-
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology May 2021The selective T-cell costimulation modulator abatacept is approved for treatment of adult rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
The selective T-cell costimulation modulator abatacept is approved for treatment of adult rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA; 6-17 years [intravenous] and 2-17 years [subcutaneous]). An extrapolation approach was taken to determine subcutaneous weight-tiered doses of abatacept to evaluate in patients with pJIA. Population pharmacokinetic (PPK) and exposure-response (E-R) analyses were conducted to determine whether the weight-tiered subcutaneous regimen provides near-maximal efficacy and is therapeutically comparable to the intravenous regimen in patients with pJIA aged 2-17 years. Combined study data from intravenous or subcutaneous abatacept were used to assess clinically relevant exposure outcomes. The PPK model was developed with data from 13 phase 2/3 studies in RA and pJIA; the E-R model for the American College of Rheumatology pediatric scores (JIA-ACR 30/50/70/100 responses) in month 4 was developed with data from 2 phase 3 pJIA studies. Predefined covariates were investigated in both analyses. PPK model-predicted exposures were steady-state peak, trough (C ), and time-averaged concentrations. Abatacept PK was characterized by a linear 2-compartment model (zero-order intravenous infusion, first-order subcutaneous absorption, first-order elimination); body weight was the only clinically relevant covariate. C was the best exposure predictor for the JIA-ACR response: log odds for response increased in proportion to log-transformed C ; JIA-ACR30 approached a plateau when C ≥ 10 μg/mL. The PPK and E-R analyses demonstrated that the weight-tiered subcutaneous and intravenous abatacept dosing regimens provide near-maximal efficacy and are clinically comparable across children with pJIA who are > 2 years old.
Topics: Abatacept; Adolescent; Age Factors; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Juvenile; Body Weight; Child; Child, Preschool; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Models, Biological; Patient Acuity; Sex Factors
PubMed: 33284480
DOI: 10.1002/jcph.1797 -
Cells Dec 2023Abatacept (CTLA4-Ig)-a monoclonal antibody which restricts T cell activation-is an effective treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Nevertheless, only 50% of RA...
A Peripheral Blood Signature of Increased Th1 and Myeloid Cells Combined with Serum Inflammatory Mediators Is Associated with Response to Abatacept in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.
Abatacept (CTLA4-Ig)-a monoclonal antibody which restricts T cell activation-is an effective treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Nevertheless, only 50% of RA patients attain clinical responses, while predictors of response are rather limited. Herein, we aimed to investigate for early biomarkers of response to abatacept, based on a detailed immunological profiling of peripheral blood (PB) cells and serum proteins. We applied flow cytometry and proteomics analysis on PB immune cells and serum respectively, of RA patients starting abatacept as the first biologic agent. After 6 months of treatment, 34.5% of patients attained response. At baseline, Th1 and FoxP3+ T cell populations were positively correlated with tender joint counts (-value = 0.047 and -value = 0.022, respectively). Upon treatment, CTLA4-Ig effectively reduced the percentages of Th1 and Th17 only in responders (-value = 0.0277 and -value = 0.0042, respectively). Notably, baseline levels of Th1 and myeloid cell populations were significantly increased in PB of responders compared to non-responders (-value = 0.009 and -value = 0.03, respectively). Proteomics analysis revealed that several inflammatory mediators were present in serum of responders before therapy initiation and strikingly 10 amongst 303 serum proteins were associated with clinical responses. Finally, a composite index based on selected baseline cellular and proteomics' analysis could predict response to abatacept with a high sensitivity (90%) and specificity (88.24%).
Topics: Humans; Abatacept; Antirheumatic Agents; Inflammation Mediators; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Myeloid Cells
PubMed: 38132128
DOI: 10.3390/cells12242808 -
Diabetologia Jan 2016Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease in the Western world. Standard treatments have ultimately proven ineffective in blocking... (Review)
Review
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease in the Western world. Standard treatments have ultimately proven ineffective in blocking DKD progression, thus necessitating the design of new therapies to complement glycaemic and blood pressure control. High glucose levels upregulate the immune-related molecule B7-1 in podocytes, and such an event may play a relevant role in DKD onset, suggesting that B7-1 is a suitable therapeutic target for DKD. CTLA4-Ig is a clinically available fusion protein, approved for the treatment of some autoimmune diseases, which binds B7-1 and blocks its signalling. We have previously demonstrated that CTLA4-Ig restores the physiological structure and cellular motility of podocytes challenged with high glucose in vitro and abrogates the onset of proteinuria in murine models of DKD in vivo. Notably, these beneficial effects occurred independently of any systemic immunological effects of CTLA4-Ig. While the expression of B7-1 on podocytes raises questions regarding the very nature of the podocyte as we know it, the preliminary positive effect of CTLA4-Ig on proteinuria in preclinical models and the evidence of B7-1 expression in kidney biopsies of diabetic individuals suggest a potential novel indication for CTLA4-Ig in DKD. Nonetheless, recent reports of problems with detecting podocyte B7-1 and of inconsistent therapeutic efficacy of CTLA4-Ig in proteinuric patients highlight the necessity to establish uniformly accepted protocols for the detection of B7-1 and underline the need for randomised trials with CTLA4-Ig in kidney diseases.
