-
BMJ Open Ophthalmology 2022This review assesses different clinical aspects of the various known drug-induced corneal deposits, based on the corneal layer involved (epithelium, stroma and/or... (Review)
Review
This review assesses different clinical aspects of the various known drug-induced corneal deposits, based on the corneal layer involved (epithelium, stroma and/or endothelium), and based on the drug class. The most well-known condition caused by drug deposits is vortex keratopathy, or corneal verticillata, which is a whorl-like opacity in the corneal epithelium. Vortex keratopathy is commonly caused by certain cationic amphiphilic drugs such as amiodarone, antimalarials, suramin, tamoxifen, chlorpromazine and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. These deposits usually occur once a certain dose of the drug is reached. Most cases present with mild to moderate symptoms with minimal visual impairment. Most of these deposits resolve automatically, after months to years of drug cessation. Notably, other drug classes can cause deposits in all three layers of the cornea. Chlorpromazine, gold, rifabutin, indomethacin and tyrosine kinase inhibitors can cause stromal deposits, with reduced visual acuity when the anterior stroma is involved. Chlorpromazine and rifabutin can also cause deposits in the endothelial layer of the cornea. Regardless of the type of corneal deposit, local therapies such as topical lubricants or corticosteroids may help improve symptoms. Drug cessation or modification can also be helpful but should be weighed against the systemic risks of the underlying disease.
Topics: Chlorpromazine; Corneal Dystrophies, Hereditary; Corneal Opacity; Humans; Rifabutin; Vision Disorders
PubMed: 35415268
DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000943 -
Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in... Jul 2016Rifamycins inhibit RNA polymerase of most bacterial genera. Rifampicin remains part of combination therapy for treating tuberculosis (TB), and for treating Gram-positive... (Review)
Review
Rifamycins inhibit RNA polymerase of most bacterial genera. Rifampicin remains part of combination therapy for treating tuberculosis (TB), and for treating Gram-positive prosthetic joint and valve infections, in which biofilms are prominent. Rifabutin has use for AIDS patients in treating mycobacterial infections TB and Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), having fewer drug-drug interactions that interfere with AIDS medications. Rifabutin is occasionally used in combination to eradicate Helicobacter pylori (peptic ulcer disease). Rifapentine has yet to fulfill its potential in reducing time of treatment for TB. Rifaximin is a monotherapeutic agent to treat gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, such as hepatic encephalopathy, irritable bowel syndrome, and travelers' diarrhea. Rifaximin is confined to the GI tract because it is not systemically absorbed on oral dosing, achieving high local concentrations, and showing anti-inflammatory properties in addition to its antibacterial activity. Resistance issues are unavoidable with all the rifamycins when the bioburden is high, because of mutations that modify RNA polymerase.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Humans; Rifabutin; Rifampin; Rifamycins; Rifaximin; Tuberculosis
PubMed: 27270559
DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a027011 -
The American Journal of Gastroenterology Aug 2023
Topics: Humans; Rifabutin; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Pyrroles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Helicobacter pylori
PubMed: 37094105
DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002248 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Mar 2023Rifampicin, a potent enzyme inducer, causes marked reduction of dolutegravir exposure. Rifabutin, a less potent enzyme inducer, may offer an alternative to rifampicin....
Rifampicin, a potent enzyme inducer, causes marked reduction of dolutegravir exposure. Rifabutin, a less potent enzyme inducer, may offer an alternative to rifampicin. We aimed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir when co-administered with rifabutin. We extended an existing dolutegravir model to include data from volunteers co-administered with dolutegravir 50 mg and rifabutin 300 mg once daily. We ran simulations of dolutegravir with and without rifabutin co-administration and compare dolutegravir trough concentrations with the IC and EC of 0.064 and 0.3 mg/L, respectively. Rifabutin decreased dolutegravir's volume of distribution by 33.1% (95% confidence interval 25.1%-42.3%) but did not affect the area under the concentration-time curve. Simulations showed that when 50 mg dolutegravir is co-administered with rifabutin once daily, the probability to attain trough concentrations above the IC of 0.064 mg/L is more than 99%. Therefore, there is no need for dolutegravir dose adjustment. Rifabutin may offer an alternative to rifampicin for the treatment of HIV/tuberculosis co-infected individuals.
