-
Cell Reports Jul 2023Protein phosphorylation modification is crucial for signaling transduction in plant development and environmental adaptation. By precisely phosphorylating crucial... (Review)
Review
Protein phosphorylation modification is crucial for signaling transduction in plant development and environmental adaptation. By precisely phosphorylating crucial components in signaling cascades, plants can switch on and off the specific signaling pathways needed for growth or defense. Here, we have summarized recent findings of key phosphorylation events in typical hormone signaling and stress responses. More interestingly, distinct phosphorylation patterns on proteins result in diverse biological functions of these proteins. Thus, we have also highlighted latest findings that show how the different phosphosites of a protein, also named phosphocodes, determine the specificity of downstream signaling in both plant development and stress responses.
Topics: Phosphorylation; Signal Transduction; Plants; Plant Development; Plant Proteins
PubMed: 37405922
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112729 -
Molecular Cell Jun 2022Protein phosphorylation is a reversible post-translational modification. Nine of the 20 natural amino acids in proteins can be phosphorylated, but most of what we know... (Review)
Review
Protein phosphorylation is a reversible post-translational modification. Nine of the 20 natural amino acids in proteins can be phosphorylated, but most of what we know about the roles of protein phosphorylation has come from studies of serine, threonine, and tyrosine phosphorylation. Much less is understood about the phosphorylation of histidine, lysine, arginine, cysteine, aspartate, and glutamate, so-called non-canonical phosphorylations. Phosphohistidine (pHis) was discovered 60 years ago as a mitochondrial enzyme intermediate; since then, evidence for the existence of histidine kinases and phosphohistidine phosphatases has emerged, together with examples where protein function is regulated by reversible histidine phosphorylation. pHis is chemically unstable and has thus been challenging to study. However, the recent development of tools for studying pHis has accelerated our understanding of the multifaceted functions of histidine phosphorylation, revealing a large number of proteins that are phosphorylated on histidine and implicating pHis in a wide range of cellular processes.
Topics: Histidine; Phosphorylation; Phosphotyrosine; Proteins
PubMed: 35654043
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.05.007 -
Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism &... Aug 2009The expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes CYPs is controlled by pregnane X receptor (PXR), and, therefore, understanding how PXR modulates CYP expression is important... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes CYPs is controlled by pregnane X receptor (PXR), and, therefore, understanding how PXR modulates CYP expression is important to minimize adverse drug interactions, one type of preventable adverse drug reaction.
OBJECTIVE
We review the mechanisms of PXR-mediated repression of CYP expression.
METHODS
We discuss the clinical implications of CYP repression and the role of signal cross-talks, including protein-protein interactions and phosphorylation of PXR and coregulators, in inhibiting PXR and repressing CYP expression.
RESULTS/CONCLUSION
Kinases such as cyclin-dependent kinase 2, protein kinase A, PKC and 70 kDa form of ribosomal protein S6 kinase repress CYP expression by phosphorylating and inhibiting PXR. Growth factor signaling represses CYP expression by phosphorylating and inhibiting forkhead in rhabdomyosarcoma, a co-activator of PXR. During inflammation, NF-kappaB represses both PXR and CYP expression through protein-protein interactions with the PXR pathway.
Topics: Animals; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Phosphorylation; Pregnane X Receptor; Proteins; Receptors, Steroid; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 19505191
DOI: 10.1517/17425250903012360 -
Essays in Biochemistry Dec 2022Phosphorylation is the most common post-translational modification (PTM) in eukaryotes, occurring particularly frequently in intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs)....
