-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2012Various pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions have been used to suppress lactation after childbirth and relieve associated symptoms. Despite the large volume... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Various pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions have been used to suppress lactation after childbirth and relieve associated symptoms. Despite the large volume of literature on the subject, there is currently no universal guideline on the most appropriate approach for suppressing lactation in postpartum women.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of interventions used for suppression of lactation in postpartum women (who have not breastfed or expressed breastmilk) to determine which approach has the greatest comparative benefits with least risk.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 June 2012).
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised trials evaluating the effectiveness of treatments used for suppression of postpartum lactation.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 62 trials (6428 women). Twenty-two trials did not contribute data to the meta-analyses. The trials were generally small and of limited quality. Three trials (107 women) indicated that bromocriptine significantly reduced the proportion of women lactating compared with no treatment at or within seven days postpartum (three trials, 107 women; risk ratio (RR) 0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24 to 0.54). Seven trials involving oestrogen preparations (diethylstilbestrol, quinestrol, chlorotrianisene, hexestrol) suggested that they significantly reduced the proportion of lactating women compared with no treatment at or within seven days postpartum (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.56). We found no trials comparing non-pharmacologic methods with no treatment. Trials comparing bromocriptine with other pharmacologic agents such as methergoline, prostaglandins, pyridoxine, carbegoline, diethylstilbestrol and cyclofenil suggested similarity in their effectiveness. Side effects were poorly reported in the trials and no case of thromboembolism was recorded in the four trials that reported it as an outcome.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is weak evidence that some pharmacologic treatments (most of which are currently unavailable to the public) are better than no treatment for suppressing lactation symptoms in the first postpartum week. No evidence currently exists to indicate whether non-pharmacologic approaches are more effective than no treatment. Presently, there is insufficient evidence to address the side effects of methods employed for suppressing lactation. When women desire treatment, bromocriptine may be considered where it is registered for lactation suppression in those without predisposition to its major side effects of public concerns. Many trials did not contribute data that could be included in analyses. Large randomised trials are needed to compare the effectiveness of pharmacologic (especially bromocriptine) and non-pharmacologic methods with no treatment. Such trials should consider the acceptability of the intervention and lactation symptoms of concern to women and be large enough to detect clinically important differences in major side effects between comparison groups.
Topics: Bromocriptine; Estrogens; Female; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Lactation; Milk Ejection; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 22972088
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005937.pub3 -
BioMed Research International 2022The current study is aimed at examining the overall effects of steroids on the tissues of organisms and pharmacotherapeutics and pharmaco-histokinetics of several...
The current study is aimed at examining the overall effects of steroids on the tissues of organisms and pharmacotherapeutics and pharmaco-histokinetics of several steroids, including Bromocriptine as mesylate and estradiol valerate in common quails (). A total of 100 birds were used for pharmaco-histokinetics. The research was carried out in two separate trials, one during the fall season and the other during the spring season. Each experiment lasted for five, ten, fifteen, and twenty days. Each study group used 20 birds while basing their experiments on a control group of 5. At the stretch of five, ten, fifteen, and twenty days in each season, therapeutic dosages were administered to a sum of two groups representing two separate steroid trial groups. Each steroid was administered to each bird in a therapeutic dose, which was three drops administered twice daily. Clinical symptoms include despondency, sluggishness, and variations in weight and temperature that almost all treated birds display. However, only in trials conducted in the fall was a sizable degree of body enlargement in one treated bird noticed. The winter testing showed a mortality rate. Four birds have died in the twenty-day group. One bird died when treated with estradiol valerate, and three birds died treated with Bromocriptine as mesylate. Both the male and female birds showed signs of having lost some of their body weight. The treated birds' kidney, stomach, hearts, and livers exhibited some edema. In comparison, almost all birds show enteritis, which indicates that steroids mainly affect the intestine. There were apparent differences in the histological analysis of heart and skeletal muscle and some treated birds with the control group. The kidney, liver, and intestine show the major histopathological change in all treated birds.
