-
Nature Methods Dec 2019High-throughput complementary DNA sequencing technologies have advanced our understanding of transcriptome complexity and regulation. However, these methods lose...
High-throughput complementary DNA sequencing technologies have advanced our understanding of transcriptome complexity and regulation. However, these methods lose information contained in biological RNA because the copied reads are often short and modifications are not retained. We address these limitations using a native poly(A) RNA sequencing strategy developed by Oxford Nanopore Technologies. Our study generated 9.9 million aligned sequence reads for the human cell line GM12878, using thirty MinION flow cells at six institutions. These native RNA reads had a median length of 771 bases, and a maximum aligned length of over 21,000 bases. Mitochondrial poly(A) reads provided an internal measure of read-length quality. We combined these long nanopore reads with higher accuracy short-reads and annotated GM12878 promoter regions to identify 33,984 plausible RNA isoforms. We describe strategies for assessing 3' poly(A) tail length, base modifications and transcript haplotypes.
Topics: Cells, Cultured; Humans; Nanopore Sequencing; Poly A; Sequence Analysis, RNA; Transcriptome
PubMed: 31740818
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-019-0617-2 -
RNA (New York, N.Y.) Apr 2019Extensive research in the past decade has brought mRNA closer to the clinical realization of its therapeutic potential. One common structural feature for all cellular...
Extensive research in the past decade has brought mRNA closer to the clinical realization of its therapeutic potential. One common structural feature for all cellular messenger RNAs is a poly(A) tail, which can either be brought in cotranscriptionally via the DNA template (plasmid- or PCR-based) or added to the mRNA in a post-transcriptional enzymatic process. Plasmids containing poly(A) regions recombine in , resulting in extensive shortening of the poly(A) tail. Using a segmented poly(A) approach, we could significantly reduce recombination of plasmids in without any negative effect on mRNA half-life and protein expression. This effect was independent of the coding sequence. A segmented poly(A) tail is characterized in that it consists of at least two A-containing elements, each defined as a nucleotide sequence consisting of 40-60 adenosines, separated by a spacer element of different length. Furthermore, reducing the spacer length between the poly(A) segments resulted in higher translation efficiencies compared to homogeneous poly(A) tail and reduced recombination (depending upon the choice of spacer nucleotide). Our results demonstrate the superior potential of segmented poly(A) tails compared to the conventionally used homogeneous poly(A) tails with respect to recombination of the plasmids and the resulting mRNA performance (half-life and translational efficiency).
Topics: A549 Cells; Animals; Base Sequence; Escherichia coli; Genetic Engineering; HEK293 Cells; Half-Life; Humans; Plasmids; Poly A; Protein Biosynthesis; RNA, Messenger; Recombination, Genetic; Transfection
PubMed: 30647100
DOI: 10.1261/rna.069286.118 -
Science Advances Oct 2022Growing oocytes store a large amount of maternal mRNA to support the subsequent "maternal-zygotic transition" process. At present, it is not clear how the growing...
Growing oocytes store a large amount of maternal mRNA to support the subsequent "maternal-zygotic transition" process. At present, it is not clear how the growing oocytes store and process the newly transcribed mRNA under physiological conditions. In this study, we report non-membrane-bound compartments, nuclear poly(A) domains (NPADs), as the hub for newly transcribed mRNA, in developing mouse oocytes. The RNA binding protein PABPN1 promotes the formation of NPAD through its N-terminal disordered domain and RNA-recognized motif by means of liquid phase separation. -null growing oocytes cannot form NPAD normally in vivo and have defects in stability of oocyte growing-related transcripts and formation of long 3' untranslated region isoform transcripts. Ultimately, mice are completely sterile with primary ovarian insufficiency. These results demonstrate that NPAD formed by the phase separation properties of PABPN1-mRNA are the hub of the newly transcribed mRNA and essential for the development of oocytes and female reproduction.
Topics: Animals; Female; Mice; Cell Nucleus; Oocytes; Poly A; RNA, Messenger; RNA-Binding Proteins
PubMed: 36306357
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abn9016 -
Trends in Cell Biology Mar 2019Poly(A) tails are non-templated additions of adenosines at the 3' ends of most eukaryotic mRNAs. In the nucleus, these RNAs are co-transcriptionally cleaved at a poly(A)... (Review)
Review
Poly(A) tails are non-templated additions of adenosines at the 3' ends of most eukaryotic mRNAs. In the nucleus, these RNAs are co-transcriptionally cleaved at a poly(A) site and then polyadenylated before being exported to the cytoplasm. In the cytoplasm, poly(A) tails play pivotal roles in the translation and stability of the mRNA. One challenge in studying poly(A) tails is that they are difficult to sequence and accurately measure. However, recent advances in sequencing technology, computational algorithms, and other assays have enabled a more detailed look at poly(A) tail length genome-wide throughout many developmental stages and organisms. With the help of these advances, our understanding of poly(A) tail length has evolved over the past 5 years with the recognition that highly expressed genes can have short poly(A) tails and the elucidation of the seemingly contradictory roles for poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) in facilitating both protection and deadenylation.
Topics: Algorithms; Animals; Cell Nucleus; Computational Biology; Cytoplasm; Humans; Poly A; RNA, Messenger; Sequence Analysis, RNA
PubMed: 30503240
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.11.002 -
RNA (New York, N.Y.) Oct 2019Polyadenylation at the 3'-end is a major regulator of messenger RNA and its length is known to affect nuclear export, stability, and translation, among others. Only...
Polyadenylation at the 3'-end is a major regulator of messenger RNA and its length is known to affect nuclear export, stability, and translation, among others. Only recently have strategies emerged that allow for genome-wide poly(A) length assessment. These methods identify genes connected to poly(A) tail measurements indirectly by short-read alignment to genetic 3'-ends. Concurrently, Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) established full-length isoform-specific RNA sequencing containing the entire poly(A) tail. However, assessing poly(A) length through base-calling has so far not been possible due to the inability to resolve long homopolymeric stretches in ONT sequencing. Here we present , an R package to estimate poly(A) tail length on ONT long-read sequencing data. operates on unaligned, base-called data. It measures poly(A) tail length from both native RNA and DNA sequencing, which makes poly(A) tail studies by full-length cDNA approaches possible for the first time. We assess 's performance across different poly(A) lengths, demonstrating that is a versatile tool providing poly(A) tail estimates across a wide range of sequencing conditions.
Topics: Nanopores; Poly A; Poly T; Polyadenylation; Sequence Analysis, DNA; Sequence Analysis, RNA
PubMed: 31266821
DOI: 10.1261/rna.071332.119 -
BMC Genomics Jul 2022Genome-wide RNA-sequencing technologies are increasingly critical to a wide variety of diagnostic and research applications. RNA-seq users often first enrich for mRNA,...
BACKGROUND
Genome-wide RNA-sequencing technologies are increasingly critical to a wide variety of diagnostic and research applications. RNA-seq users often first enrich for mRNA, with the most popular enrichment method being poly(A) selection. In many applications it is well-known that poly(A) selection biases the view of the transcriptome by selecting for longer tailed mRNA species.
RESULTS
Here, we show that poly(A) selection biases Oxford Nanopore direct RNA sequencing. As expected, poly(A) selection skews sequenced mRNAs toward longer poly(A) tail lengths. Interestingly, we identify a population of mRNAs (> 10% of genes' mRNAs) that are inconsistently captured by poly(A) selection due to highly variable poly(A) tails, and demonstrate this phenomenon in our hands and in published data. Importantly, we show poly(A) selection is dispensable for Oxford Nanopore's direct RNA-seq technique, and demonstrate successful library construction without poly(A) selection, with decreased input, and without loss of quality.
CONCLUSIONS
Our work expands the utility of direct RNA-seq by validating the use of total RNA as input, and demonstrates important technical artifacts from poly(A) selection that inconsistently skew mRNA expression and poly(A) tail length measurements.
Topics: High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Poly A; Polyadenylation; RNA; RNA, Messenger; Sequence Analysis, RNA; Transcriptome
PubMed: 35869428
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-022-08762-8 -
RNA (New York, N.Y.) May 2022Poly(A) tail length is regulated in both the nucleus and cytoplasm. One factor that controls polyadenylation in the cytoplasm is CPEB1, an RNA binding protein that...
Poly(A) tail length is regulated in both the nucleus and cytoplasm. One factor that controls polyadenylation in the cytoplasm is CPEB1, an RNA binding protein that associates with specific mRNA 3'UTR sequences to tether enzymes that add and remove poly(A). Two of these enzymes, the noncanonical poly(A) polymerases GLD2 (TENT2, PAPD4, Wispy) and GLD4 (TENT4B, PAPD5, TRF4, TUT3), interact with CPEB1 to extend poly(A). To identify additional RNA binding proteins that might anchor GLD4 to RNA, we expressed double tagged GLD4 in U87MG cells, which was used for sequential immunoprecipitation and elution followed by mass spectrometry. We identified several RNA binding proteins that coprecipitated with GLD4, among which was FMRP. To assess whether FMRP regulates polyadenylation, we performed TAIL-seq from WT and FMRP-deficient HEK293 cells. Surprisingly, loss of FMRP resulted in an overall increase in poly(A), which was also observed for several specific mRNAs. Conversely, loss of CPEB1 elicited an expected decrease in poly(A), which was examined in cultured neurons. We also examined polyadenylation in wild type (WT) and FMRP-deficient mouse brain cortex by direct RNA nanopore sequencing, which identified RNAs with both increased and decreased poly(A). Our data show that FMRP has a role in mediating poly(A) tail length, which adds to its repertoire of RNA regulation.
Topics: Animals; HEK293 Cells; Humans; Mice; Poly A; Polyadenylation; Polynucleotide Adenylyltransferase; RNA, Messenger; RNA-Binding Proteins; Transcription Factors; mRNA Cleavage and Polyadenylation Factors
PubMed: 35217597
DOI: 10.1261/rna.079050.121 -
RNA (New York, N.Y.) Jul 2022The poly(A) tail enhances translation and transcript stability, and tail length is under dynamic control during cell state transitions. Tail regulation plays essential...
The poly(A) tail enhances translation and transcript stability, and tail length is under dynamic control during cell state transitions. Tail regulation plays essential roles in translational timing and fertilization in early development, but poly(A) tail dynamics have not been fully explored in post-embryonic systems. Here, we examined the landscape and impact of tail length control during macrophage activation. Upon activation, more than 1500 mRNAs, including proinflammatory genes, underwent distinctive changes in tail lengths. Increases in tail length correlated with mRNA levels regardless of transcriptional activity, and many mRNAs that underwent tail extension encode proteins necessary for immune function and post-transcriptional regulation. Strikingly, we found that , whose protein product destabilizes target transcripts, undergoes tail extension. Our analyses indicate that many mRNAs undergoing tail lengthening are, in turn, degraded by elevated levels of ZFP36, constituting a post-transcriptional feedback loop that ensures transient regulation of transcripts integral to macrophage activation. Taken together, this study establishes the complexity, relevance, and widespread nature of poly(A) tail dynamics, and the resulting post-transcriptional regulation during macrophage activation.
Topics: Gene Expression Regulation; Macrophage Activation; Poly A; Polyadenylation; RNA, Messenger
PubMed: 35512831
DOI: 10.1261/rna.078918.121 -
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal... Nov 2018Post-transcriptional addition of poly(A) tails to the 3' end of RNA is one of the fundamental events controlling the functionality and fate of RNA in all kingdoms of... (Review)
Review
Post-transcriptional addition of poly(A) tails to the 3' end of RNA is one of the fundamental events controlling the functionality and fate of RNA in all kingdoms of life. Although an enzyme with poly(A)-adding activity was discovered in more than 50 years ago, its existence and role in prokaryotic RNA metabolism were neglected for many years. As a result, it was not until 1992 that poly(A) polymerase I was purified to homogeneity and its gene was finally identified. Further work revealed that, similar to its role in surveillance of aberrant nuclear RNAs of eukaryotes, the addition of poly(A) tails often destabilizes prokaryotic RNAs and their decay intermediates, thus facilitating RNA turnover. Moreover, numerous studies carried out over the last three decades have shown that polyadenylation greatly contributes to the control of prokaryotic gene expression by affecting the steady-state level of diverse protein-coding and non-coding transcripts including antisense RNAs involved in plasmid copy number control, expression of toxin-antitoxin systems and bacteriophage development. Here, we review the main findings related to the discovery of polyadenylation in prokaryotes, isolation, and characterization and regulation of bacterial poly(A)-adding activities, and discuss the impact of polyadenylation on prokaryotic mRNA metabolism and gene expression.This article is part of the theme issue '5' and 3' modifications controlling RNA degradation'.
Topics: Bacteria; Poly A; Polyadenylation; Prokaryotic Cells; RNA
PubMed: 30397102
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0166 -
RNA (New York, N.Y.) Jun 2022Neurons provide a rich setting for studying post-transcriptional control. Here, we investigate the landscape of translational control in neurons and search for mRNA...
Neurons provide a rich setting for studying post-transcriptional control. Here, we investigate the landscape of translational control in neurons and search for mRNA features that explain differences in translational efficiency (TE), considering the interplay between TE, mRNA poly(A)-tail lengths, microRNAs, and neuronal activation. In neurons and brain tissues, TE correlates with tail length, and a few dozen mRNAs appear to undergo cytoplasmic polyadenylation upon light or chemical stimulation. However, the correlation between TE and tail length is modest, explaining <5% of TE variance, and even this modest relationship diminishes when accounting for other mRNA features. Thus, tail length appears to affect TE only minimally. Accordingly, miRNAs, which accelerate deadenylation of their mRNA targets, primarily influence target mRNA levels, with no detectable effect on either steady-state tail lengths or TE. Larger correlates with TE include codon composition and predicted mRNA folding energy. When combined in a model, the identified correlates explain 38%-45% of TE variance. These results provide a framework for considering the relative impact of factors that contribute to translational control in neurons. They indicate that when examined in bulk, translational control in neurons largely resembles that of other types of post-embryonic cells. Thus, detection of more specialized control might require analyses that can distinguish translation occurring in neuronal processes from that occurring in cell bodies.
Topics: Gene Expression Regulation; MicroRNAs; Neurons; Poly A; Polyadenylation; Protein Biosynthesis; RNA, Messenger
PubMed: 35273099
DOI: 10.1261/rna.079046.121