-
Scientific Reports Sep 2023HLA-DRB1 shared epitope risk alleles are the strongest genetic risk factors for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and potential biomarkers for treatment response to biological...
HLA-DRB1 shared epitope risk alleles are the strongest genetic risk factors for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and potential biomarkers for treatment response to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). This study aimed to investigate the association between treatment response and individual HLA-DRB1 alleles in RA patients receiving different bDMARDs. We recruited 106 patients with active RA who had started abatacept, tocilizumab, or TNF inhibitors as a first-line bDMARDs. We examined the relationship between Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) improvement at 3 months and HLA-DRB1 allele carriage. The results revealed that the HLA-DRB1*04:05 allele, a shared-epitope allele, was significantly associated with better SDAI improvement only after abatacept treatment (SDAI improvement 28.5% without the allele vs 59.8% with allele, p = 0.003). However, no significant association was found with other treatments. Both multivariate linear regression and mediation analysis confirmed that the HLA-DRB1*04:05 allele was independently associated with abatacept treatment response, regardless of anti-CCP antibody titers. The study concluded that in patients with RA receiving their first-line bDMARD treatment, carrying the HLA-DRB1*04:05 allele was associated with better SDAI improvement specifically in abatacept-treated patients. These disease-risk HLA alleles have the potential to serve as genomic biomarkers for predicting treatment response with co-stimulation blockage therapy.
Topics: Humans; Abatacept; HLA-DRB1 Chains; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Antirheumatic Agents; Epitopes
PubMed: 37709837
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42324-6 -
Journal of Clinical Immunology Aug 2023FOXP3 deficiency results in severe multisystem autoimmunity in both mice and humans, driven by the absence of functional regulatory T cells. Patients typically present...
PURPOSE
FOXP3 deficiency results in severe multisystem autoimmunity in both mice and humans, driven by the absence of functional regulatory T cells. Patients typically present with early and severe autoimmune polyendocrinopathy, dermatitis, and severe inflammation of the gut, leading to villous atrophy and ultimately malabsorption, wasting, and failure to thrive. In the absence of successful treatment, FOXP3-deficient patients usually die within the first 2 years of life. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation provides a curative option but first requires adequate control over the inflammatory condition. Due to the rarity of the condition, no clinical trials have been conducted, with widely unstandardized therapeutic approaches. We sought to compare the efficacy of lead therapeutic candidates rapamycin, anti-CD4 antibody, and CTLA4-Ig in controlling the physiological and immunological manifestations of Foxp3 deficiency in mice.
METHOD
We generated Foxp3-deficient mice and an appropriate clinical scoring system to enable direct comparison of lead therapeutic candidates rapamycin, nondepleting anti-CD4 antibody, and CTLA4-Ig.
RESULTS
We found distinct immunosuppressive profiles induced by each treatment, leading to unique protective combinations over distinct clinical manifestations. CTLA4-Ig provided superior breadth of protective outcomes, including highly efficient protection during the transplantation process.
CONCLUSION
These results highlight the mechanistic diversity of pathogenic pathways initiated by regulatory T cell loss and suggest CTLA4-Ig as a potentially superior therapeutic option for FOXP3-deficient patients.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Mice; Abatacept; Clinical Deterioration; CTLA-4 Antigen; Disease Models, Animal; Forkhead Transcription Factors; Immune System Diseases; Sirolimus; T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory
PubMed: 37156988
DOI: 10.1007/s10875-023-01462-2 -
Annals of Hematology Mar 2021The immunomodulatory fusion protein abatacept has recently been investigated for the treatment of steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) in a phase...
The immunomodulatory fusion protein abatacept has recently been investigated for the treatment of steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) in a phase 1 clinical trial. We analyzed the safety and efficacy of abatacept for cGvHD therapy in a retrospective study with 15 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and received abatacept for cGvHD with a median age of 49 years. Grading was performed as part of the clinical routine according to the National Institute of Health's (NIH) consensus criteria at initiation of abatacept and 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months thereafter. The median time of follow-up was 191 days (range 55-393 days). Best overall response rate (ORR) was 40%. In particular, patients with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome showed significant clinical improvement and durable responses following abatacept treatment with a response rate of 89% based on improvement in lung severity score (n = 6) or stabilized lung function (n = 4) or both (n = 3). Infectious complications CTCAE °III or higher were observed in 3/15 patients. None of the patients relapsed from the underlying malignancy. Thus, abatacept appears to be a promising treatment option for cGvHD, in particular for patients with lung involvement. However, further evaluation within a phase 2 clinical trial is required.
