-
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 2020Cartilage is the grafting material of choice for certain disorders of the middle ear. The indications for its routine use remain controversial due to the possible...
INTRODUCTION
Cartilage is the grafting material of choice for certain disorders of the middle ear. The indications for its routine use remain controversial due to the possible detrimental effect on post-operative hearing.
OBJECTIVE
The present study was carried out to report a personal experience with "tragal cartilage shield" tympanoplasty to compare the results, in terms of graft uptake and hearing improvement, of endoscopic cartilage shield technique using either partial thickness or full thickness tragal cartilage for type 1 tympanoplasty and to highlight the tips for single-handed endoscopic ear surgery.
METHODS
Fifty patients with safe chronic suppurative otitis media, assisted at out-patient department from February 2014 to September 2015 were selected. They were randomly allocated into two groups, 25 patients were included in group A where a full thickness tragal cartilage was used and 25 patients included in group B where a partial thickness tragal cartilage was used. Audiometry was performed 2 months after the surgery in all cases and the patients were followed for one year.
RESULTS
Out of the total of 50 patients 39 (78%) had a successful graft take up, amongst these 22 belonged to group A and 17 belonged to the group B. The hearing improvement was similar in both groups.
CONCLUSION
This study reveals that endoscopic tragal cartilage shield tympanoplasty is a reliable technique; with a high degree of graft take and good hearing results, irrespective of the thickness. Furthermore, the tragal cartilage is easily accessible, adaptable, resistant to resorption and single-handed endoscopic ear surgery is minimally invasive, sutureless and provides a panoramic view of the middle ear.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Ear Cartilage; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Otitis Media, Suppurative; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Tympanic Membrane Perforation; Tympanoplasty; Young Adult
PubMed: 30837190
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.12.006 -
PloS One 2022The authors sought to compare simultaneous and sequential tympanoplasty and adenoidectomy surgery in pediatric patients.
BACKGROUND
The authors sought to compare simultaneous and sequential tympanoplasty and adenoidectomy surgery in pediatric patients.
METHODS
This retrospective single-center study included 65 children (36 males, 29 females; mean age 9.16 ± 3.82 years; range 3-17 years) requiring both tympanoplasty and adenoidectomy. Simultaneous surgeries were performed on the same day, during single general anesthesia, whereas sequential surgeries were separated at least 12 weeks. The groups were compared with regard to restoration of hearing, tympanic membrane status, and utilization of medical resources. All study participants had a 12-months follow-up period after surgery.
RESULTS
No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups regarding pre- and post-operative ABG values and average hearing gains. However, the post-operative ABG was significantly lower than the pre-operative ABG in both groups (p<0.001). There were no significant differences between simultaneous and sequential groups with respect to complete healing rates and complications (all p>0.355). Simultaneous tympanoplasty and adenoidectomy surgery management is associated with a significantly decreased cumulative hospital stay, cumulative operating room time, and cumulative pure surgical time (all p≤0.016).
CONCLUSIONS
The results of first comparative study of simultaneous versus sequential tympanoplasty and adenoidectomy surgery managements demonstrate no advantages for the sequential approach. The same-day surgery can show the clinical outcomes comparable to those in the sequential group. The simultaneous surgery approach appears to be associated with reduced medical resources consumption. Therefore, simultaneous surgery management is an effective and safe option for children with chronic otitis media and adenoid hypertrophy.
Topics: Adenoidectomy; Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Male; Otitis Media; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Tympanoplasty
PubMed: 35271666
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265133 -
Laryngoscope Investigative... Aug 2022To compare the indications and efficacy of endoscopic over-under tympanoplasty versus endoscopic underlay tympanoplasty.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the indications and efficacy of endoscopic over-under tympanoplasty versus endoscopic underlay tympanoplasty.
METHODS
Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing type I endoscopic tympanoplasty via either an underlay or over-under technique by a single surgeon from 2017 to 2021. Patients were excluded if they had a concurrent mastoidectomy, ossiculoplasty, or advanced cholesteatoma defined by involvement of multiple subsites. Patient demographics, perforation size and location, middle ear status, preoperative and postoperative audiograms, and perforation closure were reviewed. Middle ear status was represented using the Ossiculoplasty Outcome Parameter Score (OOPS). The primary outcome was perforation closure at most recent follow-up and secondary outcomes were change in postoperative pure-tone average (PTA) and air-bone gap (ABG).
RESULTS
Of 48 patients, 27 underwent endoscopic underlay tympanoplasty and 21 underwent endoscopic over-under tympanoplasty. Tragal cartilage-perichondrium graft was used in 90% of procedures. Distribution of OOPS scores was not significantly different between groups. Over- under technique addressed significantly larger perforations (mean size of 54% vs. 31%, < .001) and a higher rate of anterior extension (95% vs. 22%, < .001) than underlay technique. Perforation closure rate was not different between groups (95% vs. 96%). Patients experienced significant improvement in PTA and ABG in both groups.
CONCLUSION
The endoscopic over-under tympanoplasty is comparable to endoscopic underlay tympanoplasty in terms of graft take and audiologic improvement. The over-under technique is effective for repairing larger perforations or those with anterior extension.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
IV.
PubMed: 36000055
DOI: 10.1002/lio2.879 -
OTO Open 2022To systematically review the results of inlay cartilage butterfly tympanoplasty and standard underlay temporal fascia tympanoplasty for anatomic and functional end... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the results of inlay cartilage butterfly tympanoplasty and standard underlay temporal fascia tympanoplasty for anatomic and functional end points.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Virtual Health Library (VHL/Lilacs) databases were searched from inception through April 2, 2021. No restrictions on language, publication year, or publication status were applied.
REVIEW METHODS
The meta-analysis included data from articles that met inclusion criteria and were extracted by 2 authors independently. The PRISMA statement was followed. Risk of Bias 2.0 and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess risk of bias. The primary outcome was tympanic membrane closure rate. The secondary outcome was improvement of the air-bone gap.
RESULTS
Ten studies were included, 9 cohort studies and 1 randomized clinical trial, with 577 patients. The graft take rate was 82.8% in the butterfly cartilage inlay tympanoplasty group and 85.2% in the temporal fascia underlay tympanoplasty group (relative risk, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93-1.11; = 42%, = .08). The air-bone gap reduction ranged from 6.1 to 11.28 in the butterfly cartilage inlay group and from 5.2 to 12.66 in the temporal fascia underlay group, with a mean difference between groups of -2.08 (95% CI, -3.23 to -0.94; = 58%, = .04), favoring temporal fascia underlay.
CONCLUSION
The 2 tympanoplasty techniques analyzed here produced similar results in terms of successful reconstruction of the tympanic membrane and reduction in the air-bone gap. Neither age nor follow-up length of time influenced outcomes.
PubMed: 35836497
DOI: 10.1177/2473974X221108935 -
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai... Feb 2023Cartilage has undergone rapid development in ear surgery since Heermann used the grid cartilage technique to repair large perforations of the tympanic membrane.... (Review)
Review
Cartilage has undergone rapid development in ear surgery since Heermann used the grid cartilage technique to repair large perforations of the tympanic membrane. Cartilage has been widely used in tympanoplasty, ossicular chain reconstruction, reconstruction of the lateral wall of the upper tympanic cavity and the posterior wall of the external auditory canal due to its advantages of convenient sampling, high stability, good elasticity, low metabolic rate, easy survival and strong plasticity. This paper reviews the use of cartilage in tympanoplasty and discusses the possibility of placing cartilage on the stapes head for reconstruction of the auditory chain in type Ⅱ tympanoplasty.
Topics: Humans; Tympanoplasty; Tympanic Membrane; Ear, Middle; Otologic Surgical Procedures; Cartilage; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36756835
DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.02.017 -
Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology May 2022Tympanoplasty is a common surgery for chronic otitis media and has conventionally been performed with a microscope for decades. The trend of endoscopic minimally...
INTRODUCTION
Tympanoplasty is a common surgery for chronic otitis media and has conventionally been performed with a microscope for decades. The trend of endoscopic minimally invasive surgeries has been increasing worldwide for the last few decades. Few studies have discussed the outcomes of tympanoplasty with microscope and tympanoplasty with endoscope . This study aims to compare results of tympanoplasty done with microscope vs endoscope in terms of graft take rate and improvement in conductive hearing loss.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We did a retrospective review of 120 patients (54 male and 66 female) who underwent Type I tympanoplasty at Liaquat National Postgraduate Medical Center from January 2019 to January 2020. We included 60 patients who underwent tympanoplasty with microscope and 60 patients who underwent tympanoplasty with endoscope. Postoperative graft uptake and hearing improvement were studied.
RESULTS
Overall mean preoperative hearing loss was 30.24 (±9.61) dB as compared to mean postoperative hearing loss, which was reduced to 19.36 ( ±8.54) dB, and the difference was significant (P-value <0.001. No statistically significant difference was found for air-bone gap closure between the two groups (P-value 0.78). Out of 120 patients, overall successful graft uptake was seen in 109 (90.8%). In tympanoplasty with microscope, graft take was 90.0%, compared to 91.6% in endoscope group. There was no significant difference in graft take in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
The tympanoplasty with endoscope is comparable to tympanoplasty with microscope in terms of graft uptake and hearing improvement.
