-
Skin Health and Disease Dec 2022Medically unexplained dermatologic symptoms, such as pruritus, numbness and burning are known as somatization. These cutaneous symptoms can be very difficult to treat... (Review)
Review
Medically unexplained dermatologic symptoms, such as pruritus, numbness and burning are known as somatization. These cutaneous symptoms can be very difficult to treat because of an absence of an objective explanation and they may not fit neatly into any known dermatological or psychiatric condition. These disorders are more commonly encountered in primary care and in dermatology, rather than in psychiatry. Certain skin disorders, for example, pruritus, could be a manifestation of somatization and others may predispose to somatic symptoms, for example, atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Although there has been increasing research in the interconnection between psychiatry and dermatology, psychodermatology is a relatively new crossover discipline in clinical practice and recognition of psychodermatological conditions, such as cutaneous somatic disorders, can be difficult. Somatization may occur with or without the existence of a dermatological disease. When a dermatological disorder is present, somatization should be considered when the patient is worrying too much about their skin, spending too much time and energy on it and especially if the patient also complains of many non-cutaneous symptoms. Purely cutaneous somatic conditions include for example, the genital pain syndromes or Gardner-Diamond syndrome, characterized by unexplained bruising, which usually affects women. Effective management tools may include mindfulness therapies, pharmacotherapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants and cognitive conduct therapy. Electroconvulsive therapy can also be considered in extremely rare cases for treatment of severe somatization on a background of mood disorders. This paper discusses somatization, its relationship to immunodermatoses and its relevance to clinical practice.
PubMed: 36479272
DOI: 10.1002/ski2.164 -
Maedica Jun 2021Somatization is a common symptom among patients with comorbid anxiety and depression. It is associated with poorer outcome, long-term evolution, worse sleep patterns...
Somatization is a common symptom among patients with comorbid anxiety and depression. It is associated with poorer outcome, long-term evolution, worse sleep patterns and an overall lower quality of life. Previous studies suggest that sleep disturbances exacerbate somatization, which in turn negatively affects sleep. The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation between anxiety/depression and somatization/sleep quality in hospitalized psychiatric patients. Participants comprised 103 hospitalized patients with somatic symptoms disorder as major diagnosis and anxiety and depression disorders as comorbid diagnoses. All subjects were given SOMS-2 and SOMS-7 (Screening for Somatoform Symptoms) for somatization symptoms, HAM-A (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale) for anxiety, HAM-D 17 (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale) for depression and PSQI (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) for sleep quality. The Somatic Symptom Disorder-B criteria scale (SSD-12) has been also used for the psychological impact of somatization. The same scales were administered to a control group of 77 participants by trained physicians. There was a negative correlation between the scores of HAM-A/HAM-D scales and those of SSD-12. Also, positive associations between the scores of anxiety and depression scales in patients with sleep disturbances were found. Sleep scores being assessed with PSQI were significantly higher after hospitalization in 80% of participants and did not correlate with neither anxiety/depression nor somatization. In the participant group, SOMS-2 results were not correlated with any social and demographic variables. All scales scores were worse in the study group than the control group. Anxiety and depression symptoms may be associated with higher somatization symptoms but not with the psychological impact of somatization. Also, somatization may not directly impact sleep quality scores. Further approaches are needed to better understand the relationship between sleep quality and somatization, on one hand, and its modulation by comorbid psychiatric disorders, on the other hand.
PubMed: 34621347
DOI: 10.26574/maedica.2021.16.2.246 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Apr 2022The present study aimed to investigate alexithymia and psychopathological manifestations centered on the body in a sample of adolescents with somatizing and/or...
The present study aimed to investigate alexithymia and psychopathological manifestations centered on the body in a sample of adolescents with somatizing and/or self-harming issues to analyze the phenomenon of NSSI linked to Somatic Symptom Disorders (SSD). A sample of 184 adolescents between 12 and 19 years of age, was divided into three groups, one with NSSI ( = 49) and the second group with SSD ( = 57), comparing them with a third group of adolescents with SSD and NSSI ( = 78) to investigate their differences and similarities in psychopathological correlates and to analyze the mediation role of alexithymia and emotional dysregulation in NSSI and SSD related to internalizing problems. The battery of tests included the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) and the Youth Self-Report 11-18 (YSR). The NSSI + SSD group scored higher than the other two groups on all the YSR scales. The affective syndromes were the only clinical condition that discriminated between the three groups. On all the other syndrome scales, the NSSI + SSD group differed from the other two groups, while there were no differences between the NSSI group and the SSD group. The NSSI + SSD group revealed a more severely deficient emotional self-regulation. Difficulty identifying feelings was a trait shared by adolescents with SSD and those engaging in NSSI, a more complex overall alexithymia profile was associated with the combination of self-harming behavior and somatization. Alexithymia and emotional dysregulation played a mediating role in the relationship between internalizing problems and somatization. We did not find a mediating role in alexithymia and emotional dysregulation in the relationship between internalizing problems and self-injurious behavior. The combination of NSSI and SSD gave rise to more severe psychopathological correlates, clinical levels of alexithymia, and more severe deficient emotional self-regulation. Results of mediation role indicated a link between alexithymia, emotional dysregulation, and somatization.