Topics: Abatacept; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Bronchiolitis Obliterans; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Germany; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Salvage Therapy; Spain; Sweden; Transplantation, Homologous; Young Adult
PubMed: 33515310
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-021-04434-x -
Blood Advances May 2023Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only readily available cure for many life-threatening pediatric nonmalignant diseases (NMD), but most patients lack a...
Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only readily available cure for many life-threatening pediatric nonmalignant diseases (NMD), but most patients lack a matched related donor and are at higher risk for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Use of abatacept (Aba) to target donor T-cell activation has been safe and effective in preventing GVHD after unrelated donor (URD) HCT for malignant diseases (Aba2 trial). Our primary objective was to evaluate the tolerability of Aba added to standard GVHD prophylaxis (cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil) in pediatric patients with NMD undergoing URD HCT. In this single-arm, single-center phase 1 trial, 10 patients receiving reduced intensity or nonmyeloablative conditioning underwent URD HCT. Immune reconstitution was assessed longitudinally via flow cytometry and compared to pediatric patients on Aba2. Nine patients successfully engrafted, with 1 primary graft rejection in the setting of inadequate cell dose; secondary graft rejection occurred in 1 patient with concurrent cytomegalovirus viremia. Two deaths occurred, both unrelated to Aba. One patient developed probable posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease, responsive to rituximab and immune suppression withdrawal. No patients developed severe acute or chronic GVHD, and 8 patients were off systemic immunosuppression at 1 year. Immune reconstitution did not appear to be impacted by Aba, and preservation of naïve relative to effector memory CD4+ T cells was seen akin to Aba2. Thus, 4 doses of Aba were deemed tolerable in pediatric patients with NMD following URD HCT, with encouraging preliminary efficacy and supportive immune correlatives in this NMD cohort.
Topics: Humans; Child; Abatacept; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Graft vs Host Disease; Pancytopenia; Unrelated Donors; Bone Marrow Failure Disorders
PubMed: 36724508
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008545 -
Arthritis Research & Therapy Jan 2024The biological mechanisms underlying the differential response to abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are unknown. Here, we aimed to identify cellular,...
BACKGROUND
The biological mechanisms underlying the differential response to abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are unknown. Here, we aimed to identify cellular, transcriptomic, and proteomic features that predict resistance to abatacept in patients with RA.
METHODS
Blood samples were collected from 22 RA patients treated with abatacept at baseline and after 3 months of treatment. Response to treatment was defined by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria at 3 months, and seven patients were classified as responders and the others as non-responders. We quantified gene expression levels by RNA sequencing, 67 plasma protein levels, and the expression of surface molecules (CD3, 19, and 56) by flow cytometry. In addition, three gene expression data sets, comprising a total of 27 responders and 50 non-responders, were used to replicate the results.
RESULTS
Among the clinical characteristics, the number of monocytes was significantly higher in the non-responders before treatment. Cell type enrichment analysis showed that differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between responders and non-responders were enriched in monocytes. Gene set enrichment analysis, together with single-cell analysis and deconvolution analysis, identified that Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5) and interleukin-17 receptor A (IL17RA) pathway in monocytes was upregulated in non-responders. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) correlated with this signature showed higher concentrations in non-responders before treatment. The DEGs in the replication set were also enriched for the genes expressed in monocytes, not for the TLR5 and IL17RA pathway but for the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) pathway.
CONCLUSIONS
Monocyte-derived transcriptomic features before treatment underlie the differences in abatacept efficacy in patients with RA. The pathway activated in monocytes was the TLR5 and IL17RA-HGF signature in the current study, while it was the OXPHOS pathway in the replication set. Elevated levels of HGF before treatment may serve as a potential biomarker for predicting poor responses to abatacept. These findings provide insights into the biological mechanisms of abatacept resistance, contributing valuable evidence for stratifying patients with RA.
Topics: Humans; Abatacept; Monocytes; Toll-Like Receptor 5; Antirheumatic Agents; Transcriptome; Proteomics; Treatment Outcome; Arthritis, Rheumatoid
PubMed: 38167328
DOI: 10.1186/s13075-023-03236-y -
PloS One 2020Abatacept acts as a competitive inhibitor of the CD28/(CD80/86) costimulation signal required for T cell activation. Mechanisms of action of abatacept have not been... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial
OBJECTIVES
Abatacept acts as a competitive inhibitor of the CD28/(CD80/86) costimulation signal required for T cell activation. Mechanisms of action of abatacept have not been fully investigated. The objective of this study was to provide detailed insight into the mode of action of Abatacept based on gene expression data.
