-
The New England Journal of Medicine May 2023In a previous phase 3 trial, treatment with trifluridine-tipiracil (FTD-TPI) prolonged overall survival among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Preliminary... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
In a previous phase 3 trial, treatment with trifluridine-tipiracil (FTD-TPI) prolonged overall survival among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Preliminary data from single-group and randomized phase 2 trials suggest that treatment with FTD-TPI in addition to bevacizumab has the potential to extend survival.
METHODS
We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, adult patients who had received no more than two previous chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer to receive FTD-TPI plus bevacizumab (combination group) or FTD-TPI alone (FTD-TPI group). The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points were progression-free survival and safety, including the time to worsening of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance-status score from 0 or 1 to 2 or more (on a scale from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater disability).
RESULTS
A total of 246 patients were assigned to each group. The median overall survival was 10.8 months in the combination group and 7.5 months in the FTD-TPI group (hazard ratio for death, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.77; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 5.6 months in the combination group and 2.4 months in the FTD-TPI group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.54; P<0.001). The most common adverse events in both groups were neutropenia, nausea, and anemia. No treatment-related deaths were reported. The median time to worsening of the ECOG performance-status score from 0 or 1 to 2 or more was 9.3 months in the combination group and 6.3 months in the FTD-TPI group (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.67).
CONCLUSIONS
Among patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, treatment with FTD-TPI plus bevacizumab resulted in longer overall survival than FTD-TPI alone. (Funded by Servier and Taiho Oncology; SUNLIGHT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04737187; EudraCT number, 2020-001976-14.).
Topics: Adult; Humans; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colonic Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Pyrrolidines; Rectal Neoplasms; Trifluridine; Uracil
PubMed: 37133585
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2214963 -
Future Oncology (London, England) Apr 2022Trifluridine/tipiracil is a compound drug, approved in 2015 by the US FDA, and in 2016 by the EMA, for the treatment of chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancers,... (Review)
Review
Trifluridine/tipiracil is a compound drug, approved in 2015 by the US FDA, and in 2016 by the EMA, for the treatment of chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancers, after the phase III RECOURSE trial demonstrated significant benefit. Another phase III trial (TAGS) showed significant improvement of overall survival and progression-free survival in refractory gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction cancer, leading to further approval from the FDA on February 2019, followed by Japan in August 2019 and the EU in September 2019. As promising results have already been observed in the chemorefractory gastric and gastroesophageal-junction cancers, ongoing trials are assessing the use of trifluridine/tipiracil with other standard of care agents, aiming to further improve the survival rate of these patients.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Combinations; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Stomach Neoplasms; Thymine; Trifluridine
PubMed: 35081748
DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-0754 -
The Lancet. Oncology Nov 2018Trifluridine/tipiracil showed activity and was well tolerated in a phase 2 study of pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer done in Japan. We investigated... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Trifluridine/tipiracil showed activity and was well tolerated in a phase 2 study of pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer done in Japan. We investigated whether the treatment was efficacious compared with placebo in a global population.
METHODS
TAGS was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done in 110 academic hospitals in 17 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed, non-resectable, metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (including adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction) as defined by the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging classification (7th edition) who had received at least two previous chemotherapy regimens and had experienced radiological disease progression were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) via dynamic randomisation from a centralised interactive voice-response system to receive either oral trifluridine/tipiracil (35 mg/m twice daily on days 1-5 and days 8-12 every 28 days) plus best supportive care or placebo plus best supportive care. Participants were allocated to groups by study-site personnel. Randomisation was stratified by region (Japan vs rest of world), ECOG performance status (0 vs 1), and previous treatment with ramucirumab (yes vs no). Both patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population and safety in all patients who received at least one dose of treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02500043. The trial, including follow-up of all participants, has been completed.
