-
International Journal of Gynaecology... Aug 2023Many advances in the understanding of the pathologic and molecular features of endometrial cancer have occurred since the FIGO staging was last updated in 2009....
INTRODUCTION
Many advances in the understanding of the pathologic and molecular features of endometrial cancer have occurred since the FIGO staging was last updated in 2009. Substantially more outcome and biological behavior data are now available regarding the several histological types. Molecular and genetic findings have accelerated since the publication of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data and provide improved clarity on the diverse biological nature of this collection of endometrial cancers and their differing prognostic outcomes. The goals of the new staging system are to better define these prognostic groups and create substages that indicate more appropriate surgical, radiation, and systemic therapies.
METHODS
The FIGO Women's Cancer Committee appointed a Subcommittee on Endometrial Cancer Staging in October 2021, represented by the authors. Since then, the committee members have met frequently and reviewed new and established evidence on the treatment, prognosis, and survival of endometrial cancer. Based on these data, opportunities for improvements in the categorization and stratification of these factors were identified in each of the four stages. Data and analyses from the molecular and histological classifications performed and published in the recently developed ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines were used as a template for adding the new subclassifications to the proposed molecular and histological staging system.
RESULTS
Based on the existing evidence, the substages were defined as follows: Stage I (IA1): non-aggressive histological type of endometrial carcinoma limited to a polyp or confined to the endometrium; (IA2) non-aggressive histological types of endometrium involving less than 50% of the myometrium with no or focal lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) as defined by WHO criteria; (IA3) low-grade endometrioid carcinomas limited to the uterus with simultaneous low-grade endometrioid ovarian involvement; (IB) non-aggressive histological types involving 50% or more of the myometrium with no LVSI or focal LVSI; (IC) aggressive histological types, i.e. serous, high-grade endometrioid, clear cell, carcinosarcomas, undifferentiated, mixed, and other unusual types without any myometrial invasion. Stage II (IIA): non-aggressive histological types that infiltrate the cervical stroma; (IIB) non-aggressive histological types that have substantial LVSI; or (IIC) aggressive histological types with any myometrial invasion. Stage III (IIIA): differentiating between adnexal versus uterine serosa infiltration; (IIIB) infiltration of vagina/parametria and pelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IIIC) refinements for lymph node metastasis to pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes, including micrometastasis and macrometastasis. Stage IV (IVA): locally advanced disease infiltrating the bladder or rectal mucosa; (IVB) extrapelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IVC) distant metastasis. The performance of complete molecular classification (POLEmut, MMRd, NSMP, p53abn) is encouraged in all endometrial cancers. If the molecular subtype is known, this is recorded in the FIGO stage by the addition of "m" for molecular classification, and a subscript indicating the specific molecular subtype. When molecular classification reveals p53abn or POLEmut status in Stages I and II, this results in upstaging or downstaging of the disease (IICm or IAm ).
SUMMARY
The updated 2023 staging of endometrial cancer includes the various histological types, tumor patterns, and molecular classification to better reflect the improved understanding of the complex nature of the several types of endometrial carcinoma and their underlying biologic behavior. The changes incorporated in the 2023 staging system should provide a more evidence-based context for treatment recommendations and for the more refined future collection of outcome and survival data.
Topics: Female; Humans; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Neoplasm Staging; Endometrial Neoplasms; Prognosis; Carcinoma, Endometrioid; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37337978
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14923 -
The Medical Journal of Malaysia May 2022Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is one of the commonest complaints of women in reproductive age and non-gravid state that brings them to the attention of the primary...
Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is one of the commonest complaints of women in reproductive age and non-gravid state that brings them to the attention of the primary care doctor or the gynaecologist. Anovulation without any medical illness or pelvic pathology seems to be the common cause. Bleeding due to a wide variation in pathology both inside and outside the reproductive tract can be termed as anovulatory bleeding. Therefore, it is mandatory to elicit a focused menstrual history and appropriate evaluation followed by a pelvic examination. This includes a vaginal speculum examination to differentiate anovulatory bleeding from other causes of bleeding. In contrast, Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is referred to as an ovulatory bleeding exceeding 8 days duration and is often caused by uterine fibroids or adenomyosis, a copper IUD or coagulation disorders. PALM-COEIN classification is a system designed by the Federation Internationale de Gynaecologie et d'Obstetrique to define the precise underlying causes of AUB. Aetiology of AUB can be classified as the following acronym "PALM-COEIN": Polyp, Adenomyosis, Leiomyoma, Malignancy and hyperplasia, Coagulopathy, Ovulatory dysfunction, Endometrial, Iatrogenic and Not yet classified. AUB describes a range of symptoms, such as HMB, intermenstrual bleeding (IMB) and a combination of both heavy and prolonged menstrual bleeding (MB). Dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) and menorrhagia are now better described as AUB. Newborn girls sometimes spot for a few days after birth, due to placental oestrogenic stimulation of the endometrium in utero.