METHODS
In this ancillary study from the APPRAISE trial, we investigated the global molecular effects of Abatacept in whole blood samples collected prospectively in biologic naive rheumatoid arthritis patients (n = 19) at baseline and 6 months after the initiation of Abatacept therapy concomitant with methotrexate. Whole human genome microarrays (4x44K) were performed on both baseline and 6-month samples from responders and non-responders patients categorized according to EULAR criteria. T-test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction was performed to identify significant gene expression changes. Gene Ontology and Single Experiment Analysis tools allowed us to highlight specific biological mechanisms involved in methotrexate/Abatacept.
RESULTS
In methotrexate/Abatacept responders, 672 genes were significantly (q<0.05) dysregulated at 6 months compared to baseline. Correlation analysis highlighted 19 genes whose dysregulations were significantly associated with disease activity variation (p<0.05) and whose functions were associated with proliferation, apoptosis of cells and mitochondrial metabolism, suggesting a restoration of oxidative signaling. The other 653 gene expression changes were relative to direct or indirect effects of methotrexate/Abatacept treatment and were significantly (p<0.005) involved in pathways relative to mRNA processing, proteasome, angiogenesis, apoptosis and TCR signaling. This study highlights new mechanisms of action of methotrexate/Abatacept and may provide new therapeutic targets to prevent autoimmunity in rheumatoid arthritis.
Topics: Abatacept; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Blood Cells; Female; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Transcriptome
PubMed: 32760165
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237143 -
Arthritis Research & Therapy Jun 2023Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have an increased risk of infection and malignancy compared with the general population. Infection risk is increased further with...
BACKGROUND
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have an increased risk of infection and malignancy compared with the general population. Infection risk is increased further with the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), whereas evidence on whether the use of biologic DMARDs increases cancer risk remains equivocal. This single-arm, post-marketing study estimated the incidence of prespecified infection and malignancy outcomes in patients with RA treated with intravenous or subcutaneous abatacept.
METHODS
Data were included from seven European RA quality registries: ATTRA (Anti-TNF Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis [Czech Republic]), DANBIO (Danish Rheumatologic Database), ROB-FIN (National Registry of Antirheumatic and Biological Treatment in Finland), ORA (Orencia and Rheumatoid Arthritis [France]), GISEA (Italian Group for the Study of Early Arthritis), BIOBADASER (Spanish Register of Adverse Events of Biological Therapies in Rheumatic Diseases), and the SCQM (Swiss Clinical Quality Management) system. Each registry is unique with respect to design, data collection, definition of the study cohort, reporting, and validation of outcomes. In general, registries defined the index date as the first day of abatacept treatment and reported data for infections requiring hospitalization and overall malignancies; data for other infection and malignancy outcomes were not available for every cohort. Abatacept exposure was measured in patient-years (p-y). Incidence rates (IRs) were calculated as the number of events per 1000 p-y of follow-up with 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS
Over 5000 patients with RA treated with abatacept were included. Most patients (78-85%) were female, and the mean age range was 52-58 years. Baseline characteristics were largely consistent across registries. Among patients treated with abatacept, IRs for infections requiring hospitalization across the registries ranged from 4 to 100 events per 1000 p-y, while IRs for overall malignancy ranged from 3 to 19 per 1000 p-y.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite heterogeneity between registries in terms of design, data collection, and ascertainment of safety outcomes, as well as the possibility of under-reporting of adverse events in observational studies, the safety profile of abatacept reported here was largely consistent with previous findings in patients with RA treated with abatacept, with no new or increased risks of infection or malignancy.
Topics: Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Male; Abatacept; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Antirheumatic Agents; Registries
PubMed: 37308978
DOI: 10.1186/s13075-023-03067-x -
Arthritis Research & Therapy Sep 2023To compare a treat-to-target (T2T) approach and routine care (RC) in adults with active to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating subcutaneous abatacept. (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
To compare a treat-to-target (T2T) approach and routine care (RC) in adults with active to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating subcutaneous abatacept.
METHODS
A 12-month cluster-randomized trial in active RA patients treated with abatacept was conducted. Physicians were randomized to RC or T2T with a primary endpoint of achieving sustained Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) low disease activity (LDA) at two consecutive assessments approximately 3 months apart. Additional outcomes included Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Disease Activity Score 28-CRP (DAS28-CRP), Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), and the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Time to achieve therapeutic endpoints was assessed with survival analysis.
