-
Mobile Genetic Elements 2016Occupying 17% of human genome, the mobile long interspersed element 1 (LINE-1 or L1) continues to modulate the landscape of our genome by inserting into new loci and, as...
Occupying 17% of human genome, the mobile long interspersed element 1 (LINE-1 or L1) continues to modulate the landscape of our genome by inserting into new loci and, as a result, causing sporadic diseases. It is not surprising that human cells have evolved a battery of mechanisms to control and limit the activity of LINE-1. Our recent study unravels such a mechanism that is imposed by the stress granule pathway. This mechanism functions by sequestering the LINE-1 RNA-protein complex within the cytoplasmic stress granules and thus inhibiting the nuclear import of LINE-1 RNA and its subsequent reverse transcription and integration into cellular DNA. Conditions that promote stress granule formation, such as expression of the SAMHD1 protein, further reduce LINE-1 retrotransposition.
PubMed: 27066303
DOI: 10.1080/2159256X.2015.1133267 -
Proceedings of the National Academy of... Jul 2023Retrotransposons and retroviruses shape genome evolution and can negatively impact genome function. and its close relatives harbor several families of...
Retrotransposons and retroviruses shape genome evolution and can negatively impact genome function. and its close relatives harbor several families of LTR-retrotransposons, the most abundant being Ty1 in several laboratory strains. The cytosolic foci that nucleate Ty1 virus-like particle (VLP) assembly are not well understood. These foci, termed retrosomes or T-bodies, contain Ty1 Gag and likely Gag-Pol and the Ty1 mRNA destined for reverse transcription. Here, we report an intrinsically disordered N-terminal ion-ike omain (PrLD) within Gag that is required for transposition. This domain contains amino acid composition similar to known yeast prions and is sufficient to nucleate prionogenesis in an established cell-based prion reporter system. Deleting the Ty1 PrLD results in dramatic VLP assembly and retrotransposition defects but does not affect Gag protein level. Ty1 Gag chimeras in which the PrLD is replaced with other sequences, including yeast and mammalian prionogenic domains, display a range of retrotransposition phenotypes from wild type to null. We examine these chimeras throughout the Ty1 replication cycle and find that some support retrosome formation, VLP assembly, and retrotransposition, including the yeast Sup35 prion and the mouse PrP prion. Our interchangeable Ty1 system provides a useful, genetically tractable in vivo platform for studying PrLDs, complete with a suite of robust and sensitive assays. Our work also invites study into the prevalence of PrLDs in additional mobile elements.
Topics: Animals; Mice; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Retroelements; RNA, Messenger; Gene Products, gag; Virus Assembly; Mammals
PubMed: 37459521
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2303358120 -
Nucleic Acids Research May 2023The long interspersed element 1 (LINE-1 or L1) integration is affected by many cellular factors through various mechanisms. Some of these factors are required for L1...
The long interspersed element 1 (LINE-1 or L1) integration is affected by many cellular factors through various mechanisms. Some of these factors are required for L1 amplification, while others either suppress or enhance specific steps during L1 propagation. Previously, TRIM28 has been identified to suppress transposable elements, including L1 expression via its canonical role in chromatin remodeling. Here, we report that TRIM28 through its B box domain increases L1 retrotransposition and facilitates shorter cDNA and L1 insert generation in cultured cells. Consistent with the latter, we observe that tumor specific L1 inserts are shorter in endometrial, ovarian, and prostate tumors with higher TRIM28 mRNA expression than in those with lower TRIM28 expression. We determine that three amino acids in the B box domain that are involved in TRIM28 multimerization are critical for its effect on both L1 retrotransposition and cDNA synthesis. We provide evidence that B boxes from the other two members in the Class VI TRIM proteins, TRIM24 and TRIM33, also increase L1 retrotransposition. Our findings could lead to a better understanding of the host/L1 evolutionary arms race in the germline and their interplay during tumorigenesis.
Topics: DNA, Complementary; Long Interspersed Nucleotide Elements; Humans; Tripartite Motif-Containing Protein 28
PubMed: 37070200
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad247 -
The FEBS Journal Jan 2014Retrotransposons have played a central role in human genome evolution. The accumulation of heritable L1, Alu and SVA retrotransposon insertions continues to generate... (Review)
Review
Retrotransposons have played a central role in human genome evolution. The accumulation of heritable L1, Alu and SVA retrotransposon insertions continues to generate structural variation within and between populations, and can result in spontaneous genetic disease. Recent works have reported somatic L1 retrotransposition in tumours, which in some cases may contribute to oncogenesis. Intriguingly, L1 mobilization appears to occur almost exclusively in cancers of epithelial cell origin. In this review, we discuss how L1 retrotransposition could potentially trigger neoplastic transformation, based on the established correlation between L1 activity and cellular plasticity, and the proven capacity of L1-mediated insertional mutagenesis to decisively alter gene expression and functional output.