Topics: Humans; Rifabutin; Rifampin; HIV Infections; Drug Interactions
PubMed: 36385424
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15604 -
Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery Sep 2019: The treatment of lung disease faces significant challenges due to intrinsic antibiotic resistance. New drugs are needed to cure this incurable disease. The key... (Review)
Review
: The treatment of lung disease faces significant challenges due to intrinsic antibiotic resistance. New drugs are needed to cure this incurable disease. The key anti-tubercular rifamycin, rifampicin, suffers from low potency against and is not used clinically. Recently, another member of the rifamycin class, rifabutin, was shown to be active against the opportunistic pathogen. : In this review, the authors discuss the rifamycins as a reemerging drug class for treating infections. The authors focus on the differential potency of rifampicin and rifabutin against in the context of intrinsic antibiotic resistance and bacterial uptake and metabolism. Reports of rifamycin-based drug synergies and rifamycin potentiation by host-directed therapy are evaluated. : While repurposing rifabutin for lung disease may provide some immediate relief, the repositioning (chemical optimization) of rifamycins offers long-term potential for improving clinical outcomes. Repositioning will require a multifaceted approach involving renewed screening of rifamycin libraries, medicinal chemistry to improve 'bacterial cell pharmacokinetics', better models of bacterial pathophysiology and infection, and harnessing of drug synergies and host-directed therapy towards the development of a better drug regimen.
Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Repositioning; Humans; Lung Diseases; Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous; Mycobacterium abscessus; Rifabutin; Rifampin; Rifamycins
PubMed: 31195849
DOI: 10.1080/17460441.2019.1629414 -
The Journal of Antimicrobial... Feb 2021Treatment options are limited for TB/HIV-coinfected children who require PI-based ART. Rifabutin is the preferred rifamycin for adults on PIs, but the one study...
BACKGROUND
Treatment options are limited for TB/HIV-coinfected children who require PI-based ART. Rifabutin is the preferred rifamycin for adults on PIs, but the one study evaluating rifabutin with PIs among children was stopped early due to severe neutropenia.
METHODS
We evaluated rifabutin safety and plasma pharmacokinetics among coinfected children 3-15 years of age receiving rifabutin 2.5 mg/kg daily with standard doses of lopinavir/ritonavir. The AUC0-24 at 2, 4 and 8 weeks after rifabutin initiation was described using intensive sampling and non-compartmental analysis. Clinical and laboratory toxicities were intensively monitored at 12 visits throughout the study.
RESULTS
Among 15 children with median (IQR) age 13.1 (10.9-14.0) years and weight 25.5 (22.3-30.5) kg, the median (IQR) rifabutin AUC0-24 was 5.21 (4.38-6.60) μg·h/mL. Four participants had AUC0-24 below 3.8 μg·h/mL (a target for the population average exposure) at week 2 and all had AUC0-24 higher than 3.8 μg·h/mL at the 4 and 8 week visits. Of 506 laboratory evaluations during rifabutin, grade 3 and grade 4 abnormalities occurred in 16 (3%) and 2 (0.4%) instances, respectively, involving 9 (60%) children. Specifically, grade 3 (n = 4) and grade 4 (n = 1) neutropenia resolved without treatment interruption or clinical sequelae in all patients. One child died at week 4 of HIV-related complications.
CONCLUSIONS
In children, rifabutin 2.5 mg/kg daily achieved AUC0-24 comparable to adults and favourable HIV and TB treatment outcomes were observed. Severe neutropenia was relatively uncommon and improved with ongoing rifabutin therapy. These data support the use of rifabutin for TB/HIV-coinfected children who require lopinavir/ritonavir.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Coinfection; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Rifabutin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis
PubMed: 33294914
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkaa512 -
BMC Microbiology Jul 2022Recently, Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infections have been increasing, especially in immunocompromised and older adults. The rapid increase has triggered a global...
