-
Postepy Dermatologii I Alergologii Jun 2014Histamine is a mediator, which increases the permeability of capillaries during the early phase of allergic reaction, causes smooth muscle contraction of bronchi and... (Review)
Review
Histamine is a mediator, which increases the permeability of capillaries during the early phase of allergic reaction, causes smooth muscle contraction of bronchi and stimulates mucous glands in the nasal cavity. Antihistamines are the basis of symptomatic treatment in the majority of allergic diseases, especially allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis, urticaria and anaphylaxis. The cardiotoxic effects of the two withdrawn drugs, terfenadine and astemizole, were manifested by prolonged QT intervals and triggering torsades de pointes (TdP) caused by blockade of the 'rapid' I Kr potassium channels. These phenomena, however, are not a class effect. This review deals with a new generation of antihistamine drugs in the context of QT interval prolongation risk.
PubMed: 25097491
DOI: 10.5114/pdia.2014.43191 -
Indian Journal of Pharmacology 2016Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a global health problem. Almost 10%-25% of population worldwide is affected by AR. Oral/intranasal H1-antihistamine, decongestants, leukotriene... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparison of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of montelukast-levocetirizine and montelukast-fexofenadine in patients of allergic rhinitis: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial.
OBJECTIVES
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a global health problem. Almost 10%-25% of population worldwide is affected by AR. Oral/intranasal H1-antihistamine, decongestants, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and intranasal corticosteroids are the pillars in the management of AR. The combination therapy of montelukast with antihistaminic provides enhancing and complimentary effects, thereby reducing the symptoms effectively, but there are scanty data regarding the comparisons of combinations. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of montelukast-levocetirizine and montelukast-fexofenadine combination in patients of AR.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Seventy patients with AR participated in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, comparative 4-week trial. The patients between the age group of 18-65 years of either gender having moderate-severe intermittent or mild persistent AR were included in the study. The study inclusion criteria required the patients with total nasal symptom score (TNSS) of 5 or higher. The patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups with montelukast-levocetirizine (10 mg and 5 mg) in one group and montelukast-fexofenadine (10 mg and 120 mg) in another group. TNSS parameter was the main effectiveness parameter.
RESULTS
Evaluation of TNSS revealed significant difference ( < 0.05) when compared from baseline to 4 week in both groups. The mean change of TNSS, i.e., 9.46 was significant ( < 0.05) in montelukast-fexofenadine group. The cost-effectiveness ratio was less in montelukast-levocetirizine group than in montelukast-fexofenadine group.
CONCLUSION
The decrease in TNSS was more in montelukast-fexofenadine group, but the cost-effectiveness is more with montelukast-levocetirizine combination.
Topics: Acetates; Anti-Allergic Agents; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Cetirizine; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Quinolines; Rhinitis, Allergic; Sulfides; Terfenadine; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28066101
DOI: 10.4103/0253-7613.194854 -
Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine Oct 2017While it is well known that mutation of several different ion channels can cause congenital long QT syndrome, block of I is widely thought to be responsible for most... (Review)
Review
While it is well known that mutation of several different ion channels can cause congenital long QT syndrome, block of I is widely thought to be responsible for most cases of drug-induced acquired long QT syndrome (aLQTS). In this article, we review evidence supporting another cause of aLQTS due to inhibition of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling. Inhibition of PI3K affects multiple plateau currents, reducing I, I, and I while increasing the persistent sodium current (I). The effects of PI3K inhibitors develop slowly, requiring hours to days to reach steady state. Dofetilide and terfenadine, an antihistamine on which much of the original I hypothesis was based, are among the many drugs that inhibit the PI3K pathway. Reduced PI3K signaling may also play a role in aLQTS associated with diabetes. Drug safety testing to identify aLQTS risk may be improved by examining PI3K-dependent effects that develop over time.
Topics: Action Potentials; Animals; Heart Conduction System; Heart Rate; Humans; Long QT Syndrome; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase; Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase Inhibitors; Potassium Channel Blockers; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Sodium Channel Blockers
PubMed: 28687226
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2017.05.005 -
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy =... Apr 2022Cardiotoxicity remains the most common reason for failure during drug development. Recently, the zebrafish (Danio rerio) model has emerged for the evaluation of...