FINDINGS
Between Feb 24, 2016, and Jan 5, 2018, 507 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, 337 to the trifluridine/tipiracil group and 170 to the placebo group. Median overall survival was 5·7 months (95% CI 4·8-6·2) in the trifluridine/tipiracil group and 3·6 months (3·1-4·1) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·69 [95% CI 0·56-0·85]; one-sided p=0·00029, two-sided p=0·00058). Grade 3 or worse adverse events of any cause occurred in 267 (80%) patients in the trifluridine/tipiracil group and 97 (58%) in the placebo group. The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events of any cause were neutropenia (n=114 [34%]) and anaemia (n=64 [19%]) in the trifluridine/tipiracil group and abdominal pain (n=15 [9%]) and general deterioration of physical health (n=15 [9%]) in the placebo group. Serious adverse events of any cause were reported in 143 (43%) patients in the trifluridine/tipiracil group and 70 (42%) in the placebo group. One treatment-related death was reported in each group (because of cardiopulmonary arrest in the trifluridine/tipiracil group and because of toxic hepatitis in the placebo group).
INTERPRETATION
Trifluridine/tipiracil significantly improved overall survival compared with placebo and was well tolerated in this heavily pretreated population of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Trifluridine/tipiracil could be a new treatment option in this population who represent a high unmet medical need.
FUNDING
Taiho Oncology and Taiho Pharmaceutical.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Europe; Female; Humans; Israel; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Progression-Free Survival; Pyrrolidines; Stomach Neoplasms; Thymine; Time Factors; Trifluridine; United States; Uracil
PubMed: 30355453
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30739-3 -
Expert Review of Gastroenterology &... Feb 2020: Trifluridine/tipiracil is a novel oral cytotoxic chemotherapy consisting of a thymidine-based nucleoside analog, trifluridine, and a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor,... (Review)
Review
: Trifluridine/tipiracil is a novel oral cytotoxic chemotherapy consisting of a thymidine-based nucleoside analog, trifluridine, and a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor, tipiracil. Trifluridine/tipiracil was approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies. A phase II trial in Japan demonstrated that this therapy has antitumor activity and is tolerated by patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC); as a result, the phase III TAGS trial (Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer) was initiated.: Trifluridine/tipiracil has proved effective for heavily pretreated AGC and has thus been approved for use in the United States in February 2019, Japan in August 2019 and the European Union in September 2019. Detail of the phase III TAGS trial is discussed in this review.: Trifluridine/tipiracil after at least two previous courses of systemic chemotherapy improved rates of survival of gastric cancer; thus it has become one of the treatment options in affected patients. Currently, several clinical trials of trifluridine/tipiracil in combination with other anticancer agents such as ramucirumab (an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 monoclonal antibody) for patients with AGC are ongoing.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Combinations; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Stomach Neoplasms; Thymine; Trifluridine; Uracil
PubMed: 31920125
DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2020.1715209 -
The Lancet. Gastroenterology &... Feb 2023Trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab has shown efficacy in previous phase 2 studies including patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. We aimed to... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer ineligible for intensive therapy (SOLSTICE): a randomised, open-label phase 3 study.
BACKGROUND
Trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab has shown efficacy in previous phase 2 studies including patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. We aimed to investigate first-line trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine plus bevacizumab in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer ineligible for intensive treatment.
METHODS
In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 study, we enrolled patients aged 18 years and older with histologically confirmed metastatic colorectal cancer, ineligible for full-dose doublet or triplet chemotherapy and curative resection across 25 countries and regions. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab or capecitabine plus bevacizumab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity using an interactive web response system, stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (0 vs 1 vs 2), primary tumour location (right vs left colon), and the main reason for not being a candidate for intensive therapy (clinical condition vs non-clinical condition). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, defined as the time from randomisation to radiological progression or death from any cause, in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients having taken at least one dose of the study drug. The trial is ongoing, findings presented here are those of the primary analysis of progression-free survival, conducted after 629 events had occurred. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03869892.
FINDINGS
Between March 21, 2019, and Sept 14, 2020, 856 patients (54% male, 46% female) were randomly assigned to trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab (n=426) or capecitabine plus bevacizumab (n=430). After a median follow-up of 16·6 months (95% CI 16·5-17·1), the hazard ratio for progression-free survival for trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine plus bevacizumab was 0·87 (0·75-1·02; p=0·0464; protocol-defined significance level of p=0·021 not met). Investigator-assessed median progression-free survival was 9·4 months (95% CI 9·1-10·9) with trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab versus 9·3 months (8·9-9·8) with capecitabine plus bevacizumab. The most common grade 3 and higher treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (220 [52%] of 423 patients in the trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab group vs six [1%] of 427 in the capecitabine plus bevacizumab group), decreased neutrophil count (78 [18%] vs four [<1%]), anaemia (60 [14%] vs 16 [4%]), and hand-foot syndrome (none vs 61 [15%]). Nine deaths (five in the trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab group and four in the capecitabine plus bevacizumab group) were treatment related.
INTERPRETATION
First-line trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab was not superior to capecitabine plus bevacizumab in this population. As expected, the safety profile differed between the two treatments, but there were no new safety concerns. Trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab represents a feasible alternative to capecitabine plus bevacizumab in this population.
FUNDING
Servier International Research Institute, Suresnes, France.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Capecitabine; Colorectal Neoplasms; Trifluridine; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Colonic Neoplasms; Rectal Neoplasms
PubMed: 36470291
DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00334-X -
Future Oncology (London, England) Jul 2018Fluoropyrimidines are currently the backbone of treatment for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers but development of resistance to these agents remains a major problem.... (Review)
Review
Fluoropyrimidines are currently the backbone of treatment for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers but development of resistance to these agents remains a major problem. Trifluridine/tipiracil is an oral chemotherapeutic agent recently approved for third-line treatment of chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer. This article reviews the clinical value of trifluridine/tipiracil as a monotherapy, including recent trials in GI cancers, and the potential benefit of combining it with other agents in patients with GI cancers, including the preclinical rationale for combination therapy and recently completed and ongoing clinical trials. Data gathered so far suggest that trifluridine/tipiracil has the potential to form the chemotherapeutic backbone in the continuum of care for GI cancers in the future.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Camptothecin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colonic Neoplasms; Docetaxel; Drug Combinations; Fluorouracil; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Humans; Immunotherapy; Indoles; Irinotecan; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Pyrrolidines; Quality of Life; Taxoids; Thymine; Trifluridine; Uracil
PubMed: 29701076
DOI: 10.2217/fon-2018-0147 -
Drugs Sep 2016Trifluridine/tipiracil (Lonsurf(®)) is a novel, orally active, antimetabolite agent comprised of trifluridine, a thymidine-based nucleoside analogue, and tipiracil, a... (Review)
Review
Trifluridine/tipiracil (Lonsurf(®)) is a novel, orally active, antimetabolite agent comprised of trifluridine, a thymidine-based nucleoside analogue, and tipiracil, a potent thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor. Trifluridine is incorporated into DNA via phosphorylation, ultimately inhibiting cell proliferation. Tipiracil increases systemic exposure of trifluridine when coadministered. Trifluridine/tipiracil has recently been approved for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are refractory to or are not considered candidates for, current standard chemotherapy and biological therapy in the EU and USA and in unresectable advanced or recurrent CRC in Japan. The approved regimen of oral twice-daily trifluridine/tipiracil (35 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-5 and 8-12 of each 28-day cycle) significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival and was associated with a significantly higher disease control rate than placebo when added to best supportive care in the multinational, pivotal phase III trial (RECOURSE) and a phase II Japanese trial. Trifluridine/tipiracil was associated with an acceptable tolerability profile, with adverse events generally being managed with dose reductions, temporary interruptions in treatment or administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events (≥10 %) were anaemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and leukopenia. In conclusion, trifluridine/tipiracil is a useful additional treatment option for the management of mCRC in patients who are refractory to, or are not considered candidates for, currently available therapies.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Pyrrolidines; Thymine; Trifluridine
PubMed: 27568360
DOI: 10.1007/s40265-016-0633-9 -
The Lancet. Gastroenterology &... Mar 2021Findings of preclinical and clinical trials in colorectal cancer have shown promising antitumour effects of the co-formulation trifluridine/tipiracil and VEGF...
BACKGROUND
Findings of preclinical and clinical trials in colorectal cancer have shown promising antitumour effects of the co-formulation trifluridine/tipiracil and VEGF inhibition. We aimed to investigate the safety and activity of trifluridine/tipiracil and ramucirumab for previously treated advanced gastric cancer.
METHODS
We did an open-label, single-arm, two-cohort, phase 2 study at eight centres in Japan. We enrolled patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Cohort A included patients previously treated with one line of chemotherapy without ramucirumab and cohort B included patients previously treated with two to four lines of chemotherapy, including ramucirumab. Patients received trifluridine/tipiracil (35 mg/m) orally twice daily on days 1-5 and days 8-12 of each 28-day treatment cycle, plus intravenous ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) on days 1 and 15. The primary endpoint was the disease control rate, assessed by investigators and defined as the proportion of patients with a confirmed best overall response, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. This trial is registered on JapicCTI (JapicCTI-194596) and is ongoing but not recruiting.
FINDINGS
Between April 8 and Oct 11, 2019, 64 patients were enrolled and included in the safety and activity analyses, 33 in cohort A and 31 in cohort B. In cohort A, the disease control rate was 85% (95% CI 68-95; 28 of 33 patients) and in cohort B it was 77% (59-90; 24 of 31 patients). Common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse were neutrophil count decreased (27 [82%] in cohort A and 23 [74%] in cohort B), white blood cell count decreased (eight [24%] and seven [23%]), and platelet count decreased (eight [24%] and four [13%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events were recorded in three patients in cohort A (fatigue and neutrophil count decreased; large intestine perforation; and febrile neutropenia, platelet count decreased, and anaemia). No patients in cohort B had a serious treatment-related adverse event, and no treatment-related deaths were reported in either cohort.
INTERPRETATION
Trifluridine/tipiracil and ramucirumab showed an acceptable safety profile and clinical activity in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer regardless of previous ramucirumab exposure.
FUNDING
Taiho Pharmaceutical and Eli Lilly.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Administration, Intravenous; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Case-Control Studies; Drug Combinations; Esophageal Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Progression-Free Survival; Pyrrolidines; Safety; Stomach Neoplasms; Thymine; Trifluridine; Ramucirumab
PubMed: 33508242
DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30396-4 -
Journal of Geriatric Oncology May 2023Colorectal cancer is a disease of older patients, but few guidelines directly address age in their recommendations. Older patients may present comorbidities that affect... (Review)
Review
Colorectal cancer is a disease of older patients, but few guidelines directly address age in their recommendations. Older patients may present comorbidities that affect the choice of chemotherapy, and care must be taken when choosing the best approach. This narrative review aimed to describe the literature regarding approved oral agents for third-line treatment in older patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, regorafenib, and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI).
Topics: Humans; Aged; Trifluridine; Uracil; Colorectal Neoplasms; Frontotemporal Dementia; Colonic Neoplasms; Rectal Neoplasms; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 36990929
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101477 -
Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing Apr 2017Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) are common in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving chemotherapy. These AEs may affect patient adherence,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) are common in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving chemotherapy. These AEs may affect patient adherence, particularly with completely oral regimens, such as trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102, Lonsurf®), an antimetabolite agent for patients with mCRC refractory or intolerant to standard therapies. .
OBJECTIVES
This article reviews strategies for promoting adherence and educating patients and caregivers about oral therapy with trifluridine/tipiracil. .
METHODS
Recommended strategies for managing AEs are reviewed, with a focus on the most common AEs reported in patients with mCRC receiving trifluridine/tipiracil in clinical trials. .
FINDINGS
Oncology nurses play an important role in educating and counseling patients regarding treatment and its potential side effects. Among patients with mCRC refractory or intolerant to standard therapies, trifluridine/tipiracil was found to have a favorable safety profile. It is associated with hematologic AEs as well as a low incidence of nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, anorexia, and fatigue.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasm Metastasis; Trifluridine; Vomiting
PubMed: 28315543
DOI: 10.1188/17.CJON.E30-E37