Topics: Animals; Female; Male; Coturnix; Bromocriptine; Estradiol; Mesylates
PubMed: 36267841
DOI: 10.1155/2022/5482895 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... 2000Oligo-astheno-teratospermia (sperm of low concentration, reduced motility and increased abnormal morphology)of unknown cause is common and the need for treatment is felt... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Oligo-astheno-teratospermia (sperm of low concentration, reduced motility and increased abnormal morphology)of unknown cause is common and the need for treatment is felt by patients and doctors alike. As a result, a variety of empirical, non-specific treatments have been used in an attempt to improve semen characteristics and fertility. Whilst bromocriptine treatment for reducing prolactin levels in hyperprolactinaemic males (as in females), and, in the treatment of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism with hyperprolactinaemia, is beneficial, it has also been used for oligospermic men in the absence of any endocrinopathy. Prolactin may play a direct role in spermatogenesis and hormone production. It has also been claimed that in oligospermic men with normal gonadotrophins mean prolactin levels are higher and that hyperprolactinaemia is more common compared to fertile men. It has been proposed that the administration of bromocriptine under these circumstances might counteract a prolactin-induced block on the action of gonadotrophins on the testicles and, subsequently, that the reduction in prolactin levels might lead to an improvement in semen parameters and fertility. Although it is not licensed for use in male infertility, bromocriptine has been used for normogonadotrophic individuals with oligospermia and normal or sligthly elevated prolactin levels. This review considers the available evidence of the effect of bromocriptine therapy for normoprolactinaemic males with idiopathic oligo and/or asthenospermia.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this review was to assess the effects of bromocriptine on pregnancy rates among couples where subfertility has been attributed to idiopathic oligo- and/or asthenospermia.
SEARCH STRATEGY
The Cochrane Subfertility Review Group specialised register of controlled trials was searched".
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised trials of oral bromocriptine versus placebo or no treatment for couples with subfertility attributed to male factor.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Data were extracted by one reviewer and any disagreements were resolved by discussion with other reviewers.
MAIN RESULTS
Four studies were included. The method of randomisation was not specified in any of the trials, which were all of crossover design. Compared with placebo, bromocriptine was associated with a significant reduction in serum prolactin levels (weighted mean difference -195.3 micro international units per litre, 95% confidence interval -276.5 to -114). No effects on sperm parameters were seen. There was also no effect on pregnancy rates observed between bromocriptine and placebo (0.70 odds ratio, 95% confidence interval 0.15 to 3.24).
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS
Bromocriptine appears to reduce prolactin levels in subfertile men with normal gonadotrophic function. There is not enough evidence to show that bromocriptine is helpful in improving fertility.
Topics: Bromocriptine; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Infertility, Male; Male; Oligospermia; Prolactin
PubMed: 10796498
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000152 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2014Sleep bruxism is an oral activity characterized by involuntary teeth grinding or clenching during sleep. Several forms of treatment have been proposed for this disorder,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Sleep bruxism is an oral activity characterized by involuntary teeth grinding or clenching during sleep. Several forms of treatment have been proposed for this disorder, including behavioural, dental and pharmacological strategies.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological therapy for the treatment of sleep bruxism compared with other drugs, no treatment or placebo.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 8, 2014), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2014), EMBASE (1980 to August 2013) and LILACS (1982 to August 2014). We identified additional reports from the reference lists of retrieved reports and from reviews on treatment of sleep bruxism. We applied no language restrictions.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs that compared drugs with other drugs, no treatment or placebo in people with sleep bruxism.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Review authors carried out data extraction and quality assessment of the included trials independently and in duplicate. We discussed discrepancies until we reached consensus. We consulted a third review author in cases of persistent disagreement. We contacted authors of primary studies when necessary.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified 18 potentially relevant RCTs, but only seven met the inclusion criteria. All studies had a small number of participants, ranging from seven to 16 people per study and had a cross-over design. Three studies were of low risk of bias, while four were of uncertain risk. Amitriptyline (three studies), bromocriptine (one study), clonidine (one study), propranolol (one study), levodopa (Prolopa®) (one study) and tryptophan (one study) were compared with placebo. Studies evaluating bromocriptine, clonidine, propranolol and levodopa reported our primary outcome of indices of bruxism motor activity.Results were imprecise and consistent with benefit, no difference or harm. These were the specific findings for each of the drugs according to specific outcomes: 1. Amitriptyline versus placebo for masseteric electromyography (EMG) activity per minute: standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.28 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.91 to 0.34; P value = 0.37), 2. bromocriptine versus placebo for bruxism episodes per hour: mean difference (MD) 0.60 (95% CI -2.93 to 4.13), bruxism bursts per hour: MD -2.00 (95% CI -53.47 to 49.47), bruxism bursts per episode: MD 0.50 (95% CI -1.85 to 2.85) or number of episodes with grinding noise: MD 2.40 (95% CI -24.00 to 28.80), 3. clonidine versus placebo for number