-
Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2021Thrombocytopenia results from a variety of conditions, including radiation, chemotherapy, autoimmune disease, bone marrow disorders, pathologic conditions associated... (Review)
Review
Thrombocytopenia results from a variety of conditions, including radiation, chemotherapy, autoimmune disease, bone marrow disorders, pathologic conditions associated with surgical procedures, hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), and hematologic disorders associated with severe aplastic anemia. Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is caused by immune reactions that accelerate destruction and reduce production of platelets. Thrombopoietin (TPO) is a critical component of platelet production pathways, and TPO receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) are important for the management of ITP by increasing platelet production and reducing the need for other treatments. Romiplostim is a TPO-RA approved for use in patients with ITP in the United States, European Union, Australia, and several countries in Africa and Asia, as well as for use in patients with refractory aplastic anemia in Japan and Korea. Romiplostim binds to and activates the TPO receptor on megakaryocyte precursors, thus promoting cell proliferation and viability, resulting in increased platelet production. Through this mechanism, romiplostim reduces the need for other treatments and decreases bleeding events in patients with thrombocytopenia. In addition to its efficacy in ITP, studies have shown that romiplostim is effective in improving platelet counts in various settings, thereby highlighting the versatility of romiplostim. The efficacy of romiplostim in such disorders is currently under investigation. Here, we review the structure, mechanism, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of romiplostim. We also summarize the clinical evidence supporting its use in ITP and other disorders that involve thrombocytopenia, including chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia, aplastic anemia, acute radiation syndrome, perisurgical thrombocytopenia, post-HSCT thrombocytopenia, and liver disease.
Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic; Receptors, Fc; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Thrombopoietin
PubMed: 34079225
DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S299591 -
Blood Reviews May 2022Thrombopoietin regulates platelet production through activation of the thrombopoietin receptor (TPO-R). TPO-R agonists (TPO-RAs) are available to treat thrombocytopenia... (Review)
Review
Thrombopoietin regulates platelet production through activation of the thrombopoietin receptor (TPO-R). TPO-R agonists (TPO-RAs) are available to treat thrombocytopenia in chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), chronic liver disease (CLD) patients who are undergoing a procedure, severe aplastic anemia (SAA), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. There are four TPO-RAs approved in the US and Europe: romiplostim (ITP), eltrombopag (ITP, SAA, HCV), avatrombopag (ITP, CLD), and lusutrombopag (CLD). It is important to understand pharmacological characteristics of these agents when evaluating treatment options. Avatrombopag interacts with the transmembrane domain of the TPO-RA and does not compete with endogenous thrombopoietin for TPO-R binding. Structural differences between avatrombopag and other TPO-RAs may impart differential downstream effects on cell signaling pathways, potentially resulting in clinically relevant differences in outcome. Avatrombopag has a favorable pharmacological profile with similar exposure in Japanese, Chinese, or Caucasian patients and no drug-drug interactions, food interactions, or potential for chelation.
Topics: Anemia, Aplastic; Hepatitis C; Humans; Liver Diseases; Receptors, Thrombopoietin; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombopoietin
PubMed: 34815110
DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2021.100909 -
Haematologica Jun 2019The two thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA), eltrombopag and romiplostim, were licensed in the US for treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in 2008 and, since... (Review)
Review
The two thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA), eltrombopag and romiplostim, were licensed in the US for treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in 2008 and, since then, their use has progressively increased around the world; they are currently used in more than 100 countries. The six largest randomized controlled trials conducted in ITP have used one of these two agents. All studies have demonstrated a platelet response rate between 50-90%, depending on the criteria used, with good safety and tolerability. TPO-RA were shown to be effective in reducing bleeding and the need for concomitant or rescue medication. Many other investigations of their mechanism of effect, prospective and retrospective trials, and studies focusing on toxicity have been performed widening our knowledge of these two agents. Initial concerns on issues such as myelofibrosis have not been confirmed. Only a small number of patients develop moderate-severe reticulin fibrosis and/or collagen fibrosis; however, these are usually reversed after discontinuation of TPO-RA. Studies indicate, however, that TPO-RA may increase the risk of venous thromboembolism. Both TPO-RA are currently approved in patients with chronic ITP aged >1-year who are refractory to at least one other treatment. Eltrombopag has acquired two additional indications: severe aplastic anemia refractory to first-line treatment and hepatitis C patients undergoing treatment with interferon-ribavirin. Despite these wide-ranging studies, important questions still need to be answered. This summary review on TPO-RA will summarize what is known regarding efficacy in ITP, evaluate safety concerns in more depth, and focus on the questions that remain.