PubMed: 35655543
DOI: 10.22038/IJORL.2022.61234.3104 -
Journal of Otology Jun 2017Middle ear surgery is usually performed using a surgical microscope. Initially, in otorhinolaryngology practice, endoscopes were used for paranasal sinus surgeries. It... (Review)
Review
Middle ear surgery is usually performed using a surgical microscope. Initially, in otorhinolaryngology practice, endoscopes were used for paranasal sinus surgeries. It was only later that they were applied in the area of otology. In otologic surgeries, endoscopes were first used to visualize the middle ear, before being used to assist with visualization of instruments during cholesteatoma surgeries, although they are still not used alone in various otologic surgeries. As in other surgical fields, there is also a trend towards minimally invasive intervention in the field of otorhinolaryngology. Smaller incisions performed under the guidance of endoscopes are preferred over conventional large incisions. Using this approach, improved outcomes can be achieved and postoperative morbidities can be reduced. In addition, the outcomes of grafts performed using the endoscopic approach are similar to that achieved by the microscopic approach. Therefore, endoscopic ear surgery implementations are becoming increasingly popular.
PubMed: 29937839
DOI: 10.1016/j.joto.2017.04.004 -
Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck... Jun 2017Tympanoplasty is a common procedure performed by Otolaryngologists. Many types of autologous grafts have been used with variations of techniques with varying results.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Tympanoplasty is a common procedure performed by Otolaryngologists. Many types of autologous grafts have been used with variations of techniques with varying results. This is the first systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis with the aim to evaluate the effectiveness of one of the techniques which is gaining popularity, the palisade cartilage tympanoplasty. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for "palisade", "cartilage", "tympanoplasty", "perforation" and their synonyms. In total, 199 articles reporting results of palisade cartilage tympanoplasty were identified. Five articles satisfied the following inclusion criteria: adult patients, minimum 6 months follow-up, hearing and surgical outcomes reported. Studies with patients undergoing combined mastoidectomy, ossicular chain reconstruction, and/or other middle ear surgery were excluded. Perforation closure, rate of complications, and post-operative pure-tone average change were extracted for pooled analysis. Study failure and complication proportions that were used to generate odds ratios were pooled. Fixed effects and random effects weightings were generated. The resulting pooled odds ratios are reported. Palisade cartilage tympanoplasty has an overall take rate of 96% at beyond 6 months and has similar odds of complications compared to temporalis fascia (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.62, 1.30). The air-bone gap closure is statistically similar to reported results from temporalis fascia tympanoplasty.
CONCLUSIONS
Cartilage palisade tympanoplasty offers excellent graft take rates and good postoperative hearing outcomes for perforations of various sizes and for both primary and revision cases. This technique has predictable, long-term results with low complication rates, similar to temporalis fascia tympanoplasty.
Topics: Cartilage; Humans; Tympanoplasty
PubMed: 28623942
DOI: 10.1186/s40463-017-0225-z -
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and... Aug 2022We aim to compare the functional and anatomical outcomes of temporalis muscle fascia graft with that of full thickness composite tragal island cartilage graft in...
We aim to compare the functional and anatomical outcomes of temporalis muscle fascia graft with that of full thickness composite tragal island cartilage graft in patients who are undergoing Type 1 Tympanoplasty. This is a prospective study conducted on 60 patients. Patients who underwent type 1 tympanoplasty were included in the study. Patients were divided into Group A (temporalis fascia graft) and Group B (tragal island cartilage) with 30 patients in each. Out of the 60 patients, 18 females and 12 males belonged to Group A, 20 females and 10 males belonged to Group B. The mean age group was between 31 and 40 yrs in both the groups. The mean hearing gain and ABG closure for Group A was 13.83 ± 8.11 and 13.39 ± 7.44 and in Group B it was 11.17 ± 4.06 and 11.5 ± 5. The graft uptake rate of Group A was 90% and Group B was 96.67%. The wound healing rate of Group A was 93.33% and Group B was 100%. The mean duration of surgery in Group A was 97.5 ± 17.16 and in Group B was 81.33 ± 11.14. Both the groups had significant post-operative improvement in hearing. No significant results found between both the groups in terms of hearing gain, air-bone gap closure, wound healing and graft uptake rate except lesser duration of surgery in group B. We conclude that tragal island cartilage graft is a better choice in Type 1 Tympanoplasty.
PubMed: 36032890
DOI: 10.1007/s12070-021-02459-2