-
PloS One 2023The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the safety of the anti-thyroid drugs (ATDs) propylthiouracil (PTU) and methimazole (MMI) in the treatment of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the safety of the anti-thyroid drugs (ATDs) propylthiouracil (PTU) and methimazole (MMI) in the treatment of hyperthyroidism during pregnancy.
METHOD
From inception until June 2, 2022, all available studies were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, EBSCO, Embase, Scopus, and CNKI.
RESULT
Thirteen articles satisfying the inclusion criteria were examined. Our meta-analysis indicated that pregnant women treated with MMI had a higher risk of congenital anomalies than those treated with PTU (OR 0.80, 95%CI 0.69-0.92, P = 0.002, I2 = 41.9%). Shifting between MMI and PTU during pregnancy did not reduce the risk of birth defects compared to PTU alone (OR 1.18, CI 1.00 to 1.40, P = 0.061, I2 = 0.0%). There were no statistically significant differences in hepatotoxicity (OR 1.54, 95%CI 0.77-3.09, P = 0.221, I2 = 0.0%) or miscarriage (OR 0.89, 95%CI 0.72-1.11, P = 0.310, I2 = 0.0%) between PTU and MMI exposure.
CONCLUSION
The study confirmed propylthiouracil is a safer alternative to methimazole for treating hyperthyroidism in pregnant women, and it is appropriate to treat maternal thyroid disease with PTU during the first trimester of pregnancy. However, it is not clear whether switching between propylthiouracil and methimazole is a better option than treating PTU alone during pregnancy. Further studies on this matter may be needed to develop new evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of pregnant women with hyperthyroidism.
Topics: Female; Pregnancy; Humans; Methimazole; Propylthiouracil; Antithyroid Agents; Hyperthyroidism; Abortion, Spontaneous; Pregnancy Complications
PubMed: 37205692
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286097 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jun 2011Randomised clinical trials have addressed the question whether propylthiouracil has any beneficial effects in patients with alcoholic liver disease. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Randomised clinical trials have addressed the question whether propylthiouracil has any beneficial effects in patients with alcoholic liver disease.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of propylthiouracil for patients with alcoholic liver disease.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (April 2011), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library (April 2011), MEDLINE (1948 to April 2011), EMBASE (1980 to April 2011), and Science Citation Index Expanded (1900 to April 2011). These electronic searches were combined with full text searches. Manufacturers and researchers in the field were also contacted.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised clinical trials studying patients with alcoholic steatosis, alcoholic fibrosis, alcoholic hepatitis, and/or alcoholic cirrhosis were included irrespective of blinding, publication status, or language. Interventions encompassed propylthiouracil at any dose versus placebo or no intervention.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
All analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat method in RevMan Analyses. The risk of bias of the randomised clinical trials was evaluated by bias risk domains such as generation of allocation sequence, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting, academic bias, and source of funding.
MAIN RESULTS
Combining the results of six randomised clinical trials with high risk of bias which included 710 patients demonstrated no significant effects of propylthiouracil versus placebo on all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 1.30), liver-related mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.40), or complications of the liver disease. Although propylthiouracil was not associated with a significant increased risk of non-serious adverse events, there were occasional instances of serious adverse events such as leukopenia and generalised bullous eruption.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We could not demonstrate any significant beneficial effect of propylthiouracil on all-cause mortality, liver-related mortality, liver complications, or liver histology of patients with alcoholic liver disease. Propylthiouracil was associated with adverse events. Confidence intervals were wide. Thus, the risk of random errors and systematic errors was high. Accordingly, there is no evidence for using propylthiouracil for alcoholic liver disease outside randomised clinical trials.
Topics: Antimetabolites; Cause of Death; Humans; Liver Diseases, Alcoholic; Propylthiouracil; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 21678335
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002800.pub3 -
International Journal of Paediatric... Mar 2022PROP test (6-n-propylthiouracil) for the identification of genetic sensitivity to caries in young individuals has emerged as a useful tool for caries risk assessment. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
PROP test (6-n-propylthiouracil) for the identification of genetic sensitivity to caries in young individuals has emerged as a useful tool for caries risk assessment.
AIM
To systematically appraise available evidence on the association between genetic taste sensitivity, as detected by (PROP), and caries.
DESIGN
Seven databases, as of March 2020, were searched. Search terms included 'caries', 'taste predisposition', 'PROP'. Risk of bias assessment was performed using ROBINS-I tool, and the quality of evidence was assessed with GRADE. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to synthesize data, and pooled effects were estimated through standardized mean differences (SMDs) and associated confidence Intervals (95% CIs).
RESULTS
Of 92 articles initially retrieved, 12 were eligible for inclusion. Seven contributed to the meta-analyses. All were cross-sectional studies, with moderate-to-serious risk of bias. The non-tasters of PROP exhibited a significantly higher value for the DMFT compared with tasters (SMD: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.90, 1.56; P < .001), whereas the association for the DMFS was SMD: 1.34; 95% CI: 0.66, 2.01; P < .001 (non-tasters versus super-tasters). The quality of evidence was very low overall.
