-
Intensive Care Medicine Dec 2020In ARDS patients, the change from supine to prone position generates a more even distribution of the gas-tissue ratios along the dependent-nondependent axis and a more... (Review)
Review
In ARDS patients, the change from supine to prone position generates a more even distribution of the gas-tissue ratios along the dependent-nondependent axis and a more homogeneous distribution of lung stress and strain. The change to prone position is generally accompanied by a marked improvement in arterial blood gases, which is mainly due to a better overall ventilation/perfusion matching. Improvement in oxygenation and reduction in mortality are the main reasons to implement prone position in patients with ARDS. The main reason explaining a decreased mortality is less overdistension in non-dependent lung regions and less cyclical opening and closing in dependent lung regions. The only absolute contraindication for implementing prone position is an unstable spinal fracture. The maneuver to change from supine to prone and vice versa requires a skilled team of 4-5 caregivers. The most frequent adverse events are pressure sores and facial edema. Recently, the use of prone position has been extended to non-intubated spontaneously breathing patients affected with COVID-19 ARDS. The effects of this intervention on outcomes are still uncertain.
Topics: Humans; Lung Compliance; Prone Position; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Respiratory Mechanics
PubMed: 33169218
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06306-w -
Chest Jan 2017Prone positioning was first proposed in the 1970s as a method to improve gas exchange in ARDS. Subsequent observations of dramatic improvement in oxygenation with simple... (Review)
Review
Prone positioning was first proposed in the 1970s as a method to improve gas exchange in ARDS. Subsequent observations of dramatic improvement in oxygenation with simple patient rotation motivated the next several decades of research. This work elucidated the physiological mechanisms underlying changes in gas exchange and respiratory mechanics with prone ventilation. However, translating physiological improvements into a clinical benefit has proved challenging; several contemporary trials showed no major clinical benefits with prone positioning. By optimizing patient selection and treatment protocols, the recent Proning Severe ARDS Patients (PROSEVA) trial demonstrated a significant mortality benefit with prone ventilation. This trial, and subsequent meta-analyses, support the role of prone positioning as an effective therapy to reduce mortality in severe ARDS, particularly when applied early with other lung-protective strategies. This review discusses the physiological principles, clinical evidence, and practical application of prone ventilation in ARDS.
Topics: Humans; Prone Position; Pulmonary Gas Exchange; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Respiratory Mechanics; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27400909
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.06.032 -
Current Opinion in Critical Care Feb 2022Prone position has been widely used in the COVID-19 pandemic, with an extension of its use in patients with spontaneous breathing ('awake prone'). We herein propose a... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Prone position has been widely used in the COVID-19 pandemic, with an extension of its use in patients with spontaneous breathing ('awake prone'). We herein propose a review of the current literature on prone position in mechanical ventilation and while spontaneous breathing in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia or COVID-19 ARDS.
RECENT FINDINGS
A literature search retrieved 70 studies separating whether patient was intubated (24 studies) or nonintubated (46 studies). The outcomes analyzed were intubation rate, mortality and respiratory response to prone. In nonintubated patient receiving prone position, the main finding was mortality reduction in ICU and outside ICU setting.
SUMMARY
The final results of the several randomized control trials completed or ongoing are needed to confirm the trend of these results. In intubated patients, observational studies showed that responders to prone in terms of oxygenation had a better survival than nonresponders.
Topics: COVID-19; Humans; Pandemics; Prone Position; Respiration, Artificial; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Respiratory Insufficiency; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 34750322
DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000900 -
Sports Health Jul 2016Prone, supine, and side position exercises are employed to enhance core stability.
BACKGROUND
Prone, supine, and side position exercises are employed to enhance core stability.
HYPOTHESIS
Overall core muscle activity would be greater in prone position exercises compared with supine and side position exercises.
STUDY DESIGN
Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS
Eighteen men and women between 23 and 45 years of age served as subjects. Surface electrodes were positioned over the upper and lower rectus abdominis, external and internal obliques, rectus femoris, latissimus dorsi, and lumbar paraspinals. Electromyography data were collected during 5 repetitions of 10 exercises, then normalized by maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC). Differences in muscle activity were assessed using 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance, while t tests with a Bonferroni correction were employed to assess pairwise comparisons.
RESULTS
Upper and lower rectus abdominis activity was generally significantly greater in the crunch, bent-knee sit-up, and prone position exercises compared with side position exercises. External oblique activity was significantly greater in the prone on ball with right hip extension, side crunch on ball, and side bridge (plank) on toes compared with the prone and side bridge (plank) on knees, the crunch, or the bent-knee sit-up positions. Internal oblique activity was significantly greater in the prone bridge (plank) on ball and prone on ball with left and right hip extension compared with the side crunch on ball and prone and side bridge (plank) on knees positions. Lumbar paraspinal activity was significantly greater in the 3 side position exercises compared with all remaining exercises. Latissimus dorsi activity was significantly greater in the prone on ball with left and right hip extension and prone bridge (plank) on ball and on toes compared with the crunch, bent-knee sit-up, and prone and side bridge (plank) on knees positions. Rectus femoris activity was significantly greater in the prone on ball with left hip extension, bent-knee sit-up, or prone bridge (plank) on toes compared with the remaining exercises.
