-
International Journal of Environmental... Oct 2022Rehabilitation is a crucial part of recovery for stroke survivors, and numerous studies have examined various exercises and treatments of stroke. In addition, it is very... (Review)
Review
Rehabilitation is a crucial part of recovery for stroke survivors, and numerous studies have examined various exercises and treatments of stroke. In addition, it is very important for patients to choose the timing of rehabilitation and what kind of rehabilitation they will proceed with. The purpose of the current study is to examine research investigating the effects of rehabilitation exercise programs in recovery of physical function in patients with stroke, based on aspects of their physical function, physical strength, and daily activities, and systematically examine their effects. Therefore, through systematic review, we have investigated the effects of interventions in rehabilitation exercise programs for recovery of physical function in patients with stroke. We collected relevant publications through the databases MEDLINE/PubMed and Google scholar. Twenty-one articles were ultimately selected for the analysis. We classified the rehabilitation programs and identified the trends of treatment for stroke survivors. Our review indicated that task-oriented therapy is still dominant, but various types of combined rehabilitations have been attempted. In addition, it was identified that physical and active rehabilitation were required rather than unconditional rest, even at an early stage. Home-based treatment was used for rapid recovery and adaptation to daily life during the mid-term period.
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Exercise; Exercise Therapy; Humans; Stroke; Stroke Rehabilitation
PubMed: 36232038
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912739 -
Current Atherosclerosis Reports Nov 2017Despite current rehabilitative strategies, stroke remains a leading cause of disability in the USA. There is a window of enhanced neuroplasticity early after stroke,... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Despite current rehabilitative strategies, stroke remains a leading cause of disability in the USA. There is a window of enhanced neuroplasticity early after stroke, during which the brain's dynamic response to injury is heightened and rehabilitation might be particularly effective. This review summarizes the evidence of the existence of this plastic window, and the evidence regarding safety and efficacy of early rehabilitative strategies for several stroke domain-specific deficits.
RECENT FINDINGS
Overall, trials of rehabilitation in the first 2 weeks after stroke are scarce. In the realm of very early mobilization, one large and one small trial found potential harm from mobilizing patients within the first 24 h after stroke, and only one small trial found benefit in doing so. For the upper extremity, constraint-induced movement therapy appears to have benefit when started within 2 weeks of stroke. Evidence for non-invasive brain stimulation in the acute period remains scant and inconclusive. For aphasia, the evidence is mixed, but intensive early therapy might be of benefit for patients with severe aphasia. Mirror therapy begun early after stroke shows promise for the alleviation of neglect. Novel approaches to treating dysphagia early after stroke appear promising, but the high rate of spontaneous improvement makes their benefit difficult to gauge. The optimal time to begin rehabilitation after a stroke remains unsettled, though the evidence is mounting that for at least some deficits, initiation of rehabilitative strategies within the first 2 weeks of stroke is beneficial. Commencing intensive therapy in the first 24 h may be harmful.
Topics: Animals; Brain; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease Models, Animal; Humans; Neuronal Plasticity; Physical Therapy Modalities; Recovery of Function; Stroke; Stroke Rehabilitation; Time Factors
PubMed: 29116473
DOI: 10.1007/s11883-017-0686-6 -
Nature Reviews. Neurology Feb 2011Approximately one-third of patients with stroke exhibit persistent disability after the initial cerebrovascular episode, with motor impairments accounting for most... (Review)
Review
Approximately one-third of patients with stroke exhibit persistent disability after the initial cerebrovascular episode, with motor impairments accounting for most poststroke disability. Exercise and training have long been used to restore motor function after stroke. Better training strategies and therapies to enhance the effects of these rehabilitative protocols are currently being developed for poststroke disability. The advancement of our understanding of the neuroplastic changes associated with poststroke motor impairment and the innate mechanisms of repair is crucial to this endeavor. Pharmaceutical, biological and electrophysiological treatments that augment neuroplasticity are being explored to further extend the boundaries of poststroke rehabilitation. Potential motor rehabilitation therapies, such as stem cell therapy, exogenous tissue engineering and brain-computer interface technologies, could be integral in helping patients with stroke regain motor control. As the methods for providing motor rehabilitation change, the primary goals of poststroke rehabilitation will be driven by the activity and quality of life needs of individual patients. This Review aims to provide a focused overview of neuroplasticity associated with poststroke motor impairment, and the latest experimental interventions being developed to manipulate neuroplasticity to enhance motor rehabilitation.
Topics: Disabled Persons; Exercise Therapy; Humans; Motor Activity; Neuronal Plasticity; Recovery of Function; Stroke; Stroke Rehabilitation
PubMed: 21243015
DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2010.200 -
The Journal of Head Trauma... 2019To characterize the indications, timing, barriers, and perceived value of rehabilitation currently provided for individuals with moderate or severe traumatic brain...
OBJECTIVE
To characterize the indications, timing, barriers, and perceived value of rehabilitation currently provided for individuals with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) based on the perspectives of providers who work in the ICU setting.
PARTICIPANTS
Members (n = 66) of the Neurocritical Care Society and the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.
DESIGN
An anonymous electronic survey of the timing of rehabilitation for patients with TBI in the ICU.
MAIN MEASURES
Questions asked about type and timing of rehabilitation in the ICU, extent of family involvement, participation of physiatrists in patient care, and barriers to early rehabilitation.
RESULTS
Sixty-six respondents who reported caring for patients with TBI in the ICU completed the survey; 98% recommended rehabilitative care while patients were in the ICU. Common reasons to wait for the initiation of physical therapy and occupational therapy were normalization of intracranial pressure (86% and 89%) and hemodynamic stability (66% and 69%).
CONCLUSIONS
The majority of providers caring for patients with TBI in the ICU support rehabilitation efforts, typically after a patient is extubated, intracranial pressure has normalized, and the patient is hemodynamically stable. Our findings describe current practice; future studies can be designed to determine optimal timing, intensity, and patient selection for early rehabilitation.
Topics: Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Clinical Decision-Making; Hemodynamics; Hospitalization; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Intracranial Pressure; Occupational Therapy; Patient Care Team; Physical Therapy Modalities; Speech Therapy; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time-to-Treatment
PubMed: 30829824
DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000477 -
CA: a Cancer Journal For Clinicians Mar 2021Guidelines promote high quality cancer care. Rehabilitation recommendations in oncology guidelines have not been characterized and may provide insight to improve...
Guidelines promote high quality cancer care. Rehabilitation recommendations in oncology guidelines have not been characterized and may provide insight to improve integration of rehabilitation into oncology care. This report was developed as a part of the World Health Organization (WHO) Rehabilitation 2030 initiative to identify rehabilitation-specific recommendations in guidelines for oncology care. A systematic review of guidelines was conducted. Only guidelines published in English, for adults with cancer, providing recommendations for rehabilitation referral and assessment or interventions between 2009 and 2019 were included. 13840 articles were identified. After duplicates and applied filters, 4897 articles were screened. 69 guidelines were identified with rehabilitation-specific recommendations. Thirty-seven of the 69 guidelines endorsed referral to rehabilitation services but provided no specific recommendations regarding assessment or interventions. Thirty-two of the 69 guidelines met the full inclusion criteria and were assessed using the AGREE II tool. Twenty-one of these guidelines achieved an AGREE II quality score of ≥ 45 and were fully extracted. Guidelines exclusive to pharmacologic interventions and complementary and alternative interventions were excluded. Findings identify guidelines that recommend rehabilitation services across many cancer types and for various consequences of cancer treatment signifying that rehabilitation is a recognized component of oncology care. However, these findings are at odds with clinical reports of low rehabilitation utilization rates suggesting that guideline recommendations may be overlooked. Considering that functional morbidity negatively affects a majority of cancer survivors, improving guideline concordant rehabilitative care could have substantial impact on function and quality of life among cancer survivors.
Topics: Cancer Survivors; Exercise Therapy; Humans; Medical Oncology; Neoplasms; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Quality of Life; Survivorship
PubMed: 33107982
DOI: 10.3322/caac.21639 -
European Journal of Physical and... Jun 2020The improvement of the upper limb disability, which is mainly caused by stroke, is still one of the rehabilitation treatment challenges. However, the effectiveness of... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
The improvement of the upper limb disability, which is mainly caused by stroke, is still one of the rehabilitation treatment challenges. However, the effectiveness of task-based mirror therapy (TBMT) on subacute stroke with moderate and severe upper limb impairment has not been deeply explored.
AIM
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of TBMT, in comparison to occupational therapy, in moderate and severe upper limb impairment by analyzing the motor function and activities of daily living in subacute stroke patients.
DESIGN
A randomized controlled trial.
SETTING
Rehabilitative inpatient unit.
POPULATION
Thirty patients with moderate and severe-subacute stroke recruited from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University have been randomly divided into two groups; the task-based mirror therapy group (N.=15) and the control group (N.=15).
METHODS
The first group received TBMT while the control group only underwent only occupational therapy without a mirror utilization. Taking into consideration that both groups received conventional therapy. The intervention time was equal for both groups consisting of 25 minutes per day for 25 days. Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Brunnstrom Assessment (BRS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), and Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) were used to assess the outcomes for this study.
RESULTS
After 25 sessions of treatment, the patients in both groups have shown-improvement in the activates of daily living, motor recovery, and motor function. No significant differences between the two groups were observed on BRS and MBI. However, interestingly, the results of the TBMT group were significantly better than the control group in FMA (P<0.05) and certain aspects of MAS (elbow flexion, wrist flexion, wrist extension, and fingers extension with P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
This study shows that the combination of conventional rehabilitation treatment and TBMT is an effective way to improve the functional recovery in the upper limb stroke patients.
CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT
TBMT is a therapeutic technique that can be used in subacute stroke patients with moderate and severe upper limb impairment.
Topics: Adult; Disability Evaluation; Feedback, Sensory; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Occupational Therapy; Paresis; Psychomotor Performance; Recovery of Function; Single-Blind Method; Stroke Rehabilitation; Upper Extremity
PubMed: 32214062
DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06070-0 -
Clinical Interventions in Aging 2019After hospitalization, 11% of the older patients are referred to rehabilitation facilities. Nowadays, there is a trend to formalize the rehabilitation process for these... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
After hospitalization, 11% of the older patients are referred to rehabilitation facilities. Nowadays, there is a trend to formalize the rehabilitation process for these patients in a Challenging Rehabilitation Environment (CRE). This concept involves the comprehensive organization of care, support and the environment on a rehabilitation ward. However, since literature on the principles of CRE is scarce, this review aimed to explore and describe the principles of CRE.
METHODS
A search was made in PubMed for relevant literature concerning CRE. Then, articles were hand searched for relevant keywords (ie, task-oriented training, therapy intensity, patient-led therapy, group training), references were identified, and topics categorized.
RESULTS
After evaluating 51 articles, 7 main topics of CRE were identified: 1) Therapy time; ie, the level of (physical) activity; the intensity of therapy and activity is related to rehabilitation outcomes, 2) group training; used to increase practice time and can be used to achieve multiple goals (eg, activities of daily living, mobility), 3) patient-regulated exercise; increases the level of self-management and practice time, 4) family participation; may lead to increased practice time and have a positive effect on rehabilitation outcomes, 5) task-oriented training; in addition to therapy, nurses can stimulate rehabilitants to perform meaningful tasks that improve functional outcomes, 6) enriched environment; this challenges rehabilitants to be active in social and physical activities, and 7) team dynamics; shared goals during rehabilitation and good communication in a transdisciplinary team improve the quality of rehabilitation.
DISCUSSION
This is the first description of CRE based on literature; however, the included studies discussed rehabilitation mainly after stroke and for few other diagnostic groups.
CONCLUSION
Seven main topics related to CRE were identified that may help patients to improve their rehabilitation outcomes. Further research on the concept and effectivity of CRE is necessary.
