Review

Authors: Tobias Klatte, Vincenzo Ficarra, Christian Gratzke...

CONTEXT

A detailed understanding of renal surgical anatomy is necessary to optimize preoperative planning and operative technique and provide a basis for improved outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the literature regarding pertinent surgical anatomy of the kidney and related structures, nephrometry scoring systems, and current surgical strategies for partial nephrectomy (PN).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A literature review was conducted.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Surgical renal anatomy fundamentally impacts PN surgery. The renal artery divides into anterior and posterior divisions, from which approximately five segmental terminal arteries originate. The renal veins are not terminal. Variations in the vascular and lymphatic channels are common; thus, concurrent lymphadenectomy is not routinely indicated during PN for cT1 renal masses in the setting of clinically negative lymph nodes. Renal-protocol contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging is used for standard imaging. Anatomy-based nephrometry scoring systems allow standardized academic reporting of tumor characteristics and predict PN outcomes (complications, remnant function, possibly histology). Anatomy-based novel surgical approaches may reduce ischemic time during PN; these include early unclamping, segmental clamping, tumor-specific clamping (zero ischemia), and unclamped PN. Cancer cure after PN relies on complete resection, which can be achieved by thin margins. Post-PN renal function is impacted by kidney quality, remnant quantity, and ischemia type and duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical renal anatomy underpins imaging, nephrometry scoring systems, and vascular control techniques that reduce global renal ischemia and may impact post-PN function. A contemporary ideal PN excises the tumor with a thin negative margin, delicately secures the tumor bed to maximize vascularized remnant parenchyma, and minimizes global ischemia to the renal remnant with minimal complications.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this report we review renal surgical anatomy. Renal mass imaging allows detailed delineation of the anatomy and vasculature and permits nephrometry scoring, and thus precise, patient-specific surgical planning. Novel off-clamp techniques have been developed that may lead to improved outcomes.

Topics: Humans; Kidney; Nephrectomy

PubMed: 25911061
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.010

Review

Authors: R C Minnee, M M Idu

Living donor nephrectomy has been developed and promoted as a method to address the shortfall in kidneys available for transplantation. The classical method to procure a kidney from a living donor is the open donor nephrectomy performed through a flank lumbotomy incision. However, this classical method has negative short- and long-term side effects for the donor. These disincentives are a drawback for possible donors to donate a kidney. Therefore, transplant surgeons were stimulated to develop new and less invasive techniques. In this review several new open and laparoscopic techniques are described. Compared with open donor nephrectomy, laparoscopic donor nephrectomy has shown superior results in terms of postoperative pain, cosmetics, convalescence, and return to normal daily activities. No significant differences exist between the two approaches in terms of complication rates, cost-effectiveness and graft function. Nowadays, laparoscopic donor nephrectomy has become the preferred method for procuring kidney grafts of living donors in many centres.

Topics: Humans; Kidney; Kidney Transplantation; Laparoscopy; Living Donors; Nephrectomy; Tissue and Organ Procurement

PubMed: 20508268
DOI: No ID Found

Review

Authors: Sidar Copur, Lasin Ozbek, Mustafa Guldan...

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), the most common hereditary kidney disease, accounts for approximately 10% of the patients on kidney transplantation waitlists. High rates of complications including hemorrhage, infections, nephrolithiasis and kidney size-related compressive complaints have been reported among ADPKD patients. Therefore, the need for routine native nephrectomy and timing of such procedure in ADPKD patients being prepared for transplantation are debated. Even though pre-transplant nephrectomy has the potential to provide fewer infectious complications due to lack of immunosuppressive medication use, such procedure has been associated with longer hospital stay, loss of residual kidney function and need for dialysis. Although simultaneous nephrectomy and transplantation could potentially lead to longer perioperative duration, perioperative complications and need for blood transfusions, this was not confirmed in cohort studies. Therefore, some institutions routinely perform simultaneous unilateral nephrectomy and kidney transplantation. In this narrative review, our aim is to evaluate the current evidence regarding the need and timing of nephrectomy in ADPKD patients in relation to kidney transplantation.

