-
Psychiatria Danubina Jun 2010A number of large naturalistic trials have reported in recent years comparing second generation antipsychotic drugs with their predecessors. The conclusions they draw... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
INTRODUCTION
A number of large naturalistic trials have reported in recent years comparing second generation antipsychotic drugs with their predecessors. The conclusions they draw have rightly sparked much debate, but are these studies truly comparable? If not, which of them are most methodologically robust and are these the studies most suitable as a foundation for clinical care guidelines with a strong evidence base. We aimed to conduct a review of the current literature to establish the appropriateness of several recent major clinical studies being used as the basis for clinical guidelines.
METHOD
A literature search using the PUBMED database was carried out. Five major studies comparing antipsychotic efficacy were selected as possible candidates and subjected to further analysis. The studies were: * CUTLASS (Cost Utility of the Latest Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia study); * CATIE (Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness study); * SOHO (Schizophrenia outpatients Health Outcomes study); * CAFE (Comparison of Atypicals in First Episode study); * EUFEST (European First Episode Schizophrenia Trial).
DISCUSSION
The trials: * CAFE - the trial, although well randomised and blinded, uses discontinuation as a primary endpoint - this is hard to draw conclusions from: patients may discontinue due to side effects, due to lack of efficacy or with against medical advice for a multitude of reasons. As a secondary endpoint, the study does make use of a PANSS scoring system to measure efficacy, adding some weight to the conclusion that olanzapine, quetiaine and risperidone in early psychosis patients have equivalent efficacies. * CATIE - This trial was a comparative study, and so lacked a control arm and used discontinuation of medication an inverse measure of efficacy - an easily quantifiable event, but making for difficult interpretation. However most criticism has been directed at the unusually low (quitiapine, ziprasidone) and high (olanzapine and perphenazine) doses of drug used, which were reflected in their differing rates of efficacy. * CUtLASS This trial allows for less generalisation of its findings to the general population as it makes use a specific sub-population (those switching from one medication to another after a period of treatment). Also some patients were prescribed oral medications and some depot injections - making comparisons difficult due to possible differences in compliance. * EUFEST This trial makes use of discontinuation as an endpoint with the weaknesses we have described. Treatment of first episodes of psychosis is shown to be feasible, but it could not suggest if haloperidol or second generation drugs may be more efficacious. * SOHO - This trial hindered by the observational design of the study and small numbers reaching the primary end point (4%) caution should be exercised in the conclusion that olanzapine is superior to risperidone, quetiapine or typical antipsychotics.
CONCLUSION
There is much information useful for clinical practice to be gathered from the results of these major studies, however, interpretation is hampered by both variations and weakness in study design. On balance it does appear that different antipsychotics possess differing efficacy, but also of relevance to the development of sound clinical guidelines is their differing side effects profile.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology
PubMed: 20562774
DOI: No ID Found -
Schizophrenia Bulletin Jun 2022Optimal doses of most antipsychotics in the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia are unknown. We aimed to study the risk of severe relapse indicated by...
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS
Optimal doses of most antipsychotics in the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia are unknown. We aimed to study the risk of severe relapse indicated by rehospitalization for different dose categories of 15 most frequently used antipsychotics in monotherapy in Finland.
STUDY METHODS
We studied the risk of rehospitalization (Adjusted Hazard Ratio, aHR) associated with six antipsychotic monotherapy dose categories (as time-varying dose, measured in defined daily dose, DDDs/day) in a nationwide cohort of persons diagnosed with schizophrenia (n = 61 889), using within-individual analyses to eliminate selection bias.
STUDY RESULTS
Among the 15 most widely used antipsychotics, 13 had a U- or J-shaped dose-response curve, showing the lowest risks of relapse for doses of 0.6-<1.1 DDDs/day vs nonuse of antipsychotics. The exceptions were oral perphenazine (aHR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.68-0.76, <0.6 DDDs/day), and olanzapine-long-acting injectable (LAI), which had the lowest aHR of any antipsychotic (aHR = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.11-0.25, 1.4-<1.6 DDDs/day). Certain risperidone and perphenazine doses <0.9 DDD/day were associated with 21%-45% lower risk of rehospitalization (P < .001) than the standard dose of 0.9-1.1 DDD/day (ie, 5 mg for risperidone and 30 mg for perphenazine).