RESULTS
Among the 284 enrolled patients, 130 were in the T2T group and 154 in RC. Primary endpoint was achieved by 36.9% and 40.3% of patients in T2T and RC groups, respectively. No significant between-group differences were observed in the odds of achieving secondary outcomes, except for a higher likelihood of CDAI LDA in the T2T group vs. RC (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.33 [1.03-1.71], p = 0.0263). Compared with RC, patients in the T2T group achieved SDAI remission significantly faster (Kaplan-Meier-estimated mean [standard error]: 14.0 [0.6] vs. 19.3 [0.8] months, p = 0.0428) with a trend toward faster achievement of CDAI LDA/remission, DAS28-CRP remission, and HAQ-DI minimum clinically important difference.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients managed per T2T and those under RC experienced significant improvements in RA disease activity at 12 months of abatacept treatment. T2T was associated with higher odds of CDAI LDA and a shorter time to achieving therapeutic endpoints.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Name of the registry: ClinicalTrials.gov.
TRIAL REGISTRATIONS
NCT03274141 . Date of registration: September 6, 2017.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Abatacept; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Minimal Clinically Important Difference; Odds Ratio
PubMed: 37759330
DOI: 10.1186/s13075-023-03151-2 -
Arthritis Research & Therapy Aug 2022Abatacept is a recombinant fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 and the Fc portion of immunoglobulin (Ig) G. The...
BACKGROUND
Abatacept is a recombinant fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 and the Fc portion of immunoglobulin (Ig) G. The mechanism of action of abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is believed to be competitive inhibition of T cell costimulation mediated by the binding of CD28 to CD80/CD86 on antigen-presenting cells, and recent studies have shown that abatacept induces reverse signaling in macrophages and osteoclast precursors in a T cell-independent manner. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effects of abatacept on circulating monocytes that contribute to RA pathogenesis.
METHODS
Purified circulating monocytes derived from RA patients and controls were cultured in the absence or presence of abatacept or CD28-Ig for 24 h. The recovered cells were subjected to flow cytometry to evaluate the expression levels of cell surface molecules, and cytokines and chemokines in the culture supernatant were measured by multiplex bead arrays. The expression of candidate molecules was further examined by immunoblotting using total cellular extracts of the cultured monocytes. Finally, the effects of abatacept on cytokine production in monocytes stimulated with the immune complex of anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPAs) were examined.
RESULTS
CD64/FcγRI was identified as a monocyte-derived molecule that was downregulated by abatacept but not CD28-Ig. This effect was observed in both RA patients and controls. The abatacept-induced downregulation of CD64/FcγRI was abolished by treatment with anti-CD86 antibodies but not anti-CD80 antibodies. Abatacept suppressed the production of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, C-C motif chemokine ligand 2, and tumor necrosis factor-α in cultured monocytes stimulated with the ACPA immune complex.
CONCLUSIONS
The therapeutic effects of abatacept on RA are mediated, in part, by the downregulation of CD64/FcγRI on circulating monocytes via direct binding to CD86 and the suppression of immune complex-mediated inflammatory cytokine production.
Topics: Abatacept; Antigen-Antibody Complex; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Autoantibodies; Cytokines; Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Monocytes; Receptors, IgG
PubMed: 35964055
DOI: 10.1186/s13075-022-02886-8 -
Rheumatology (Oxford, England) Apr 2019To assess whether abatacept as initial biological DMARD (bDMARD) in the treatment of RA, when compared with other bDMARDs, is associated with an increased risk of cancer... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
OBJECTIVE
To assess whether abatacept as initial biological DMARD (bDMARD) in the treatment of RA, when compared with other bDMARDs, is associated with an increased risk of cancer overall and by specific cancer sites (breast, lung, lymphoma, melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer).
METHODS
We performed a population-based cohort study among patients newly treated with bDMARDs within the US-based Truven MarketScan population and Supplemental US Medicare from 2007 to 2014. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% CIs of any cancer (and specific cancers) associated with initiation of abatacept, compared with initiation of other bDMARDs, adjusted for age and deciles of the propensity score.
RESULTS
The cohort included 4328 patients on abatacept and 59 860 on other bDMARDs, of whom 409 and 4197 were diagnosed with any cancer during follow-up (incidence rates 4.76 per 100 per year and 3.41 per 100 per year, respectively). Compared with other bDMARDs, the use of abatacept was associated with an increased incidence of cancer overall (hazard ratioadjusted 1.17; 95% CI 1.06, 1.30). Analyses by specific cancer sites showed a significantly increased incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer (hazard ratioadjusted 1.20; 95% CI 1.03, 1.39), but no significant difference for other specific cancer sites.
CONCLUSION
The use of abatacept as first bDMARD in the treatment of RA was associated with a slight increased risk of cancer overall and particularly non-melanoma skin cancer, compared with other bDMARDs. This potential signal needs to be replicated in other settings.
Topics: Abatacept; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Medicare; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Proportional Hazards Models; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; United States
PubMed: 30535094
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/key352