PubMed: 35456311
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11082220 -
International Journal of Environmental... Nov 2022Somatization is a phenomenon in which the individual experiences physical symptoms attributable to mental projections. It is a widely used term in common parlance to... (Review)
Review
Somatization is a phenomenon in which the individual experiences physical symptoms attributable to mental projections. It is a widely used term in common parlance to figuratively describe a stressful situation. Syndromes directly related to the mind have been described; pathologies are influenced by somatization. However, the extent of somatization is also related to social and cultural factors. In fact, each culture expresses varying levels of somatization characteristic of the country of origin. A disease can even manifest with different symptoms in different ethnic groups. The migration process arises from the need for change on the part of those who undertake it and culminates in the integration of the person in the host country. This process induces changes in the person of a psychological nature, which also affects somatization. In fact, the most integrated subjects show levels of somatization comparable to those of the host country. These considerations support the thesis that psychological changes are an integral part of health and can affect the development of organic and somatized pathologies.
Topics: Humans; Somatoform Disorders; Acculturation; Ethnicity
PubMed: 36498084
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192316011 -
Frontiers in Psychiatry 2019
PubMed: 30984040
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00146 -
Assessment Apr 2018The assessment of medically unexplained symptoms and "somatic symptom disorders" in older adults is challenging due to somatic multimorbidity, which threatens the... (Review)
Review
The assessment of medically unexplained symptoms and "somatic symptom disorders" in older adults is challenging due to somatic multimorbidity, which threatens the validity of somatization questionnaires. In a systematic review study, the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15) and the somatization subscale of the Symptom Checklist 90-item version (SCL-90 SOM) are recommended out of 40 questionnaires for usage in large-scale studies. While both scales measure physical symptoms which in younger persons often refer to unexplained symptoms, in older persons, these symptoms may originate from somatic diseases. Using empirical data, we show that PHQ-15 and SCL-90 SOM among older patients correlate with proxies of somatization as with somatic disease burden. Updating the previous systematic review, revealed six additional questionnaires. Cross-validation studies are needed as none of 46 identified scales met the criteria of suitability for an older population. Nonetheless, specific recommendations can be made for studying older persons, namely the SCL-90 SOM and PHQ-15 for population-based studies, the Freiburg Complaint List and somatization subscale of the Brief Symptom Inventory 53-item version for studies in primary care, and finally the Schedule for Evaluating Persistent Symptoms and Somatic Symptom Experiences Questionnaire for monitoring treatment studies.
Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Male; Medically Unexplained Symptoms; Outpatients; Patient Health Questionnaire; Pilot Projects; Reproducibility of Results; Somatoform Disorders; Surveys and Questionnaires; Symptom Assessment
PubMed: 28745072
DOI: 10.1177/1073191117721740 -
Frontiers in Psychiatry 2022Adults who have histories of childhood trauma have been noted to display greater somatization, dissociative symptoms and affect dysregulation. What happens in the...
INTRODUCTION
Adults who have histories of childhood trauma have been noted to display greater somatization, dissociative symptoms and affect dysregulation. What happens in the parent-child relationship when those traumatized children become parents? A potential link to somatization in the child has been suggested by several prior studies. Children who have early attachment disturbances had more physical complaints if their mothers displayed less maternal sensitivity during observed parent-child interactions. Yet, the intergenerational link between maternal and child somatization has not been sufficiently explored in a longitudinal study in order to understand the potential impact of maternal trauma history and related psychopathology on subsequent child somatization and psychopathology.
METHODS
This paper examined prospective, longitudinal data of 64 mother-toddler dyads (mean age = 2.4 years, SD = 0.7) who were later studied when children had a mean age of 7 years. Mothers with and without histories of interpersonal violence (IPV; physical/sexual abuse and/or family violence exposure) were included. Mothers with IPV histories were oversampled. Linear and Poisson regression models were used to test the associations between maternal IPV-related post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) with maternal somatization severity when children were toddlers, and between maternal somatization and maternal interactive behaviors with child somatization by maternal report and clinician-rated assessment at school-age.
RESULTS
Maternal PTSD severity was significantly associated with increased maternal somatization severity ( = 0.031). Maternal somatization severity during the child's early childhood predicted both maternal report of child somatization ( = 0.011) as well as child thought problems ( = 0.007) when children were school-aged. No association was found between maternal somatization and child-reported psychopathology. The study did not find that maternal alexithymia, caregiving behaviors or child exposure to violence contributed significantly to the model examining the association between maternal and child somatization.
