-
Clinical Microbiology Reviews Jun 2023Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are common causes of bloodstream infections (BSIs) with high morbidity and mortality rates. They are pathogens of global concern... (Review)
Review
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are common causes of bloodstream infections (BSIs) with high morbidity and mortality rates. They are pathogens of global concern with a limited treatment pipeline. Significant challenges exist in the management of VRE BSI, including drug dosing, the emergence of resistance, and the optimal treatment for persistent bacteremia and infective endocarditis. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for antimicrobial therapy is evolving for VRE-active agents; however, there are significant gaps in the literature for predicting antimicrobial efficacy for VRE BSIs. To date, TDM has the greatest evidence for predicting drug toxicity for the three main VRE-active antimicrobial agents daptomycin, linezolid, and teicoplanin. This article presents an overview of the treatment options for VRE BSIs, the role of antimicrobial dose optimization through TDM in supporting clinical infection management, and challenges and perspectives for the future.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Vancomycin; Linezolid; Bacteremia; Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci; Anti-Infective Agents; Sepsis; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
PubMed: 37067406
DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00059-22 -
International Journal of Antimicrobial... Nov 2023Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide with a long elimination half-life and is currently licensed for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in...
BACKGROUND
Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide with a long elimination half-life and is currently licensed for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in adults. Dalbavancin's potential in treating off-label complex Gram-positive infections is promising and real-world experience in treating such infections is growing. However, clear guidance on extended dosing regimens is lacking.
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to provide clear expert opinion based on recent pharmacokinetic literature and expert and real-world experience in infection areas that require > 2 weeks of treatment.
METHODS
A single face-to-face meeting was held in September 2022 to collate expert opinion and present safety data of dalbavancin use in these clinical indications. A survey was completed by all authors on their individual experience with dalbavancin, which highlighted the heterogeneity in the regimens that were used.
RESULTS
After review of the survey data and recent literature, this study presents expert panel proposals that accommodate different healthcare settings and resource availability, and centre around the length of treatment duration including up to or exceeding 6 weeks. To achieve adequate dalbavancin concentrations for up to 6 weeks, 3000 mg of dalbavancin should be given over 4 weeks for the agreed complex infections requiring > 2 weeks of treatment. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is advised for longer treatment durations and in cases of renal failure. Specific dosing recommendations for other special populations require further investigation.
CONCLUSIONS
These proposals based on expert opinion have been defined to encourage best practice with dalbavancin, to optimise its administration beyond the current approved licenced dose across different healthcare settings.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Monitoring; Expert Testimony; Teicoplanin
PubMed: 37633424
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106960 -
Infectious Diseases and Therapy Jun 2023Pharmacist-driven (PD) dosing and monitoring services have been shown to improve the clinical and economic outcomes in patients treated with different antibiotics, other...
Pharmacist-Driven Dosing Services and Pharmaceutical Care Increase Probability of Teicoplanin Target Concentration Attainment and Improve Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Non-Critically Ill Patients.
INTRODUCTION
Pharmacist-driven (PD) dosing and monitoring services have been shown to improve the clinical and economic outcomes in patients treated with different antibiotics, other than teicoplanin. This study investigates the impact of PD dosing and monitoring services on the clinical and economic outcomes of non-critically ill patients receiving teicoplanin treatment.
METHODS
A single-center retrospective study was conducted. Patients were divided into the PD group and the non-PD (NPD) group. Primary outcomes included the achievement of target serum concentration, and a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and sepsis or septic shock development during hospitalization or within 30 days of hospital admission. The cost of teicoplanin, overall medication cost, and total cost during hospital stay were also compared.
RESULTS
A total of 163 patients from January to December 2019 were included and assessed. Seventy patients were assigned to the PD group and 93 to the NPD group. The PD group had a higher percentage of patients reaching the target trough concentration (54% versus 16%, p < 0.001). Around 26% of the patients in the PD group and 50% of the patients in the NPD group met the composite endpoint during their hospital stay (p = 0.002). The PD group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of sepsis or septic shock, shorter hospital stays, reduced drug costs, and lower total expenses.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study demonstrates that pharmacist-driven teicoplanin therapy can improve the clinical and economic outcomes for non-critically ill patients.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
https://www.chictr.org.cn ; identifier, ChiCTR2000033521.