Topics: Abatacept; Animals; B7-1 Antigen; Biopsy; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Immune System; Inflammation; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Mice; Podocytes; Proteinuria; Signal Transduction; Up-Regulation
PubMed: 26409459
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-015-3766-6 -
Science Translational Medicine Mar 2023Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as nivolumab and ipilimumab, not only elicit antitumor responses in a wide range of human cancers but also cause severe...
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as nivolumab and ipilimumab, not only elicit antitumor responses in a wide range of human cancers but also cause severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including death. A largely unmet medical need is to treat irAEs without abrogating the immunotherapeutic effect of ICIs. Although abatacept has been used to treat irAEs, it risks neutralizing the anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibodies administered for cancer therapy, thereby reducing the efficacy of anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy. To avoid this caveat, we compared wild-type abatacept and mutants of CTLA-4-Ig for their binding to clinically approved anti-CTLA-4 antibodies and for their effect on both irAEs and immunotherapy conferred by anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies. Here, we report that whereas abatacept neutralized the therapeutic effect of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, the mutants that bound to B7-1 and B7-2, but not to clinical anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, including clinically used belatacept, abrogated irAEs without affecting cancer immunotherapy. Our data demonstrate that anti-CTLA-4-induced irAEs can be corrected by provision of soluble CTLA-4 variants and that the clinically available belatacept may emerge as a broadly applicable drug to abrogate irAEs while preserving the therapeutic efficacy of CTLA-4-targeting ICIs.
Topics: Humans; Abatacept; Immunotherapy; Ipilimumab; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Nivolumab
PubMed: 36857433
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abm5663 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Oct 2009
Topics: Abatacept; Antirheumatic Agents; Humans; Immunoconjugates; Methotrexate
PubMed: 19843049
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03502.x -
Cells Aug 2019Full activation of T lymphocytes requires signals from both T cell receptors and costimulatory molecules. In addition to CD28, several T cell molecules could deliver... (Review)
Review
Full activation of T lymphocytes requires signals from both T cell receptors and costimulatory molecules. In addition to CD28, several T cell molecules could deliver costimulatory signals, including CD154, which primarily interacts with CD40 on B-cells. CD40 is a critical molecule regulating several B-cell functions, such as antibody production, germinal center formation and cellular proliferation. Upregulated expression of CD40 and CD154 occurs in immune effector cells and non-immune cells in different autoimmune diseases. In addition, therapeutic benefits have been observed by blocking the CD40-CD154 interaction in animals with collagen-induced arthritis. Given the therapeutic success of the biologics abatacept, which blocks CD28 costimulation, and rituximab, which deletes B cells in the treatment of autoimmune arthritis, the inhibition of the CD40-CD154 axis has two advantages, namely, attenuating CD154-mediated T cell costimulation and suppressing CD40-mediated B-cell stimulation. Furthermore, blockade of the CD40-CD154 interaction drives the conversion of CD4+ T cells to regulatory T cells that mediate immunosuppression. Currently, several biological products targeting the CD40-CD154 axis have been developed and are undergoing early phase clinical trials with encouraging success in several autoimmune disorders, including autoimmune arthritis. This review addresses the roles of the CD40-CD154 axis in the pathogenesis of autoimmune arthritis and its potential as a therapeutic target.
Topics: Abatacept; Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis; Autoimmune Diseases; B-Lymphocytes; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; CD40 Antigens; CD40 Ligand; Cells, Cultured; Humans; Lymphocyte Activation; Mice; Rituximab; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 31426619
DOI: 10.3390/cells8080927 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2022Belatacept (Bela) was developed to reduce nephrotoxicity and cardiovascular risk that are associated with the chronic use of Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in kidney... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Belatacept (Bela) was developed to reduce nephrotoxicity and cardiovascular risk that are associated with the chronic use of Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in kidney transplant recipients. The use of Bela with early steroid withdrawal (ESW) and simultaneous CNI avoidance has not been formally evaluated.