Phosphorylation is the most common post-translational modification (PTM) in eukaryotes, occurring particularly frequently in intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). These proteins are highly flexible and dynamic by nature. Thus, it is intriguing that the addition of a single phosphoryl group to a disordered chain can impact its function so dramatically. Furthermore, as many IDPs carry multiple phosphorylation sites, the number of possible states increases, enabling larger complexities and novel mechanisms. Although a chemically simple and well-understood process, the impact of phosphorylation on the conformational ensemble and molecular function of IDPs, not to mention biological output, is highly complex and diverse. Since the discovery of the first phosphorylation site in proteins 75 years ago, we have come to a much better understanding of how this PTM works, but with the diversity of IDPs and their capacity for carrying multiple phosphoryl groups, the complexity grows. In this Essay, we highlight some of the basic effects of IDP phosphorylation, allowing it to serve as starting point when embarking on studies into this topic. We further describe how recent complex cases of multisite phosphorylation of IDPs have been instrumental in widening our view on the effect of protein phosphorylation. Finally, we put forward perspectives on the phosphorylation of IDPs, both in relation to disease and in context of other PTMs; areas where deep insight remains to be uncovered.
Topics: Intrinsically Disordered Proteins; Phosphorylation; Protein Processing, Post-Translational; Protein Conformation
PubMed: 36350035
DOI: 10.1042/EBC20220060 -
The Plant Journal : For Cell and... Apr 2022Heterotrimeric G proteins, comprised of Gα, Gβ and Gγ subunits, influence signaling in most eukaryotes. In metazoans, G proteins are activated by...
Heterotrimeric G proteins, comprised of Gα, Gβ and Gγ subunits, influence signaling in most eukaryotes. In metazoans, G proteins are activated by G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated GDP to GTP exchange on Gα; however, the role(s) of GPCRs in regulating plant G-protein signaling remains equivocal. Mounting evidence suggests the involvement of receptor-like kinases (RLKs) in regulating plant G-protein signaling, but their mechanistic details remain scarce. We have previously shown that during Glycine max (soybean) nodulation, the nod factor receptor 1 (NFR1) interacts with G-protein components and indirectly affects signaling. We explored the direct regulation of G-protein signaling by RLKs using protein-protein interactions, receptor-mediated in vitro phosphorylations and the effects of such phosphorylations on soybean nodule formation. Results presented in this study demonstrate a direct, phosphorylation-based regulation of Gα by symbiosis receptor kinase (SymRK). SymRKs interact with and phosphorylate Gα at multiple residues in vitro, including two in its active site, which abolishes GTP binding. Additionally, phospho-mimetic Gα fails to interact with Gβγ, potentially allowing for constitutive signaling by the freed Gβγ. These results uncover an unusual mechanism of G-protein cycle regulation in plants where the receptor-mediated phosphorylation of Gα not only affects its activity but also influences the availability of its signaling partners, thereby exerting a two-pronged check on signaling.
Topics: Heterotrimeric GTP-Binding Proteins; Phosphorylation; Signal Transduction; Glycine max; Symbiosis
PubMed: 35048428
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.15672 -
Molecular Pharmacology Apr 2022The family of AGC kinases not only regulates cellular biology by phosphorylating substrates but is itself controlled by phosphorylation. Phosphorylation generally occurs... (Review)
Review
The family of AGC kinases not only regulates cellular biology by phosphorylating substrates but is itself controlled by phosphorylation. Phosphorylation generally occurs at two conserved regions in these kinases: a loop near the entrance to the active site, termed the activation loop, that correctly aligns residues for catalysis, and a C-terminal tail whose phosphorylation at a site termed the hydrophobic motif stabilizes the active conformation. Whereas phosphorylation of the activation loop is well established to be catalyzed by the phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1, the mechanism of phosphorylation of the C-tail hydrophobic motif has been controversial. For a subset of AGC kinases, which include most protein kinase C (PKC) isozymes and Akt, phosphorylation of the hydrophobic motif in cells was shown to depend on mTORC2 over 15 years ago, yet whether this was by direct phosphorylation or by another mechanism has remained elusive. The recent identification of a novel and evolutionarily conserved phosphorylation site on the C-tail, termed the TOR interaction motif (TIM), has finally unraveled the mystery of how mTORC2 regulates its client kinases. mTORC2 does not directly phosphorylate the hydrophobic motif; instead, it converts kinases such as PKC and Akt into a conformation that can ultimately autophosphorylate at the hydrophobic motif. Identification of the direct mTOR phosphorylation that facilitates autoregulation of the C-tail hydrophobic motif revises the activation mechanisms of mTOR-regulated AGC kinases. This new twist to an old tail opens avenues for therapeutic intervention. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The enzyme mTORC2 has been an enigmatic regulator of AGC kinases such as protein kinase C (PKC) and Akt. The recent discovery of a motif named the TOR interaction motif in the C-tail of these kinases solves the mystery: mTORC2 marks these kinases for maturity by, ultimately, facilitating autophosphorylation of another C-tail site, the hydrophobic motif.
Topics: Humans; Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 2; Phosphorylation; Protein Kinase C; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases
PubMed: 34155089
DOI: 10.1124/molpharm.121.000310 -
Nuclear Receptor Signaling May 2007Although the primary signal for the activation of steroid hormone receptors is binding of hormone, there is increasing evidence that the activities of cell signaling... (Review)
Review
Although the primary signal for the activation of steroid hormone receptors is binding of hormone, there is increasing evidence that the activities of cell signaling pathways and the phosphorylation status of these transcription factors and their coregulators determine the overall response to the hormone. In some cases, enhanced cell signaling is sufficient to cause activation of receptors in medium depleted of steroids. Steroid receptors are targets for multiple kinases. Many of the phosphorylation sites contain Ser/Thr-Pro motifs implicating proline-directed kinases such as the cyclin-dependent kinases and the mitogen-activated kinases (MAPK) in receptor phosphorylation. Although some sites are constitutively phosphorylated, others are phosphorylated in response to hormone. Still others are only phosphorylated in response to specific cell signaling pathways. Phosphorylation of specific sites has been implicated not only in overall transcriptional activity, but also in nuclear localization, protein stability, and DNA binding. The studies of the roles of phosphorylation in coregulator function are more limited, but it is now well established that many of them are highly phosphorylated and that phosphorylation regulates their function. There is good evidence that some of the phosphorylation sites in the receptors and coregulators are targets of multiple signaling pathways. Individual sites have been associated both with functions that enhance the activity of the receptor, as well as with functions that inhibit activity. Thus, the specific combinations of phosphorylations of the steroid receptor combined with the expression levels and phosphorylation status of coregulators will determine the genes regulated and the biological response.
Topics: Cell Nucleus; Feedback; Gonadal Steroid Hormones; Models, Biological; Nuclear Proteins; Phosphorylation; Phosphotransferases; Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 17525795
DOI: 10.1621/nrs.05005 -
Microbiology and Molecular Biology... Jun 2014The bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP):carbohydrate phosphotransferase system (PTS) carries out both catalytic and regulatory functions. It catalyzes the transport and... (Review)
Review
The bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate:carbohydrate phosphotransferase system: regulation by protein phosphorylation and phosphorylation-dependent protein-protein interactions.
The bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP):carbohydrate phosphotransferase system (PTS) carries out both catalytic and regulatory functions. It catalyzes the transport and phosphorylation of a variety of sugars and sugar derivatives but also carries out numerous regulatory functions related to carbon, nitrogen, and phosphate metabolism, to chemotaxis, to potassium transport, and to the virulence of certain pathogens. For these different regulatory processes, the signal is provided by the phosphorylation state of the PTS components, which varies according to the availability of PTS substrates and the metabolic state of the cell. PEP acts as phosphoryl donor for enzyme I (EI), which, together with HPr and one of several EIIA and EIIB pairs, forms a phosphorylation cascade which allows phosphorylation of the cognate carbohydrate bound to the membrane-spanning EIIC. HPr of firmicutes and numerous proteobacteria is also phosphorylated in an ATP-dependent reaction catalyzed by the bifunctional HPr kinase/phosphorylase. PTS-mediated regulatory mechanisms are based either on direct phosphorylation of the target protein or on phosphorylation-dependent interactions. For regulation by PTS-mediated phosphorylation, the target proteins either acquired a PTS domain by fusing it to their N or C termini or integrated a specific, conserved PTS regulation domain (PRD) or, alternatively, developed their own specific sites for PTS-mediated phosphorylation. Protein-protein interactions can occur with either phosphorylated or unphosphorylated PTS components and can either stimulate or inhibit the function of the target proteins. This large variety of signal transduction mechanisms allows the PTS to regulate numerous proteins and to form a vast regulatory network responding to the phosphorylation state of various PTS components.
