-
Neurology Jan 2021To update the 2016 formal consensus-based guidance for the management of myasthenia gravis (MG) based on the latest evidence in the literature. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To update the 2016 formal consensus-based guidance for the management of myasthenia gravis (MG) based on the latest evidence in the literature.
METHODS
In October 2013, the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America appointed a Task Force to develop treatment guidance for MG, and a panel of 15 international experts was convened. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was used to develop consensus recommendations pertaining to 7 treatment topics. In February 2019, the international panel was reconvened with the addition of one member to represent South America. All previous recommendations were reviewed for currency, and new consensus recommendations were developed on topics that required inclusion or updates based on the recent literature. Up to 3 rounds of anonymous e-mail votes were used to reach consensus, with modifications to recommendations between rounds based on the panel input. A simple majority vote (80% of panel members voting "yes") was used to approve minor changes in grammar and syntax to improve clarity.
RESULTS
The previous recommendations for thymectomy were updated. New recommendations were developed for the use of rituximab, eculizumab, and methotrexate as well as for the following topics: early immunosuppression in ocular MG and MG associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.
CONCLUSION
This updated formal consensus guidance of international MG experts, based on new evidence, provides recommendations to clinicians caring for patients with MG worldwide.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Consensus; Disease Management; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Immunosuppressive Agents; Methotrexate; Myasthenia Gravis; Rituximab; Thymectomy
PubMed: 33144515
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011124 -
Neurologic Clinics May 2018With specialized care, patients with myasthenia gravis can have very good outcomes. The mainstays of treatment are acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, and immunosuppressive... (Review)
Review
With specialized care, patients with myasthenia gravis can have very good outcomes. The mainstays of treatment are acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, and immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory therapies. There is good evidence thymectomy is beneficial in thymomatous and nonthymomatous disease. Nearly all of the drugs used for MG are considered "off-label." The 2 exceptions are acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and complement inhibition with eculizumab, which was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for myasthenia gravis. This article reviews the evidence base and provides a framework for the treatment of myasthenia gravis, highlighting recent additions to the literature.
Topics: Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Myasthenia Gravis; Thymectomy
PubMed: 29655452
DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2018.01.011 -
Neurology Jul 2016To develop formal consensus-based guidance for the management of myasthenia gravis (MG). (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To develop formal consensus-based guidance for the management of myasthenia gravis (MG).
METHODS
In October 2013, the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America appointed a Task Force to develop treatment guidance for MG, and a panel of 15 international experts was convened. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology was used to develop consensus guidance statements. Definitions were developed for goals of treatment, minimal manifestations, remission, ocular MG, impending crisis, crisis, and refractory MG. An in-person panel meeting then determined 7 treatment topics to be addressed. Initial guidance statements were developed from literature summaries. Three rounds of anonymous e-mail votes were used to attain consensus on guidance statements modified on the basis of panel input.
RESULTS
Guidance statements were developed for symptomatic and immunosuppressive treatments, IV immunoglobulin and plasma exchange, management of impending and manifest myasthenic crisis, thymectomy, juvenile MG, MG associated with antibodies to muscle-specific tyrosine kinase, and MG in pregnancy.
CONCLUSION
This is an international formal consensus of MG experts intended to be a guide for clinicians caring for patients with MG worldwide.
Topics: Adult; Child; Consensus; Female; Goals; Humans; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Immunosuppressive Agents; Myasthenia Gravis; Plasma Exchange; Pregnancy; Thymectomy
PubMed: 27358333
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002790 -
The New England Journal of Medicine Aug 2023The function of the thymus in human adults is unclear, and routine removal of the thymus is performed in a variety of surgical procedures. We hypothesized that the adult...
BACKGROUND
The function of the thymus in human adults is unclear, and routine removal of the thymus is performed in a variety of surgical procedures. We hypothesized that the adult thymus is needed to sustain immune competence and overall health.
METHODS
We evaluated the risk of death, cancer, and autoimmune disease among adult patients who had undergone thymectomy as compared with demographically matched controls who had undergone similar cardiothoracic surgery without thymectomy. T-cell production and plasma cytokine levels were also compared in a subgroup of patients.