CONCLUSIONS
For most antipsychotics, the risk of severe relapse was the lowest during use of standard dose. Our results suggest that olanzapine LAI is highly effective in dose ranges >0.9 DDD/day, and especially at 1.4-<1.6 DDDs/day (405 mg/4 weeks) associated with substantially lower risk of rehospitalization than any dose of any other antipsychotic. The current WHO standard dose definitions appear to be clearly too high for perphenazine and somewhat too high for risperidone.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Humans; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Recurrence; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Secondary Prevention
PubMed: 35524479
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbac039 -
Health Psychology Research 2022Phenothiazines, a diverse class of drugs, can be used to treat multiple mental health and physical conditions. Phenothiazines have been used for decades to treat mental...
Phenothiazines, a diverse class of drugs, can be used to treat multiple mental health and physical conditions. Phenothiazines have been used for decades to treat mental illnesses, including schizophrenia, mania in bipolar disorder, and psychosis. Additionally, these drugs offer relief for physical illnesses, including migraines, hiccups, nausea, and vomiting in both adults and children. Further research is needed to prove the efficacy of phenothiazines in treating physical symptoms. Phenothiazines are dopaminergic antagonists that inhibit D2 receptors with varying potency. High potency phenothiazines such as perphenazine are used to treat various psychiatric conditions such as the positive symptoms of schizophrenia, the symptoms of psychosis, and mania that can occur with bipolar disorder. Low/mid potency phenothiazines such as chlorpromazine antipsychotic drugs that have been used to treat schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like disorders since the 1950s and are utilized in numerous disease states. The present investigation aims to elucidate the effects of phenothiazines in clinical practice.
PubMed: 36425230
DOI: 10.52965/001c.38930 -
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Mar 2018Although pregnancy is known to cause changes in drug pharmacokinetics, little is known about its impact on serum levels of antipsychotics. In this study we...
Although pregnancy is known to cause changes in drug pharmacokinetics, little is known about its impact on serum levels of antipsychotics. In this study we retrospectively assessed 201 routine serum antipsychotic therapeutic drug monitoring concentration measurements obtained from a total of 110 pregnancies in 103 women, and 512 measurements from the same women before and after pregnancy. Serum concentrations in the third trimester were significantly lower than baseline for quetiapine (-76%; confidence interval (CI), -83%, -66%; P < 0.001) and aripiprazole (-52%; CI, -62%, -39%; P < 0.001), but not for olanzapine (-9%; CI, -28%, +14%; P = 0.40). For the remaining antipsychotics (perphenazine, haloperidol, ziprasidone, risperidone, and clozapine), our dataset was limited, but it indicates that concentrations may decline at least for perphenazine and possibly also for haloperidol. Even though the clinical consequence of the serum concentrations decline remains to be elucidated, our results warrant close clinical monitoring throughout pregnancy, preferentially supported by therapeutic drug monitoring.
Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; Norway; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, Third; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Young Adult
PubMed: 28643331
DOI: 10.1002/cpt.770 -
JAMA Internal Medicine Oct 2022An increasing number of individuals fill antipsychotic prescriptions during pregnancy, and concerns have been raised about prenatal antipsychotic exposure on...
IMPORTANCE
An increasing number of individuals fill antipsychotic prescriptions during pregnancy, and concerns have been raised about prenatal antipsychotic exposure on neurodevelopmental outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
To examine whether maternal prescription fill for antipsychotics during pregnancy was associated with performance in standardized tests among schoolchildren.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This register-based cohort study included 667 517 children born in Denmark from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2009, and who were attending public primary and lower secondary school. All children had completed at least 1 language (Danish) or mathematics test as part of the Danish National School Test Program between 2010 and 2018. Data were analyzed from November 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022.