Topics: Animals; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Humans; Neoplasms; Neoplastic Stem Cells; Retroelements
PubMed: 24286172
DOI: 10.1111/febs.12601 -
Virulence Aug 2014Retrotransposons constitute a major part of the genome in a number of eukaryotes. Long-terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are one type of the retrotransposons.... (Review)
Review
Retrotransposons constitute a major part of the genome in a number of eukaryotes. Long-terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are one type of the retrotransposons. Candida albicans have 34 distinct LTR-retrotransposon families. They respectively belong to the Ty1/copia and Ty3/gypsy groups which have been extensively studied in the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. LTR-retrotransposons carry two LTRs flanking a long internal protein-coding domain, open reading frames. LTR-retrotransposons use RNA as intermediate to synthesize double-stranded DNA copies. In this article, we describe the structure feature, retrotransposition mechanism and the influence on organism diversity of LTR retrotransposons in C. albicans. We also discuss the relationship between pathogenicity and LTR retrotransposons in C. albicans.
Topics: Candida albicans; Genetic Variation; Recombination, Genetic; Retroelements; Terminal Repeat Sequences
PubMed: 25101670
DOI: 10.4161/viru.32180 -
PLoS Genetics May 2023Transposable elements constitute nearly half of the mammalian genome and play important roles in genome evolution. While a multitude of both transcriptional and...
Transposable elements constitute nearly half of the mammalian genome and play important roles in genome evolution. While a multitude of both transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms exist to silence transposable elements, control of transposition in vivo remains poorly understood. MOV10, an RNA helicase, is an inhibitor of mobilization of retrotransposons and retroviruses in cell culture assays. Here we report that MOV10 restricts LINE1 retrotransposition in mice. Although MOV10 is broadly expressed, its loss causes only incomplete penetrance of embryonic lethality, and the surviving MOV10-deficient mice are healthy and fertile. Biochemically, MOV10 forms a complex with UPF1, a key component of the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay pathway, and primarily binds to the 3' UTR of somatically expressed transcripts in testis. Consequently, loss of MOV10 results in an altered transcriptome in testis. Analyses using a LINE1 reporter transgene reveal that loss of MOV10 leads to increased LINE1 retrotransposition in somatic and reproductive tissues from both embryos and adult mice. Moreover, the degree of LINE1 retrotransposition inhibition is dependent on the Mov10 gene dosage. Furthermore, MOV10 deficiency reduces reproductive fitness over successive generations. Our findings demonstrate that MOV10 attenuates LINE1 retrotransposition in a dosage-dependent manner in mice.
Topics: Animals; Male; Mice; DNA Transposable Elements; Nonsense Mediated mRNA Decay; Retroelements; RNA Helicases
PubMed: 37126510
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010566 -
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal... Mar 2020The cell culture-based retrotransposition reporter assay has been (and is) an essential tool for the study of vertebrate Long INterspersed Elements (LINEs). Developed...
The cell culture-based retrotransposition reporter assay has been (and is) an essential tool for the study of vertebrate Long INterspersed Elements (LINEs). Developed more than 20 years ago, this assay has been instrumental in characterizing the role of LINE-encoded proteins in retrotransposition, understanding how ribonucleoprotein particles are formed, how host factors regulate LINE mobilization, etc. Moreover, variations of the conventional assay have been developed to investigate the biology of other currently active human retrotransposons, such as Alu and SVA. Here, we describe a protocol that allows combination of the conventional cell culture-based LINE-1 retrotransposition reporter assay with short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and microRNA (miRNAs) mimics or inhibitors, which has allowed us to uncover specific miRNAs and host factors that regulate retrotransposition. The protocol described here is highly reproducible, quantitative, robust and flexible, and allows the study of several small RNA classes and various retrotransposons. To illustrate its utility, here we show that siRNAs to Fanconi anaemia proteins (FANC-A and FANC-C) and an inhibitor of miRNA-20 upregulate and downregulate human L1 retrotransposition, respectively. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Crossroads between transposons and gene regulation'.
Topics: Cell Culture Techniques; Genetic Techniques; Long Interspersed Nucleotide Elements; MicroRNAs; RNA, Small Interfering; Retroelements
PubMed: 32075559
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0346 -
Journal of Virology Oct 2022Long interspersed element type 1 (LINE-1) is the only known type of retroelement that can replicate autonomously, and its retrotransposition activity can trigger...