PubMed: 37140880
DOI: 10.1007/s40121-023-00812-2 -
The Journal of Antimicrobial... Nov 2023The glycopeptide teicoplanin is considered first-line treatment for severe infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria. Individualized treatment of teicoplanin is...
BACKGROUND
The glycopeptide teicoplanin is considered first-line treatment for severe infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria. Individualized treatment of teicoplanin is gaining interest. As only protein-unbound drug is pharmacologically active, a sensitive assay measuring unbound and total teicoplanin is indispensable for pharmacological research and dose optimization.
OBJECTIVES
To develop and validate a UPLC-MS/MS method to quantify unbound and total teicoplanin in human serum.
METHODS
The developed assay was validated according to the ICH guideline M10 on Bioanalytical Method Validation and study sample analysis. Unbound teicoplanin was obtained by ultrafiltration. The assay was cross-validated with a quantitative microsphere (QMS) immunoassay in a side-by-side comparison using 40 patient samples.
RESULTS
With the developed and validated method, all main teicoplanin components (A2-1, A2-2/A2-3, A2-4/A2-5 and A3-1) can be quantified. Total run time was 5.5 min. Concentration range was 2.5-150 mg/L for total and 0.1-25 mg/L for unbound teicoplanin. Precision (coefficient of variation) and accuracy (bias) of total teicoplanin were 5.97% and 107%, respectively, and 7.17% and 108%, respectively, for unbound teicoplanin.Bland-Altman analysis showed total concentrations measured with the UPLC-MS/MS method were equivalent to the results of the QMS immunoassay. A total of 188 samples from 30 patients admitted to the ICU and haematology department were measured; total concentrations ranged between 2.92 and 98.5 mg/L, and unbound concentrations ranged between 0.37 and 30.7 mg/L.
CONCLUSIONS
The developed method provided rapid, precise and accurate measurement of unbound and total teicoplanin. The developed method is now routinely applied in pharmacological research and clinical practice.
Topics: Humans; Teicoplanin; Chromatography, Liquid; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Glycopeptides
PubMed: 37757461
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkad290 -
Current Biology : CB Aug 2023Antibiotic resistance often confers a fitness cost to the resistant cell and thus raises key questions of how resistance is maintained in the absence of antibiotics and,...
Antibiotic resistance often confers a fitness cost to the resistant cell and thus raises key questions of how resistance is maintained in the absence of antibiotics and, if lost, whether cells are genetically primed for re-evolving resistance. To address these questions, we have examined vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) strains that arise during vancomycin therapy. VISA strains harbor a broad spectrum of mutations, and they are known to be unstable both in patients and in the laboratory. Here, we show that loss of resistance in VISA strains is correlated with a fitness increase and is attributed to adaptive mutations, leaving the initial VISA-adaptive mutations intact. Importantly, upon a second exposure to vancomycin, such revertants evolve significantly faster to become VISA, and they reach higher resistance levels than vancomycin-naive cells. Further, we find that sub-lethal concentrations of vancomycin stabilize the VISA phenotype, as do the human β-defensin 3 (hBD-3) and the bacteriocin nisin that both, like vancomycin, bind to the peptidoglycan building block, lipid II. Thus, factors binding lipid II may stabilize VISA both in vivo and in vitro, and in case resistance is lost, mutations remain that predispose to resistance development. These findings may explain why VISA infections often are re-occurring and suggest that previous vancomycin adaptation should be considered a risk factor when deciding on antimicrobial chemotherapy.
Topics: Humans; Staphylococcus aureus; Vancomycin; Vancomycin Resistance; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Staphylococcal Infections
PubMed: 37494936
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.082 -
Scientific Reports Aug 2023Teicoplanin can cause acute kidney injury, but little is known about the risk of acute kidney injury when teicoplanin is co-administered with loop diuretics (a powerful...