METHODS
At 3 months post-transplant, stable kidney transplant recipients with ESW on Tacrolimus (Tac) + mycophenolate (MPA) were randomized 1:1:1 to: 1) Bela+MPA, 2) Bela+low-dose Tac (trough goal <5 ng/mL), or 3) continue Tac+MPA. All patients underwent surveillance graft biopsies at enrollment and then at 12, and 24 months post-transplant. Twenty-seven recipients were included; 9 underwent conversion to Bela+MPA, 8 to Bela+low-dose Tac and 10 continued Tac+MPA. Serial blood samples were collected for immune phenotyping and gene expression analyses.
RESULTS
The Bela+MPA arm was closed early due to high rate of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR). The incidence of BPAR was 4/9 in Bela+MPA, 0/8 in Bela+low dose Tac and 2/10 in Tac+MPA, P= 0.087. The Bela+low-dose Tac regimen was associated with +8.8 mL/min/1.73 m increase in eGFR compared to -0.38 mL/min/1.73 m in Tac+MPA, P= 0.243. One graft loss occurred in the Bela+MPA group. Immunophenotyping of peripheral blood monocyte count (PBMC) showed that CD28CD4 and CD28CD8 T cells were higher in Bela+MPA patients with acute rejection compared to patients without rejection, although the difference did not reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS
Our data indicate that, in steroid free regimens, low-dose Tac maintenance is needed to prevent rejection when patients are converted to Bela, at least when the maneuver is done early after transplant.
Topics: Humans; Abatacept; Calcineurin; Calcineurin Inhibitors; CD28 Antigens; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kidney Transplantation; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Mycophenolic Acid; Steroids; Tacrolimus; Drug Substitution
PubMed: 36601111
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1096881 -
Health Technology Assessment... Apr 2016Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is characterised by joint pain, swelling and a limitation of movement caused by inflammation. Subsequent joint damage can lead to... (Review)
Review
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept and tocilizumab for treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
BACKGROUND
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is characterised by joint pain, swelling and a limitation of movement caused by inflammation. Subsequent joint damage can lead to disability and growth restriction. Treatment commonly includes disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), such as methotrexate. Clinical practice now favours newer drugs termed biologic DMARDs where indicated.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four biologic DMARDs [etanercept (Enbrel(®), Pfizer), abatacept (Orencia(®), Bristol-Myers Squibb), adalimumab (Humira(®), AbbVie) and tocilizumab (RoActemra(®), Roche) - with or without methotrexate where indicated] for the treatment of JIA (systemic or oligoarticular JIA are excluded).
DATA SOURCES
Electronic bibliographic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects were searched for published studies from inception to May 2015 for English-language articles. Bibliographies of related papers, systematic reviews and company submissions were screened and experts were contacted to identify additional evidence.
REVIEW METHODS
Systematic reviews of clinical effectiveness, health-related quality of life and cost-effectiveness were undertaken in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. A cost-utility decision-analytic model was developed to compare the estimated cost-effectiveness of biologic DMARDs versus methotrexate. The base-case time horizon was 30 years and the model took a NHS perspective, with costs and benefits discounted at 3.5%.
RESULTS
Four placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria for the clinical effectiveness review (one RCT evaluating each biologic DMARD). Only one RCT included UK participants. Participants had to achieve an American College of Rheumatology Pediatric (ACR Pedi)-30 response to open-label lead-in treatment in order to be randomised. An exploratory adjusted indirect comparison suggests that the four biologic DMARDs are similar, with fewer disease flares and greater proportions of ACR Pedi-50 and -70 responses among participants randomised to continued biologic DMARDs. However, confidence intervals were wide, the number of trials was low and there was clinical heterogeneity between trials. Open-label extensions of the trials showed that, generally, ACR responses remained constant or even increased after the double-blind phase. The proportions of adverse events and serious adverse events were generally similar between the treatment and placebo groups. Four economic evaluations of biologic DMARDs for patients with JIA were identified but all had limitations. Two quality-of-life studies were included, one of which informed the cost-utility model. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for adalimumab, etanercept and tocilizumab versus methotrexate were £38,127, £32,526 and £38,656 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), respectively. The ICER for abatacept versus methotrexate as a second-line biologic was £39,536 per QALY.
LIMITATIONS
The model does not incorporate the natural history of JIA in terms of long-term disease progression, as the current evidence is limited. There are no head-to-head trials of biologic DMARDs, and clinical evidence for specific JIA subtypes is limited.
