-
International Journal of Environmental... Feb 2022(1) Background: pneumonia (PCP) has a substantial impact on the morbidity and mortality of patients, especially those with autoimmune disorders, thus requiring optimal... (Review)
Review
(1) Background: pneumonia (PCP) has a substantial impact on the morbidity and mortality of patients, especially those with autoimmune disorders, thus requiring optimal dosing strategies of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX). Therefore, to ensure the safety of TMP-SMX, there is a high demand to review current evidence in PCP patients with a focus on dose optimization strategies; (2) Methods: Various databases were searched from January 2000 to December 2021 for articles in English, focusing on the dose optimization of TMP-SMX. The data were collected in a specific form with predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of each article was evaluated using a Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for retrospective studies, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical checklist for case reports, and Cochrane bias tool for randomized clinical trials (RCTs); (3) Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria for final analysis. Of the 13 selected studies, nine were retrospective cohort studies, two case reports, and two randomized controlled trials (RCT). Most of the studies compared the high-dose with low-dose TMP-SMX therapy for PCP. We have found that a low dose of TMP-SMX provides satisfactory outcomes while reducing the mortality rate and PCP-associated adverse events. This strategy reduces the economic burden of illness and enhances patients' compliance to daily regimen plan; (4) Conclusions: The large-scale RCTs and cohort studies are required to improve dosing strategies to prevent initial occurrence of PCP or to prevent recurrence of PCP in immune compromised patients.
Topics: Cohort Studies; Humans; Pneumonia, Pneumocystis; Retrospective Studies; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination
PubMed: 35270525
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19052833 -
Science (New York, N.Y.) Sep 2016A key aspect of bacterial survival is the ability to evolve while migrating across spatially varying environmental challenges. Laboratory experiments, however, often...
A key aspect of bacterial survival is the ability to evolve while migrating across spatially varying environmental challenges. Laboratory experiments, however, often study evolution in well-mixed systems. Here, we introduce an experimental device, the microbial evolution and growth arena (MEGA)-plate, in which bacteria spread and evolved on a large antibiotic landscape (120 × 60 centimeters) that allowed visual observation of mutation and selection in a migrating bacterial front. While resistance increased consistently, multiple coexisting lineages diversified both phenotypically and genotypically. Analyzing mutants at and behind the propagating front, we found that evolution is not always led by the most resistant mutants; highly resistant mutants may be trapped behind more sensitive lineages. The MEGA-plate provides a versatile platform for studying microbial adaption and directly visualizing evolutionary dynamics.
Topics: Adaptation, Physiological; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteria; Ciprofloxacin; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Evolution, Molecular; Genotype; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Microbial Viability; Mutation; Phenotype; Selection, Genetic; Trimethoprim
PubMed: 27609891
DOI: 10.1126/science.aag0822 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2014Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) is a disease affecting immunocompromised patients. PCP among these patients is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) is a disease affecting immunocompromised patients. PCP among these patients is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness of PCP prophylaxis among non-HIV immunocompromised patients; and to define the type of immunocompromised patient for whom evidence suggests a benefit for PCP prophylaxis.
SEARCH METHODS
Electronic searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 1), MEDLINE and EMBASE (to March 2014), LILACS (to March 2014), relevant conference proceedings; and references of identified trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs comparing prophylaxis with an antibiotic effective against PCP versus placebo, no intervention, or antibiotic(s) with no activity against PCP; and trials comparing different antibiotics effective against PCP among immunocompromised non-HIV patients. We only included trials in which Pneumocystis infections were available as an outcome.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias in each trial and extracted data from the included trials. We contacted authors of the included trials to obtain missing data. The primary outcome was documented PCP infections. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated and pooled using the random-effects model.
MAIN RESULTS
Thirteen trials performed between the years 1974 and 2008 were included, involving 1412 patients. Four trials included 520 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and the remaining trials included adults with acute leukemia, solid organ transplantation or autologous bone marrow transplantation. Compared to no treatment or treatment with fluoroquinolones (inactive against Pneumocystis), there was an 85% reduction in the occurrence of PCP in patients receiving prophylaxis with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, RR of 0.15 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.62; 10 trials, 1000 patients). The evidence was graded as moderate due to possible risk of bias. PCP-related mortality was also significantly reduced, RR of 0.17 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.94; nine trials, 886 patients) (low quality of evidence due to possible risk of bias and imprecision), but in trials comparing PCP prophylaxis against placebo or no treatment there was no significant effect on all-cause mortality (low quality of evidence due to imprecision). Occurrence of leukopenia or neutropenia and their duration were not reported consistently. No significant differences in overall adverse events or events requiring discontinuation were seen comparing trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole to no treatment or placebo (four trials, 470 patients, moderate quality evidence). No differences between once daily versus thrice weekly trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole were seen (two trials, 207 patients).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Given an event rate of 6.2% in the control groups of the included trials, prophylaxis for PCP using trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole is highly effective among non-HIV immunocompromised patients, with a number needed to treat to prevent PCP of 19 patients (95% CI 17 to 42). Prophylaxis should be considered for patients with a similar baseline risk of PCP.
Topics: Adult; Anti-Infective Agents; Child; HIV Seronegativity; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Pneumonia, Pneumocystis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination
PubMed: 25269391
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005590.pub3 -
JAMA Jul 2021Determination of optimal treatment durations for common infectious diseases is an important strategy to preserve antibiotic effectiveness. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
IMPORTANCE
Determination of optimal treatment durations for common infectious diseases is an important strategy to preserve antibiotic effectiveness.
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether 7 days of treatment is noninferior to 14 days when using ciprofloxacin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole to treat urinary tract infection (UTI) in afebrile men.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled noninferiority trial of afebrile men with presumed symptomatic UTI treated with ciprofloxacin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole at 2 US Veterans Affairs medical centers (enrollment, April 2014 through December 2019; final follow-up, January 28, 2020). Of 1058 eligible men, 272 were randomized.
INTERVENTIONS
Participants continued the antibiotic prescribed by their treating clinician for 7 days of treatment and were randomized to receive continued antibiotic therapy (n = 136) or placebo (n = 136) for days 8 to 14 of treatment.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The prespecified primary outcome was resolution of UTI symptoms by 14 days after completion of active antibiotic treatment. A noninferiority margin of 10% was selected. The as-treated population (participants who took ≥26 of 28 doses and missed no more than 2 consecutive doses) was used for the primary analysis, and a secondary analysis included all patients as randomized, regardless of treatment adherence. Secondary outcomes included recurrence of UTI symptoms and/or adverse events within 28 days of stopping study medication.
RESULTS
Among 272 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 69 [62-73] years) who were randomized, 100% completed the trial and 254 (93.4%) were included in the primary as-treated analysis. Symptom resolution occurred in 122/131 (93.1%) participants in the 7-day group vs 111/123 (90.2%) in the 14-day group (difference, 2.9% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -5.2% to ∞]), meeting the noninferiority criterion. In the secondary as-randomized analysis, symptom resolution occurred in 125/136 (91.9%) participants in the 7-day group vs 123/136 (90.4%) in the 14-day group (difference, 1.5% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -5.8% to ∞]) Recurrence of UTI symptoms occurred in 13/131 (9.9%) participants in the 7-day group vs 15/123 (12.9%) in the 14-day group (difference, -3.0% [95% CI, -10.8% to 6.2%]; P = .70). Adverse events occurred in 28/136 (20.6%) participants in the 7-day group vs 33/136 (24.3%) in the 14-day group.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Among afebrile men with suspected UTI, treatment with ciprofloxacin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for 7 days was noninferior to 14 days of treatment with regard to resolution of UTI symptoms by 14 days after antibiotic therapy. The findings support the use of a 7-day course of ciprofloxacin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole as an alternative to a 14-day course for treatment of afebrile men with UTI.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01994538.
Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ciprofloxacin; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Duration of Therapy; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination; Urinary Tract Infections; Urine
PubMed: 34313686
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.9899 -
The New England Journal of Medicine Mar 2015Skin and skin-structure infections are common in ambulatory settings. However, the efficacy of various antibiotic regimens in the era of community-acquired... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Skin and skin-structure infections are common in ambulatory settings. However, the efficacy of various antibiotic regimens in the era of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is unclear.
METHODS
We enrolled outpatients with uncomplicated skin infections who had cellulitis, abscesses larger than 5 cm in diameter (smaller for younger children), or both. Patients were enrolled at four study sites. All abscesses underwent incision and drainage. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either clindamycin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) for 10 days. Patients and investigators were unaware of the treatment assignments and microbiologic test results. The primary outcome was clinical cure 7 to 10 days after the end of treatment.
