-
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Apr 19771 The beta-adrenoceptor blocking effects of penbutolol were compared with those of propranolol and a placebo in a double-blind trial involving six healthy volunteers. 2... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
1 The beta-adrenoceptor blocking effects of penbutolol were compared with those of propranolol and a placebo in a double-blind trial involving six healthy volunteers. 2 Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were measured at rest and during vigorous exercise before and at intervals up to 7 h after oral administration of the drugs. In addition, plasma renin activity (PRA) at rest and plasma levels of penbutolol and propranolol were determined. 3 Penbutolol proved to be a non-cardioselective beta-adrenoceptor blocking drug, antagonizing exercise-induced tachycardia, reducing exercise-induced increase in PEFR and decreasing PRA. The beta-adrenolytic potency of penbutolol was shown to be four-fold that of propranolol but the duration of its effect was similar. 4 The peak plasma level of penbutolol was reached 1 h after administration and its half-life was 4.5 h. 5 Comparison of plasma levels and biological activity of penbutolol revealed that after oral administration this drug is transformed into an active metabolite in man.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Adult; Blood Pressure; Chromatography, Gas; Cyclopentanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Tolerance; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Kinetics; Male; Peak Expiratory Flow Rate; Propanolamines; Propranolol; Renin
PubMed: 16632
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1977.tb00684.x -
Genome Medicine Oct 2021In spite of many years of research, our understanding of the molecular bases of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is still incomplete, and the medical treatments available mainly...
BACKGROUND
In spite of many years of research, our understanding of the molecular bases of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is still incomplete, and the medical treatments available mainly target the disease symptoms and are hardly effective. Indeed, the modulation of a single target (e.g., β-secretase) has proven to be insufficient to significantly alter the physiopathology of the disease, and we should therefore move from gene-centric to systemic therapeutic strategies, where AD-related changes are modulated globally.
METHODS
Here we present the complete characterization of three murine models of AD at different stages of the disease (i.e., onset, progression and advanced). We combined the cognitive assessment of these mice with histological analyses and full transcriptional and protein quantification profiling of the hippocampus. Additionally, we derived specific Aβ-related molecular AD signatures and looked for drugs able to globally revert them.
RESULTS
We found that AD models show accelerated aging and that factors specifically associated with Aβ pathology are involved. We discovered a few proteins whose abundance increases with AD progression, while the corresponding transcript levels remain stable, and showed that at least two of them (i.e., lfit3 and Syt11) co-localize with Aβ plaques in the brain. Finally, we found two NSAIDs (dexketoprofen and etodolac) and two anti-hypertensives (penbutolol and bendroflumethiazide) that overturn the cognitive impairment in AD mice while reducing Aβ plaques in the hippocampus and partially restoring the physiological levels of AD signature genes to wild-type levels.
CONCLUSIONS
The characterization of three AD mouse models at different disease stages provides an unprecedented view of AD pathology and how this differs from physiological aging. Moreover, our computational strategy to chemically revert AD signatures has shown that NSAID and anti-hypertensive drugs may still have an opportunity as anti-AD agents, challenging previous reports.
Topics: Aging; Alzheimer Disease; Amyloid beta-Peptides; Animals; Brain; Cognitive Dysfunction; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Discovery; Female; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Gene Knock-In Techniques; Humans; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Transgenic; Plaque, Amyloid; Proteomics; Transcriptome
PubMed: 34702310
DOI: 10.1186/s13073-021-00983-y -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2014Beta-blockers are one of the classes of drugs frequently used to treat hypertension. Quantifying the blood pressure (BP) lowering effects of nonselective beta-blockers... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Beta-blockers are one of the classes of drugs frequently used to treat hypertension. Quantifying the blood pressure (BP) lowering effects of nonselective beta-blockers provides important information that aids clinical decision making.