Topics: Adenomyosis; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Leiomyoma; Menorrhagia; Placenta; Pregnancy; Uterine Hemorrhage
PubMed: 35638495
DOI: No ID Found -
Human Reproduction Update Nov 2022To provide the optimal milieu for implantation and fetal development, the female reproductive system must orchestrate uterine dynamics with the appropriate hormones...
BACKGROUND
To provide the optimal milieu for implantation and fetal development, the female reproductive system must orchestrate uterine dynamics with the appropriate hormones produced by the ovaries. Mature oocytes may be fertilized in the fallopian tubes, and the resulting zygote is transported toward the uterus, where it can implant and continue developing. The cervix acts as a physical barrier to protect the fetus throughout pregnancy, and the vagina acts as a birth canal (involving uterine and cervix mechanisms) and facilitates copulation. Fertility can be compromised by pathologies that affect any of these organs or processes, and therefore, being able to accurately model them or restore their function is of paramount importance in applied and translational research. However, innate differences in human and animal model reproductive tracts, and the static nature of 2D cell/tissue culture techniques, necessitate continued research and development of dynamic and more complex in vitro platforms, ex vivo approaches and in vivo therapies to study and support reproductive biology. To meet this need, bioengineering is propelling the research on female reproduction into a new dimension through a wide range of potential applications and preclinical models, and the burgeoning number and variety of studies makes for a rapidly changing state of the field.
OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE
This review aims to summarize the mounting evidence on bioengineering strategies, platforms and therapies currently available and under development in the context of female reproductive medicine, in order to further understand female reproductive biology and provide new options for fertility restoration. Specifically, techniques used in, or for, the uterus (endometrium and myometrium), ovary, fallopian tubes, cervix and vagina will be discussed.
SEARCH METHODS
A systematic search of full-text articles available in PubMed and Embase databases was conducted to identify relevant studies published between January 2000 and September 2021. The search terms included: bioengineering, reproduction, artificial, biomaterial, microfluidic, bioprinting, organoid, hydrogel, scaffold, uterus, endometrium, ovary, fallopian tubes, oviduct, cervix, vagina, endometriosis, adenomyosis, uterine fibroids, chlamydia, Asherman's syndrome, intrauterine adhesions, uterine polyps, polycystic ovary syndrome and primary ovarian insufficiency. Additional studies were identified by manually searching the references of the selected articles and of complementary reviews. Eligibility criteria included original, rigorous and accessible peer-reviewed work, published in English, on female reproductive bioengineering techniques in preclinical (in vitro/in vivo/ex vivo) and/or clinical testing phases.
OUTCOMES
Out of the 10 390 records identified, 312 studies were included for systematic review. Owing to inconsistencies in the study measurements and designs, the findings were assessed qualitatively rather than by meta-analysis. Hydrogels and scaffolds were commonly applied in various bioengineering-related studies of the female reproductive tract. Emerging technologies, such as organoids and bioprinting, offered personalized diagnoses and alternative treatment options, respectively. Promising microfluidic systems combining various bioengineering approaches have also shown translational value.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS
The complexity of the molecular, endocrine and tissue-level interactions regulating female reproduction present challenges for bioengineering approaches to replace female reproductive organs. However, interdisciplinary work is providing valuable insight into the physicochemical properties necessary for reproductive biological processes to occur. Defining the landscape of reproductive bioengineering technologies currently available and under development for women can provide alternative models for toxicology/drug testing, ex vivo fertility options, clinical therapies and a basis for future organ regeneration studies.
Topics: Animals; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Bioengineering; Embryo Implantation; Genitalia, Female; Reproduction; Uterus
PubMed: 35652272
DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmac025 -
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Sep 2023Many advances in the understanding of the pathologic and molecular features of endometrial cancer have occurred since the FIGO staging was last updated in 2009....
INTRODUCTION
Many advances in the understanding of the pathologic and molecular features of endometrial cancer have occurred since the FIGO staging was last updated in 2009. Substantially more outcome and biological behavior data are now available regarding the several histological types. Molecular and genetic findings have accelerated since the publication of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data and provide improved clarity on the diverse biological nature of this collection of endometrial cancers and their differing prognostic outcomes. The goals of the new staging system are to better define these prognostic groups and create substages that indicate more appropriate surgical, radiation, and systemic therapies.
