-
The Journal of Family Practice Jul 2023Insomnia is a distinct disorder that is common, yet underrecognized and undertreated in primary care. Treating insomnia has been shown to improve outcomes, including... (Review)
Review
Insomnia is a distinct disorder that is common, yet underrecognized and undertreated in primary care. Treating insomnia has been shown to improve outcomes, including reduced risk of developing cardiovascular and mental health disorders. Insomnia is influenced by the brain's regulation of sleep and wake, which are mutually exclusive events. Insomnia should be treated as a distinct condition, even when occurring with a comorbid diagnosis such as depression or anxiety. Clinicians should implement a multimodal approach to insomnia management, including nonpharmacologic interventions and pharmacologic therapy (when indicated). Pharmacologic agents that are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for insomnia include benzodiazepine receptor agonists (zolpidem, eszopiclone, and zaleplon), low-dose doxepin (tricyclic antidepressant), ramelteon (melatonin receptor agonist), and dual orexin receptor agonists (DORAs, daridorexant, lemborexant, and suvorexant). Unlike other pharmacologic agents, DORAs inhibit wakefulness rather than induce sedation. Additionally, these medications have no evidence of rebound insomnia or withdrawal, and little to no abuse potential. Daridorexant is the newest DORA, has an ideal half-life of 8 hours, and has demonstrated continued efficacy over a 12-month period. Selection of pharmacologic agent should be based on the patient's comorbid conditions, treatment goals and preferences, and other clinical characteristics.
Topics: Humans; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Sleep; Zolpidem; Doxepin
PubMed: 37549414
DOI: 10.12788/jfp.0620 -
Nature Oct 2023Type A γ-aminobutyric acid receptors (GABARs) are the principal inhibitory receptors in the brain and the target of a wide range of clinical agents, including...
Type A γ-aminobutyric acid receptors (GABARs) are the principal inhibitory receptors in the brain and the target of a wide range of clinical agents, including anaesthetics, sedatives, hypnotics and antidepressants. However, our understanding of GABAR pharmacology has been hindered by the vast number of pentameric assemblies that can be derived from 19 different subunits and the lack of structural knowledge of clinically relevant receptors. Here, we isolate native murine GABAR assemblies containing the widely expressed α1 subunit and elucidate their structures in complex with drugs used to treat insomnia (zolpidem (ZOL) and flurazepam) and postpartum depression (the neurosteroid allopregnanolone (APG)). Using cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) analysis and single-molecule photobleaching experiments, we uncover three major structural populations in the brain: the canonical α1β2γ2 receptor containing two α1 subunits, and two assemblies containing one α1 and either an α2 or α3 subunit, in which the single α1-containing receptors feature a more compact arrangement between the transmembrane and extracellular domains. Interestingly, APG is bound at the transmembrane α/β subunit interface, even when not added to the sample, revealing an important role for endogenous neurosteroids in modulating native GABARs. Together with structurally engaged lipids, neurosteroids produce global conformational changes throughout the receptor that modify the ion channel pore and the binding sites for GABA and insomnia medications. Our data reveal the major α1-containing GABAR assemblies, bound with endogenous neurosteroid, thus defining a structural landscape from which subtype-specific drugs can be developed.
Topics: Animals; Mice; Binding Sites; Cryoelectron Microscopy; Depression, Postpartum; Flurazepam; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Ion Channel Gating; Neurosteroids; Photobleaching; Pregnanolone; Protein Conformation; Protein Subunits; Receptors, GABA-A; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Zolpidem
PubMed: 37730991
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06556-w -
Kansas Journal of Medicine 2023Recent research has focused on evaluating the impact of pharmalogical sources on fracture risk. The purpose of this study was to review the literature on anxiolytic... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Recent research has focused on evaluating the impact of pharmalogical sources on fracture risk. The purpose of this study was to review the literature on anxiolytic medications that may be associated with an increased risk of fracture.
METHODS
A search was conducted in MEDLINE and Embase databases to identify primary clinical studies of patients who sustained a fracture while prescribed anxiolytic medications and were published prior to July 2021. Anxiolytics defined by ATC Class N05B, beta blockers, and zolpidem were included. The search terms consisted of variations of the following: ("Psychotropic Drugs" or MeSH terms) AND ("Fracture" or MeSH terms).