CONCLUSIONS
Within the limitations of this study, non-tasters to PROP exhibited higher caries experience, with subsequent clinical implications for follow-up and management of the 'high-susceptibility' individuals.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Dental Caries; Humans; Propylthiouracil; Taste
PubMed: 34080244
DOI: 10.1111/ipd.12845 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Oct 2021Maternal antithyroid drug (ATD) use during pregnancy has been associated with an increased risk of birth defects in offspring. Uncertainty remains on the size of this... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Antithyroid drug use during pregnancy and the risk of birth defects in offspring: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies with methodological considerations.
AIMS
Maternal antithyroid drug (ATD) use during pregnancy has been associated with an increased risk of birth defects in offspring. Uncertainty remains on the size of this risk and how it compares to untreated hyperthyroidism due to methodological limitations of previous studies.
METHODS
Systematic review of MEDLINE and EMBASE identifying observational studies examining ATD use during pregnancy and risk of birth defects by 28 August 2020. Data were extracted on study characteristics, effect estimates and comparator groups. Adjusted effect estimates were pooled using a random-effects generic inverse variance method and absolute risk calculated.
RESULTS
Seven cohort studies and 1 case-control study involving 6 212 322 pregnancies and 388 976 birth defects were identified reporting regression effect estimates. Compared to an unexposed population comparison, the association between ATD use during pregnancy and birth defects in offspring was: adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 1.16 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.25 for propylthiouracil (PTU); aRR 1.28 95%CI 1.06-1.54 for methimazole/carbimazole (MMI/CMZ); aRR 1.51, 95%CI 1.16-1.97 for both MMI/CMZ and PTU; and aRR 1.15 95%CI 1.02-1.29 for untreated hyperthyroidism. The excess risk of any and major birth defects per 1000, respectively, was: 10.2 and 1.3 for PTU; 17.8 and 2.3 for MMI/CMZ; 32.5 and 4.1 for both MMI/CMZ and PTU; and 9.6 and 1.2 for untreated hyperthyroidism.
CONCLUSIONS
When appropriately analysed the risk of birth defects associated with ATD use in pregnancy is attenuated. Although still elevated, the risk of birth defects is smallest with PTU compared to MMI/CMZ and may be similar to that of untreated hyperthyroidism.
Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Antithyroid Agents; Case-Control Studies; Female; Humans; Hyperthyroidism; Methimazole; Observational Studies as Topic; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Propylthiouracil
PubMed: 33783857
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14805 -
European Journal of Cancer Prevention :... Jan 2022The thyroid peroxidase inhibiting compounds methimazole, methylthiouracil, propylthiouracil, thiouracil (i.e. 'antithyroid' drugs) and ethylenethiourea have been...
INTRODUCTION
The thyroid peroxidase inhibiting compounds methimazole, methylthiouracil, propylthiouracil, thiouracil (i.e. 'antithyroid' drugs) and ethylenethiourea have been associated to thyroid tumours in rodents. According to a systematic review by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) published in 2000, evidence for the human carcinogenicity was inadequate.
METHODS
We performed an up-to-date systematic review of human epidemiological studies on the association between such compounds and thyroid cancer incidence or mortality.
RESULTS
The literature research (1999-March 2020) identified four relevant articles. Considering also reports from the previous IARC review, this systematic review considered seven reports (five distinct studies) on antithyroid drugs and two on ethylenethiourea. As for antithyroid drugs, three reports based on different follow-ups gave results from a cohort of patients treated for hyperthyroidism in 1946-1964. In the earlier report, thyroid cancer incidence was higher in patients primarily treated with antithyroid drugs (3.2/1000) than in those originally treated with thyroidectomy (0.34/1000) or radioactive iodine (0.88/1000), which can be explained by the higher frequency of subsequent thyroidectomy, and hence the higher chance of cancer detection, in that group (30 vs. 0.5 and 1.2%). The two subsequent reports found no deaths from thyroid cancer among patients treated exclusively with antithyroid drugs through 1990 and 2014. A nested case-control study found an odds ratio (OR) of thyroid cancer of 2.79 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.78-10.02, from a 2-year lag analysis] for ≥3 vs. no propylthiouracil prescriptions. The increased risk can be attributed to advanced diagnosis of an underlying cancer, as suggested by the stronger association observed in a no-lag analysis (OR, 8.03). In a historical cohort of newly diagnosed hyperthyroid patients, the hazard ratio for treatment with radioactive iodine vs. thionamides only was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.21-0.99), possibly due to the closer surveillance of patients receiving thionamides only. Two case-control studies did not find any association with the use of antithyroid drugs. As for ethylenethiourea, no thyroid cancer cases were found in a historical cohort of 1929 workers occupationally exposed in a 15-year period and no association with proxies of mancozeb exposure (a fungicide whose main metabolite is ethylenethiourea) was detected in a cohort of >236 000 farmers.
CONCLUSION
There is no evidence for a relevant role of either antithyroid drugs or ethylenethiourea on thyroid cancer.
Topics: Antithyroid Agents; Case-Control Studies; Ethylenethiourea; Humans; Hyperthyroidism; Iodine Radioisotopes; Propylthiouracil; Thyroid Neoplasms
PubMed: 33492873
DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000658