-
Journal of the American College of... Jan 2021Opioids are the most potent of all analgesics. Although traditionally used solely for acute self-limited conditions and palliation of severe cancer-associated pain, a... (Review)
Review
Opioids are the most potent of all analgesics. Although traditionally used solely for acute self-limited conditions and palliation of severe cancer-associated pain, a movement to promote subjective pain (scale, 0 to 10) to the status of a "fifth vital sign" bolstered widespread prescribing for chronic, noncancer pain. This, coupled with rising misuse, initiated a surge in unintentional deaths, increased drug-associated acute coronary syndrome, and endocarditis. In response, the American College of Cardiology issued a call to action for cardiovascular care teams. Opioid toxicity is primarily mediated via potent μ-receptor agonism resulting in ventilatory depression. However, both overdose and opioid withdrawal can trigger major adverse cardiovascular events resulting from hemodynamic, vascular, and proarrhythmic/electrophysiological consequences. Although natural opioid analogues are devoid of repolarization effects, synthetic agents may be proarrhythmic. This perspective explores cardiovascular consequences of opioids, the contributions of off-target electrophysiologic properties to mortality, and provides practical safety recommendations.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Cardiotoxicity; Cardiovascular Diseases; Humans; Methadone; Opioid-Related Disorders
PubMed: 33446314
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.002 -
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy : JMCP 2011
Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Dextropropoxyphene; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Inappropriate Prescribing
PubMed: 21204591
DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.1.60 -
Neurology India 2022There are numerous toxins that affect our nervous system, both central and peripheral. Innumerable differentials exist in patients of acute encephalopathy and the list...
BACKGROUND
There are numerous toxins that affect our nervous system, both central and peripheral. Innumerable differentials exist in patients of acute encephalopathy and the list can be narrowed down with appropriate imaging. Specific neuroradiological features point to a particular diagnosis in a substantial number of cases.
OBJECTIVE
Through this study, we aimed to demonstrate the varied imaging findings of toxic encephalopathy on MRI encountered at our institute.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A retrospective analysis of the patients clinically diagnosed as toxic encephalopathy and referred for imaging between March 2015 and December 2019 was done. A total of 25 patients were included. Patient records were reviewed for clinical details, laboratory investigations, and treatment; the institute Picture Archiving and Communication System provided the imaging findings.
RESULTS
Patients presenting were aged between 22 and 55 years (mean-34.3 years). Four patients (16%) presented with imaging findings characteristic of Marchiafava-Bignami disease and six patients (24%) had MRI findings of Wernicke encephalopathy. Three patients (12%) had methanol poisoning sequelae while imaging findings of nitroimidazole drug toxicity were observed in another three patients (12%). Two patients (8%) each of carbon monoxide poisoning and lead toxicity were seen. We had one patient (4%) each of isoniazid, methyl iodide, dextropropoxyphene toxicity, chronic toluene abuse, and hyperglycemia-induced hemiballismus-hemichorea.
CONCLUSION
Our study illustrates the amalgamated spectrum of MRI appearances in various subgroups of toxic encephalopathies. Imaging substantiated by relevant history and clinical manifestations can accurately diagnose the possible causative agent in the majority of the cases.
Topics: Adult; Brain Diseases; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Middle Aged; Neurotoxicity Syndromes; Retrospective Studies; Wernicke Encephalopathy; Young Adult
PubMed: 36076654
DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.355127 -
British Medical Journal Mar 1977
Topics: Dextropropoxyphene; Humans; Self Administration; Substance-Related Disorders; Suicide, Attempted
PubMed: 843865
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Medical Toxicology :... Mar 2016Sodium bicarbonate is a well-known antidote for tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) poisoning. It has been used for over half a century to treat toxin-induced sodium channel... (Review)
Review
Sodium bicarbonate is a well-known antidote for tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) poisoning. It has been used for over half a century to treat toxin-induced sodium channel blockade as evidenced by QRS widening on the electrocardiogram (ECG). The purpose of this review is to describe the literature regarding electrophysiological mechanisms and clinical use of this antidote after poisoning by tricyclic antidepressants and other agents. This article will also address the literature supporting an increased serum sodium concentration, alkalemia, or the combination of both as the responsible mechanism(s) for sodium bicarbonate's antidotal properties. While sodium bicarbonate has been used as a treatment for cardiac sodium channel blockade for multiple other agents including citalopram, cocaine, flecainide, diphenhydramine, propoxyphene, and lamotrigine, it has uncertain efficacy with bupropion, propranolol, and taxine-containing plants.
