-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... 2004Trifluoperazine is an inexpensive accessible 'high potency' antipsychotic drug, widely used to treat schizophrenia or related psychoses. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Trifluoperazine is an inexpensive accessible 'high potency' antipsychotic drug, widely used to treat schizophrenia or related psychoses.
OBJECTIVES
To estimate the effects of trifluoperazine compared with placebo and other drugs.
SEARCH STRATEGY
Searches of the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's register of trials (March 2002), supplemented with hand searching, reference searching, personal communication and contact with industry.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All clinical randomised trials involving people with schizophrenia and comparing trifluoperazine with any other treatment.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Studies were reliably selected and quality rated and data was extracted. For dichotomous data, relative risks (RR) were estimated, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Where possible, we undertook intention-to-treat analyses. For statistically significant results, the number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated. We estimated heterogeneity (I-square technique) and publication bias.
MAIN RESULTS
1162 people from 13 studies were randomised to trifluoperazine or placebo. For global improvement, small short-term studies favoured trifluoperazine (n=95, 3 RCTs, RR 0.62 CI 0.49 to 0.78 NNT 3 CI 2 to 4). Loss to follow up was about 12% in both groups (n=280, 7 RCTs, RR 0.99 CI 0.62 to 1.57) and more people allocated trifluoperazine used antiparkinson drugs to alleviate movements disorders compared with placebo (n=195, 4 RCTs, RR 5.06 CI 2.49 to 10.27, NNH 4 CI 2 to 9). 2230 people from 49 studies were randomised to trifluoperazine or another older generation antipsychotic. Trifluoperazine was not clearly different in terms of 'no substantial improvement' (n=1016, 27 RCTs, RR 1.06 CI 0.98 to 1.14) or leaving the study early (n=930, 22 RCTs, RR 1.15 CI 0.83 to 1.58). Almost identical numbers of people reported at least one adverse event (60%) in each group (n=585, 14 RCTs, RR 0.99 CI 0.87 to 1.13), although trifluoperazine was more likely to cause extrapyramidal adverse effects overall when compared to low potency antipsychotics such as chlorpromazine (n=130, 3 RCTs, RR 1.66 CI 1.03 to 2.67, NNH 6 CI 3 to 121). One small study (n=38) found no clear differences between trifluoperazine and the atypical drug, sulpiride.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS
Although there are shortcomings and gaps in the data, there appears to be enough consistency over different outcomes and periods to confirm that trifluoperazine is an antipsychotic of similar efficacy to other commonly used neuroleptics for people with schizophrenia. Its adverse events profile is similar to that of other drugs. It has been claimed that trifluoperazine is effective at low doses for patients with schizophrenia but this does not appear to be based on good quality trial based evidence.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Trifluoperazine
PubMed: 14974020
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003545.pub2 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2014Trifluoperazine is a long-established high potency typical antipsychotic drug used in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like illnesses. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Trifluoperazine is a long-established high potency typical antipsychotic drug used in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like illnesses.
OBJECTIVES
To determine absolute effects of trifluoperazine for schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like illnesses compared with placebo.To critically appraise and summarise current evidence on the resource use, cost and economic evaluation of trifluoperazine compared with placebo for schizophrenia.
SEARCH METHODS
Searches of the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's register of trials (July 2012), supplemented with handsearching, reference searching, personal communication and contact with industry. Two review authors undertook a search for economic studies using the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Health Economic Database (CSzGHED) on the 9th April 2013.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All available clinical randomised trials involving people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like illnesses that compare trifluoperazine with placebo.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Studies for the effects of interventions were reliably selected by a review team and data were doubly independently extracted to reduce bias. We only used dichotomous data, using intention-to-treat analysis when possible. Data were estimated using risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A 'Summary of findings' table was produced, where possible, for each primary outcome using GRADE. Economic studies were searched and reliably selected by review authors (VF and SS) to provide an economic summary of available data. Where no relevant economic studies were eligible for inclusion, the economic review team valued the already-included effectiveness outcome data to provide a rudimentary economic summary.