BACKGROUND
Recently, Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infections have been increasing, especially in immunocompromised and older adults. The rapid increase has triggered a global health concern due to limited therapeutic strategies and adverse effects caused by long-term medication. To provide more evidence for the treatment of MAC, we studied the in vitro inhibitory activities of 17 antimicrobial agents against clinical MAC isolates.
RESULTS
A total of 111 clinical MAC isolates were enrolled in the study and they were identified as M. intracellulare, M. avium, M. marseillense, M. colombiense, M. yongonense, and two isolates could not be identified at the species level. MAC strains had relatively low (0-21.6%) resistance to clarithromycin, amikacin, bedaquiline, rifabutin, streptomycin, and clofazimine, and the resistant rates to isoniazid, rifampin, linezolid, doxycycline, and ethionamide were very high (72.1-100%). In addition, M. avium had a significantly higher resistance rate than that of M. intracellulare for ethambutol (92.3% vs 40.7%, P < 0.001), amikacin (15.4% vs 1.2%, P = 0.049), and cycloserine (69.2% vs 25.9%, P = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS
Our results supported the current usage of macrolides, rifabutin, and aminoglycosides in the regimens for MAC infection, and also demonstrated the low resistance rate against new drugs, such as clofazimine, tedizolid, and bedaquiline, suggesting the possible implementation of these drugs in MAC treatment.
Topics: Aged; Amikacin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Clarithromycin; Clofazimine; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Mycobacterium avium Complex; Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare Infection; Rifabutin
PubMed: 35804298
DOI: 10.1186/s12866-022-02582-2 -
Annals of Medicine Dec 2022To determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distribution of antibacterial drugs and the susceptibility of non-tuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) isolates to...
Antimicrobial susceptibility and minimum inhibitory concentration distribution of common clinically relevant non-tuberculous mycobacterial isolates from the respiratory tract.
To determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distribution of antibacterial drugs and the susceptibility of non-tuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) isolates to provide a reference basis for the clinical selection of an effective starting regimen. The common clinical isolates of NTM in the respiratory tract, which met the standards of the American Thoracic Society for NTM lung disease, were collected. The MICs of 81 isolates were determined using the microbroth dilution method (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, USA. Included were 43 complex (MAC) strains, 24 complex (MAB) strains, and 14 strains. The sensitivity rates of MAC to clarithromycin and amikacin were 81.4% and 79.1%, respectively, while the sensitivity rates to linezolid and moxifloxacin were only 20.9% and 9.3%; the MIC of rifabutin was the lowest (MIC50% was just 2 μg/mL). After incubation for 3-5 days, the sensitivity rate of MAB to clarithromycin was 87.5%; this decreased to 50% after 14 days' incubation. Most of them were susceptible to amikacin (91.6%), and most were resistant to moxifloxacin (95.8%), ciprofloxacin (95.8%), imipenem (95.8%), amoxicillin/clavulanate (95.8%), tobramycin (79.1%), doxycycline (95.8%) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (95.8%). intermediate (83.3%) and resistant (16.7%) to cefoxitin. The susceptibility to linezolid was only 33.3%. The sensitivity and resistance breakpoints of tigecycline were set to ≤0.5 and ≥8 μg/mL, respectively, and the sensitivity and resistance rates were 50% and 0%, respectively. was susceptible to clarithromycin, amikacin, linezolid, moxifloxacin, rifampicin and rifabutin (100%). In Wenzhou, clarithromycin, amikacin and rifabutin have good antibacterial activity against MAC, while linezolid and moxifloxacin have high resistance. Amikacin and tigecycline have strong antibacterial activity against MAB, while most other antibacterial drugs are resistant to varying degrees. Most antibacterial drugs are susceptible to . and have good antibacterial activity. The identification of NTM species and the detection of their MICs have certain guiding values for the treatment of NTM lung disease.Key MessageThe three most common respiratory non-tuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) isolates with clinical significance in the Wenzhou area were tested for drug susceptibility. The broth microdilution method was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration distribution of antibacterial drugs and the susceptibility of NTM isolates to provide a reference basis for the clinical selection of an effective starting regimen.