Topics: Bacteria; Bacterial Proteins; Biological Transport; Carbohydrate Metabolism; Phosphoenolpyruvate; Phosphorylation; Phosphotransferases; Protein Binding
PubMed: 24847021
DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00001-14 -
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology Jan 2022Loading of the eukaryotic replicative helicase onto replication origins involves two MCM hexamers forming a double hexamer (DH) around duplex DNA. During S phase,...
Loading of the eukaryotic replicative helicase onto replication origins involves two MCM hexamers forming a double hexamer (DH) around duplex DNA. During S phase, helicase activation requires MCM phosphorylation by Dbf4-dependent kinase (DDK), comprising Cdc7 and Dbf4. DDK selectively phosphorylates loaded DHs, but how such fidelity is achieved is unknown. Here, we determine the cryogenic electron microscopy structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DDK in the act of phosphorylating a DH. DDK docks onto one MCM ring and phosphorylates the opposed ring. Truncation of the Dbf4 docking domain abrogates DH phosphorylation, yet Cdc7 kinase activity is unaffected. Late origin firing is blocked in response to DNA damage via Dbf4 phosphorylation by the Rad53 checkpoint kinase. DDK phosphorylation by Rad53 impairs DH phosphorylation by blockage of DDK binding to DHs, and also interferes with the Cdc7 active site. Our results explain the structural basis and regulation of the selective phosphorylation of DNA-loaded MCM DHs, which supports bidirectional replication.
Topics: Amino Acid Sequence; Cell Cycle Proteins; Checkpoint Kinase 2; DNA, Fungal; Minichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 4; Molecular Docking Simulation; Nucleotides; Phosphorylation; Protein Multimerization; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins; Substrate Specificity
PubMed: 34963704
DOI: 10.1038/s41594-021-00698-z -
The Journal of Biological Chemistry Oct 2013Pho85 is a versatile cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) found in budding yeast that regulates a myriad of eukaryotic cellular functions in concert with 10 cyclins (called...
Pho85 is a versatile cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) found in budding yeast that regulates a myriad of eukaryotic cellular functions in concert with 10 cyclins (called Pcls). Unlike cell cycle CDKs that require phosphorylation of a serine/threonine residue by a CDK-activating kinase (CAK) for full activation, Pho85 requires no phosphorylation despite the presence of an equivalent residue. The Pho85-Pcl10 complex is a key regulator of glycogen metabolism by phosphorylating the substrate Gsy2, the predominant, nutritionally regulated form of glycogen synthase. Here we report the crystal structures of Pho85-Pcl10 and its complex with the ATP analog, ATPγS. The structure solidified the mechanism for bypassing CDK phosphorylation to achieve full catalytic activity. An aspartate residue, invariant in all Pcls, acts as a surrogate for the phosphoryl adduct of the phosphorylated, fully activated CDK2, the prototypic cell cycle CDK, complexed with cyclin A. Unlike the canonical recognition motif, SPX(K/R), of phosphorylation sites of substrates of several cell cycle CDKs, the motif in the Gys2 substrate of Pho85-Pcl10 is SPXX. CDK5, an important signal transducer in neural development and the closest known functional homolog of Pho85, does not require phosphorylation either, and we found that in its crystal structure complexed with p25 cyclin a water/hydroxide molecule remarkably plays a similar role to the phosphoryl or aspartate group. Comparison between Pho85-Pcl10, phosphorylated CDK2-cyclin A, and CDK5-p25 complexes reveals the convergent structural characteristics necessary for full kinase activity and the variations in the substrate recognition mechanism.
Topics: Adenosine Triphosphate; Amino Acid Motifs; Cyclin A; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2; Cyclin-Dependent Kinases; Cyclins; Phosphorylation; Protein Structure, Quaternary; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins; Signal Transduction; Structure-Activity Relationship
PubMed: 24022486
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.502773