RESULTS
After exclusions, 1420 patients who had undergone thymectomy and 6021 controls were included in the study; 1146 of the patients who had undergone thymectomy had a matched control and were included in the primary cohort. At 5 years after surgery, all-cause mortality was higher in the thymectomy group than in the control group (8.1% vs. 2.8%; relative risk, 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 4.8), as was the risk of cancer (7.4% vs. 3.7%; relative risk, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.2). Although the risk of autoimmune disease did not differ substantially between the groups in the overall primary cohort (relative risk, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.4), a difference was found when patients with preoperative infection, cancer, or autoimmune disease were excluded from the analysis (12.3% vs. 7.9%; relative risk, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.2). In an analysis involving all patients with more than 5 years of follow-up (with or without a matched control), all-cause mortality was higher in the thymectomy group than in the general U.S. population (9.0% vs. 5.2%), as was mortality due to cancer (2.3% vs. 1.5%). In the subgroup of patients in whom T-cell production and plasma cytokine levels were measured (22 in the thymectomy group and 19 in the control group; mean follow-up, 14.2 postoperative years), those who had undergone thymectomy had less new production of CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes than controls (mean CD4+ signal joint T-cell receptor excision circle [sjTREC] count, 1451 vs. 526 per microgram of DNA [Pā=ā0.009]; mean CD8+ sjTREC count, 1466 vs. 447 per microgram of DNA [P<0.001]) and higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines in the blood.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, all-cause mortality and the risk of cancer were higher among patients who had undergone thymectomy than among controls. Thymectomy also appeared be associated with an increased risk of autoimmune disease when patients with preoperative infection, cancer, or autoimmune disease were excluded from the analysis. (Funded by the Tracey and Craig A. Huff Harvard Stem Cell Institute Research Support Fund and others.).
Topics: Humans; Adult; Thymectomy; Thymus Gland; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cytokines; Autoimmune Diseases
PubMed: 37530823
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2302892 -
Neuromuscular Disorders : NMD Feb 2020Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disease characterized by dysfunction of the neuromuscular junction. Current treatment is based on lifestyle advice, symptomatic... (Review)
Review
Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disease characterized by dysfunction of the neuromuscular junction. Current treatment is based on lifestyle advice, symptomatic treatment, immunosuppressive drugs and thymectomy. Corticosteroids remain the cornerstone of treatment beside symptomatic medication due to their low cost, wide availability and fast mode of action. However, long term steroid use carries substantial risks of severe adverse side effects. Therefore, non-steroidal immunosuppressive drugs are commonly added to the treatment. Unfortunately, they have a delayed-onset effect and evidence of their efficacy appears to be difficult to obtain. Several trials using drugs that have had clear positive results in other immunological disorders have failed in myasthenia. This failure may in part be related to difficulties in the design of clinical trial for myasthenia, which has a fluctuating disease course involving weakness that may be difficult to assess quantitively. This problem is exacerbated by the tendency of most clinical trials to select patients with a stable, but severe disease. Future trials should: select patients with weakness and fatigability that is completely explained by their myasthenia gravis, use a design that avoids the exclusion of patients with recent changes in medication, and explore the possibilities to completely avoid the use of corticosteroids.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Exercise Therapy; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Myasthenia Gravis; Proteasome Inhibitors; Thymectomy
PubMed: 32007304
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2019.12.003 -
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association... Sep 2018
Topics: Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological; Electromyography; Humans; Myasthenia Gravis; Thymectomy
PubMed: 30249760
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.180656 -
The New England Journal of Medicine Aug 2016Thymectomy has been a mainstay in the treatment of myasthenia gravis, but there is no conclusive evidence of its benefit. We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Thymectomy has been a mainstay in the treatment of myasthenia gravis, but there is no conclusive evidence of its benefit. We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial comparing thymectomy plus prednisone with prednisone alone.
METHODS
We compared extended transsternal thymectomy plus alternate-day prednisone with alternate-day prednisone alone. Patients 18 to 65 years of age who had generalized nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis with a disease duration of less than 5 years were included if they had Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America clinical class II to IV disease (on a scale from I to V, with higher classes indicating more severe disease) and elevated circulating concentrations of acetylcholine-receptor antibody. The primary outcomes were the time-weighted average Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (on a scale from 0 to 39, with higher scores indicating more severe disease) over a 3-year period, as assessed by means of blinded rating, and the time-weighted average required dose of prednisone over a 3-year period.