CONCLUSION
Prone position exercises are good alternatives to supine position exercises for recruiting core musculature. Side position exercises are better for oblique and lumbar paraspinal recruitment.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Because high core muscle activity is associated with high spinal compressive loading, muscle activation patterns should be considered when prescribing trunk exercises to those in which high spinal compressive loading may be deleterious.
Topics: Abdominal Muscles; Adult; Back Muscles; Electromyography; Exercise; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Posture; Prone Position; Sports Equipment; Supine Position; Young Adult
PubMed: 27302152
DOI: 10.1177/1941738116653931 -
Intensive Care Medicine Aug 2022
Review
Topics: Humans; Patient Positioning; Prone Position; Respiration, Artificial; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Supine Position
PubMed: 35652920
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06731-z -
Critical Care Medicine May 2022
Topics: COVID-19; Humans; Patient Positioning; Prone Position; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 35120038
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005486 -
British Journal of Anaesthesia May 2022The prone position has been used to improve oxygenation in patients affected by acute respiratory distress syndrome, but its role in patients with COVID-19 is still...
The prone position has been used to improve oxygenation in patients affected by acute respiratory distress syndrome, but its role in patients with COVID-19 is still unclear when these patients are breathing spontaneously. Mechanisms of ventilation and perfusion in the prone position are discussed, with new insights on how these changes relate to patients with COVID-19.
Topics: COVID-19; Humans; Prone Position; Respiration; Respiration, Artificial; Respiratory Distress Syndrome
PubMed: 35216817
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.01.024 -
Chest Mar 2023
Topics: Humans; Lung; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Prone Position; Supine Position
PubMed: 36894254
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.12.002 -
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia Nov 2021To review the effects of prone position and supine position on oxygenation parameters in patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
STUDY OBJECTIVE
To review the effects of prone position and supine position on oxygenation parameters in patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized trials.
PATIENTS
Databases of EMBASE, MEDLINE and CENTRAL were systematically searched from its inception until March 2021.
INTERVENTIONS
COVID-19 patients being positioned in the prone position either whilst awake or mechanically ventilated.
MEASUREMENTS
Primary outcomes were oxygenation parameters (PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio, PaCO₂, SpO₂). Secondary outcomes included the rate of intubation and mortality rate.
RESULTS
Thirty-five studies (n = 1712 patients) were included in this review. In comparison to the supine group, prone position significantly improved the PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio (study = 13, patients = 1002, Mean difference, MD 52.15, 95% CI 37.08 to 67.22; p < 0.00001) and SpO₂ (study = 11, patients = 998, MD 4.17, 95% CI 2.53 to 5.81; p ≤0.00001). Patients received prone position were associated with lower incidence of mortality (study = 5, patients = 688, Odd ratio, OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.80; p = 0.007). No significant difference was noted in the incidence of intubation rate (study = 5, patients = 626, OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.86; p = 0.42) between the supine and prone groups.
CONCLUSION
Our meta-analysis demonstrated that prone position improved PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio with better SpO₂ than supine position in COVID-19 patients. Given the limited number of studies with small sample size and substantial heterogeneity of measured outcomes, further studies are warranted to standardize the regime of prone position to improve the certainty of evidence. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42021234050.
Topics: COVID-19; Humans; Prone Position; Respiration, Artificial; SARS-CoV-2; Supine Position
PubMed: 34182261
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110406 -
Intensive & Critical Care Nursing Oct 2020Early enteral nutrition (EN) and prone position may both improve the outcome of patients affected by moderate to severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Recent...
BACKGROUND
Early enteral nutrition (EN) and prone position may both improve the outcome of patients affected by moderate to severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Recent guidelines suggest to administer early EN also during prone position. However, EN intolerance, such as high residual gastric volumes, regurgitation or vomiting, may occur during pronation.
AIM
This systematic review aims to assess the occurrence of high residual gastric volume, regurgitation or vomiting episodes, that can be encountered in patients receiving EN during prone position.
METHODS
We have conducted a systematic review. We queried three scientific databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL) from inception until November 19, 2019 without language restrictions, using keywords and related MeSH terms. All relevant articles enrolling adult patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation and evaluating the use of early EN during prone position were included.
RESULTS
From 111 records obtained, we included six studies. All studies but one reported no differences with respect to gastric residual volumes between supine and prone positions. A 24-hours EN administration protocol seems to be better, as compared to an 18-hours feeding protocol. The need to stop EN and vomiting episodes were higher during prone position, although the rate of high gastric volume was similar between supine and prone positions. Ventilator associated pneumonia, lengths of stay and mortalities were similar between supine and prone positions. Only one study reported lower mortality in patients receiving EN throughout the entire day, as compared to an 18-hours administration protocol.
CONCLUSION
Protocols should be followed by healthcare providers in order to increase the enteral feeding volume, while avoiding EN intolerance (such as EN stops, high residual volume, regurgitation and vomiting).
Topics: Adult; Critical Illness; Enteral Nutrition; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nursing; Prone Position; Respiration, Artificial; Vomiting
PubMed: 32641217
DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102899