Teicoplanin can cause acute kidney injury, but little is known about the risk of acute kidney injury when teicoplanin is co-administered with loop diuretics (a powerful diuresis), which can alter renal hemodynamics and glomerular filtration rate. We performed a signal detection analysis using a Japanese adverse event database to determine the additive impact of loop diuretics on acute kidney injury associated with teicoplanin. The dataset originated between April 2004 and August 2022. Disproportionality analysis was performed to detect the signals for acute kidney injury (the Standardized MedDRA Query) when co-administered teicoplanin or vancomycin (a positive control) with individual diuretics, including loop diuretics. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was tested to estimate the adjusted reporting odds ratio (aROR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). There were 147 and 515 events of acute kidney injury associated with teicoplanin and vancomycin, respectively. A significant positive signal for acute kidney injury when teicoplanin was co-administered with loop diuretics was present (aROR 4.83, 95% CI 3.52-6.61, p < 0.0001). Contrastingly, no significant signals were observed when vancomycin was co-administered with any diuretics. These findings suggest that co-administered loop diuretics may have an unfavorable effect on acute kidney injury while undertaking teicoplanin but not vancomycin.
Topics: Humans; Acute Kidney Injury; Diuretics; Drug Interactions; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; East Asian People; Sodium Potassium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors; Teicoplanin; Vancomycin; Japan
PubMed: 37633977
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-41095-4 -
Effectiveness, safety, and cost of vancomycin and linezolid in Kuwait: A retrospective cohort study.Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal : SPJ :... Nov 2023The effectiveness, safety, and cost of vancomycin and linezolid for managing gram-positive bacterial infections in Kuwait are unknown. This study assessed the...
BACKGROUND
The effectiveness, safety, and cost of vancomycin and linezolid for managing gram-positive bacterial infections in Kuwait are unknown. This study assessed the effectiveness, safety, and cost of vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid for managing gram-positive bacterial infections in Kuwait.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
This retrospective study included adult patients who were prescribed antibiotics (vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid) for the treatment of gram-positive infections at five hospitals in Kuwait. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the effectiveness and safety outcomes. A cost analysis was performed on the patients hospitalised for gram-positive infections.
RESULTS
Among 116 patients, 42.2 % (n = 49) received glycopeptides (vancomycin [n = 45] and teicoplanin [n = 4]) or linezolid (n = 67). Clinical cure was achieved in 100 patients without significant intergroup differences (p = 0.34). Thrombocytopenia and acute kidney injury occurred in 19 and 20 patients (p = 0.82 and 0.96), respectively, and their incidence was similar with all the studied agents. The average cost per patient was USD 983.70. The estimated total direct medical costs were USD 894,570.6, the cost was highest for linezolid (USD 469,682.30) and vancomycin (USD 370,342.5), and lowest for teicoplanin (USD 20,799.9).
CONCLUSIONS
Glycopeptides and linezolid were highly effective. Linezolid was the most frequently prescribed agent; its effectiveness and safety were similar according to the antibiotic class. However, treatment with linezolid and vancomycin were associated with considerable costs.
PubMed: 37860688
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101813 -
Journal of Nephrology Sep 2023This systematic review summarises the stability of less commonly prescribed antibiotics in different peritoneal dialysis solutions that could be used for... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This systematic review summarises the stability of less commonly prescribed antibiotics in different peritoneal dialysis solutions that could be used for culture-directed therapy of peritonitis, which would be especially useful in regions with a high prevalence of multidrug antibiotic-resistant strains.
METHODS
A literature search of Medline, Scopus, Embase and Google Scholar for articles published from inception to 25 January, 2023 was conducted. Only antibiotic stability studies conducted in vitro and not recently reviewed by So et al. were included. The main outcomes were chemical, physical, antimicrobial and microbial stability. This protocol was registered in PROSPERO (registration number CRD42023393366).
RESULTS
We screened 1254 abstracts, and 28 articles were included in the study. In addition to those discussed in a recent systematic review (So et al., Clin Kidney J 15(6):1071-1078, 2022), we identified 18 antimicrobial agents. Of these, 9 have intraperitoneal dosing recommendations in the recent International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) peritonitis guidelines, and 7 of the 9 had stability data applicable to clinical practice. They were cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, daptomycin, ofloxacin, and teicoplanin in glucose-based solutions, tobramycin in Extraneal solution only and fosfomycin in Extraneal, Nutrineal, Physioneal 1.36% and 2.27% glucose solutions.