EXPOSURES
Antipsychotic prescriptions filled by pregnant individuals were obtained from the Danish National Prescription Register.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Differences in standardized test scores (range, 1-100; higher scores indicate better test results) in language and mathematics between children of mothers with and without antipsychotic prescription fills during pregnancy were estimated using linear regression models. Seven sensitivity analyses, including a sibling-controlled analysis, were performed.
RESULTS
Of the 667 517 children included (51.2% males), 1442 (0.2%) children were born to mothers filling an antipsychotic prescription during pregnancy. The mean (SD) age of children at the time of testing spanned from 8.9 (0.4) years in grade 2 to 14.9 (0.4) years in grade 8. Maternal prescription fill for antipsychotics was not associated with performance in language (crude mean test score: 50.0 [95% CI, 49.1-50.9] for the exposed children vs 55.4 [95% CI, 55.4-55.5] for the unexposed children; adjusted difference, 0.5 [95% CI, -0.8 to 1.7]) or in mathematics (crude mean test score: 48.1 [95% CI, 47.0-49.3] for the exposed children vs 56.1 [95% CI, 56.1-56.2] for the unexposed children; adjusted difference, 0.4 [95% CI, -1.0 to 1.8]). There was no evidence that results were modified by the timing of filling prescriptions, classes (first-generation and second-generation) of antipsychotics, or the most commonly prescribed antipsychotic monotherapies, including chlorprotixene, flupentixol, olanzapine, zuclopenthixol, quetiapine, perphenazine, and methotrimeprazine. The results remained robust across sensitivity analyses, including sibling-controlled analyses, negative control exposures analyses, and probabilistic bias analyses.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this register-based cohort study, maternal prescription fill for antipsychotics during pregnancy did not appear to be associated with standardized test scores in the offspring. The findings provide further reassuring data on offspring neurodevelopmental outcomes associated with antipsychotic treatment during pregnancy.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Child; Clopenthixol; Cohort Studies; Denmark; Female; Flupenthixol; Humans; Male; Methotrimeprazine; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Pregnancy; Prescriptions; Quetiapine Fumarate
PubMed: 35969410
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.3388 -
The Journal of Veterinary Medical... Sep 2016Lymphoma is one of the most common malignant tumors in canine. Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), a well-conserved serine/threonine phosphatase, plays a critical role as a...
Lymphoma is one of the most common malignant tumors in canine. Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), a well-conserved serine/threonine phosphatase, plays a critical role as a tumor suppressor. Perphenazine (PPZ) is one of the phenothiazines and widely used as an antipsychotic drug. Recently, it is reported that PPZ directly binds with scaffolding subunit of PP2A complex and exerts anti-tumor effects on human T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. However, the effect of PPZ on canine lymphoma has not been studied. Here, we investigated the potential therapeutic role of PPZ and its molecular mechanism in canine T-cell lymphoma. In canine T-cell lymphoma cell lines, UL-1 and Ema, PPZ decreased cell survival in a dose-dependent manner. Increased caspase 3 activity and Annexin V positive cells suggested that PPZ induced apoptosis. PPZ dephosphorylated Akt, MEK1/2 and ERK1/2. Akt inhibitor, but not MEK1/2 inhibitor and ERK1/2 inhibitor, induced cell death, indicating the importance of Akt dephosphorylation for the anti-tumor effect of PPZ. Finally, we observed enhanced PP2A activity by PPZ treatment. The present results for the first time revealed that PPZ induced canine lymphoma cells apoptosis through Akt dephosphorylation via PP2A activation. Our study suggests the possible therapeutic application of phenothiazines for canine T-cell lymphoma.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Cell Line, Tumor; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Flow Cytometry; Immunoblotting; Lymphoma; Lymphoma, T-Cell; MAP Kinase Signaling System; Oncogene Protein v-akt; Perphenazine; Phosphorylation; Protein Phosphatase 2
PubMed: 27150024
DOI: 10.1292/jvms.15-0707 -
Anaesthesia Jan 1982
Topics: Amitriptyline; Antipsychotic Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Pain, Intractable; Phenothiazines
PubMed: 6123279
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1982.tb01014.x -
International Journal of Molecular... May 2024In the area of drug research, several computational drug repurposing studies have highlighted candidate repurposed drugs, as well as clinical trial studies that have...