Topics: Action Potentials; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Antidotes; Antimalarials; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Drug Overdose; Heart Conduction System; Heart Rate; Humans; Risk Factors; Sodium Bicarbonate; Sodium Channel Blockers
PubMed: 26159649
DOI: 10.1007/s13181-015-0483-y -
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Nov 2015Our aim is to determine if propoxyphene withdrawal from the US market was associated with opioid continuation, continued chronic opioid use, and secondary...
PURPOSE
Our aim is to determine if propoxyphene withdrawal from the US market was associated with opioid continuation, continued chronic opioid use, and secondary propoxyphene-related adverse events (emergency department visits, opioid-related events, and acetaminophen toxicity).
METHODS
Medical service use and pharmacy data from 19/11/08 to 19/11/11 were collected from the national Veterans Healthcare Administration healthcare databases. A quasi-experimental pre-post retrospective cohort design utilizing a historical comparison group provided the study framework. Logistic regression controlling for baseline covariates was used to estimate the effect of propoxyphene withdrawal.
RESULTS
There were 24,328 subjects (policy affected n = 10,747; comparison n = 13,581) meeting inclusion criteria. In the policy-affected cohort, 10.6% of users ceased using opioids, and 26.6% stopped chronic opioid use compared with 3.8% and 13.5% in the historical comparison cohort, respectively. Those in the policy-affected cohort were 2.7 (95%CI: 2.5-2.8) and 3.2 (95%CI: 2.9-3.6) times more likely than those in the historical comparison cohort to discontinue chronic opioid and any opioid use, respectively. Changes in adverse events and Emergency Department (ED) visits were not different between policy-affected and historical comparison cohorts (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
The withdrawal of propoxyphene-containing products resulted in rapid and virtually complete elimination in propoxyphene prescribing in the veterans population; however, nearly 90% of regular users of propoxyphene switched to an alternate opioid, and three quarters continued to use opioids chronically.
Topics: Acetaminophen; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Cohort Studies; Databases, Factual; Dextropropoxyphene; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Safety-Based Drug Withdrawals; United States; Veterans; Young Adult
PubMed: 26248742
DOI: 10.1002/pds.3851 -
American Family Physician Mar 2005Physicians most often recommend or prescribe oral medication for relief of acute pain. This review of the available evidence supports the use of acetaminophen in doses... (Review)
Review
Physicians most often recommend or prescribe oral medication for relief of acute pain. This review of the available evidence supports the use of acetaminophen in doses up to 1,000 mg as the initial choice for mild to moderate acute pain. In some cases, modest improvements in analgesic efficacy can be achieved by adding or changing to a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). The safest NSAID is ibuprofen in doses of 400 mg. Higher doses may offer somewhat greater analgesia but with more adverse effects. Other NSAIDs have failed to demonstrate consistently greater efficacy or safety than ibuprofen. Although they may be more expensive, these alternatives may be chosen for their more convenient dosing. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors provide equivalent efficacy to traditional NSAIDs but lack a demonstrable safety advantage for the treatment of acute pain. For more severe acute pain, the evidence supports the addition of oral narcotic medications such as hydrocodone, morphine, or oxycodone. Specific oral analgesics that have shown poor efficacy and side effects include codeine, propoxyphene, and tramadol.