MAIN RESULTS
This review included 10 studies with a total number of 686 participants featuring in 20 different outcomes of interest. Overall, there was significant clinical improvement in clinical global state at medium term amongst people receiving trifluoperazine (3 RCTs, n = 417, RR 4.61, CI 1.54 to 13.84, low quality evidence) and significantly fewer people receiving trifluoperazine left the studies early due to relapse or worsening at medium term (2 RCTs, n = 381, RR 0.34, CI 0.23 to 0.49, low quality evidence). However, results were equivocal for leaving the study early at medium term for any reason (2 RCTs, n = 391, RR 0.80, CI 0.17 to 3.81, very low quality evidence) and due to severe adverse effects (2 RCTs, n = 391, RR 1.54, CI 0.56 to 4.24, very low quality evidence). Equivocal data were also found for intensified symptoms at medium term (2 RCTs, n = 80, RR 1.05, CI 0.54 to 2.05, very low quality evidence) and rates of agitation or distress again at medium term (1 RCT, n = 52, RR 2.00, CI 0.19 to 20.72, very low quality evidence). Comparison between low and high-dose trifluoperazine with placebo from a single study provided equivocal evidence of effects. For economic outcomes, we valued outcomes in GBP terms and presented them in additional tables; there was an estimated saving of £3488.3 in favour of trifluoperazine. However, numerous assumptions were made and these savings need to be interpreted in light of those assumptions.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Our results agree with existing evidence that compared to placebo, trifluoperazine is an effective antipsychotic for people with schizophrenia. Furthermore, our review provides supportive evidence that trifluoperazine increases the risk of extrapyramidal adverse effects. Although the effect sizes against placebo are similar to those observed with other agents, they are based on data from many small, pre-CONSORT trials with generally either a low or very low GRADE evidence that has limited implication for clinical practice. Large, independent trials are needed that adhere to the CONSORT statement to compare trifluoperazine with placebo used in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like illnesses.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Trifluoperazine
PubMed: 24414883
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010226.pub2 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2014Antipsychotic drugs are the core treatment for schizophrenia. Treatment guidelines state that there is no difference in efficacy between any other antipsychotic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Antipsychotic drugs are the core treatment for schizophrenia. Treatment guidelines state that there is no difference in efficacy between any other antipsychotic compounds, however, low-potency antipsychotic drugs are often perceived as less efficacious than high-potency compounds by clinicians, and they also seem to differ in their side-effects.
OBJECTIVES
To review the effects in response to treatment of trifluoperazine and low-potency antipsychotics for people with schizophrenia.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Trials Register (November 2010).
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included all randomised trials comparing trifluoperazine with first-generation low-potency antipsychotic drugs for people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychosis.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a random-effects model.
MAIN RESULTS
The review currently includes seven randomised trials involving 422 participants that compared trifluoperazine with low-potency antipsychotic drugs. The size of the included studies was between 20 and 157 participants with a study length between four and 52 weeks. Overall, sequence generation, allocation procedures and blinding were poorly reported. Trifluoperazine was not significantly different from low-potency antipsychotic drugs in terms of response to treatment (trifluoperazine 26%, low-potency drug 27%, 3 RCTs, n = 120, RR 0.96 CI 0.59 to 1.56, moderate quality evidence). There was also no significant difference in acceptability of treatment with equivocal number of participants leaving the studies early due to any reason (trifluoperazine 20%, low-potency antipsychotics 16%, 3 RCTs, n = 239, RR 1.25, CI 0.72 to 2.17,low quality evidence). There was no significant difference in numbers with at least one adverse effect (trifluoperazine 60%, low-potency antipsychotics 38%, 1 RCT, n = 60, RR 1.60, CI 0.94 to 2.74, moderate quality evidence). However, at least one movement disorder was significantly more frequent in the trifluoperazine group (trifluoperazine 23%, low-potency antipsychotics 13%, 2 RCTs, n = 123, RR 2.08 CI 0.78 to 5.55, very low quality evidence) as well as incoordination (trifluoperazine 20%, low-potency antipsychotics 5%, 1 RCT, n = 60, RR 7.00, CI 1.60 to 30.66) and rigor (trifluoperazine 45%, low-potency antipsychotics 10%, 1 RCT, n = 60, RR 4.50, CI 1.58 to 12.84). No data were available for other outcomes of interest death, sedation and quality of life.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The results did not show a difference in efficacy between trifluoperazine and low-potency antipsychotics. Trifluoperazine produced more movement disorders. The number of randomised studies as well as their quality is low, the quality of evidence for outcomes of interest ranged from moderate to very low quality, so more, newer studies would be needed for conclusions about the relative effects of trifluoperazine and low-potency antipsychotics.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Humans; Patient Dropouts; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Trifluoperazine
PubMed: 25003310
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009396.pub2 -
Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and... Jan 2016Trifluoperazine, developed in the mid-1950s and introduced in 1959 as an anxiolytic and antipsychotic agent, has been an extensively studied drug molecule that has been...
Trifluoperazine, developed in the mid-1950s and introduced in 1959 as an anxiolytic and antipsychotic agent, has been an extensively studied drug molecule that has been used as a calmodulin inhibitor. Regulation of calmodulin has important roles in cellular proliferation, inflammation, neurodegeneration, and other pathological processes. Trifluoperazine also inhibits P-glycoprotein, a protein that transports organic compounds across cell membranes and the blood-brain barrier. Trifluoperazine is currently approved for the treatment of schizophrenia as well as for the treatment of non-psychotic anxiety, but has other potential clinical uses based on calmodulin and P-glycoprotein inhibition.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety Disorders; Calmodulin; Humans; Schizophrenia; Trifluoperazine
PubMed: 26760133
DOI: 10.3928/02793695-20151223-01 -
International Journal of Medical... 2023Currently, no specific and standard treatment for traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been developed. Therefore, studies on new therapeutic drugs for TBI treatment are...
Currently, no specific and standard treatment for traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been developed. Therefore, studies on new therapeutic drugs for TBI treatment are urgently needed. Trifluoperazine (TFP) is a therapeutic agent for the treatment of psychiatric disorders that reduces edema of the central nervous system. However, the specific working mechanism of TFP is not fully understood in TBI. In this study, the immunofluorescence co-localization analysis revealed that the area and intensity covered by Aquaporin4 (AQP4) on the surface of brain cells (astrocyte endfeet) increased significantly after TBI. In contrast, TFP treatment reversed these phenomena. This finding showed that TFP inhibited AQP4 accumulation on the surface of brain cells (astrocyte endfeet). The tunel fluorescence intensity and fluorescence area were lower in the TBI+TFP group compared to the TBI group. Additionally, the brain edema, brain defect area, and modified neurological severity score (mNSS) were lower in the TBI+TFP. The RNA-seq was performed on the cortical tissues of rats in the Sham, TBI, and TBI+TFP groups. A total of 3774 genes differently expressed between the TBI and the Sham group were identified. Of these, 2940 genes were up-regulated and 834 genes were down-regulated. A total of 1845 differently expressed genes between the TBI+TFP and TBI group were also identified, in which 621 genes were up-regulated and 1224 genes were down-regulated. Analysis of the common differential genes in the three groups showed that TFP could reverse the expression of apoptosis and inflammation genes. Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis revealed that the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were highly enriched in the signaling pathways regulating inflammation. In conclusion, TFP alleviates brain edema after TBI by preventing the accumulation of AQP4 on the surface of brain cells. Generally, TFP alleviates apoptosis and inflammatory response induced by TBI, and promotes the recovery of nerve function in rats after TBI. Thus, TFP is a potential therapeutic agent for TBI treatment.
Topics: Animals; Rats; Apoptosis; Aquaporin 4; Brain; Brain Edema; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Inflammation; Trifluoperazine
PubMed: 37213674
DOI: 10.7150/ijms.82677 -
Archives of Virology Nov 2022Dengue virus (DENV), a member of the genus Flavivirus, family Flaviviridae, is the most widespread viral pathogen transmitted to humans by mosquitoes. Despite the...
Dengue virus (DENV), a member of the genus Flavivirus, family Flaviviridae, is the most widespread viral pathogen transmitted to humans by mosquitoes. Despite the increased incidence of DENV infection, there are no antiviral drugs available for treatment or prevention. Phenothiazines are heterocyclic compounds with various pharmacological properties that are very adaptable for drug repurposing. In the present report, we analyzed the antiviral activity against DENV and the related Zika virus (ZIKV) of trifluoperazine (TFP), a phenothiazine derivative in clinical use as an antipsychotic and antiemetic agent. TFP exhibited dose-dependent inhibitory activity against the four DENV serotypes and ZIKV in monkey Vero cells at non-cytotoxic concentrations with 50% effective concentration values in the range 1.6-6.4 µM. A similar level of antiviral efficacy was exhibited by TFP against flavivirus infection in the human cell lines A549 and HepG2. Mechanistic studies, performed using time-dependent infectivity assays, real-time RT-PCR, Western blot, and immunofluorescence techniques, indicated that uncoating of the virus during penetration into the cell was the main target for TFP in infected cells, but the compound also exerted a minor effect on a late stage of the virus multiplication cycle. This study demonstrates that TFP, a pharmacologically active phenothiazine, is a selective inhibitor of DENV multiplication in cell culture. Our findings open perspectives for the repositioning of phenothiazines like TFP with a wide spectrum of antiviral efficacy as potential agents for the control of pathogenic flaviviruses.
Topics: Animals; Antiemetics; Antipsychotic Agents; Antiviral Agents; Chlorocebus aethiops; Dengue; Dengue Virus; Humans; Phenothiazines; Trifluoperazine; Vero Cells; Virus Replication; Zika Virus; Zika Virus Infection
PubMed: 35920983
DOI: 10.1007/s00705-022-05555-y -
The Tohoku Journal of Experimental... Jul 2022Multiple myeloma (MM) is a common hematological malignancy. Bortezomib (BTZ) is a traditional medicine for MM treatment, but there are limitations for current treatment...
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a common hematological malignancy. Bortezomib (BTZ) is a traditional medicine for MM treatment, but there are limitations for current treatment methods. Trifluoperazine (TFP) is a clinical drug for acute and chronic psychosis therapy. Lately, researchers have found that TFP can suppress tumor growth in many cancers. We attempted to study the effects of BTZ and TFP on MM in vivo and in vitro. We concentrated on the individual and combined impact of BTZ and TFP on the proliferation and apoptosis of MM cells via Cell Counting kit-8 assay, EdU assay, western blot, and flow cytometry. We found that combination therapy has a strong synergistic impact on MM cells. Combination therapy could induce cell arrest during G2/M phase and induce apoptosis in MM cells. Meanwhile, BTZ combined with TFP could play a better role in the anti-MM effect in vivo through MM.1s xenograft tumor models. Furthermore, we explored the mechanism of TFP-induced apoptosis in MM, and we noticed that TFP might induce MM apoptosis by inhibiting p-P38 MAPK/NUPR1. In summary, our findings suggest that TFP could synergistically enhance the BTZ-induced anti-cancer effect in multiple myeloma, which might be a promising therapeutic strategy for MM treatment.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors; Bortezomib; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Neoplasm Proteins; Trifluoperazine; p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases
PubMed: 35644544
DOI: 10.1620/tjem.2022.J044 -
Journal of Cellular Biochemistry Sep 2019The development of cancer in patients with schizophrenia is affected by genetic and environmental factors and antipsychotic medication. Several studies found that...
The development of cancer in patients with schizophrenia is affected by genetic and environmental factors and antipsychotic medication. Several studies found that schizophrenia was associated with decreased risk of some cancers, and the neuroleptic medication might help to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Phenothiazine drugs including trifluoperazine (TFP) are widely used antipsychotic drugs and showed some antitumor effects, we here investigated the potential application of TFP in the treatment of colon cancer. A series doses of TFP were treated to the colon cancer cell line HCT116 and the inhibitory concentration (IC ) of TFP for HCT116 was determined by cell counting kit-8. The results indicated that the treatment of TFP impaired the cell vitality of HCT116 in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Meanwhile, the Edu assay demonstrated that the proliferation was also inhibited by TFP, which was accompanied with the induction of apoptosis and autophagy. The expression of CCNE1, CDK4, and antiapoptosis factor BCL-2 was downregulated but the proapoptosis factor BAX was upregulated. The autophagy inhibitor chloroquine could significantly reverse the TFP-induced apoptosis. Moreover, the ability of migration and invasion of HCT116 was found to be suppressed by TFP, which was associated with the inhibition of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). The function of TFP in vivo was further confirmed. The results showed that the administration of TFP remarkably abrogated the tumor growth with decreased tumor volume and proliferation index Ki-67 level in tumor tissues. The EMT phenotype was also confirmed to be inhibited by TFP in vivo, suggesting the promising antitumor effects of TFP in CRC.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Movement; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; HCT116 Cells; Humans; Mice; Mice, Nude; Time Factors; Trifluoperazine; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
PubMed: 31081173
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.28845 -
Head & Neck Feb 2023Trifluoperazine (TFP) is a typical antipsychotic primarily used to treat schizophrenia. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether TFP can be used as a therapeutic...
BACKGROUND
Trifluoperazine (TFP) is a typical antipsychotic primarily used to treat schizophrenia. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether TFP can be used as a therapeutic agent against nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and identify its underlying molecular mechanisms.
METHODS
We used NPC-TW01, TW03, TW04, and BM to assess the anticancer effects of TFP by using cytotoxicity, wound healing, colony formation, and cell invasion assays. An in vivo animal study was conducted. RNA sequencing combined with Ingenuity Pathways Analysis was performed to identify the mechanism by which TFP influences NPC cells.
RESULTS
Our data revealed that TFP decreased NPC cell viability in a dose-dependent manner. The invasion and migration of NPC tumor cells were inhibited by TFP. An in vivo study also demonstrated the anticancer effects of TFP. RNA sequencing revealed several anticancer molecular mechanisms following TFP administration.
CONCLUSIONS
The antipsychotic drug TFP could be a potential therapeutic regimen for NPC treatment.
Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Trifluoperazine; Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma; Cell Line, Tumor; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms; Cell Proliferation; Cell Movement
PubMed: 36349408
DOI: 10.1002/hed.27238 -
The Ulster Medical Journal Oct 1990
Topics: Adult; Diagnostic Errors; Dystonia; Humans; Male; Trifluoperazine
PubMed: 2278124
DOI: No ID Found