RESULTS
Of 3,213 studies, 13 (0.4%) met inclusion criteria and were evaluated. Fractures associated with benzodiazepine were reported in 12 of 13 studies; the highest risk occurred in patients aged 60 years and older (RR=2.29, 95% CI (1.48-4.40)). The ATC Class N05B showed an increased fracture risk for those ≤ 55 years of age that differed by sex: for men (RR=5.42, 95% CI(4.86-6.05)) and for women (RR=3.33, 95% CI (3.03-3.66)). Zolpidem also showed an increase fracture risk (RR=2.29, 95% CI(1.48-3.56)), but only during the first four weeks of treatment. A relative risk of 0.77, 95% CI(0.72-0.83) was observed for beta blockers.
CONCLUSIONS
Fractures are a mainstay of traumatic injuries and are accompanied by economical, physiological, and psychological hardship. With proper assessment and prophylactic measures, fracture risk can be reduced dramatically. Anxiolytic medications have been described widely to increase fracture risk, such as benzodiazepines in 60+ year old patients, and ATC Class N05B anxiolytics increased fracture risk in 55+ year old men and in 55+ year old women. Yet, some studies showed that at low doses, nitrazepam lowered fracture risk. Other anxiolytic medications, such as zolpidem and beta blockers, also showed a decrease in fracture risk. Ultimately, this scoping review helped to illuminate the inconsistency of anxiolytic fracture risk assessment while simultaneously illustrating the necessary steps to guide future research.
PubMed: 37791022
DOI: 10.17161/kjm.vol16.20091 -
CNS Drugs Jul 2023Daridorexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist approved in early 2022, reduces wake after sleep onset without reducing the number of awakenings in patients with... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Daridorexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist approved in early 2022, reduces wake after sleep onset without reducing the number of awakenings in patients with insomnia. The objective of this post hoc analysis was to explore the effect of daridorexant on the number, duration, and distribution of night-time wake bouts, and their correlation with daytime functioning.
METHODS
Adults with insomnia disorder were randomized 1:1:1:1:1:1 to placebo, zolpidem 10 mg, or daridorexant 5, 10, 25, or 50 mg in a phase II dose-finding study, and 1:1:1 to placebo or daridorexant 25 or 50 mg in a pivotal phase III study. We analyzed polysomnography data for daridorexant 25 and 50 mg, zolpidem 10 mg, and placebo groups. Polysomnography was conducted at baseline, then on Days 1/2, 15/16, and 28/29 in the phase II study, and Months 1 and 3 in the phase III study. The number, duration, and distribution of wake bouts (≥ 0.5 min) were assessed.
RESULTS
Data from 1111 patients (phase II study: daridorexant 50 mg [n = 61], zolpidem 10 mg [n = 60], placebo [n = 60]; phase III study: daridorexant 25 mg [n = 310], daridorexant 50 mg [n = 310], placebo [n = 310]) were analyzed. Long wake bouts were defined as > 6 min. Compared with placebo, daridorexant 50 mg reduced overall wake time (p < 0.05; all time points, both studies), the odds of experiencing long wake bouts (p < 0.001; Months 1 and 3, phase III study), and the cumulative duration of long wake bouts (p < 0.01; all time points, both studies). Reductions in long wake bouts were sustained through the second half of the night and correlated with improvements in daytime functioning. An increase in the cumulative duration of short wake bouts was observed with daridorexant 50 mg (p < 0.01 vs placebo, Months 1 and 3, phase III study); this was uncorrelated with daytime functioning.
CONCLUSION
Daridorexant reduced the number and duration of longer wake bouts throughout the night compared with placebo, corresponding with improved daytime functioning.
CLINICAL TRIALS
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02839200 (registered July 20, 2016), NCT03545191 (registered June 4, 2018).
Topics: Adult; Humans; Zolpidem; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Pyridines; Double-Blind Method
PubMed: 37477771
DOI: 10.1007/s40263-023-01020-9 -
La Clinica Terapeutica 2023Z-Drugs are a category of non-benzodiazepine sedative-hypnotic drugs that include Zolpidem, Zopiclone and Zaleplon. They are all rapidly adsorbed and have a very short... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Z-Drugs are a category of non-benzodiazepine sedative-hypnotic drugs that include Zolpidem, Zopiclone and Zaleplon. They are all rapidly adsorbed and have a very short half- life, features that make them first-line treatment of insomnia and, in the meantime, first-choice drugs in cases of poisoning for criminal purposes. Z-drugs are frequently use in Drug Facilitated Crime cases (DFC) and Drug Facilitated Sexual Assault (DFSA), namely crimes, robberies, extortion and sexual violence committed after administration of incapacitating substances able to induce sedative-hypnotic effects. In these circumstances, the psychoactive substance is considered as a weapon and constitutes an aggravating circumstance in the criminal act: accordingly, judicial authority legitimates the analytical determination of these substances. Currently, few tests able to detect such drugs are available in daily clinical practice.