RESULTS
A total of 126 patients underwent randomization between 2006 and 2012 at 36 sites. Patients who underwent thymectomy had a lower time-weighted average Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score over a 3-year period than those who received prednisone alone (6.15 vs. 8.99, P<0.001); patients in the thymectomy group also had a lower average requirement for alternate-day prednisone (44 mg vs. 60 mg, P<0.001). Fewer patients in the thymectomy group than in the prednisone-only group required immunosuppression with azathioprine (17% vs. 48%, P<0.001) or were hospitalized for exacerbations (9% vs. 37%, P<0.001). The number of patients with treatment-associated complications did not differ significantly between groups (P=0.73), but patients in the thymectomy group had fewer treatment-associated symptoms related to immunosuppressive medications (P<0.001) and lower distress levels related to symptoms (P=0.003).
CONCLUSIONS
Thymectomy improved clinical outcomes over a 3-year period in patients with nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and others; MGTX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00294658.).
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Combined Modality Therapy; Female; Glucocorticoids; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myasthenia Gravis; Prednisone; Severity of Illness Index; Single-Blind Method; Thymectomy; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 27509100
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602489 -
Medicina 2019Juvenile myasthenia gravis is a rare autoimmune disease, which has made it difficult to collect data from prospective randomized controlled trials to evaluate the...
Juvenile myasthenia gravis is a rare autoimmune disease, which has made it difficult to collect data from prospective randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and results of different treatments. Although there are differences between the juvenile myasthenia gravis and that of the adult, the data provided by some researches in adults in the treatment of juvenile myasthenia gravis have been used. The different therapeutic options will be evaluated, with the different evidences that sustain it and a treatment algorithm will be elaborated keeping always in mind that each patient offers us different challenges.
Topics: Child; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Myasthenia Gravis; Steroids; Thymectomy
PubMed: 31603848
DOI: No ID Found -
Frontiers in Neurology 2020When the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG) has been secured, the aim of management should be prompt symptom control and the induction of remission or minimal... (Review)
Review
When the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG) has been secured, the aim of management should be prompt symptom control and the induction of remission or minimal manifestations. Symptom control, with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors such as pyridostigmine, is commonly employed. This may be sufficient in mild disease. There is no single universally accepted treatment regimen. Corticosteroids are the mainstay of immunosuppressive treatment in patients with more than mild MG to induce remission. Immunosuppressive therapies, such as azathioprine are prescribed in addition to but sometimes instead of corticosteroids when background comorbidities preclude or restrict the use of steroids. Rituximab has a role in refractory MG, while plasmapheresis and immunoglobulin therapy are commonly prescribed to treat MG crisis and in some cases of refractory MG. Data from the MGTX trial showed clear evidence that thymectomy is beneficial in patients with acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody positive generalized MG, up to the age of 65 years. Minimally invasive thymectomy surgery including robotic-assisted thymectomy surgery has further revolutionized thymectomy and the management of MG. Ocular MG is not life-threatening but can be significantly disabling when diplopia is persistent. There is evidence to support early treatment with corticosteroids when ocular motility is abnormal and fails to respond to symptomatic treatment. Treatment needs to be individualized in the older age-group depending on specific comorbidities. In the younger age-groups, particularly in women, consideration must be given to the potential teratogenicity of certain therapies. Novel therapies are being developed and trialed, including ones that inhibit complement-induced immunological pathways or interfere with antibody-recycling pathways. Fatigue is common in MG and should be duly identified from fatigable weakness and managed with a combination of physical therapy with or without psychological support. MG patients may also develop dysfunctional breathing and the necessary respiratory physiotherapy techniques need to be implemented to alleviate the patient's symptoms of dyspnoea. In this review, we discuss various facets of myasthenia management in adults with ocular and generalized disease, including some practical approaches and our personal opinions based on our experience.
PubMed: 32733360
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00604