Topics: Acetaminophen; Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Algorithms; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Aspirin; Humans; Narcotics; Pain; Tramadol
PubMed: 15768621
DOI: No ID Found -
British Journal of Anaesthesia Oct 2005Toxicity resulting from excessive intra-synaptic serotonin, historically referred to as serotonin syndrome, is now understood to be an intra-synaptic serotonin... (Review)
Review
Toxicity resulting from excessive intra-synaptic serotonin, historically referred to as serotonin syndrome, is now understood to be an intra-synaptic serotonin concentration-related phenomenon. Recent research more clearly delineates serotonin toxicity as a discreet toxidrome characterized by clonus, hyper-reflexia, hyperthermia and agitation. Serotonergic side-effects occur with serotonergic drugs, and overdoses of serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SRIs) frequently produce marked serotonergic side-effects, and in 15% of cases, moderate serotonergic toxicity, but not to a severe degree, which produces hyperthermia and risk of death. It is only combinations of serotonergic drugs acting by different mechanisms that are capable of raising intra-synaptic serotonin to a level that is life threatening. The combination that most commonly does this is a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) drug combined with any SRI. There are a number of lesser-known drugs that are MAOIs, such as linezolid and moclobemide; and some opioid analgesics have serotonergic activity. These properties when combined can precipitate life threatening serotonin toxicity. Possibly preventable deaths are still occurring. Knowledge of the properties of these drugs will therefore help to ensure that problems can be avoided in most clinical situations, and treated appropriately (with 5-HT(2A) antagonists for severe cases) if they occur. The phenylpiperidine series opioids, pethidine (meperidine), tramadol, methadone and dextromethorphan and propoxyphene, appear to be weak serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and have all been involved in serotonin toxicity reactions with MAOIs (including some fatalities). Morphine, codeine, oxycodone and buprenorphine are known not to be SRIs, and do not precipitate serotonin toxicity with MAOIs.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Humans; Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors; Serotonin; Serotonin Syndrome; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
PubMed: 16051647
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aei210 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2015Oral analgesia is a convenient and widely used form of pain relief following caesarean section. It includes various medications used at different doses alone or in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Oral analgesia is a convenient and widely used form of pain relief following caesarean section. It includes various medications used at different doses alone or in adjunction to other form of analgesia.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of oral analgesia for post-caesarean pain relief.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 July 2014) and reference lists of retrieved studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Cluster-randomised trials were eligible for inclusion but none were identified. Quasi-randomised and cross-over trials were not eligible for inclusion.Interventions included oral medication given to women for post-caesarean pain relief compared with oral medication, or placebo/no treatment.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed for inclusion all the potential studies and independently assessed trial quality, extracted the data using the agreed data extraction form, and checked them for accuracy.
MAIN RESULTS
Eight small trials involving 962 women (out of 13 included trials) contributed data to the analysis, of which only four trials had low risk of bias.None of the included studies reported on 'adequate pain relief', which is one of this review's primary outcomes. 1. Opiod analgesics versus placeboBased on one trial involving 120 women, the effect of opioids versus placebo was not significant in relation to the need for additional pain relief (primary outcome) (risk ratio (RR) 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06 to 1.92), and the effect in terms of adverse drug effects outcomes was also uncertain (RR 6.58, 95% CI 0.38 to 113.96).Low (75 mg) and high (150 mg) doses of tramadol had a similar effect on the need for additional pain relief (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.12 to 3.78 and RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.68, respectively, one study, 80 women). 2. Non-opioid analgesia versus placeboThe confidence interval for the lower requirement for additional analgesia (primary outcome) with the non-opioid analgesia group was wide and includes little or no effect (average RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.01, six studies, 584 women). However, we observed substantial heterogeneity due to the variety of non-opioid drugs used (I(2) = 85%). In a subgroup analysis of different drugs, only gabapentin use resulted in less need for additional pain relief (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.51, one trial, 126 women). There was no difference in need for additional pain relief with the use of celexocib, ibuprofen, ketoprofen, naproxen, paracetamol. Maternal drug effects were more common with the use of non-opioid analgesics (RR 11.12, 95% CI 2.13 to 58.22, two trials, 267 women).Gabapentin 300 mg (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.49, one study, 63 women) and 600 mg (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.71, one study, 63 women) as well as ketoprofen 100 mg (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.79, one study 72 women) were both more effective than placebo with respect to the need for additional pain relief. However, the 50 mg ketoprofen group and the placebo group did not differ in terms of the number of women requiring additional pain relief (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.07, one study, 72 women). 