CONCLUSIONS
Physicochemical stability has not been demonstrated for all antibiotics with intraperitoneal dosing recommendations in the ISPD peritonitis guidelines. Further studies are required to determine the stability of antibiotics, especially in icodextrin-based and low-glucose degradation products, pH-neutral solutions.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Dialysis Solutions; Glucose; Icodextrin; Peritoneal Dialysis; Peritonitis
PubMed: 37548827
DOI: 10.1007/s40620-023-01716-7 -
Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2023To develop a population pharmacokinetic model describing teicoplanin concentrations in patients hospitalized in intensive care unit (ICU) and to perform Monte Carlo... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
PURPOSE
To develop a population pharmacokinetic model describing teicoplanin concentrations in patients hospitalized in intensive care unit (ICU) and to perform Monte Carlo simulations to provide detailed dosing regimens of teicoplanin.
METHODS
This single-center, prospective, observational study was conducted on 151 patients in ICU with 347 plasma samples. The population pharmacokinetics model was established and various covariates were evaluated. The probability of target attainment (PTA) of various proposal dosing regimens was calculated by Monte Carlo simulations.
RESULTS
The two-compartment model adequately described teicoplanin concentration-time data. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) associated with systemic clearance (CL) was the only covariate included in the final model. The estimate of CL was 0.838 L/h, with the eGFR adjustment factor of 0.00823. The volume of the central compartment (V), inter-compartmental clearance (Q) and volumes of the peripheral compartments (V) were 14.4 L, 3.08 L/h and 51.6 L, respectively. The simulations revealed that the standard dosage regimen was only sufficient for the patients with severe renal dysfunction (eGFR ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 m) to attain target trough concentration (C, PTA 52.8%). When eGFR > 30 mL/min/1.73 m, increasing dose and the administration times of loading doses were the preferred options to achieve target C based on the renal function and types of infection.
CONCLUSION
The most commonly used standard dosage regimen was insufficient for all ICU patients. Our study provided detailed dosing regimens of teicoplanin stratified by eGFR and types of infection for ICU patients.
Topics: Humans; Teicoplanin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Critical Illness; Prospective Studies; Kidney; Microbial Sensitivity Tests
PubMed: 37546521
DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S413662 -
Scientific Reports Aug 2023Glycopeptide antibiotics (vancomycin and teicoplanin) are usually used for the treatment of Staphylococcus epidermidis infections owing to their increased oxacillin...
Glycopeptide antibiotics (vancomycin and teicoplanin) are usually used for the treatment of Staphylococcus epidermidis infections owing to their increased oxacillin resistance. However, S. epidermidis strains with decreased susceptibility to teicoplanin have become increasingly incident in recent years. We aimed to identify the characteristics of teicoplanin-non-susceptible (Teico-NS) S. epidermidis isolated at our hospital and analyze its relationship with teicoplanin usage. We retrospectively evaluated 328 S. epidermidis strains isolated from clinical isolates between January 2016 and December 2021. All strains were susceptible to vancomycin (minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤ 4 mg/L). The annual incidence for S. epidermidis strains with an elevated teicoplanin MIC of 8 mg/L ranged from 22.2 to 28.9%. In addition, in 2021, the number of S. epidermidis strains with teicoplanin MIC ≥ 16 mg/L rapidly increased (n = 13, 32.5%). Furthermore, teicoplanin use increased annually until 2019; however, in 2020, it decreased abruptly due to the COVID 19 pandemic. Thus, we could not confirm the existence of a clear correlation between teicoplanin usage and increased incidence of S. epidermidis with reduced teicoplanin-susceptibility. We showed the increased incidence of Teico-NS S. epidermidis in recent years. Further studies are needed to identify the mechanisms and risk factors for teicoplanin-resistance in S. epidermidis.
Topics: Humans; Teicoplanin; Vancomycin; Retrospective Studies; Staphylococcus epidermidis; Incidence; Staphylococcus; COVID-19; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Staphylococcal Infections
PubMed: 37537250
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39666-6