RESULTS
A total of 524 patients were enrolled (264 in the clindamycin group and 260 in the TMP-SMX group), including 155 children (29.6%). One hundred sixty patients (30.5%) had an abscess, 280 (53.4%) had cellulitis, and 82 (15.6%) had mixed infection, defined as at least one abscess lesion and one cellulitis lesion. S. aureus was isolated from the lesions of 217 patients (41.4%); the isolates in 167 (77.0%) of these patients were MRSA. The proportion of patients cured was similar in the two treatment groups in the intention-to-treat population (80.3% in the clindamycin group and 77.7% in the TMP-SMX group; difference, -2.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -10.2 to 4.9; P=0.52) and in the populations of patients who could be evaluated (466 patients; 89.5% in the clindamycin group and 88.2% in the TMP-SMX group; difference, -1.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.6 to 5.1; P=0.77). Cure rates did not differ significantly between the two treatments in the subgroups of children, adults, and patients with abscess versus cellulitis. The proportion of patients with adverse events was similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
We found no significant difference between clindamycin and TMP-SMX, with respect to either efficacy or side-effect profile, for the treatment of uncomplicated skin infections, including both cellulitis and abscesses. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00730028.).
Topics: Abscess; Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cellulitis; Child; Child, Preschool; Clindamycin; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Skin Diseases, Bacterial; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination; Young Adult
PubMed: 25785967
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1403789 -
Science Translational Medicine Dec 2021Although systemic antibiotics are critical in controlling infections and reducing morbidity and mortality, overuse of antibiotics is presumed to contribute to negative... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Although systemic antibiotics are critical in controlling infections and reducing morbidity and mortality, overuse of antibiotics is presumed to contribute to negative repercussions such as selection of antimicrobial-resistant organisms and collateral damage to commensal microbes. In a prospective, randomized study of four clinically relevant antibiotic regimens [doxycycline (20 mg or 100 mg), cephalexin, or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole], we investigated microbial alterations on skin after administration of systemic antibiotics to healthy human volunteers. Samples from different skin and oral sites, as well as stool, were collected before, during, and up to 1 year after antibiotic use, and shotgun metagenomic sequencing was performed. Taxonomic analysis showed that subjects receiving doxycycline 100 mg and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) exhibited greater changes to their skin microbial communities, as compared to those receiving other regimens or untreated controls. Oral and stool microbiota also demonstrated fluctuations after antibiotics. Bacterial culturing in combination with whole-genome sequencing revealed specific emergence, expansion, and persistence of antibiotic-resistant staphylococci harboring or and or genes in all subjects who received doxycycline 100 mg or TMP/SMX, respectively. Last, analysis of metagenomic data revealed an increase of genes involved in gene mobilization, indicating stress responses of microbes to antibiotics. Collectively, these findings demonstrate direct, long-lasting effects of antibiotics on skin microbial communities, highlighting the skin microbiome as a site for the development and persistence of antibiotic resistance and the risks of overprescribing.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Humans; Microbiota; Prospective Studies; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination
PubMed: 34936382
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abd8077 -
Age and Ageing Mar 2019clinical guidelines recommend antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs), but there is little evidence for their effectiveness in...
BACKGROUND
clinical guidelines recommend antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs), but there is little evidence for their effectiveness in older adults.
METHODS
this was a retrospective cohort study of health records from 19,696 adults aged ≥65 with recurrent UTIs. We used prescription records to ascertain ≥3 months' prophylaxis with trimethoprim, cefalexin or nitrofurantoin. We used random effects Cox recurrent event models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for risks of clinical recurrence (primary outcome), acute antibiotic prescribing and hospitalisation.
RESULTS
of 4,043 men and 15,653 women aged ≥65 with recurrent UTIs, 508 men (12.6%) and 2,229 women (14.2%) were prescribed antibiotic prophylaxis. In men, prophylaxis was associated with a reduced risk of clinical recurrence (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.45-0.54), acute antibiotic prescribing (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.51-0.57) and UTI-related hospitalisation (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64-0.94). In women, prophylaxis was also associated with a reduced risk of clinical recurrence (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.55-0.59) and acute antibiotic prescribing (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.59-0.62), but estimates of the risk of UTI-related hospitalisation were inconsistent between our main analysis (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.28) and sensitivity analysis (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72-0.94).
CONCLUSIONS
antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with lower rates of UTI recurrence and acute antibiotic prescribing in older adults. To fully understand the benefits and harms of prophylaxis, further research should determine the frequency of antibiotic-related adverse events and the impact on antimicrobial resistance and quality of life.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Cephalexin; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Nitrofurantoin; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Secondary Prevention; Treatment Outcome; Trimethoprim; Urinary Tract Infections
PubMed: 30165433
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afy146 -
BMJ Open May 2017To address clinical uncertainties about the effectiveness and safety of long-term antibiotic therapy for preventing recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) in older... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To address clinical uncertainties about the effectiveness and safety of long-term antibiotic therapy for preventing recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) in older adults.