of bruxism episodes per hour: MD -2.41 (95% CI -4.84 to 0.02), 4. propranolol versus placebo for the number of bruxism episodes per hour: MD 1.16 (95% CI -1.89 to 4.21), 5. L-tryptophan versus placebo for masseteric EMG activity per second: SMD 0.08 (95% CI -0.90 to 1.06) and 6. levodopa versus placebo for bruxism episodes per hour of sleep: MD -1.47 (95% CI -3.64 to 0.70), for bruxism bursts per episode: MD 0.06 (95% CI -2.47 to 2.59).We combined several secondary outcomes (sleep duration, masseteric EMG activity per minute and pain intensity) in a meta-analysis for comparison of amitriptyline with placebo. The results for most comparisons were uncertain because of statistical imprecision. One study reported that clonidine reduced rapid eye movement (REM) sleep stage and increased the second stage of sleep. However, results for other sleep-related outcomes with clonidine were uncertain. Adverse effects were frequent in people who took amitriptyline (5/10 had drowsiness, difficulty awakening in the morning, insomnia or xerostomia compared with 0/10 in the placebo group), as well as in people who received propranolol (7/16 had moderate-to-severe xerostomia compare with 2/16 in the placebo group). Clonidine was associated with prolonged morning hypotension in three of 16 participants. The use of preventive medication avoided any adverse effects in people treated with levodopa and bromocriptine.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There was insufficient evidence on the effectiveness of pharmacotherapy for the treatment of sleep bruxism. This systematic review points to the need for more, well-designed, RCTs with larger sample sizes and adequate methods of allocation, outcome assessment and duration of follow-up. Ideally, parallel RCTs should be used in future studies to avoid the bias associated with cross-over studies. There is a need to standardize the outcomes of RCTs on treatments for sleep bruxism.
Topics: Amitriptyline; Bromocriptine; Clonidine; Humans; Levodopa; Propranolol; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sleep Bruxism; Tryptophan
PubMed: 25338726
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005578.pub2 -
International Journal of Gynaecology... Dec 2022To evaluate the effectiveness of bromocriptine for prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effectiveness of bromocriptine for prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).
METHODS
The retrospective study included women at risk of OHSS who were receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocols, including 52 women given 2.5 mg bromocriptine by rectal insertion, 52 women given 500 ml intravenous hydroxyethyl starch (HES), and 40 women who received no intervention. Treatments were administered daily for 5 days beginning on the day of oocyte retrieval. Baseline information and data related to OHSS were compared.
RESULTS
No significant differences were found among groups in estradiol concentration on the day of trigger or in number of retrieved oocytes. Incidence of mild OHSS was not significantly different among groups, respectively 13.5%, 15.4%, and 17.5% (P > 0.05). The incidence of moderate to severe OHSS was significantly lower in the bromocriptine and HES groups compared with the control group, respectively 7.7%, 5.8%, and 22.5% (P < 0.05). D-dimer levels were significantly lower in the bromocriptine and HES groups compared with the control group on Day 5 after oocyte retrieval (P < 0.05). No differences in liver or renal function were found in the three groups.
CONCLUSION
Bromocriptine was apparently as effective as intravenous HES in patients with high risk of OHSS.
Topics: Female; Humans; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Bromocriptine; Retrospective Studies; Fertilization in Vitro; Starch; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Ovulation Induction
PubMed: 35575072
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14264 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Dec 2021Prolactin (PRL) is a protein hormone secreted by the anterior pituitary gland that regulates pituitary hormones. Hyperprolactinemia (HPRL), a pathological phenomenon of... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial
BACKGROUND
Prolactin (PRL) is a protein hormone secreted by the anterior pituitary gland that regulates pituitary hormones. Hyperprolactinemia (HPRL), a pathological phenomenon of excessive PRL, can cause infertility in severe cases and is currently treated mainly with Western drugs, such as bromocriptine, a dopamine agonist (DA). Unfortunately, DAs produce psychological side effects which limit their long-term use. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has minimal side effects and good results spanning many years of research. The combined treatment of TCM and Western medicine may enhance treatment efficacy and improve the long-term prognosis in HPRL. To analyze the effects of Bu-shen-zhu-yun decoction (BSZY-D) combined with bromocriptine on serum hormones, anxiety, and pregnancy in hyperprolactinemic infertile patients.
METHODS
One hundred patients diagnosed with HPRL infertility from June 2020 to June 2021 in the gynecology clinic of Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were selected and grouped by envelope method. After excluding patients who withdrew or missed visits, 37 cases assigned to the control group were treated with bromocriptine, and 40 cases assigned to the observation group were treated with bromocriptine combined with BSZY-D. The patients' PRL and kisspeptin (KP) serum indexes, improvements in infertility, Anxiety Self-Assessment Scale (SAS) scores, and improvements in the Insomnia Severity Index Scale (ISI) scores were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS
At 3 and 6 months of treatment, serum PRL, SAS, and ISI scores were significantly lower, and serum KP was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05). During the study period, the pregnancy rates were 62.50% (25/40) and 37.84% (14/37) in the observation and control groups, respectively. The observation group also had significantly fewer early miscarriages [10.00% (4/40) vs. 32.43% (12/37)] and less adverse reactions [7.50% (3/40) vs. 24.32% (9/37)] than the control group (all P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
The combination of bromocriptine with BSZY-D was superior to bromocriptine alone in treating HPRL and HPRL-related infertility, which also demonstrated a positive effect on patients' sleep and low mood.