AIM
The aim of this work is to evaluate the effective utilization of Z-Drugs.
METHODS
We have analyzed the literature, focusing on cases in which the criminal use of such incapacitating substances has been demonstrated. Relevant scientific articles were identified from PubMed, Cochrane Central, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, EMBASE up to December 2022 using the following keywords: "z-drugs", "drug facilitated crime", "forensic toxicology". The resulting references were screened to exclude duplicates. In addition, non-English papers were excluded. This evaluation left 10 articles (8 case reports and 2 original studies) divided as follows: 1 case report of a DFC (robbery), 6 cases of confirmed DFSA, 3 cases of suspected DFSA, 2 original studies about DFC.
RESULTS
The totality of the selected cases showed positive toxicological tests for a single intake of z-drugs.
CONCLUSIONS
This work has shown the limitations of screening tests currently in use in the emergency rooms. Forensic toxicology tests should be introduced in daily clinical practice.
Topics: Humans; Crime; Crime Victims; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Sex Offenses; Case Reports as Topic
PubMed: 37750379
DOI: 10.7417/CT.2023.2465 -
Sleep Medicine: X Dec 2023Insomnia is a common disease, and the application of various types of sleeping pills for cognitive impairment is controversial, especially as different doses can lead to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Insomnia is a common disease, and the application of various types of sleeping pills for cognitive impairment is controversial, especially as different doses can lead to different effects. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the cognitive impairment caused by different sleeping pills to provide a theoretical basis for guiding clinicians in the selection of medication regimens.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate whether various different doses (low, medium and high) of anti-insomnia drugs, such as the dual-orexin receptor antagonist (DORA), zopiclone, eszopiclone and zolpidem, induce cognitive impairment.
METHODS
The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception to September 20th, 2022 for keywords in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the therapeutic effects of DORA, eszopiclone, zopiclone and zolpidem on sleep and cognitive function. The primary outcomes were indicators related to cognitive characteristics, including scores on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and daytime alertness. The secondary outcomes were the indicators associated with sleep and adverse events. Continuous variables were expressed as the standard mean difference (SMD). Data were obtained through GetData 2.26 and analyzed by Stata v.15.0.
RESULTS
A total of 8702 subjects were included in 29 studies. Eszopiclone significantly increased the daytime alertness score (SMD = 3.00, 95 % CI: 1.86 to 4.13) compared with the placebo, and eszopiclone significantly increased the daytime alertness score (SMD = 4.21, 95 % CI: 1.65 to 6.77; SMD = 3.95, 95 % CI: 1.38 to 6.51; SMD = 3.26, 95 % CI: 0.38 to 6.15; and SMD = 3.23, 95 % CI: 0.34 to 6.11) compared with zolpidem, zolpidem, DORA, and eszopiclone, respectively. Compared with the placebo, zopiclone, zolpidem, and eszopiclone, DORA significantly increased the TST (SMD = 2.39, 95 % CI: 1.11 to 3.67; SMD = 6.00, 95 % CI: 2.73 to 9.27; SMD = 1.89, 95 % CI: 0.90 to 2.88; and SMD = 1.70, 95 % CI: 0.42 to 2.99, respectively).
CONCLUSION
We recommend DORA as the best intervention for insomnia because it was highly effective in inducing and maintaining sleep without impairing cognition. Although zolpidem had a more pronounced effect on sleep maintenance, this drug is better for short-term use. Eszopiclone and zopiclone improved sleep, but their cognitive effects have yet to be verified.
PubMed: 38149178
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleepx.2023.100094 -
JAMA Network Open Dec 2023Daytime functional impairments are the primary reasons for patients with insomnia to seek treatment, yet little is known about what the optimal treatment is for... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
IMPORTANCE
Daytime functional impairments are the primary reasons for patients with insomnia to seek treatment, yet little is known about what the optimal treatment is for improving daytime functions and how best to proceed with treatment for patients whose insomnia has not remitted.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the efficacy of behavioral therapy (BT) and zolpidem as initial therapies for improving daytime functions among patients with insomnia and evaluate the added value of a second treatment for patients whose insomnia has not remitted.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
In this sequential multiple-assignment randomized clinical trial conducted at institutions in Canada and the US, 211 adults with chronic insomnia disorder were enrolled between May 1, 2012, and December 31, 2015, and followed up for 12 months. Statistical analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis in April and October 2023.
