-
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular... May 2022Early mobilization of patients in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery who are hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a practice that has a positive... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Early mobilization of patients in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery who are hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a practice that has a positive impact.
METHODS
This is a systematic review of studies published until September 2020 in the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (or MEDLINE®), Embase, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (or PEDro), Scientific Electronic Library Online (or SciELO), and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (or LILACS) databases. Randomized clinical trials describing mobilization protocols performed early in ICU patients after cardiac surgery were included.
RESULTS
According to the eligibility criteria, only 14 of the 1,128 articles found were included in the analysis. Early mobilization protocols were initiated in the immediate postoperative period or first postoperative day. The resources and technics used were progressive mobilization, cycle ergometer, early bed activities, walking protocols, resistance exercise, and virtual reality. Intensity of the mobilization activities was determined using the Borg scale and heart rate.
CONCLUSION
Early mobilization protocols are generalist (not individual), and low-intensity exercises are used, through progressive mobilization, with two daily physical therapy sessions, during 10 to 30 minutes.
Topics: Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Early Ambulation; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Postoperative Period; Prescriptions
PubMed: 35244377
DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0140 -
International Journal of Environmental... Aug 2021Unintentional hypothermia (core temperature < 36 °C) is a common side effect in patients undergoing surgery. Several patient-centred and external factors, e.g., drugs,... (Review)
Review
Unintentional hypothermia (core temperature < 36 °C) is a common side effect in patients undergoing surgery. Several patient-centred and external factors, e.g., drugs, comorbidities, trauma, environmental temperature, type of anaesthesia, as well as extent and duration of surgery, influence core temperature. Perioperative hypothermia has negative effects on coagulation, blood loss and transfusion requirements, metabolization of drugs, surgical site infections, and discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit. Therefore, active temperature management is required in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative period to diminish the risks of perioperative hypothermia. Temperature measurement should be done with accurate and continuous probes. Perioperative temperature management includes a bundle of warming tools adapted to individual needs and local circumstances. Warming blankets and mattresses as well as the administration of properly warmed infusions via dedicated devices are important for this purpose. Temperature management should follow checklists and be individualized to the patient's requirements and the local possibilities.
Topics: Blood Transfusion; Body Temperature; Humans; Hypothermia; Postoperative Period; Surgical Wound Infection
PubMed: 34444504
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18168749 -
JAMA Jan 2022
Topics: Anesthesia, General; Humans; Postoperative Period
PubMed: 34928317
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.22465 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Sep 2019
Topics: Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Postoperative Period
PubMed: 31445646
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.05.024 -
Anesthesiology Jun 2022
Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Period; Risk Factors
PubMed: 35482968
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004233 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Aug 2022
Topics: Humans; Postoperative Period
PubMed: 35871274
DOI: 10.21037/apm-22-784 -
Obstetrics and Gynecology Mar 2024Gynecologic surgeons have traditionally restricted the physical activity of postoperative patients. Minimally invasive surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery... (Review)
Review
Gynecologic surgeons have traditionally restricted the physical activity of postoperative patients. Minimally invasive surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery programs have contributed to decreased hospital stays and more expeditious recovery. In this narrative review, we review the current state of postoperative activity restrictions in gynecology and other specialties, the purported risks and potential benefits of postoperative activity, the available evidence to refute or support activity in the postoperative activity, and, finally, the potential benefit of added activity in the postoperative period.
Topics: Female; Humans; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures; Length of Stay; Postoperative Period; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 38207325
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005501 -
British Journal of Anaesthesia Jul 2022There is no consensus about the type of instrument with which to assess postoperative recovery or the time points when assessments are most appropriate. It is also... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
There is no consensus about the type of instrument with which to assess postoperative recovery or the time points when assessments are most appropriate. It is also unclear whether instruments measure the four dimensions of postoperative recovery, that is physical, psychological, social, and habitual recovery. This scoping review had three objectives: (1) to identify and describe instruments used in clinical trials to assess postoperative recovery; (2) to determine how, when, and the number of times postoperative recovery was measured; and (3) to explore whether the four dimensions of postoperative recovery are represented in the identified instruments.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted in CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Web of Science. The search terms were related to three search strands: postoperative recovery, instrument, and clinical trials. The limits were English language and publication January 2010 to November 2021. In total, 5015 studies were identified.
RESULTS
A total of 198 studies were included in the results. We identified 20 instruments measuring postoperative recovery. Different versions of Quality of Recovery represented 81.8% of the included instruments. Postoperative recovery was often assessed at one time point (47.2%) and most often on postoperative day 1 (81.5%). Thirteen instruments had items covering all four dimensions of postoperative recovery.
CONCLUSIONS
Assessing recovery is important to evaluate and improve perioperative care. We emphasise the importance of choosing the right instrument for the concept studied and, if postoperative recovery is of interest, of assessing more than once. Ideally, instruments should include all four dimensions to cover the whole recovery process.
Topics: Humans; Postoperative Period
PubMed: 35623904
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.04.015 -
Acta Orthopaedica Jul 2022
Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Humans; Knee Joint; Postoperative Period
PubMed: 35848732
DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2022.3977 -
Anaesthesia Apr 2020
Topics: Blood Transfusion; Blood Transfusion, Autologous; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Postoperative Period
PubMed: 31872437
DOI: 10.1111/anae.14965