. In this study, we evaluated the potential protective effects of...
Mirtazapine is an antidepressant drug that has been proven to possess a cognitive enhancer efficiency. In this study, we evaluated the potential protective effects of mirtazapine on BV2 microglia in response to isoflurane exposure. Our results show that mirtazapine attenuated isoflurane-induced expression of microglia-specific protein Iba1 in BV2 microglia. Mirtazapine prevented isoflurane-induced production of the pro-inflammatory factors interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18 by inhibiting the activation of the nod-like receptor family protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome in BV2 microglia. The increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and elevated expression level of NADPH oxidase 4 (NOX4) in isoflurane-induced BV2 microglia were mitigated by mirtazapine. Isoflurane exposure reduced triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) expression in BV2 microglia, which was restored by mirtazapine. Moreover, silencing of TREM2 abolished the inhibitory effects of mirtazapine on ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba1) expression and inflammation in BV2 microglia. From these results, we could infer that mirtazapine exerted a protective effect on BV2 microglia against isoflurane exposure-caused microglia activation, neuroinflammation, and oxidative stress via inducing TREM2 activation. Hence, mirtazapine might be a potential intervention strategy to prevent isoflurane exposure-caused cognitive dysfunction in clinical practice.
Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Cell Line; Interleukin-18; Interleukin-1beta; Isoflurane; Membrane Glycoproteins; Mice; Microglia; Mirtazapine; NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein; Oxidative Stress; Reactive Oxygen Species; Receptors, Immunologic
PubMed: 34964706
DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2021.2009971 -
American Family Physician Jan 1999Mirtazapine is a newer antidepressant that exhibits both noradrenergic and serotonergic activity. It is at least as effective as the older antidepressants for treating... (Review)
Review
Mirtazapine is a newer antidepressant that exhibits both noradrenergic and serotonergic activity. It is at least as effective as the older antidepressants for treating mild to severe depression. Sedation is the most common side effect. Although agranulocytosis is the most serious side effect, it is rare (approximately one in 1,000) and usually reversible when the medication is stopped. Mirtazapine is relatively safe in overdose. Many clinicians consider mirtazapine a second-line or even third-line antidepressant to be used when older antidepressants are not tolerated or are ineffective. Physicians who are concerned about the risks of elevated lipid levels and agranulocytosis may choose to reserve mirtazapine as a third-line choice. It is particularly useful in patients who experience sexual side effects from other antidepressants. Mirtazapine is also a good choice in depressed patients with significant anxiety or insomnia. Although mirtazapine has been used successfully in Europe for a number of years, its place in the care of patients with depression in the United States has not yet been established.
Topics: Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Depressive Disorder; Drug Interactions; Humans; Mianserin; Mirtazapine
PubMed: 9917581
DOI: No ID Found