3. Combination analgesics versus placeboOur pooled analysis for the effect of combination analgesics on the need for additional pain relief was RR 0.70 (95% CI 0.35 to 1.40, three trials, 242 women, I(2) = 69%). When comparing different drugs within the combination oral analgesics versus placebo comparison we observed subgroup differences (P = 0.05; I² = 65.8%). One trial comparing paracetamol plus codeine versus placebo resulted in fewer women requiring additional pain relief (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.82, one trial, 65 women). However, there were no differences in the the number of women requiring additional pain relief when comparing paracetamol plus oxycodone versus placebo, or paracetamol plus propoxyphene (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.28, one trial, 96 women and RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.69, one trial, 81 women, respectively).Maternal drug effects were more common in combination analgesics group versus placebo (RR 13.18, 95% CI 2.86 to 60.68, three trials, 252 women). 4. Opioid analgesics versus non-opioid analgesicsThe confidence interval for the effect on additional pain relief between opioid and non-opioid drugs was very wide (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.07 to 3.51, one trial, 121 women). Side effects were more common with the use opioids versus non-opioids analgesics (RR 2.32, 95% CI 1.15 to 4.69, two trials 241 women). 5. Opioid analgesics versus combination analgesicsThere was no difference in need for additional pain relief in opioid analgesics versus combination analgesics based on one study involving 121 women comparing tramadol and paracetamol plus propoxyphene (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.07 to 3.51). Maternal adverse effects also did not differ between the two groups (RR 6.74, 95% CI 0.39 to 116.79). 6. Non-opioid versus combination analgesicsThe need for additional pain relief was greater in the group of women who received non-opoid analgesics (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.93, one trial, 192 women) compared with the group of women who received combination analgesics. Secondary outcomes not reported in the included studiesNo data were found on the following secondary outcomes: number of days in hospital post-operatively, re-hospitalisation due to incisional pain, fully breastfeeding on discharge, mixed feeding at discharge, incisional pain at six weeks after caesarean section, maternal post partum depression, effect (negative) on mother and baby interaction and cost of treatment.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Eight trials with 962 women were included in the analysis, but only four trials were of high quality. All the trials were small. We carried out subgroup analysis for different drugs within the same group and for high versus low doses of the same drug. However, the relatively few studies (one to two trials) and numbers of women (40 to 136) limits the reliability of these subgroup analyses.Due to limited data available no conclusions can be made regarding the safest and the most effective form of oral analgesia for post-caesarean pain. Further studies are necessary.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Analgesia; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Analgesics, Opioid; Cesarean Section; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Pain, Postoperative; Pregnancy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 25821010
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010450.pub2 -
PloS One 2012Inappropriate medication prescription is a common cause of preventable adverse drug events among elderly persons in the primary care setting. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Inappropriate medication prescription is a common cause of preventable adverse drug events among elderly persons in the primary care setting.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this systematic review is to quantify the extent of inappropriate prescription to elderly persons in the primary care setting.
METHODS
We systematically searched Ovid-Medline and Ovid-EMBASE from 1950 and 1980 respectively to March 2012. Two independent reviewers screened and selected primary studies published in English that measured (in)appropriate medication prescription among elderly persons (>65 years) in the primary care setting. We extracted data sources, instruments for assessing medication prescription appropriateness, and the rate of inappropriate medication prescriptions. We grouped the reported individual medications according to the Anatomical Therapeutic and Chemical (ATC) classification and compared the median rate of inappropriate medication prescription and its range within each therapeutic class.
RESULTS
We included 19 studies, 14 of which used the Beers criteria as the instrument for assessing appropriateness of prescriptions. The median rate of inappropriate medication prescriptions (IMP) was 20.5% [IQR 18.1 to 25.6%.]. Medications with largest median rate of inappropriate medication prescriptions were propoxyphene 4.52 (0.10-23.30)%, doxazosin 3.96 (0.32 15.70)%, diphenhydramine 3.30 (0.02-4.40)% and amitriptiline 3.20 (0.05-20.5)% in a decreasing order of IMP rate. Available studies described unequal sets of medications and different measurement tools to estimate the overall prevalence of inappropriate prescription.
CONCLUSIONS
Approximately one in five prescriptions to elderly persons in primary care is inappropropriate despite the attention that has been directed to quality of prescription. Diphenhydramine and amitriptiline are the most common inappropriately prescribed medications with high risk adverse events while propoxyphene and doxazoxin are the most commonly prescribed medications with low risk adverse events. These medications are good candidates for being targeted for improvement e.g. by computerized clinical decision support.
Topics: Aged; Humans; Inappropriate Prescribing; Primary Health Care
PubMed: 22928004
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043617