Topics: Anxiety; Bromocriptine; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Female; Humans; Hyperprolactinemia; Infertility, Female; Kisspeptins; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate; Prolactin; Sleep
PubMed: 35016475
DOI: 10.21037/apm-21-3111 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2016Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a potentially serious complication of ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction technology (ART). It is characterised by... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a potentially serious complication of ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction technology (ART). It is characterised by enlarged ovaries and an acute fluid shift from the intravascular space to the third space, resulting in bloating, increased risk of venous thromboembolism and decreased organ perfusion. Most cases are mild, but forms of moderate or severe OHSS appear in 3% to 8% of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles. The dopamine agonist cabergoline was introduced as a secondary prevention intervention for OHSS in women at high risk of OHSS undergoing ART treatment. As cabergoline seemed to be effective in preventing OHSS, other types of dopamine agonists, such as quinagolide and bromocriptine, have since been studied in ART to prevent OHSS.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and safety of dopamine agonists in preventing OHSS in high-risk women undergoing ART treatment.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched several databases from inception to August 2016 (Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Specialised Register of trials, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Clinicaltrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP)) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of dopamine agonist in preventing OHSS. We handsearched the reference lists of relevant studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We considered RCTs which compared dopamine agonists with placebo/no intervention or another intervention for preventing OHSS in high-risk women for inclusion. Primary outcome measures were incidence of moderate or severe OHSS and live birth rate. Secondary endpoints were clinical pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and any other adverse effects of the treatment.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts of publications, selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We resolved any disagreements by consensus. We reported pooled results as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) by the Mantel-Haenszel method. In addition, we graded the overall quality of the evidence using GRADE criteria.
MAIN RESULTS
The search identified 14 new RCTs since the last published version of this review, resulting in 16 included RCTs involving 2091 high-risk women for this updated review. They evaluated three types of dopamine agonists: cabergoline, quinagolide and bromocriptine.When compared with placebo or no intervention, dopamine agonists seemed effective in the prevention of moderate or severe OHSS (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.39; 1022 participants; 8 studies; I = 0%; moderate quality evidence). This suggests that if 29% of women undergoing ART experience moderate or severe OHSS, the use of dopamine agonists will lower this to 7% to 14% of women. There was no evidence of a difference in live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate or miscarriage rate (very low to moderate quality evidence). However, taking dopamine agonists (especially quinagolide) may increase the incidence of adverse events such as gastrointestinal adverse effects (OR 4.54, 95% CI 1.49 to 13.84; 264 participants; 2 studies; I = 49%, very low quality evidence).When we compared dopamine agonist plus co-intervention with co-intervention, there was no evidence of a difference in the outcomes of moderate or severe OHSS, live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate or adverse events. The co-interventions were hydroxyethyl starch (two RCTs) and albumin (one RCT).Cabergoline was associated with a lower risk of moderate or severe OHSS compared with human albumin (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.38; 296 participants; 3 studies; I = 72%). However, there was no evidence of a difference between cabergoline and hydroxyethyl starch, coasting (withholding any more ovarian stimulation for a few days) or prednisolone. There was an increased clinical pregnancy rate in the cabergoline group when cabergoline was compared with coasting (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.13 to 6.21; 120 participants; 2 studies; I = 0%). In other respects, there was no evidence of a difference in clinical pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate or miscarriage rate between cabergoline and other active interventions.The quality of the evidence between dopamine agonist and placebo or no intervention ranged from very low to moderate, mainly due to poor reporting of study methods (mostly a lack of details on randomisation or blinding) and serious imprecision for some comparisons.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Dopamine agonists appear to reduce the incidence of moderate or severe OHSS in women at high risk of OHSS (moderate quality evidence). If a fresh embryo transfer is performed, the use of dopamine agonists does not affect the pregnancy outcome (live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate) (very low to moderate quality evidence). However, dopamine agonists might increase the risk of adverse events, such as gastrointestinal symptoms. Further research should focus on dose-finding, comparisons with other effective treatments and consideration of combination treatments. Therefore, large, well-designed and well-executed RCTs that involve more clinical endpoints (e.g., live birth rate) are necessary to further evaluate the role of dopamine agonists in OHSS prevention.