CONCLUSIONS
Biologic DMARDs are superior to placebo (with methotrexate where permitted) in children with (predominantly) polyarticular course JIA who have had an insufficient response to previous treatment. Randomised comparisons of biologic DMARDs with long-term efficacy and safety follow-up are needed to establish comparative effectiveness. RCTs for JIA subtypes for which evidence is lacking are also required.
STUDY REGISTRATION
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42015016459.
FUNDING
The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Topics: Abatacept; Adalimumab; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Juvenile; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Double-Blind Method; Etanercept; Humans; Methotrexate; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27135404
DOI: 10.3310/hta20340 -
Clinical Rheumatology Sep 2023The ASCORE study on treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) showed better retention and clinical response rates for abatacept as first-line versus later-line therapy....
Subcutaneous abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in routine clinical practice in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland: 2-year retention and efficacy by treatment line and serostatus.
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES
The ASCORE study on treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) showed better retention and clinical response rates for abatacept as first-line versus later-line therapy. This post hoc analysis of ASCORE assessed 2-year retention, efficacy, and safety of subcutaneous (SC) abatacept in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.
METHODS
Adults with RA who initiated SC abatacept 125 mg once weekly were assessed. Primary endpoint was abatacept retention rate at 2 years. Secondary endpoints: proportions of patients with low disease activity (LDA)/remission per Disease Activity Score in 28 joints based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (≤ 3.2), Simplified Disease Activity Index (≤ 11), and Clinical Disease Activity Index (≤ 10). Outcomes were analyzed by treatment line and serostatus.
RESULTS
For the pooled cohort, the 2-year abatacept retention rate was 47.6%; retention was highest in biologic-naïve patients (50.5% [95% confidence interval 44.9, 55.9]). Patients seropositive for both anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor (RF; + / +) at baseline had a higher 2-year abatacept retention rate than patients with single seropositivity for either APCA or RF or double-seronegativity (- / -), irrespective of treatment line. At 2 years, a higher proportion of patients who were biologic-naïve were in LDA/remission than patients with one or ≥ two prior biologics.
CONCLUSION
A higher proportion of patients with + / + RA (compared with - / - RA) had abatacept retention after 2 years. Early identification of patients with seropositive RA may facilitate a precision-medicine approach to RA treatment, leading to a higher proportion of patients in LDA/remission.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT02090556; date registered: March 18, 2014 (retrospectively registered). Key Points • This post hoc analysis of a German-speaking subset of European patients with RA from the global ASCORE study (NCT02090556) showed that retention of SC abatacept within this subset was 47.6%, with good clinical outcomes after 2 years. • Patients with double-seropositive RA (ACPA and RF positive) had higher retention of abatacept than patients with double-seronegative RA (ACPA and RF negative). Retention and clinical responses were highest for patients who were biologic-naïve compared with patients who had one or ≥ two prior biologic treatments. • These real-world data may be useful for clinicians in informing individualized treatment pathways for patients with RA, and fostering superior disease control and clinical outcomes.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Abatacept; Antirheumatic Agents; Austria; Switzerland; Treatment Outcome; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Germany
PubMed: 37314665
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-023-06649-x -
JCI Insight Dec 2022Here, the efficacy of abatacept in patients with early diffuse systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) was analyzed to test the hypothesis that patients in the inflammatory intrinsic... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Here, the efficacy of abatacept in patients with early diffuse systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) was analyzed to test the hypothesis that patients in the inflammatory intrinsic subset would show the most significant clinical improvement. Eighty-four participants with dcSSc were randomized to receive abatacept or placebo for 12 months. RNA-Seq was performed on 233 skin paired biopsies at baseline and at 3 and 6 months. Improvement was defined as a 5-point or more than 20% change in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) between baseline and 12 months. Samples were assigned to intrinsic gene expression subsets (inflammatory, fibroproliferative, or normal-like subsets). In the abatacept arm, change in mRSS was most pronounced for the inflammatory and normal-like subsets relative to the placebo subset. Gene expression for participants on placebo remained in the original molecular subset, whereas inflammatory participants treated with abatacept had gene expression that moved toward the normal-like subset. The Costimulation of the CD28 Family Reactome Pathway decreased in patients who improved on abatacept and was specific to the inflammatory subset. Patients in the inflammatory subset had elevation of the Costimulation of the CD28 Family pathway at baseline relative to that of participants in the fibroproliferative and normal-like subsets. There was a correlation between improved ΔmRSS and baseline expression of the Costimulation of the CD28 Family pathway. This study provides an example of precision medicine in systemic sclerosis clinical trials.
Topics: Humans; Abatacept; CD28 Antigens; Scleroderma, Systemic; Scleroderma, Diffuse; Skin
PubMed: 36355434
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.155282