DESIGN
Systematic review andmeta-analysis of randomised trials.
METHOD
We searched Medline, Embase, The CINAHL), and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials from inception to August 2016. Eligible studies compared long-term antibiotic therapy with non-antibiotic therapy or placebo in men or women aged over 65, or in postmenopausal women, with recurrent UTIs.
RESULTS
We did not identify any studies that included older men. Three randomised controlled trials compared long-term antibiotics with vaginal oestrogens (n=150), oral lactobacilli (n=238) and D-mannose powder (n=94) in postmenopausal women. Long-term antibiotics reduced the risk of UTI recurrence by 24% (three trials, n=482; pooled risk ratio (RR) 0.76; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.95, number needed to treat=8.5). There was no statistically significant increase in risk of adverse events (mild adverse events: pooled RR 1.52; 95% CI 0.76 to 3.03; serious adverse events: pooled RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.66). One trial showed 90% of urinary and faecal isolates were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole after 1 month of prophylaxis.
CONCLUSIONS
Findings from three small trials with relatively short follow-up periods suggest long-term antibiotic therapy reduces the risk of recurrence in postmenopausal women with recurrent UTI. We did not identify any evidence to inform several clinically important scenarios including, benefits and harms in older men or frail care home residents, optimal duration of prophylaxis, recurrence rates once prophylaxis stops and effects on urinary antibiotic resistance.
Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Female; Humans; Postmenopause; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Secondary Prevention; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination; Urinary Tract Infections
PubMed: 28554926
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015233 -
Minerva Medica Aug 2021The antimicrobial trimethoprim is structurally related to potassium-sparing diuretics and may consequently lead to derangements in electrolyte and acid-base balance....
INTRODUCTION
The antimicrobial trimethoprim is structurally related to potassium-sparing diuretics and may consequently lead to derangements in electrolyte and acid-base balance. Since no report so far analyzed the literature documenting individual cases with electrolyte and acid-base derangements induced by trimethoprim, a systematic review was carried out.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
We retained 53 reports documenting 68 cases (42 males and 26 females 23 to 96 years of age) of electrolyte or acid-base derangements occurring on trimethoprim for about 5 days.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
One hundred five electrolyte imbalances were detected in the 68 patients: hyperkalemia (>5.0 mmol/L) in 62 (91%), hyponatremia (<135 mmol/L) in 29 (43%) and metabolic acidosis (pH<7.38 and bicarbonate <19 mmol/L) in 14 (21%) cases. Following possible predisposing factors for electrolyte and acid-base abnormalities were found in 54 (79%) patients: high-dose trimethoprim, comedication with drugs that have been associated with electrolyte and acid-base derangements, preexisting kidney disease, age ≥80 years and diabetes mellitus.
CONCLUSIONS
High-dose trimethoprim, comedicated with drugs that have been associated with electrolyte and acid-base derangements, poor kidney function, age ≥80 years and diabetes mellitus predispose to trimethoprim-associated electrolyte and acid-base abnormalities. Clinicians must recognize patients at risk, possibly avoid drug combinations that may worsen the problem and monitor the laboratory values.
Topics: Acidosis; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Infective Agents, Urinary; Bicarbonates; Diabetes Complications; Female; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hyponatremia; Kidney Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Trimethoprim; Young Adult
PubMed: 32697061
DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4806.20.06660-4 -
Folia Medica Cracoviensia 2015We analyzed publications and articles in the PubMed database about the use of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) in dermatology. Literature published in the... (Review)
Review
We analyzed publications and articles in the PubMed database about the use of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) in dermatology. Literature published in the English language, at least in the past two decades, was reviewed. Specific dermatologic indications for TMP-SMX are few but it is often used as the second- or third- line agent. TMP-SMX is used to treat cutaneous nocardiosis and Aeromonas infections. TMP-SMX is a treatment option for cat - scratch disease, granuloma inguinale, melioidosis and Mycobacterium marinum/fortuitum cutaneous infections. TMP-SMX is an alternate choice for treatment of pyodermas and lymphogranuloma venereum. TMP-SMX has been used to treat acne vulgaris in tetracycline and erythromycin - resistant patients. TMP-SMX is still the preferred empiric antibiotic for methicillin - resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infection in HIV positive population. TMP-SMX is used in dermatology to treat various skin conditions and is one of the most commonly prescribed sulfonamide drugs. TMP-SMX as monotherapy is an effective treatment option in many diseases but due to drug resistance, a combination therapy-usually of two drugs-may be considered.
Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Soft Tissue Infections; Staphylococcal Infections; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination
PubMed: 26774630
DOI: No ID Found