OBJECTIVES
To quantify the dose-related effects of nonselective beta-adrenergic receptor blockers (beta-blockers) on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) as compared with placebo in people with primary hypertension.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials up to October 2013.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel or cross-over trials. Studies had to contain a nonselective beta-blocker monotherapy arm with a fixed dose. Participants enrolled into the studies had to have primary hypertension at baseline. Duration of studies had to be between three and 12 weeks.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors (GW and AL) independently confirmed the inclusion of studies and extracted the data.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 25 RCTs that evaluated the BP lowering effects of seven nonselective beta-blockers in 1264 people with hypertension. Among the 25 RCTs, four were parallel studies and 21 were cross-over studies. Overall, nonselective beta-blockers lowered systolic BP and diastolic BP compared with placebo. Nonselective beta-blockers, in the recommended dose range, did not showed a convincing dose-response relationship by direct comparison. The once (1x) and twice (2x) starting dose subgroups contained the largest sample size. The estimate of BP lowering efficacy for nonselective beta-blockers by combining the 1x and 2x starting dose subgroup was -10 mmHg (95% CI -11 to -8) for systolic BP and -7 mmHg (95% CI -8 to -6) for diastolic BP (low-quality evidence). Nonselective beta-blockers starting at the 1x recommended starting doses lowered heart rate by 12 beats per minute (95% CI 10 to 13) (low-quality evidence). The dose-response relationship in heart rate was evident by both direct and indirect comparison. Due to imprecision, there was no clear evidence of an effect of nonselective beta-blockers on pulse pressure in any dose subgroups except for a small reduction with the 2x starting dose (-2.2 mmHg, 95% CI -3.7 to -0.7) (very low quality evidence). The point estimates in the 1x, four times (4x) and eight times (8x) starting dose subgroups were similar to the 2x starting dose subgroup. Therefore, it would appear that if nonselective beta-blockers do lower pulse pressure, the magnitude is likely to be about 2 mmHg. There were very limited data (two studies) on withdrawals due to adverse effects (risk ratio (RR) 0.84; 95% CI 0.38 to 1.82).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
In people with mild-to-moderate hypertension, nonselective beta-blockers lowered peak BP by a mean of -10/-7 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) and reduced heart rate by 12 beats per minute. Propranolol and penbutolol were the two drugs that contributed to most of the data for nonselective beta-blockers. This estimate is likely exaggerated due to the presence of extreme outliers and other sources of bias. If we removed the extreme outliers from the analysis, the estimate for non-selective beta-blockers was lower (-8/-5 mmHg (systolic/diastolic)). Nonselective beta-blockers did not show a convincing graded dose-response in the recommended dose range for systolic BP and diastolic BP, while higher dose nonselective beta-blockers provided greater reduction of heart rate. Using higher dose nonselective beta-blockers might cause more side effects, such as bradycardia, without producing an additional BP lowering effect. The effect of nonselective beta-blockers on pulse pressure was likely small, at about 2 mmHg.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypertension; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 24585007
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007452.pub2 -
Journal of Neurochemistry Aug 2000There is considerable interest in the use of drugs that selectively block presynaptic (somatodendritic) serotonin 5-HT(1A) receptors for the adjunctive treatment of...
There is considerable interest in the use of drugs that selectively block presynaptic (somatodendritic) serotonin 5-HT(1A) receptors for the adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder. The 5-HT(1A)/beta-adrenoceptor ligands (+/-)-pindolol, (-)-tertatolol, and (-)-penbutolol are currently under clinical investigation, and knowledge of their affinity at different populations of central 5-HT(1A) receptors is needed. Here we have determined the affinity of these drugs for presynaptic and postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors in postmortem human and rat brain using receptor autoradiography and the selective 5-HT(1A) radioligand [(3)H]WAY-100635. The binding of [(3)H]WAY-100635 was specific and saturable and showed high affinity in the rat dorsal raphe nucleus and hippocampus (K(D) = 1.5-1.7 nM). In competition studies, the three compounds had nanomolar affinity and produced monophasic displacement of [(3)H]WAY-100635 binding in all regions of both species. (-)-Penbutolol and (-)-tertatolol had similar affinity for pre-and postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors in both rat and human brain. However, in the human, but not the rat, the affinity of (+/-)-pindolol in dorsal raphe nucleus (K(i) = 8.9 +/- 1. 1 nM) was slightly but significantly higher than that in hippocampus (K(i) = 14.4 +/- 1.5 nM in CA1). In summary, our data show that (+/-)-pindolol, (-)-tertatolol, and (-)-penbutolol are all high-affinity ligands at native human and rat 5-HT(1A) receptors. (-)-Penbutolol and (-)-tertatolol do not discriminate between the pre- and postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) sites tested in either species, but (+/-)-pindolol showed a slightly higher affinity for the presynaptic site in human brain. Further work is needed to establish whether the latter difference is clinically relevant.
Topics: Aged; Animals; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Autoradiography; Brain; Dentate Gyrus; Female; Hippocampus; Humans; Male; Penbutolol; Pindolol; Piperazines; Propanolamines; Pyridines; Radioligand Assay; Raphe Nuclei; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptors, Presynaptic; Receptors, Serotonin; Receptors, Serotonin, 5-HT1; Serotonin Antagonists; Synapses; Thiophenes; Tritium
PubMed: 10899952
DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0750755.x -
Scientific Reports Jan 2023Wound healing is a well-organized dynamic process involving coordinated consecutive phases: homeostasis, inflammation, proliferation and resolution. Fibroblasts play...
Wound healing is a well-organized dynamic process involving coordinated consecutive phases: homeostasis, inflammation, proliferation and resolution. Fibroblasts play major roles in skin wound healing such as in wound contraction and release of growth factors which are of importance in angiogenesis and tissue remodeling. Abnormal fibroblast phenotypes have been identified in patients with chronic wounds. In this work, we analyzed scRNA-seq datasets of normal and wounded skin from mice at day 4 post-wound to investigate fibroblast heterogeneity during the proliferative phase of wound healing. Compositional analysis revealed a specific subset of fibroblast (cluster 3) that primarily increased in wounded skin (14%) compared to normal skin (3.9%). This subset was characterized by a gene signature marked by the plasma membrane proteins Sfrp2 + Sfrp4 + Sfrp1 + and the transcription factors Ebf1 + Prrx1 + Maged1 + . Differential gene expression and enrichment analysis identified epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and angiogenesis to be upregulated in the emerging subset of fibroblasts of the wounded skin. Using two other datasets for murine wounded skin confirmed the increase in cluster 3-like fibroblasts at days 2, 7 and 14 post-wounding with a peak at day 7. By performing a similarity check between the differential gene expression profile between wounded and normal skin for this emerging fibroblast subset with drug signature from the ConnectivityMap database, we identified drugs capable of mimicking the observed gene expression change in fibroblasts during wound healing. TTNPB, verteprofin and nicotinic acid were identified as candidate drugs capable of inducing fibroblast gene expression profile necessary for wound healing. On the other hand, methocarbamol, ifosfamide and penbutolol were recognized to antagonize the identified fibroblast differential expression profile during wound healing which might cause delay in wound healing. Taken together, analysis of murine transcriptomic skin wound healing datasets suggested a subset of fibroblasts capable of inducing EMT and further inferred drugs that might be tested as potential candidates to induce wound closure.