INTERVENTIONS
Participants were randomly assigned to either BT or zolpidem as first-stage therapy, and those whose insomnia had not remitted received a second-stage psychological therapy (BT or cognitive therapy) or medication therapy (zolpidem or trazodone).
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Study outcomes were daytime symptoms of insomnia, including mood disturbances, fatigue, functional impairments of insomnia, and scores on the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical and mental health components.
RESULTS
Among 211 adults with insomnia (132 women [63%]; mean [SD] age, 45.6 [14.9] years), 104 were allocated to BT and 107 to zolpidem at the first stage. First-stage treatment with BT or zolpidem yielded significant and equivalent benefits for most of the daytime outcomes, including depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory-II mean score change, -3.5 [95% CI, -4.7 to -2.3] vs -4.3 [95% CI, -5.7 to -2.9]), fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory mean score change, -4.7 [95% CI, -7.3 to -2.2] vs -5.2 [95% CI, -7.9 to -2.5]), functional impairments (Work and Social Adjustment Scale mean score change, -5.0 [95% CI, -6.7 to -3.3] vs -5.1 [95% CI, -7.2 to -2.9]), and mental health (SF-36 mental health subscale mean score change, 3.5 [95% CI, 1.9-5.1] vs 2.5 [95% CI, 0.4-4.5]), while BT produced larger improvements for anxiety symptoms relative to zolpidem (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory mean score change, -4.1 [95% CI, -5.8 to -2.4] vs -1.2 [95% CI, -3.0 to 0.5]; P = .02; Cohen d = 0.55). Second-stage therapy produced additional improvements for the 2 conditions starting with zolpidem at posttreatment in fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory mean score change: zolpidem plus BT, -3.8 [95% CI, -7.1 to -0.4]; zolpidem plus trazodone, -3.7 [95% CI, -6.3 to -1.1]), functional impairments (Work and Social Adjustment Scale mean score change: zolpidem plus BT, -3.7 [95% CI, -6.4 to -1.0]; zolpidem plus trazodone, -3.3 [95% CI, -5.9 to -0.7]) and mental health (SF-36 mental health subscale mean score change: zolpidem plus BT, 5.3 [95% CI, 2.7-7.9]; zolpidem plus trazodone, 2.0 [95% CI, 0.1-4.0]). Treatment benefits achieved at posttreatment were well maintained throughout the 12-month follow-up, and additional improvements were noted for patients receiving the BT treatment sequences.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this randomized clinical trial of adults with insomnia disorder, BT and zolpidem produced improvements for various daytime symptoms of insomnia that were no different between treatments. Adding a second treatment offered an added value with further improvements of daytime functions.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01651442.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Behavior Therapy; Fatigue; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Trazodone; Zolpidem; Male
PubMed: 38153735
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49638 -
The Mental Health Clinician Oct 2023Chronic insomnia affects 5% to 10% of the US population, increasing the demand for treatment options and the corresponding research to prove their validity.1 This review... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Chronic insomnia affects 5% to 10% of the US population, increasing the demand for treatment options and the corresponding research to prove their validity.1 This review compares recommendations from 3 clinical guidelines and summarizes hypnotic medications, including their newly reported side effects not mentioned in the guidelines. In addition, we aim to provide an overview of what pharmacotherapies are available for prescribers and patients.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted for articles published prior to January 10, 2022, and case reports and clinical studies were retrieved from PubMed and Google Scholar.
RESULTS
Definitive conclusions cannot be drawn regarding the safety and efficacy of medications reviewed; however, trends are apparent. All 3 guidelines included in this review remarked most treatment recommendations as weak except for cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, which is effective but not readily available. Furthermore, based on the 15 case reports and 13 clinical studies presented in this review, many of the medications used for treatment of insomnia present safety concerns.
DISCUSSION
Benzodiazepines and benzodiazepine receptor agonists are commonly used hypnotic agents with the "Z-drugs" having robust data establishing their efficacy for the short-term treatment of chronic insomnia. However, significant adverse effects related to the central nervous system (CNS), including developing tolerance, addiction, CNS depression, and amnesia, remain barriers to their long-term use. In comparison, newer agents present more favorable side-effect profiles although with less established efficacy. Additionally, off-label agents, including antidepressants, antihistamines, and natural supplements, are discussed due to their prominent use.
PubMed: 38131058
DOI: 10.9740/mhc.2023.10.244 -
Sleep Nov 2023
Topics: Humans; Zolpidem; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Pyridines; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Behavior Therapy; Double-Blind Method
PubMed: 37691423
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsad240