-
The Pan African Medical Journal 2017Septic arthritis of the pubis symphysis is rare and difficult to diagnose. The objective of our study was to describe the biological, clinical, radiological and...
Septic arthritis of the pubis symphysis is rare and difficult to diagnose. The objective of our study was to describe the biological, clinical, radiological and therapeutic aspects of this disease. This is a retrospective study of 4 cases of septic arthritis of the pubic symphysis collected in the Department of Rheumatology and Orthopaedics in Sousse in Tunisia over a period of 16 years (2000-2016). Our population consists of 3 women and one men. The mean age was 47 years (18-83). Clinical signs of appeal were inflammatory groin pain, pubic pain and fever. Symptoms appeared after forceps delivery in 2 cases, after surgery on the pelvis in one case and in a context of sepsis in one case. Radiographs showed pubic disjunction with irregular shoreline in all cases. CT performed in all patients and MRI in 2 patients showed erosions of the banks of the pubic symphysis with infiltration of the soft parts in all cases. The causative organisms were isolated in 3 cases by biopsy of soft tissue abscess under CT in 2 cases and vaginal swab in one case. Identified germs were staphylococcus aureus Méti-S (n=1), proteus mirabilis (n=1) and varied flora (n=1). The treatment consisted of appropriate antibiotics in all cases and surgical drainage of soft tissue abscess resistant to medical treatment in 2 cases. The outcome was favorable in all cases. Diagnosis of septic arthritis of the pubic symphysis is based on clinic supported by microbiologic culture results, image methods, and proteins augment during acute phase.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Arthritis, Infectious; Biopsy; Drainage; Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Pubic Symphysis; Retrospective Studies; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Tunisia; Young Adult
PubMed: 28690730
DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2017.26.215.12204 -
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi Jun 2022To find the appropriate method for age estimation for different ages and sexes.
OBJECTIVES
To find the appropriate method for age estimation for different ages and sexes.
METHODS
The costal cartilage, sternum and pubic symphysis of 91 unknowns from 2000 to 2020 from the Forensic Department of the Criminal Investigation Team of Shanghai Public Security Bureau were collected. Costal cartilage, sternal and pubic symphysis inferences were used to estimate the age, and the consistency between the estimated results and the actual physiological age of the unknowns was tested. The accuracy of age estimation of different samples was compared, and the relationship between accuracy and age and sex was analyzed.
RESULTS
Using the costal cartilage method, the inference errors of males, females and the whole population under 40 years old were (0.608±2.298) years, (0.429±1.867) years and (0.493±2.040) years, while those over 40 years old were (-1.707±3.770) years, (-3.286±4.078) years and (-2.625±4.029) years. The differences between different age groups in these three populations were statistically significant (<0.05). Using the sternum method, the inference errors of males and females under the age of 40 were (0.921±3.019) years and (0.452±1.451) years, while those over the age of 40 were (-5.903±5.088) years and (-1.429±2.227) years. The differences between different age groups in males and females were statistically significant (<0.05). Using the pubic symphysis method, the inference errors of males and females under 40 years old were (-0.204±1.876) years and (0.238±2.477) years, while those over 40 years old were (1.500±2.156) years and (-2.643±4.270) years. The differences between different age groups in males and females were statistically significant (<0.05). Using the sternum method and pubic symphysis method for age estimation of over 40 years old, the difference between different sexes was statistically significant (<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
All three methods of age estimation are stable and effective and more accurate for people under 40 years old. For age estimation of unknowns over 40 years old, the pubic symphysis method is preferred in males and the sternum method is preferred in females.
Topics: Adult; Age Determination by Skeleton; Child, Preschool; China; Female; Forensic Anthropology; Forensic Medicine; Humans; Infant; Male; Pubic Symphysis
PubMed: 36221820
DOI: 10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2021.410703 -
Frontiers in Surgery 2022Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is an increasingly prevalent pathology in young and active patients, that has contributing factors from both abnormal hip... (Review)
Review
Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is an increasingly prevalent pathology in young and active patients, that has contributing factors from both abnormal hip morphology as well as abnormal hip motion. Disease progression can be detrimental to patient quality of life in the short term, from limitations on sport and activity, as well as the long term through early onset of hip arthritis. However, several concurrent or contributing pathologies may exist that exacerbate hip pain and are not addressed by arthroscopic intervention of cam and pincer morphologies. Lumbopelvic stiffness, for instance, places increased stress on the hip to achieve necessary flexion. Pathology at the pubic symphysis and sacroiliac joint may exist concurrently to FAIS through aberrant muscle forces. Additionally, both femoral and acetabular retro- or anteversion may contribute to impingement not associated with traditional cam/pincer lesions. Finally, microinstability of the hip from either osseous or capsuloligamentous pathology is increasingly being recognized as a source of hip pain. The present review investigates the pathophysiology and evaluation of alternate causes of hip pain in FAIS that must be evaluated to optimize patient outcomes.
PubMed: 36034352
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.697488 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2012Symphysiotomy is an operation in which the fibres of the pubic symphysis are partially divided to allow separation of the joint and thus enlargement of the pelvic... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Symphysiotomy is an operation in which the fibres of the pubic symphysis are partially divided to allow separation of the joint and thus enlargement of the pelvic dimensions during childbirth. It is performed with local analgesia and does not require an operating theatre nor advanced surgical skills. It may be a lifesaving procedure for the mother or the baby, or both, in several clinical situations. These include: failure to progress in labour when caesarean section is unavailable, unsafe or declined by the mother; and obstructed birth of the aftercoming head of a breech presenting baby. Criticism of the operation because of complications, particularly pelvic instability, and as being a 'second best' option has resulted in its decline or disappearance from use in many countries. Several large observational studies have reported high rates of success, low rates of complications and very low mortality rates.
OBJECTIVES
To determine, from the best available evidence, the effectiveness and safety of symphysiotomy versus alternative options for obstructed labour in various clinical situations.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (7 July 2012).
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomized trials comparing symphysiotomy with alternative management, or alternative techniques of symphysiotomy, for obstructed labour or obstructed aftercoming head during breech birth.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Planned methods included evaluation of studies against objective quality criteria for inclusion, extraction of data, and analysis of data using risk ratios or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. The primary outcomes were maternal death or severe morbidity, and perinatal death or severe morbidity.
MAIN RESULTS
We found no randomized trials of symphysiotomy.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Because of controversy surrounding the use of symphysiotomy, and the possibility that it may be a life-saving procedure in certain circumstances, professional and global bodies should provide guidelines for the use (or non-use) of symphysiotomy based on the best available evidence (currently evidence from observational studies). Research is needed to provide robust evidence of the effectiveness and safety of symphysiotomy compared with no symphysiotomy or comparisons of alternative symphysiotomy techniques in clinical situations in which caesarean section is not available; and compared with caesarean section in clinical situations in which the relative risks and benefits are uncertain (for example in women at very high risk of complications from caesarean section).
Topics: Cephalopelvic Disproportion; Female; Humans; Pelvimetry; Pregnancy; Pubic Symphysis; Symphysiotomy
PubMed: 23076913
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005299.pub3 -
Reviews in Urology 2017Osteitis pubis is a noninfectious inflammatory condition affecting the pubic symphysis. First described in a series of patients undergoing urologic procedures, it is an... (Review)
Review
Osteitis pubis is a noninfectious inflammatory condition affecting the pubic symphysis. First described in a series of patients undergoing urologic procedures, it is an uncommon cause of lower abdominal and suprapubic pain. However, this condition can cause significant morbidity in patients affected, often requiring lengthy recovery periods. Given its rarity, the diagnosis and management is challenging, as many urologists are unfamiliar with the condition and may ascribe the constellation of symptoms as expected side effects from a recent surgical procedure. This review describes the urologic considerations for osteitis pubis, its potential etiologies, and clinical findings, and identifies treatment strategies for this potentially debilitating condition.
PubMed: 29302238
DOI: 10.3909/riu0767 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jul 2023Open reduction and reconstruction plate and screws fixation (RPSF) is considered the gold standard for the treatment of traumatic symphysis pubis diastasis (SPD).... (Review)
Review
Percutaneous Fixation for Traumatic Symphysis Pubis Disruption-Are the Results Superior Compared to Open Techniques? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes.
INTRODUCTION
Open reduction and reconstruction plate and screws fixation (RPSF) is considered the gold standard for the treatment of traumatic symphysis pubis diastasis (SPD). Percutaneous cannulated screw fixation (PCSF) has recently gained popularity as it may reduce operative time and morbidity. The current systematic review aims to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of PCSF and RPSF in traumatic SPD and analyze the biomechanical effectiveness of PCSF.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched until February 2023. The primary outcomes were the incidence of implant failure and revision surgery and the amount of displacement of symphysis pubis. Secondary outcomes were the intraoperative blood loss, the scar length, the operative time, the wound infection, and the patients' functional improvement.
RESULTS
Six clinical trial studies with a total of 184 patients and nine biomechanical studies were included. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the incidence of implant failure, the prevalence of revision surgery, and the amount of postoperative loss of reduction ( > 0.05 for all outcomes). The intraoperative blood loss (14.9 ± 4.2 mL for PCSF versus 162.7 ± 47.6 mL for PCSF, < 0.001) and the incision length (1.7 ± 0.9 mL for PCSF versus 8 ± 1.4 mL for PCSF, < 0.001) were significantly lower after PCSF. The mean operative time was 37 ± 19.1 min for PCSF and 68.9 ± 13.6 min for RPSF ( < 0.001). The infection rate was less frequent in the PCSF group (3% for PCSF versus 14.3% for RPSF, = 0.01). One clinical trial reported better functional recovery after PCSF. In all biomechanical studies, the threshold for implant failure was beyond the applied forces corresponding to daily activities.
CONCLUSIONS
PCSF for traumatic SPD is associated with less operative time, less blood loss, and a lower infection rate when compared to conventional plate techniques without increasing the incidence of postoperative fixation failure and revision surgery. Moreover, PCSF has been proven to be biomechanically sufficient for stabilization. Therefore, it should be considered an efficient and viable alternative for the reconstruction of SPD when closed reduction can be adequately achieved.
PubMed: 37568389
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12154988 -
Journal of Bone and Joint Infection 2022: Septic arthritis and osteomyelitis of the pubic symphysis (SAS) are rare conditions with nonspecific symptoms leading to diagnostic delay and treatment. : We draw...
: Septic arthritis and osteomyelitis of the pubic symphysis (SAS) are rare conditions with nonspecific symptoms leading to diagnostic delay and treatment. : We draw awareness to this condition elucidating the diagnostic procedures, surgical intervention and antibiotic management. : This entail a retrospective follow-up study of 26 consecutive patients, median age of 71 years (range: 48-89) surgically treated for septic arthritis of the pubic symphysis between 2009 and 2020. Patient files, diagnostic imaging and bacterial cultures were evaluated. : Before diagnosed with SAS, 21 of the patients had previous pelvic surgery (16 due to malign conditions, 5 due to benign conditions), while 5 of the patients were not previously operated. Median follow-up period after SAS surgery was 18.5 months (range: 8 to 144.5 months). Dominating symptoms were severe suprapubic/pubic pain ( 26), gait difficulties ( 10) and intermittent fever ( 9). Diagnostic delay was between 1 and 12 months. The diagnostic imaging included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ( 24), computer tomography (CT) ( 17) and/or PET-CT ( 10), predominantly displaying bone destruction/erosion of the symphysis ( 13), abscess ( 12) and/or fistula ( 5) in the adjacent muscles. All patients underwent surgical debridement with resection of the symphysis and received a minimum of 6 weeks antibiotic treatment. Fourteen patients presented with monocultures and 4 patients with polycultures. Five patients underwent at least one revision surgery. Twenty-three patients experienced postoperative pain relief at 6 weeks follow-up, and 19 patients were ambulant without walking aids. : SAS are rare conditions and should be suspected in patients with infection, pubic pain and impaired gait, especially after pelvic surgery. Bone infection, abscess and fistula near the symphysis can be visualized with proper imaging, most frequently with MRI. For most patients in this cohort surgical debridement combined with a minimum of 6 weeks antibiotic treatment resulted in pain relief, improved walking ability and a low recurrence rate.
PubMed: 35251903
DOI: 10.5194/jbji-7-35-2022