METHODS
The FIGO Women's Cancer Committee appointed a Subcommittee on Endometrial Cancer Staging in October 2021, represented by the authors. Since then, the committee members have met frequently and reviewed new and established evidence on the treatment, prognosis, and survival of endometrial cancer. Based on these data, opportunities for improvements in the categorization and stratification of these factors were identified in each of the four stages. Data and analyses from the molecular and histological classifications performed and published in the recently developed ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines were used as a template for adding the new subclassifications to the proposed molecular and histological staging system.
RESULTS
Based on the existing evidence, the substages were defined as follows: non-aggressive histological type of endometrial carcinoma limited to a polyp or confined to the endometrium; (IA2) non-aggressive histological types of endometrium involving less than 50% of the myometrium with no or focal lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) as defined by WHO criteria; (IA3) low-grade endometrioid carcinomas limited to the uterus with simultaneous low-grade endometrioid ovarian involvement; (IB) non-aggressive histological types involving 50% or more of the myometrium with no LVSI or focal LVSI; (IC) aggressive histological types, i.e. serous, high-grade endometrioid, clear cell, carcinosarcomas, undifferentiated, mixed, and other unusual types without any myometrial invasion. non-aggressive histological types that infiltrate the cervical stroma; (IIB) non-aggressive histological types that have substantial LVSI; or (IIC) aggressive histological types with any myometrial invasion. differentiating between adnexal versus uterine serosa infiltration; (IIIB) infiltration of vagina/parametria and pelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IIIC) refinements for lymph node metastasis to pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes, including micrometastasis and macrometastasis. locally advanced disease infiltrating the bladder or rectal mucosa; (IVB) extrapelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IVC) distant metastasis. The performance of complete molecular classification (, MMRd, NSMP, p53abn) is encouraged in all endometrial cancers. If the molecular subtype is known, this is recorded in the FIGO stage by the addition of "m" for molecular classification, and a subscript indicating the specific molecular subtype. When molecular classification reveals p53abn or status in Stages I and II, this results in upstaging or downstaging of the disease (IICm or IAm).
SUMMARY
The updated 2023 staging of endometrial cancer includes the various histological types, tumor patterns, and molecular classification to better reflect the improved understanding of the complex nature of the several types of endometrial carcinoma and their underlying biologic behavior. The changes incorporated in the 2023 staging system should provide a more evidence-based context for treatment recommendations and for the more refined future collection of outcome and survival data.
Topics: Female; Humans; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Endometrial Neoplasms; Endometrium; Uterus; Carcinoma, Endometrioid
PubMed: 37593813
DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e85 -
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection... 2023The previous researches show that infertile patients have a higher incidence of endometritis and endometrial polyps, and the occurrence of these two diseases is related...
BACKGROUND
The previous researches show that infertile patients have a higher incidence of endometritis and endometrial polyps, and the occurrence of these two diseases is related to changes in the microbiota of the genital tract. We aim to determine the composition and changing characteristics of the microbiota in the genital tract (especially the endometrium) of infertile patients with chronic endometritis or endometrial polyps, and find the correlation between it and the occurrence of diseases.
METHODS
This is a prospective study. We collected genital tract biopsy samples from 134 asymptomatic infertile patients receiving assisted reproductive therapy before embryo transfer. Through pathological examination and 16S ribosomal RNA(16S rRNA) sequencing, we determined the distribution of chronic endometritis and endometrial polyps in these patients, as well as their distribution of reproductive tract microorganisms.
RESULTS
Compared with the normal control group, the microbial group of reproductive tract in patients with chronic endometritis and endometrial polyps is changed, and there are significant species differences and relative abundance differences in the vagina, cervix and uterine cavity. , the dominant flora of female genital tract, showed a change in abundance in patients with endometrial diseases. Endometrial microbiota composed of , etc. are related to chronic endometritis and endometrial polyps.
CONCLUSION
The results showed that, compared with the normal control group, the endometrial microbiota of infertile patients with chronic endometritis or endometrial polyps did have significant changes in the relative abundance distribution of species, suggesting that changes in local microecology may be an important factor in the occurrence of disease, or even adverse pregnancy outcomes. The further study of endometrial microecology may provide a new opportunity to further improve the diagnosis and treatment strategy of chronic endometritis.