In the area of drug research, several computational drug repurposing studies have highlighted candidate repurposed drugs, as well as clinical trial studies that have tested/are testing drugs in different phases. To the best of our knowledge, the aggregation of the proposed lists of drugs by previous studies has not been extensively exploited towards generating a dynamic reference matrix with enhanced resolution. To fill this knowledge gap, we performed weight-modulated majority voting of the modes of action, initial indications and targeted pathways of the drugs in a well-known repository, namely the Drug Repurposing Hub. Our method, Democracy, exploits this pile of information and creates frequency tables and, finally, a disease suitability score for each drug from the selected library. As a testbed, we applied this method to a group of neurodegenerative diseases (Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, Huntington's disease and Multiple Sclerosis). A super-reference table with drug suitability scores has been created for all four neurodegenerative diseases and can be queried for any drug candidate against them. Top-scored drugs for Alzheimer's Disease include agomelatine, mirtazapine and vortioxetine; for Parkinson's Disease, they include apomorphine, pramipexole and lisuride; for Huntington's, they include chlorpromazine, fluphenazine and perphenazine; and for Multiple Sclerosis, they include zonisamide, disopyramide and priralfimide. Overall, Democracy is a methodology that focuses on leveraging the existing drug-related experimental and/or computational knowledge rather than a predictive model for drug repurposing, offering a quantified aggregation of existing drug discovery results to (1) reveal trends in selected tracks of drug discovery research with increased resolution that includes modes of action, targeted pathways and initial indications for the investigated drugs and (2) score new candidate drugs for repurposing against a selected disease.
Topics: Drug Repositioning; Humans; Drug Discovery; Neurodegenerative Diseases
PubMed: 38791356
DOI: 10.3390/ijms25105319 -
British Journal of Anaesthesia Jul 1970
Clinical Trial Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
Topics: Amides; Benzoates; Blood Pressure; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Humans; Laparotomy; Nausea; Perphenazine; Postoperative Complications; Pulse; Unconsciousness; Vomiting
PubMed: 4916523
DOI: 10.1093/bja/42.7.614 -
Scientific Reports Oct 2022Organophosphates (OPs) are inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase and have deleterious effects on the central nervous system. Clinical manifestations of OP poisoning include...
Organophosphates (OPs) are inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase and have deleterious effects on the central nervous system. Clinical manifestations of OP poisoning include convulsions, which represent an underlying toxic neuro-pathological process, leading to permanent neuronal damage. This neurotoxicity is mediated through the cholinergic, GABAergic and glutamatergic (NMDA) systems. Pharmacological interventions in OP poisoning are designed to mitigate these specific neuro-pathological pathways, using anticholinergic drugs and GABAergic agents. Benactyzine is a combined anticholinergic, anti-NMDA compound. Based on previous development of novel GABA derivatives (such as prodrugs based on perphenazine for the treatment of schizophrenia and nortriptyline against neuropathic pain), we describe the synthesis and preliminary testing of a mutual prodrug ester of benactyzine and GABA. It is assumed that once the ester crosses the blood-brain-barrier it will undergo hydrolysis, releasing benactyzine and GABA, which are expected to act synergistically. The combined release of both compounds in the brain offers several advantages over the current OP poisoning treatment protocol: improved efficacy and safety profile (where the inhibitory properties of GABA are expected to counteract the anticholinergic cognitive adverse effects of benactyzine) and enhanced chemical stability compared to benactyzine alone. We present here preliminary results of animal studies, showing promising results with early gabactyzine administration.
Topics: Animals; Benactyzine; Antidotes; Prodrugs; Organophosphates; Acetylcholinesterase; Chemical Warfare Agents; Cholinergic Antagonists; Esters; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Organophosphate Poisoning; Cholinesterase Inhibitors
PubMed: 36302937
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23141-9