Topics: Abortion, Spontaneous; Administration, Oral; Aminoquinolines; Bromocriptine; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Ergolines; Female; Humans; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
PubMed: 27901279
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008605.pub3 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... 2000Long-term levodopa therapy for Parkinson's disease is complicated by the development of motor fluctuations and abnormal involuntary movements. One approach is to add a... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Long-term levodopa therapy for Parkinson's disease is complicated by the development of motor fluctuations and abnormal involuntary movements. One approach is to add a dopamine agonist at this stage of the disease to reduce the time the patient spends immobile or off and to reduce the dose of levodopa in the hope of reducing such problems in the future.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the efficacy and safety of adjuvant ropinirole therapy with bromocriptine in patients with Parkinson's disease already established on levodopa therapy and suffering from motor complications.
SEARCH STRATEGY
Electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Handsearching of the neurology literature as part of the Cochrane Movement Disorders Group's strategy. Examination of the reference lists of identified studies and other reviews. Contact with SmithKline Beecham.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials of ropinirole versus bromocriptine in patients with a clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease and long-term complications of levodopa therapy.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Data was abstracted independently by the authors and differences settled by discussion. The outcome measures used included Parkinson's disease rating scales, levodopa dosage, 'off' time measurements and the frequency of withdrawals and adverse events.
MAIN RESULTS
No significant differences between ropinirole and bromocriptine were found in off time reduction, dyskinesia as an adverse event, motor impairment and disability, or levodopa dose reduction. Withdrawal rates and adverse event frequency were similar with the two agents apart from significantly less nausea with ropinirole (odds ratio 0.50; 0.29, 0. 84 95% CI; p =0.01).
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS
Ropinirole is at least as good as bromocriptine in patients with Parkinson's disease with motor complications in terms of improving off time and reducing levodopa dose, without increasing adverse events including dyskinesia. However, these comparitor studies may have been underpowered to detect clinically meaningful differences between the agonists. Further, much larger, phase IV studies are required to examine the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of all of the dopamine agonists as adjuvant therapy in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Bromocriptine; Dopamine Agonists; Dyskinesias; Humans; Indoles; Levodopa; Parkinson Disease; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 10908504
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001517 -
British Medical Journal Oct 1977
Topics: Bromocriptine; Female; Humans; Hypogonadism; Prolactin
PubMed: 922321
DOI: No ID Found -
BMJ Open Jun 2021Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the most common causes of dementia. Pathogenic variants in the presenilin 1 (PSEN1) gene are the most frequent cause of early-onset... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Repurposing bromocriptine for Aβ metabolism in Alzheimer's disease (REBRAnD) study: randomised placebo-controlled double-blind comparative trial and open-label extension trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of bromocriptine in Alzheimer's disease with presenilin 1 (PSEN1) mutations.
INTRODUCTION
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the most common causes of dementia. Pathogenic variants in the presenilin 1 (PSEN1) gene are the most frequent cause of early-onset AD. Medications for patients with AD bearing PSEN1 mutation (PSEN1-AD) are limited to symptomatic therapies and no established radical treatments are available. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-based drug repurposing identified bromocriptine as a therapeutic candidate for PSEN1-AD. In this study, we used an enrichment strategy with iPSCs to select the study population, and we will investigate the safety and efficacy of an orally administered dose of bromocriptine in patients with PSEN1-AD.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS
This is a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. AD patients with PSEN1 mutations and a Mini Mental State Examination-Japanese score of ≤25 will be randomly assigned, at a 2:1 ratio, to the trial drug or placebo group (≥4 patients in TW-012R and ≥2 patients in placebo). This clinical trial consists of a screening period, double-blind phase (9 months) and extension phase (3 months). The double-blind phase for evaluating the efficacy and safety is composed of the low-dose maintenance period (10 mg/day), high-dose maintenance period (22.5 mg/day) and tapering period of the trial drug. Additionally, there is an open-labelled active drug extension period for evaluating long-term safety. Primary outcomes are safety and efficacy in cognitive and psychological function. Also, exploratory investigations for the efficacy of bromocriptine by neurological scores and biomarkers will be conducted.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION
The proposed trial is conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the Institutional Review Board (K070). The study results are expected to be disseminated at international or national conferences and published in international journals following the peer-review process.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
jRCT2041200008, NCT04413344.
Topics: Alzheimer Disease; Bromocriptine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Repositioning; Humans; Mutation; Presenilin-1; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34193504
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051343