Cardiotoxicity remains the most common reason for failure during drug development. Recently, the zebrafish (Danio rerio) model has emerged for the evaluation of drug-dependent cardiotoxicity and for the identification of cardioprotective molecules. However, it remains unknown how closely the zebrafish-based results may be translated to humans. To tackle this issue, we established embryonic zebrafish models of doxorubicin-, adrenaline- and terfenadine-induced cardiotoxicity with unified dosing regimen which eventually enabled head-to-head comparison of the drugs. Subsequently, we determined whether human cardioprotective medications - dexrazoxane, metoprolol, carvedilol and valsartan - are able to manage heart dysfunction in zebrafish. Our results indicated that doxorubicin, adrenaline and terfenadine elicited overt signs of cardiotoxicity in fish, and we further showed that the blockade of the renin-angiotensin system and, to a lesser extent, β-adrenergic system, ameliorated the heart disease in zebrafish. From the drug development standpoint, our work opens the possibility to determine the cardiovascular properties of tested compounds using the rapid and affordable zebrafish model.
Topics: Animals; Cardiomyopathies; Cardiotoxicity; Carvedilol; Doxorubicin; Zebrafish
PubMed: 35158142
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.112695 -
BioMed Research International 2022Lupus nephritis (LN) is the most common and significant complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) due to its poor prognosis and mortality rates in SLE patients....
Lupus nephritis (LN) is the most common and significant complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) due to its poor prognosis and mortality rates in SLE patients. There is a critical need for new drugs as the pathogenesis of LN remains to be elucidated and immunosuppressive therapy comes with many deficiencies. In this study, 23 hub genes (IFI6, PLSCR1, XAF1, IFI16, IFI44, MX1, IFI44L, IFIT3, IFIT2, IFI27, DDX58, EIF2AK2, IFITM1, RTP4, IFITM3, TRIM22, PARP12, IFIH1, OAS1, HERC6, RSAD2, DDX60, and MX2) were identified through bioinformatics and network analysis and are closely related to interferon production and function. Interestingly, immune cell infiltration analysis and correlation analysis demonstrate a positive correlation between the expression of 23 hub genes and monocyte infiltration in glomeruli and M2 macrophage infiltration in the tubulointerstitium of LN patients. Additionally, the CTD database, DsigDB database, and DREIMT database were used to explore the bridging role of genes in chemicals and LN as well as the potential influence of these chemicals on immune cells. After comparison and discussion, six small molecules (Acetohexamide, Suloctidil, Terfenadine, Prochlorperazine, Mefloquine, and Triprolidine) were selected for their potential ability in treating lupus nephritis.
Topics: Computational Biology; Female; Gene Expression; Genes, Regulator; Humans; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Lupus Nephritis; Male; Membrane Proteins; RNA-Binding Proteins
PubMed: 35502341
DOI: 10.1155/2022/2259164 -
British Journal of Pharmacology Sep 2019A second-generation antihistamine, terfenadine, is known to induce arrhythmia by blocking hERG channels. In this study, we have shown that terfenadine also inhibits the...
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
A second-generation antihistamine, terfenadine, is known to induce arrhythmia by blocking hERG channels. In this study, we have shown that terfenadine also inhibits the activity of G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying K (GIRK) channels, which regulate the excitability of neurons and cardiomyocytes. To clarify the underlying mechanism(s), we examined the effects of several antihistamines on GIRK channels and identified the structural determinant for the inhibition.
EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH
Electrophysiological recordings were made in Xenopus oocytes and rat atrial myocytes to analyse the effects of antihistamines on various GIRK subunits (K 3.x). Mutagenesis analyses identified the residues critical for inhibition by terfenadine and the regulation of ion selectivity. The potential docking site of terfenadine was analysed by molecular docking.
KEY RESULTS
GIRK channels containing K 3.1 subunits heterologously expressed in oocytes and native GIRK channels in atrial myocytes were inhibited by terfenadine and other non-sedating antihistamines. In K 3.1 subunits, mutation of Phe137, located in the centre of the pore helix, to the corresponding Ser in K 3.2 subunits reduced the inhibition by terfenadine. Introduction of an amino acid with a large side chain in K 3.2 subunits at Ser148 increased the inhibition. When this residue was mutated to a non-polar amino acid, the channel became permeable to Na . Phosphoinositide-mediated activity was also decreased by terfenadine.
CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS
The Phe137 residue in K 3.1 subunits is critical for inhibition by terfenadine. This study provides novel insights into the regulation of GIRK channels by the pore helix and information for drug design.
Topics: Animals; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; G Protein-Coupled Inwardly-Rectifying Potassium Channels; Histamine Antagonists; Male; Molecular Docking Simulation; Mutation; Myocytes, Cardiac; Oocytes; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Structure-Activity Relationship; Xenopus laevis
PubMed: 31116876
DOI: 10.1111/bph.14717 -
The Journal of Toxicological Sciences 2018In order to better understand the variability of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles of terfenadine between the previous studies as well as to qualitatively and... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
Comparison of electropharmacological effects between terfenadine and its active derivative fexofenadine using a cross-over study in halothane-anesthetized dogs to analyze variability of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles of terfenadine and torsadogenic risk of fexofenadine.
In order to better understand the variability of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles of terfenadine between the previous studies as well as to qualitatively and quantitatively examine the proarrhythmic potential of its major active metabolite fexofenadine in comparison with that of terfenadine, we directly compared their electropharmacological effects with halothane-anesthetized dogs (n = 3). For this purpose, we adopted a cross-over design, which can directly compare the effects of terfenadine and fexofenadine under the identical metabolic condition. Terfenadine in doses of 0.03 and 0.3 mg/kg increased the mean blood pressure, but that of 3 mg/kg decreased it. Terfenadine also increased the heart rate and ventricular contractility in a dose-related manner; but delayed the atrioventricular nodal and intraventricular conductions as well as repolarization suggesting its proarrhythmic potential. Meanwhile, fexofenadine in the same dose increased the mean blood pressure in a dose-related manner without affecting any of the electrophysiological variables in the same animals that proarrhythmic risk of terfenadine was confirmed, indicating its lack of proarrhythmic risk. Peak plasma concentrations for fexofenadine were 3.7, 8.1 and 11.2 times greater than for terfenadine at each matching dose, indicating terfenadine may be metabolized much faster than fexofenadine. Taken together, after the low and middle doses of terfenadine, vasopressor effect of a metabolite fexofenadine could be greater than the depressor effect of parent compound terfenadine, but its reverse would be correct after the high dose. Thus, the cross-over analysis can be an effective way to better understand drug-induced cardiovascular responses.
Topics: Anesthesia; Animals; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Blood Pressure; Cross-Over Studies; Dogs; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electrocardiography; Halothane; Heart Rate; Myocardial Contraction; Risk; Terfenadine
PubMed: 29540652
DOI: 10.2131/jts.43.183 -
Acta Pharmaceutica (Zagreb, Croatia) Jun 2021Terfenadine is a second-generation H1-antihistamine that despite potentially can produce severe side effects it has recently gained attention due to its anticancer...
Terfenadine is a second-generation H1-antihistamine that despite potentially can produce severe side effects it has recently gained attention due to its anticancer properties. Lately, the subfamily 2 of inward rectifier potassium channels (Kir2) has been implicated in the progression of some tumoral processes. Hence, we characterized the effects of terfenadine on Kir2.x channels expressed in HEK-293 cells. Terfenadine inhibited Kir2.3 channels with a strikingly greater potency (IC50 = 1.06 ± 0.11 μmol L-1) compared to Kir2.1 channels (IC50 = 27.8 ± 4.8 μmol L-1). The Kir2.3(I213L) mutant, possessing a larger affinity for phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) than the wild-type Kir2.3, was less sensitive to terfenadine inhibition (IC50 = 13.0 ± 2.9 μmol L-1). Additionally, the PIP2 intracellular application had largely reduced the inhibition of Kir2.1 channels by terfenadine. Our data support that Kir2.x channels are targets of terfena-dine by affecting their interaction with PIP2, which could be regarded as a mechanism of the antitumor properties of terfenadine.
Topics: HEK293 Cells; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Potassium Channels, Inwardly Rectifying; Terfenadine
PubMed: 33151169
DOI: 10.2478/acph-2021-0017