Topics: Pregnancy; Humans; Female; Endometritis; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S; Prospective Studies; Infertility, Female; Endometrium; Microbiota
PubMed: 37284497
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1125640 -
Fertility and Sterility Jan 2022To analyze the impact on live birth rates (LBRs) of the individualized luteal phase support (termed iLPS) in patients with low serum progesterone (P) levels compared...
Individualized luteal phase support normalizes live birth rate in women with low progesterone levels on the day of embryo transfer in artificial endometrial preparation cycles.
OBJECTIVE
To analyze the impact on live birth rates (LBRs) of the individualized luteal phase support (termed iLPS) in patients with low serum progesterone (P) levels compared with patients without iLPS.
DESIGN
Retrospective cohort study, December 1, 2018, to May 30, 2019.
SETTING
Private medical center.
PATIENT(S)
A total of 2,275 patients checked for serum P on the day of blastocyst transfer were analyzed. During the study period, 1,299 patients showed serum P levels of ≥9.2 ng/mL, whereas 550 showed serum P levels of <9.2 ng/mL and received iLPS. Additionally, a historical group of 426 patients with serum P levels of <9.2 ng/mL but no iLPS were used for comparison. Eligible patients were aged ≤50 years with adequate endometrium morphology after receiving estrogens. Luteal phase support was provided with micronized vaginal P (MVP) to all women. Patients with personalized initiation of exogenous P according to the endometrial receptivity assay test, polyps, fibroids distorting the cavity, or hydrosalpinx were not included in the analysis.
INTERVENTION(S)
As routine practice since December 2018, patients with low serum P levels received an iLPS with a daily injection of 25 mg of subcutaneous P from the day of embryo transfer (ET) in addition to standard LPS (400 mg of MVP twice a day).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)
Live birth rate.
RESULT(S)
The LBR was 44.9% in the iLPS cases vs. 45.0% in patients with normal serum P levels (crude odds ratio [OR], 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.22). By regression analysis, low serum P levels did not affect the LBR after adjusting for possible confounders (age, oocyte origin, fresh vs. frozen, day of ET, embryo quality, number of embryos transferred) (adjusted OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.79-1.25). Similarly, no differences were observed in other pregnancy outcomes between groups. The LBR was significantly higher in the group of patients who received additional subcutaneous P (iLPS) compared with the historical group with low serum P levels and no iLPS (44.9% vs. 37.3%; OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.06-1.78). In the overall population, patients showing P levels of <9.2 ng/mL on the day of ET were slightly younger and had higher body mass index and lower estradiol and P levels during the proliferative phase compared with patients with P levels of ≥9.2 ng/mL. No differences were observed with regard to the time in between the last dose of MVP and the serum P determination. After a multivariable logistic regression analysis, only body mass index and estradiol levels in the proliferative phase reminded statistically significant. Significant differences in the LBR were observed between patients with serum P levels of <9.2 ng/mL without iLPS and patients with serum P levels of ≥9.2 ng/mL when using either own or donated oocytes.
CONCLUSION(S)
Individualized LPS for patients with low serum P levels produces LBRs similar to those of patients with adequate serum P levels.
Topics: Adult; Birth Rate; Cohort Studies; Embryo Transfer; Endometrium; Female; Fertility Agents, Female; Humans; Live Birth; Luteal Phase; Middle Aged; Ovulation Induction; Precision Medicine; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate; Progesterone; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 34548167
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.08.040 -
Canadian Association of Radiologists... Aug 2016Female gynaecologic conditions arising from the endometrium are common and depend on a woman's age, her menstrual history, and the use of medications such as hormone... (Review)
Review
Female gynaecologic conditions arising from the endometrium are common and depend on a woman's age, her menstrual history, and the use of medications such as hormone replacement and tamoxifen. Both benign and malignant conditions affect the endometrium. Benign conditions must be distinguished from malignant and premalignant conditions. The most commonly used imaging modality for evaluating the endometrium is pelvic ultrasound with transabdominal and transvaginal techniques. Additional imaging methods include hysterosonography and magnetic resonance imaging. This pictorial essay will review the normal and abnormal appearance of the endometrium and diagnostic algorithms to evaluate abnormal vaginal bleeding and abnormal endometrial thickness.
Topics: Endometrial Neoplasms; Endometrium; Endosonography; Female; Humans; Hyperplasia; Infertility, Female; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Polyps
PubMed: 27090929
DOI: 10.1016/j.carj.2015.09.012 -
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association... May 2023
Topics: Female; Humans; Endometriosis; Vaginal Diseases; Polyps
PubMed: 37127308
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.220466