Topics: Mice; Animals; Skin; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Wound Healing; Transcription Factors; Fibroblasts; Neoplasm Proteins
PubMed: 36650180
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-27152-4 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Jun 1977Eleven patients with spinal canal block from metastatic epidural tumor, documented with Pantopaque myelography, were given an additional injection of up to 5 cc of air.... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
Eleven patients with spinal canal block from metastatic epidural tumor, documented with Pantopaque myelography, were given an additional injection of up to 5 cc of air. This technique forced contrast material past the block in 10 of 11 cases. It failed in one case in which symptoms had been present for 19 days. Air injection allowed visualization of more cephalad lesions and defined the superior extent of the initial obstructing lesion without the need for a lateral cervical or cisternal puncture. It caused transient discomfort but no neurologic deterioration. This technique is less painful, requires less patient cooperation, expedites localization, and does not require the special skills needed for cervical puncture.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Cyclopentanes; Humans; Kinetics; Physical Exertion; Propanolamines; Propranolol; Pulse; Time Factors
PubMed: 20121
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1977.tb00734.x -
British Journal of Pharmacology May 1999The antidepressant efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) might be enhanced by co-administration of 5-HT1A receptor antagonists. Thus, we have...
Effects of (-)-tertatolol, (-)-penbutolol and (+/-)-pindolol in combination with paroxetine on presynaptic 5-HT function: an in vivo microdialysis and electrophysiological study.
The antidepressant efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) might be enhanced by co-administration of 5-HT1A receptor antagonists. Thus, we have recently shown that the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100635, blocks the inhibitory effect of an SSRI on 5-HT cell firing, and enhances its ability to elevate extracellular 5-HT in the forebrain. Here we determined whether the beta-adrenoceptor/5-HT1A receptor ligands (+/-)-pindolol, (-)-tertatolol and (-)-penbutolol, interact with paroxetine in a similar manner. Both (-)-tertatolol (2.4 mg kg(-1) i.v.) and (-)-penbutolol (2.4 mg kg(-1) i.v.) enhanced the effect of paroxetine (0.8 mg kg(-1) i.v.) on extracellular 5-HT in the frontal cortex, whilst (+/-)-pindolol (4 mg kg(-1) i.v.) did not. (-)-Tertatolol (2.4 mg kg(-1) i.v.) alone caused a slight increase in 5-HT however, (-)-penbutolol (2.4 mg kg(-1) i.v.) alone had no effect. In electrophysiological studies (-)-tertatolol (2.4 mg kg(-1) i.v.) alone had no effect on 5-HT cell firing but blocked the inhibitory effect of paroxetine. In contrast, (-)-penbutolol (0.1-0.8 mg kg(-1) i.v.) itself inhibited 5-HT cell firing, and this effect was reversed by WAY 100635 (0.1 mg kg(-1) i.v.). We have recently shown that (+/-)-pindolol inhibits 5-HT cell firing via a WAY 100635-sensitive mechanism. Our data suggest that (-)-tertatolol enhances the effect of paroxetine on forebrain 5-HT via blockade of 5-HT1A autoreceptors which mediate paroxetine-induced inhibition of 5-HT cell firing. In comparison, the mechanisms by which (-)-penbutolol enhances the effect of paroxetine on extracellular 5-HT is unclear, since (-)-penbutolol itself appears to have agonist properties at the 5-HT1A autoreceptor. Indeed, the agonist action of (+/-)-pindolol at 5-HT1A autoreceptors probably explains its inability to enhance the effect of paroxetine on 5-HT in the frontal cortex. Overall, our data suggest that both (-)-tertatolol and (-)-penbutolol are superior to (+/-)-pindolol in terms of enhancing the effect of an SSRI on extracellular 5-HT. Both (-)-tertatolol and (-)-penbutolol are worthy of investigation for use as adjuncts to SSRIs in the treatment of major depression.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Drug Synergism; Electrophysiology; In Vitro Techniques; Male; Membrane Potentials; Microdialysis; Paroxetine; Patch-Clamp Techniques; Penbutolol; Pindolol; Propanolamines; Prosencephalon; Raphe Nuclei; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptors, Presynaptic; Receptors, Serotonin; Serotonin; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Thiophenes
PubMed: 10369467
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0702546