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Health Services for the Aged; Humans; Patient Care Team; Rehabilitation; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31496672
DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S207863 -
European Journal of Physical and... Sep 2012Acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (Guillain-Barré syndrome, GBS) can be a significant cause of new long-term disability, which is thought to be amenable... (Review)
Review
Acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (Guillain-Barré syndrome, GBS) can be a significant cause of new long-term disability, which is thought to be amenable to rehabilitation. Rehabilitation is an expensive resource and the evidence to support its justification is urgently needed. This systematic review presents an evidence-based overview of the effectiveness of various rehabilitation interventions in adults with GBS and the outcomes that are affected. Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, PEDro, LILACS and the Cochrane Library were searched up to March 2012 for studies reporting outcomes of GBS patients following rehabilitation interventions that addressed functional restoration and participation. Two reviewers applied the inclusion criteria to select potential studies and independently extracted data and assessed the methodological quality. Included studies were critically appraised using GRADE methodological quality approach. Formal levels of evidence of each intervention were assigned using a standard format defined by National Health and Medical Research Council. Fourteen papers (one systematic review, one randomized controlled trial, one case-control study, five cohort studies and six case series/reports) that described a range of rehabilitation interventions for persons with GBS were evaluated for the "best" evidence to date. One high quality randomised controlled trial demonstrated effectiveness of higher intensity multidisciplinary ambulatory rehabilitation in reducing disability in persons with GBS in the later stages of recovery, compared with lesser intensity rehabilitation intervention for up to 12 months. Four observational studies, further demonstrated some support for improved disability and quality of life following inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation up to 12 months. Evidence for uni-disciplinary rehabilitation interventions is limited, with 'satisfactory' evidence for physical therapy in reducing fatigue, improving function and quality of life in persons with GBS. This review provides "good" evidence to support multidisciplinary rehabilitative intervention in adults with GBS; and "satisfactory" evidence for physical therapy in these patients. Evidence for other uni-disciplinary interventions is limited or inconclusive. The gaps in existing research should not be interpreted as ineffectiveness of rehabilitation intervention in GBS. Further research is needed with appropriate study designs, outcome measurement, type of modalities and cost-effectiveness of these interventions.
Topics: Disability Evaluation; Guillain-Barre Syndrome; Humans; Physical Therapy Modalities
PubMed: 22820829
DOI: No ID Found -
Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation... Jun 2016Rehabilitation is widely recommended in national and international guidelines for managing osteoarthritis (OA) in primary care settings. According to the 2014 OA... (Review)
Review
Rehabilitation is widely recommended in national and international guidelines for managing osteoarthritis (OA) in primary care settings. According to the 2014 OA Research Society International (OARSI) recommendations, rehabilitation is even considered the core treatment of OA and is recommended for all patients. Rehabilitation for OA widely includes land- and water-based exercise, strength training, weight management, self-management and education, biomechanical interventions, and physically active lifestyle. We performed a critical narrative review of the efficacy and safety of rehabilitation for managing OA and discuss evidence-based international recommendations. The process of article selection was unsystematic. Articles were selected based on authors' expertise, self-knowledge, and reflective practice. For the purpose of the review, we focused on land- and water-based exercise and strength training for knee, hip and hand OA. Other aspects of rehabilitation in OA are treated elsewhere in this special issue. Exercise therapy is widely recommended for managing knee, hip and hand OA. However, the level of evidence varies according to OA location. Overall, consistent evidence suggests that exercise therapy and specific strengthening exercise or strength training for the lower limb reduce pain and improve physical function in knee OA. Evidence for other OA sites are less consistent. Therefore, because of the lack of specific studies, recommendations for hip and hand OA are mainly derived from studies of knee OA. In addition, no recommendations have been established regarding the exercise regimen. The efficacy and safety of exercise therapy and strength training need to be further evaluated in randomized controlled trials of patients with hip and hand OA. The optimal delivery of exercise programs also has to be more clearly defined.
Topics: Evidence-Based Medicine; Exercise Therapy; Humans; Osteoarthritis; Resistance Training; Self Care
PubMed: 27155923
DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2016.02.010 -
Journal of Physiotherapy Apr 2020
Topics: Humans; Neoplasms; Physical Therapy Modalities; Rehabilitation; Survivors
PubMed: 32291229
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphys.2020.03.004