CONCLUSION
The results are in line with the hypothesis of intergenerational transmission of somatization in the context of IPV and related maternal PTSD during formative early development. We interpret this as an expression of psychological distress from mother to child, as maternal trauma and pathology affect the caregiving environment and, thus, the parent-child relationship. The authors conclude with a discussion of implications for parent-infant and early childhood intervention.
PubMed: 35280182
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.820652 -
Journal of Psychosomatic Research Dec 2021Difficulties in the assessments of Somatoform Disorders (SD) and Personality Disorders (PD) regarding operationalization, arbitrary thresholds, and reliability led to a... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Difficulties in the assessments of Somatoform Disorders (SD) and Personality Disorders (PD) regarding operationalization, arbitrary thresholds, and reliability led to a shift from categorical to dimensional models in the DSM-5. Empirical research data postulates a continuous level of severity in both groups of diseases. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the overlap between somatization and personality pathology.
METHODS
Until July 2020, we conducted a systematic literature search with PubMed, Web of Science and SCOPUS. We specifically reviewed current empirical data on the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) and Somatic Symptom Disorder (SSD) and SD. Data was drawn out using predefined data panels. Results were reflected in the context of the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) model. Risk of bias was assessed due to blinding, randomization, selective reporting, incomplete data, and attribution bias.
RESULTS
A total of eight studies (N = 2979) met the inclusion criteria. Whereas categorical measures revealed mixed results, positive correlations between SD/SSD and dimensionally measured personality functioning were present in four studies (N = 1741). In three studies (N = 2025) correlations between SD/SSD and neuroticism/negative affectivity (d = 0.22-1.041) were present. Moreover, harm avoidant (d = 0.526 - 0.826) and self-defeating traits (d = 0.892) revealed significant associations with somatization.
CONCLUSIONS
Dimensional personality assessments are highly neglected in patients with SSD and warrant further research. However, in line with the HiTOP model, there is tentative evidence that somatization can be described as an independent personality trait, which shows most striking overlaps with self-pathologies (Criterion A) and the trait of negative affectivity (Criterion B).
Topics: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Humans; Medically Unexplained Symptoms; Personality; Personality Disorders; Reproducibility of Results
PubMed: 34715494
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110646 -
Mobile Genetic Elements 2017The somatic mobilization of transposable elements is more common than previously thought. In this review we discuss how the intensity and the biologic consequences of... (Review)
Review
The somatic mobilization of transposable elements is more common than previously thought. In this review we discuss how the intensity and the biologic consequences of somatic mobilization are dependent on the transposable elements landscapes of each genome, and on the "momentum" of each particular TE with respect to the mechanisms that control its transposition and the possibility to escape this control. Additionally, the biologic consequences of somatic mobilization vary among organisms that show an early separation between the germline and somatic cells and those organisms that do not exhibit this separation or that reproduce asexually. In the former, somatic transposition can be involved in phenotypic plasticity, detrimental conditions such as disease, or processes such as aging. For the organisms without separation between the germ and soma, somatic mobilization can be a source of genetic variability.
PubMed: 28580196
DOI: 10.1080/2159256X.2017.1314236 -
PeerJ 2022Previous studies have shown that an increased prevalence of mental illness can be found among medical and dental students. Among these, somatization symptoms are...
OBJECTIVE
Previous studies have shown that an increased prevalence of mental illness can be found among medical and dental students. Among these, somatization symptoms are severely understudied. The present study examined the prevalence of somatization symptoms in a subpopulation of medical and dental students and aimed at finding associated risk and resilience factors.
METHODS
A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a self-reporting questionnaire, including the SOMS-2, the Becks-Depression-Inventory-II (BDI-II), the NEO-Five-Factor-Inventory, and a questionnaire on socio-demographics for possible risk and resilience factors. A total of 271 medical and dental students of a mid-sized German university completed the questionnaire.
RESULTS
The Somatization index yielded a mean of 9.12 symptoms for the total sample, which is 1.2 SD higher than the reported norm. A total of 50.7% of the medical students and 63.6% of the dental students transcend a critical somatization score. Significant positive associations for eight general risk factors, four university related stress factors, and a significant negative association for seven resilience factors were found.
CONCLUSION
Medical and even more dental students at the studied university showed a high burden of somatoform complaints. Also, factors were found that could be of etiological relevance and others that could be used to enhance resilience. Both could present an opportunity for the prevention of somatization disorders but prospective and multicenter studies with an aged-matched comparison group are needed to obtain a more accurate overview.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Depression; Students, Dental; Prevalence; Cross-Sectional Studies; Prospective Studies; Universities
PubMed: 36003309
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13803