Long interspersed element type 1 (LINE-1) is the only known type of retroelement that can replicate autonomously, and its retrotransposition activity can trigger interferon (IFN) production. IFN production suppresses the infectivity of exogenous viruses, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). As a counteraction, HIV has been reported to use multiple proteins and mechanisms to suppress LINE-1 replication. However, the mechanisms of HIV-mediated LINE-1 regulation are not fully understood. In this study, we discovered that Nef protein, which is expressed by HIV and is important for HIV pathogenesis, inhibits LINE-1 retrotransposition. Two distinct mechanisms have been uncovered for Nef-induced LINE-1 suppression. Without direct interaction with LINE-1 DNA, Nef potently inhibits the promoter activity of the LINE-1 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR) and reduces the expression levels of LINE-1 RNA and proteins. Alternatively, although Nef does not bind to the LINE-1 open reading frame 1 protein (ORF1p) or LINE-1 RNA, it significantly compromises the ORF1p-LINE-1 RNA interaction, which is essential for LINE-1 retrotransposition. Both mechanisms can be suppressed by the G2A mutation, which abolishes myristoylation of Nef, suggesting that membrane attachment is essential for Nef to suppress LINE-1. Consequently, through LINE-1 inhibition, Nef downregulates IFN production in host cells. Therefore, our data revealed that Nef is a potent LINE-1 suppressor and an effective innate immune regulator, which not only provides new information on the intricate interaction between HIV, LINE-1, and IFN signaling systems but also strengthens the importance of Nef in HIV infection and highlights the potential of designing novel Nef-targeting anti-HIV drugs. Human immunodeficiency viruses are pathogens of AIDS that were first discovered almost 40 years ago and continue to threaten human lives to date. While currently used anti-HIV drugs are sufficient to suppress viral loads in HIV-infected patients, both drug-resistant HIV strains and adverse side effects triggered by the long-term use of these drugs highlight the need to develop novel anti-HIV drugs targeting different viral proteins and/or different steps in viral replication. To achieve this, more information is required regarding HIV pathogenesis and especially its impact on cellular activities in host cells. In this study, we discovered that the Nef protein expressed by HIV potently inhibits LINE-1 retrotransposition. During our attempt to determine the mechanism of Nef-mediated LINE-1 suppression, two additional functions of Nef were uncovered. Nef effectively repressed the promoter activity of LINE-1 5'-UTR and destabilized the interaction between ORF1p and LINE-1 RNA. Consequently, Nef not only compromises LINE-1 replication but also reduces LINE-1-triggered IFN production. The reduction in IFN production, in theory, promotes HIV infectivity. Together with its previously known functions, these findings indicate that Nef is a potential target for the development of novel anti-HIV drugs. Notably, the G2 residue, which has been reported to be essential for most Nef functions, was found to be critical in the regulation of innate immune activation by Nef, suggesting that compromising myristoylation or membrane attachment of Nef may be a good strategy for the inhibition of HIV infection.
Topics: Humans; nef Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus; HIV Infections; Retroelements; HIV-1; Gene Products, nef; Anti-HIV Agents; Interferons; RNA; Untranslated Regions
PubMed: 36197106
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.01148-22 -
Methods (San Diego, Calif.) Nov 2009LINE1s (L1s) are a class of mammalian non-LTR (long terminal repeat) retroelements that make up nearly 20% of the human genome. Because of the difficulty of studying the... (Review)
Review
LINE1s (L1s) are a class of mammalian non-LTR (long terminal repeat) retroelements that make up nearly 20% of the human genome. Because of the difficulty of studying the mobilization of endogenous L1s, an exogenous cell culture retrotransposition assay has become integral to research in L1 biology. This assay has allowed for investigation of the mechanism and consequences of mobilization of this retroelement, both in cell lines and in whole animal models. In this paper, we outline the genesis of in vitro retrotransposition systems which led to the development of the L1 retrotransposition assay in the mid-1990s. We then provide a retrospective, describing the many uses and variations of this assay, ending with caveats and predictions for future developments. Finally, we provide detailed protocols on the application of the retrotransposition assay, including lists of constructs available in the L1 research community and cell lines in which this assay has been applied.
Topics: Animals; Cell Culture Techniques; Cell Line; Chickens; Cricetinae; Genetic Techniques; Humans; Long Interspersed Nucleotide Elements; Mice; Models, Genetic; Mutagenesis, Insertional; Rats
PubMed: 19398011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2009.04.012 -
Genetica 1999Long Interspersed Nuclear Elements (L1s or LINEs) are the most abundant retrotransposons in the human genome, and they comprise approximately 17% of DNA. L1... (Review)
Review
Long Interspersed Nuclear Elements (L1s or LINEs) are the most abundant retrotransposons in the human genome, and they comprise approximately 17% of DNA. L1 retrotransposition can be mutagenic, and deleterious insertions both in the germ-line and in somatic cells have resulted in disease. Recently, an assay was developed to monitor L1 retrotransposition in cultured human cells. This assay, for the first time, now allows for a systematic study of L1 retrotransposition at the molecular level. Here, I will review progress made in L1 biology during the past three years. In general, I will limit the discussion to studies conducted on human L1s. However, interesting parallels to rodent L1s and other non-LTR retrotransposons also will be discussed.
Topics: Cells, Cultured; Humans; Retroelements
PubMed: 10952196
DOI: No ID Found