Topics: Amikacin; Amoxicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefoxitin; Ciprofloxacin; Clarithromycin; Clavulanic Acid; Doxycycline; Humans; Imipenem; Linezolid; Lung Diseases; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Moxifloxacin; Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous; Nontuberculous Mycobacteria; Respiratory System; Rifabutin; Rifampin; Sulfamethoxazole; Tigecycline; Tobramycin; Trimethoprim
PubMed: 36120867
DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2121984 -
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Apr 2022A recent landmark trial showed a 4-month regimen of rifapentine, pyrazinamide, moxifloxacin, and isoniazid (PZMH) to be noninferior to the 6-month standard of care....
A recent landmark trial showed a 4-month regimen of rifapentine, pyrazinamide, moxifloxacin, and isoniazid (PZMH) to be noninferior to the 6-month standard of care. Here, two murine models of tuberculosis were used to test whether novel regimens replacing rifapentine and isoniazid with bedaquiline and another drug would maintain or increase the sterilizing activity of the regimen. In BALB/c mice, replacing rifapentine in the PZM backbone with bedaquiline (i.e., BZM) significantly reduced both lung CFU counts after 1 month and the proportion of mice relapsing within 3 months after completing 1.5 months of treatment. The addition of rifabutin to BZM (BZMRb) further increased the sterilizing activity. In the C3HeB/FeJ mouse model characterized by caseating lung lesions, treatment with BZMRb resulted in significantly fewer relapses than PZMH after 2 months of treatment. A regimen combining the new DprE1 inhibitor OPC-167832 and delamanid (BZOD) also had superior bactericidal and sterilizing activity compared to PZM in BALB/c mice and was similar in efficacy to PZMH in C3HeB/FeJ mice. Thus, BZM represents a promising backbone for treatment-shortening regimens. Given the prohibitive drug-drug interactions between bedaquiline and rifampin or rifapentine, the BZMRb regimen represents the best opportunity to combine, in one regimen, the treatment-shortening potential of the rifamycin class with that of BZM and deserves high priority for evaluation in clinical trials. Other 4-drug BZM-based regimens and BZOD represent promising opportunities for extending the spectrum of treatment-shortening regimens to rifamycin- and fluoroquinolone-resistant tuberculosis.
Topics: Animals; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Antitubercular Agents; Diarylquinolines; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Isoniazid; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Moxifloxacin; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Nitroimidazoles; Oxazoles; Pyrazinamide; Rifabutin; Tuberculosis
PubMed: 35315690
DOI: 10.1128/aac.02398-21 -
Microbiology Spectrum Sep 2021After staphylococci, streptococci and enterococci are the most frequent causes of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). MICs and minimum biofilm bactericidal...
After staphylococci, streptococci and enterococci are the most frequent causes of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). MICs and minimum biofilm bactericidal concentrations of rifampin, rifabutin, and rifapentine were determined for 67 enterococcal and 59 streptococcal PJI isolates. Eighty-eight isolates had rifampin MICs of ≤1 μg/ml, among which rifabutin and rifapentine MICs were ≤ 8 and ≤4 μg/ml, respectively. There was low rifamycin antibiofilm activity except for a subset of Streptococcus mitis group isolates. Rifampin is an antibiotic with antistaphylococcal biofilm activity used in the management of staphylococcal periprosthetic joint infection with irrigation and debridement with component retention; some patients are unable to receive rifampin due to drug interactions or intolerance. We recently showed rifabutin and rifapentine to have activity against planktonic and biofilm states of rifampin-susceptible periprosthetic joint infection-associated staphylococci. After staphylococci, streptococci and enterococci combined are the most common causes of periprosthetic joint infection. Here, we investigated the antibiofilm activity of rifampin, rifabutin, and rifapentine against 126 Streptococcus and periprosthetic joint infection isolates. In contrast to our prior findings with staphylococcal biofilms, there was low antibiofilm activity of rifampin, rifabutin, and rifapentine against PJI-associated streptococci and enterococci, apart from some Streptococcus mitis group isolates.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; Biofilms; Enterococcus; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Rifabutin; Rifampin; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus
PubMed: 34259553
DOI: 10.1128/Spectrum.00071-21