Topics: Animals; Benzoates; Biomarkers; Blood Coagulation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease Susceptibility; Humans; Hydrazines; Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic; Pyrazoles; Receptors, Fc; Receptors, Thrombopoietin; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Signal Transduction; Thrombopoietin; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31073079
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2018.212845 -
Drugs Jul 2021The thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) romiplostim, eltrombopag, avatrombopag, and lusutrombopag carry unique US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA)- and... (Review)
Review
The thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) romiplostim, eltrombopag, avatrombopag, and lusutrombopag carry unique US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA)- and European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved indications and may be used to increase platelet counts in a variety of conditions. Current indications for available TPO-RAs include treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in cases of insufficient response to prior treatment (avatrombopag, eltrombopag, romiplostim), management of thrombocytopenia in adult patients with chronic liver disease who are scheduled to undergo a procedure (avatrombopag, lusutrombopag), management of severe aplastic anemia (eltrombopag), and management of thrombocytopenia associated with interferon-based therapy for hepatitis C (eltrombopag). Across current indications, pharmacists can assist in stabilizing platelet counts and help to reduce large undulations commonly seen when starting, stopping, or transitioning between these agents. If therapy modifications may benefit the patient, pharmacists should discuss possible changes with the patient's treatment team or treating physician. When used for ITP, romiplostim, eltrombopag, and avatrombopag stimulate TPO receptors on hematopoietic stem cells (also known as c-Mpl, or CD110) to promote platelet production; however, romiplostim is the only TPO-RA that binds at the same site as endogenous TPO. These subtle mechanistic differences may explain why switching TPO-RA may be clinically advantageous in some situations. As pharmacists are called to counsel patients on TPO-RA use, a deep understanding of potential adverse events and management strategies, as well as appropriate monitoring, will increase the likelihood that patients meet their goals of therapy in the shortest timeframe. Other uses of TPO-RAs are also discussed in this review, including use following hematopoietic stem cell transplant, use in myelodysplastic syndrome, and use in chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia.
Topics: Benzoates; Cinnamates; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Hydrazines; Pharmacists; Platelet Count; Pyrazoles; Receptors, Fc; Receptors, Thrombopoietin; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombocytopenia; Thrombopoietin
PubMed: 34160821
DOI: 10.1007/s40265-021-01553-7 -
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official... Nov 2019Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) leads to delay or reduction in cancer treatment. There is no approved treatment. (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
PURPOSE
Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) leads to delay or reduction in cancer treatment. There is no approved treatment.
METHODS
We conducted a phase II randomized trial of romiplostim versus untreated observation in patients with solid tumors with CIT. Before enrollment, patients had platelets less than 100,000/μL for at least 4 weeks, despite delay or dose reduction of chemotherapy. Patients received weekly titrated romiplostim with a target platelet count of 100,000/μL or more, or were monitored with usual care. The primary end point was correction of platelet count within 3 weeks. Twenty-three patients were treated in a randomization phase, and an additional 37 patients were treated in a single-arm, romiplostim phase. Resumption of chemotherapy without recurrent CIT was a secondary end point.
RESULTS
The mean platelet count at enrollment was 62,000/μL. In the randomization phase, 14 of 15 romiplostim-treated patients (93%) experienced correction of their platelet count within 3 weeks, compared with one of eight control patients (12.5%; < .001). Including all romiplostim-treated patients (N = 52), the mean platelet count at 2 weeks of treatment was 141,000/μL. The mean platelet count in the eight observation patients at 3 weeks was 57,000/μL. Forty-four patients who achieved platelet correction with romiplostim resumed chemotherapy with weekly romiplostim. Only three patients (6.8%) experienced recurrent reduction or delay of chemotherapy because of isolated CIT.
CONCLUSION
This prospective trial evaluated treatment of CIT with romiplostim. Romiplostim is effective in correcting CIT, and maintenance allows for resumption of chemotherapy without recurrence of CIT in most patients.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Blood Platelets; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; New York City; Platelet Count; Prospective Studies; Receptors, Fc; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Thrombocytopenia; Thrombopoietin; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31545663
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.18.01931 -
Haematologica Jun 2022Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common complication of the treatment of non-hematologic malignancies. Many patient-related variables (e.g., age, tumor...
Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common complication of the treatment of non-hematologic malignancies. Many patient-related variables (e.g., age, tumor type, number of prior chemotherapy cycles, amount of bone marrow tumor involvement) determine the extent of CIT. CIT is related to the type and dose of chemotherapy, with regimens containing gemcitabine, platinum, or temozolomide producing it most commonly. Bleeding and the need for platelet transfusions in CIT are rather uncommon except in patients with platelet counts below 25x109/L in whom bleeding rates increase significantly and platelet transfusions are the only treatment. Nonetheless, platelet counts below 70x109/L present a challenge. In patients with such counts, it is important to exclude other causes of thrombocytopenia (medications, infection, thrombotic microangiopathy, post-transfusion purpura, coagulopathy and immune thrombocytopenia). If these are not present, the common approach is to reduce chemotherapy dose intensity or switch to other agents. Unfortunately decreasing relative dose intensity is associated with reduced tumor response and remission rates. Thrombopoietic growth factors (recombinant human thrombopoietin, pegylated human megakaryocyte growth and development factor, romiplostim, eltrombopag, avatrombopag and hetrombopag) improve pretreatment and nadir platelet counts, reduce the need for platelet transfusions, and enable chemotherapy dose intensity to be maintained. National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines permit their use but their widespread adoption awaits adequate phase III randomized, placebo-controlled studies demonstrating maintenance of relative dose intensity, reduction of platelet transfusions and bleeding, and possibly improved survival. Their potential appropriate use also depends on consensus by the oncology community as to what constitutes an appropriate pretreatment platelet count as well as identification of patient-related and treatment variables that might predict bleeding.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Humans; Neoplasms; Platelet Count; Platelet Transfusion; Thrombocytopenia
PubMed: 35642485
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2021.279512 -
British Journal of Haematology Jan 2021A previous dose-finding study has suggested that romiplostim is effective in patients with refractory aplastic anaemia (AA) and 10 µg/kg once weekly was recommended as...
A previous dose-finding study has suggested that romiplostim is effective in patients with refractory aplastic anaemia (AA) and 10 µg/kg once weekly was recommended as a starting dose. In this Phase II/III, multicentre, open-label study, romiplostim was administered subcutaneously at a fixed dose of 10 µg/kg once weekly for 4 weeks (weeks 1-4) followed by weekly doses (5, 10, 15 and 20 µg/kg) titrated by platelet response for up to 52 weeks (weeks 5-52). A total of 31 patients with AA who were refractory to immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and thrombocytopenia (platelet count of ≤30 × 10 /l) were enrolled. The primary efficacy endpoint of the proportion of patients achieving any haematological (platelet, neutrophil and erythrocyte) response at week 27 was 84% [95% confidence interval (CI) 66-95%]. Trilineage response was 39% (95% CI 22-58%) at week 53. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were headache and muscle spasms (each 13%). All AEs were mild or moderate except for three patients with Grade 3 hepatic AEs; no AEs necessitated romiplostim discontinuation. Two patients developed cytogenetic abnormalities, of whom one returned to normal karyotype at last follow-up. High-dose romiplostim is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with AA refractory to IST.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Anemia, Aplastic; Anemia, Refractory; Blood Cell Count; Female; Headache; Hematopoiesis; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Receptors, Fc; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Spasm; Thrombopoietin; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 33152120
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.17190 -
Haematologica Apr 2021Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) frequently complicates cancer treatment causing chemotherapy delays, dose reductions, and discontinuation. There is no...
Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) frequently complicates cancer treatment causing chemotherapy delays, dose reductions, and discontinuation. There is no FDA-approved agent available to manage CIT. This study retrospectively evaluated patients with CIT treated on institutional romiplostim treatment pathways at 4 U.S. centers. The primary outcome was achievement of a romiplostim response [median on-romiplostim platelet count (Plt) ≥75x109/L and ≥30x109/L above baseline]. Secondary outcomes included time to Plt≥100x109/L and rates of the following: Plt<100x109/L, Plt<75x109/L, Plt<50x109/L, thrombocytosis, chemotherapy dose reduction/treatment delay, platelet transfusion, bleeding, and thromboembolism. Multivariable regression was used to identify predictors of romiplostim non-response and compare weekly dosing with intracycle/intermittent dosing. 173 patients (153 solid tumor, 20 lymphoma or myeloma) were treated, with 170 (98%) receiving a median of 4 (range, 1-36) additional chemotherapy cycles on romiplostim. Romiplostim was effective in solid tumor patients: 71% of patients achieved a romiplostim response, 79% avoided chemotherapy dose reductions/treatment delays and 89% avoided platelet transfusions. Median per-patient Plt on romiplostim was significantly higher than baseline (116x109/L vs. 60x109/L, P<0.001). Bone marrow tumor invasion, prior pelvic irradiation, and prior temozolomide predicted romiplostim non-response. Bleeding rates were lower than historical CIT cohorts and thrombosis rates were not elevated. Weekly dosing was superior to intracycle dosing with higher response rates and less chemotherapy dose reductions/treatment delays (IRR 3.00, 95% CI 1.30-6.91, P=0.010) or bleeding (IRR 4.84, 95% CI 1.18-19.89, P=0.029). Blunted response (10% response rate) was seen in non-myeloid hematologic malignancy patients with bone marrow involvement. In conclusion, romiplostim was safe and effective for CIT in most solid tumor patients.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Neoplasms; Receptors, Fc; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Retrospective Studies; Thrombocytopenia; Thrombopoietin
PubMed: 32499239
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2020.251900 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2022Therapeutic options for rare congenital (hemoglobinopathies, membrane and enzyme defects, congenital dyserythropoietic anemia) and acquired anemias [warm autoimmune... (Review)
Review
Therapeutic options for rare congenital (hemoglobinopathies, membrane and enzyme defects, congenital dyserythropoietic anemia) and acquired anemias [warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA), cold agglutinin disease CAD, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), and aplastic anemia (AA)] are rapidly expanding. The use of luspatercept, mitapivat and etavopivat in beta-thalassemia and pyruvate kinase deficiency (PKD) improves transfusion dependence, alleviating iron overload and long-term complications. Voxelotor, mitapivat, and etavopivat reduce vaso-occlusive crises in sickle cell disease (SCD). Gene therapy represents a fascinating approach, although patient selection, the toxicity of the conditioning regimens, and the possible long-term safety are still open issues. For acquired forms, wAIHA and CAD will soon benefit from targeted therapies beyond rituximab, including B-cell/plasma cell targeting agents (parsaclisib, rilzabrutinib, and isatuximab for wAIHA), complement inhibitors (pegcetacoplan and sutimlimab for CAD, ANX005 for wAIHA with complement activation), and inhibitors of extravascular hemolysis in the reticuloendothelial system (fostamatinib and FcRn inhibitors in wAIHA). PNH treatment is moving from the intravenous anti-C5 eculizumab to its long-term analog ravulizumab, and to subcutaneous and oral proximal inhibitors (anti-C3 pegcetacoplan, factor D and factor B inhibitors danicopan and iptacopan). These drugs have the potential to improve patient convenience and ameliorate residual anemia, although patient compliance becomes pivotal, and long-term safety requires further investigation. Finally, the addition of eltrombopag significantly ameliorated AA outcomes, and data regarding the alternative agent romiplostim are emerging. The accelerated evolution of treatment strategies will need further effort to identify the best candidate for each treatment in the precision medicine era.
PubMed: 36698833
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1097426 -
Blood May 2022Translation is essential for megakaryocyte (MK) maturation and platelet production. However, how the translational pathways are regulated in this process remains...
Translation is essential for megakaryocyte (MK) maturation and platelet production. However, how the translational pathways are regulated in this process remains unknown. In this study, we found that MK/platelet-specific lactate dehydrogenase A (LdhA) knockout mice exhibited an increased number of platelets with remarkably accelerated MK maturation and proplatelet formation. Interestingly, the role of LDHA in MK maturation and platelet formation did not depend on lactate content, which was the major product of LDHA. Mechanism studies revealed that LDHA interacted with eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2) in the cytoplasm, controlling the participation of eEF2 in translation at the ribosome. Furthermore, the interaction of LDHA and eEF2 was dependent on nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH), a coenzyme of LDHA. NADH-competitive inhibitors of LDHA could release eEF2 from the LDHA pool, upregulate translation, and enhance MK maturation in vitro. Among LDHA inhibitors, stiripentol significantly promoted the production of platelets in vivo under a physiological state and in the immune thrombocytopenia model. Moreover, stiripentol could promote platelet production from human cord blood mononuclear cell-derived MKs and also have a superposed effect with romiplostim. In short, this study shows a novel nonclassical function of LDHA in translation that may serve as a potential target for thrombocytopenia therapy.
Topics: Animals; Blood Platelets; Elongation Factor 2 Kinase; Enzyme Inhibitors; L-Lactate Dehydrogenase; Megakaryocytes; Mice; Mice, Knockout; NAD; Peptide Elongation Factor 2; Thrombocytopenia; Thrombopoiesis
PubMed: 35176139
DOI: 10.1182/blood.2022015620