Topics: Humans; Nephrectomy; Kidney Transplantation; Polycystic Kidney, Autosomal Dominant; Waiting Lists; Time Factors; Postoperative Complications; Treatment Outcome

PubMed: 38512371
DOI: 10.1007/s40620-024-01899-7

Authors: Rawan N Almutlaq, Louise C Evans

Topics: Angiotensins; Kidney; Nephrectomy

PubMed: 35343851
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00063.2022

Review

Authors: Thilina Gunawardena, Dan Ridgway

Kidney transplantation is the gold standard treatment option for patients with endstage kidney disease. As the number of waitlisted patients increases, the gap between supply and demand for suitable donor kidneys keeps widening. The adoption of novel strategies that expand the donor pool has attenuated this issue to a certain degree, and this has led to a progressive increase in the number of annual transplants performed. As transplanted kidneys have a finite lifespan, there is a reciprocal rise in the number of patients who return to dialysis once their allograft fails. The clinicians involved in the management of such patients are left with the problem of managing the nonfunctioning allograft. The decision to undertake transplant nephrectomy (TN) in these patients is not straightforward. Allograft nephrectomy is a procedure that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It will have implications for the outcomes of the subsequent transplant. In this review, we aimed to compressively discuss the indications, techniques, and outcomes of TN, which is an integral component of the management of a failing allograft.

Topics: Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Kidney; Nephrectomy; Transplantation, Homologous; Kidney Failure, Chronic

PubMed: 37955463
DOI: 10.4103/1319-2442.389431

Meta-Analysis

Authors: Sander Groen In 't Woud, Alessandro Gobino, Nel Roeleveld...

BACKGROUND

Unilateral nephrectomy is a relatively common procedure in children which results in a solitary functioning kidney (SFK). Living with an SFK predisposes to kidney injury, but it remains unknown which children are most at risk. We aimed to investigate kidney injury rates in patients who underwent unilateral nephrectomy in childhood and to investigate differences among nephrectomies performed for a congenital anomaly, malignancy or other condition.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for studies reporting kidney injury rates [i.e. proteinuria, hypertension and/or a decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR)] of patients who underwent unilateral nephrectomy during childhood. Studies including five or more patients with at least 12 months of follow-up were eligible. Analyses were performed using random effects models and stratified by indication for nephrectomy. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines were used for reporting.

RESULTS

Over 5000 unique articles were screened, of which 53 studies reporting on >4000 patients were included in the analyses. Proteinuria, hypertension and a decreased GFR were present in 15.3, 14.5 and 11.9% of patients, respectively. Heterogeneity among the studies was large in several subgroups, impairing quantitative meta-analyses. However, none of our analyses indicated differences in injury rates between a congenital anomaly or malignancy as an indication for nephrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral nephrectomy during childhood results in signs of kidney injury in >10% of patients, with no clear difference between the indications for nephrectomy. Therefore, structured follow-up is necessary in all children who underwent nephrectomy, regardless of the indication.

Topics: Humans; Nephrectomy; Kidney; Proteinuria; Hypertension

PubMed: 35099015
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfac021

Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review

Authors: Zhenjie Wu, Mingmin Li, Bing Liu...

OBJECTIVES

To critically review the currently available evidence of studies comparing robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature from Pubmed, Web of Science and Scopus was performed in October 2013. All relevant studies comparing RPN with OPN were included for further screening. A cumulative meta-analysis of all comparative studies was performed and publication bias was assessed by a funnel plot.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included for the analysis, including a total of 3418 patients (757 patients in the robotic group and 2661 patients in the open group). Although RPN procedures had a longer operative time (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 40.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 14.39-67.40; p = 0.002), patients in this group benefited from a lower perioperative complication rate (19.3% for RPN and 29.5% for OPN; odds ratio [OR]: 0.53; 95%CI, 0.42-0.67; p<0.00001), shorter hospital stay (WMD: -2.78; 95%CI, -3.36 to -1.92; p<0.00001), less estimated blood loss(WMD: -106.83; 95%CI, -176.4 to -37.27; p = 0.003). Transfusions, conversion to radical nephrectomy, ischemia time and estimated GFR change, margin status, and overall cost were comparable between the two techniques. The main limitation of the present meta-analysis is the non-randomization of all included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

RPN appears to be an efficient alternative to OPN with the advantages of a lower rate of perioperative complications, shorter length of hospital stay and less blood loss. Nevertheless, high quality prospective randomized studies with longer follow-up period are needed to confirm these findings.

Topics: Blood Loss, Surgical; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Length of Stay; Nephrectomy; Operative Time; Robotics; Treatment Outcome

PubMed: 24740259
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094878

Comparative Study

Authors: Glenn S Gerber, Benjamin R Stockton

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

With continuing rapid changes in endourology, we conducted a new survey of practice trends and expanded our sampling to include non-American urologists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The survey was done via the Internet using the database for the 2003 World Congress of Endourology. Approximately 1100 surveys were sent, and responses were received from 193 urologists, who had been in practice for a mean of 9.9 years (median 8 years). Of these, 52% spend >50% in endourology, and 48% devote >20% of their practice to laparoscopy.

RESULTS

More than half of the respondents (56%) perform laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), and 65% chose LPN as the procedure of choice for patients with an uncomplicated 3-cm renal mass. The majority obtain vascular control, most commonly by clamping the renal artery only. Most respondents do not use ureteral stents unless the collecting system is entered.

CONCLUSIONS

These results and a review of the literature indicate a growing acceptance among endourologists of LPN as the procedure of choice for patients with small renal masses who are to undergo nephron-sparing surgery. Disagreement remains concerning the role and type of vascular control, the use of hemostatic agents, and the value of stents when the collecting system is entered.

Topics: Data Collection; Humans; Laparoscopy; Nephrectomy; Retrospective Studies; Urology; Workforce

PubMed: 15735377
DOI: 10.1089/end.2005.19.21

Meta-Analysis Review

Authors: Ray C J Hsu, Theodosia Salika, Jonathan Maw...

OBJECTIVES

The provision of complex surgery is increasingly centralised to high-volume (HV) specialist hospitals. Evidence to support nephrectomy centralisation however has been inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association between hospital case volumes and perioperative outcomes in radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy and nephrectomy with venous thrombectomy.

METHODS

Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies published between 1990 and 2016. Pooled effect estimates for nephrectomy mortality and complications were calculated for each nephrectomy type using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. Sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the effects of heterogeneity on the pooled effect estimates by excluding studies with the heaviest weighting, lowest methodological score and most likely to introduce bias from misclassification of standardised hospital volume.

RESULTS

Some 226 372 patients from 16 publications were included in our review and meta-analysis. Considerable between-study heterogeneity was noted and only a few reported volume-outcome relationships specifically in partial nephrectomy or nephrectomy with venous thrombectomy.HV hospitals were correlated with a 26% and 52% reduction in mortality for radical nephrectomy (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.90, p<0.01) and nephrectomy with venous thrombectomy (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.81, p<0.01), respectively. In addition, radical nephrectomy in HV hospitals was associated with an 18% reduction in complications (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.92, p<0.01). No significant volume-outcome relationship in mortality (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.26, p=0.73) or complications (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.30, p=0.44) was observed for partial nephrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that patients undergoing radical nephrectomy have improved outcomes when treated by HV hospitals. Evidence of this in partial nephrectomy and nephrectomy with venous thrombectomy is however not yet clear and could be secondary to the low number of studies included and the small patient number in our analyses. Further investigation is warranted to establish the full potential of nephrectomy centralisation particularly as existing evidence is of low quality with significant heterogeneity.

Topics: Hospitals, High-Volume; Hospitals, Low-Volume; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Kidney Neoplasms; Nephrectomy; Postoperative Complications

PubMed: 28877947
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016833

Review

Authors: Nicholas Raison, Norbert Doeuk, Theo Malthouse...

Although most partial nephrectomies are performed as primary procedures in the elective or semi-imperative setting on kidneys with relatively normal anatomy, this is not always the case. The indications for partial nephrectomy continue to expand and it is becoming particularly relevant in patients with single functioning kidneys, poor kidney function, anatomical anomalies and hereditary syndromes predisposing to multiple kidney cancers, such as Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome. These, along with previous abdominal surgery, pose surgical challenges. In this article we offer advice as to how to tackle these unusual situations. An ability to master the whole range of indications will allow the modern upper renal tract surgeon to offer partial nephrectomy to a wider range of patients.

Topics: Abdomen; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Neoplasms; Nephrectomy; Syndrome; von Hippel-Lindau Disease

PubMed: 27262880
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.05.070