Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir or darunavir in combination with lamivudine plus either zidovudine or tenofovir for second-line treatment of HIV infection (NADIA): week 96 results from a prospective, multicentre, open-label, factorial, randomised, non-inferiority trial.

Authors: Nicholas I Paton, Joseph Musaazi, Cissy Kityo...

BACKGROUND

WHO guidelines recommend dolutegravir plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) for second-line HIV therapy, with NRTI switching from first-line tenofovir to zidovudine. We aimed to examine whether dolutegravir is non-inferior to darunavir, the best-in-class protease inhibitor drug, and whether maintaining tenofovir in second-line therapy is non-inferior to switching to zidovudine.

METHODS

In this prospective, multicentre, open-label, factorial, randomised, non-inferiority trial (NADIA), participants with confirmed HIV first-line treatment failure (HIV-1 RNA ≥1000 copies per mL) were recruited at seven clinical sites in Kenya, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. Following a 2 × 2 factorial design and stratified by site and screening HIV-1 RNA concentration, participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive a 96-week regimen containing either dolutegravir (50 mg once daily) or ritonavir-boosted darunavir (800 mg of darunavir plus 100 mg of ritonavir once daily) in combination with either tenofovir (300 mg once daily) plus lamivudine (300 mg once daily) or zidovudine (300 mg twice daily) plus lamivudine (150 mg twice daily). The NRTI drugs allocated by randomisation were administered orally in fixed-dose combination pills; other drugs were administered orally as separate pills. The previously reported primary outcome was the proportion of participants with a plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration of less than 400 copies per mL at 48 weeks. Here, we report the main secondary outcome: the proportion of participants with a plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration of less than 400 copies per mL at 96 weeks (non-inferiority margin 12%). We analysed this outcome and safety outcomes in the intention-to-treat population, which excluded only those who were randomly assigned in error and withdrawn before receiving trial drugs. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03988452, and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between July 30 and Dec 18, 2019, we screened 783 patients and enrolled 465. One participant was randomly assigned in error and immediately withdrawn. The remaining 464 participants were randomly assigned to receive either dolutegravir (n=235) or ritonavir-boosted darunavir (n=229) and to receive lamivudine plus either tenofovir (n=233) or zidovudine (n=231). At week 96, 211 (90%) of 235 participants in the dolutegravir group and 199 (87%) of 229 participants in the darunavir group had HIV-1 RNA less than 400 copies per mL (percentage point difference 2·9, 95% CI -3·0 to 8·7), indicating non-inferiority. Nine (4%) participants (all in the dolutegravir group) developed dolutegravir resistance; no participants developed darunavir resistance (p=0·0023). In the other randomised comparison, 214 (92%) of 233 patients in the tenofovir group and 196 (85%) of 231 patients in the zidovudine group had HIV-1 RNA less than 400 copies per mL (percentage point difference 7·0, 95% CI 1·2 to 12·8), showing non-inferiority and indicating the superiority of tenofovir (p=0·019). The proportions of participants with any grade 3-4 adverse event were similar between the dolutegravir (26 [11%]) and darunavir (28 [12%]) groups and between the tenofovir (22 [9%]) and zidovudine (32 [14%]) groups. There were no deaths related to study medication.

INTERPRETATION

Dolutegravir-based and darunavir-based regimens maintain good viral suppression during 96 weeks; dolutegravir is non-inferior to darunavir but is at greater risk of resistance in second-line therapy. Tenofovir should be continued in second-line therapy, rather than being switched to zidovudine.

FUNDING

Janssen.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Lamivudine; Oxazines; Piperazines; Prospective Studies; Pyridones; RNA; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Viral Load; Zidovudine

PubMed: 35460601
DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(22)00092-3

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

Dolutegravir plus boosted darunavir versus recommended standard-of-care antiretroviral regimens in people with HIV-1 for whom recommended first-line non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy has failed (DEFT): an open-label, randomised, phase 3b/4 trial.

Authors:

BACKGROUND

Randomised comparative data on efficacy and safety of second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) after failure of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) across diverse geographical settings are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate optimal second-line ART for people with HIV.

METHODS

DEFT is a completed international, randomised, open-label, phase 3b/4 trial evaluating three second-line ART strategies in adults (aged ≥18 years) with HIV-1 for whom first-line NNRTI therapy has failed. The study was done at 28 sites across 14 countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. It was originally designed to compare recommended standard of care (ritonavir-boosted darunavir [800 mg darunavir plus 100 mg ritonavir once daily] plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NRTIs; dosed once or twice daily]) with a novel nucleoside sparing regimen of dolutegravir (50 mg once daily) with ritonavir-boosted darunavir. The study was adapted during the first year to add a third arm of dolutegravir (50 mg once daily) with fixed tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (300 mg once daily) plus either lamivudine (300 mg once daily) or emtricitabine (200 mg once daily). Participants were randomly assigned with a computer-generated, blocked randomisation scheme (block size of two) stratified by site, previous tenofovir disoproxil fumarate use, and HIV viral load. The trial was designed to evaluate non-inferiority of either interventional arm against standard of care for the primary outcome of virological suppression, as determined by HIV RNA load of less than 50 copies per mL at 48 weeks. The prespecified non-inferiority margin was 12%. Comparisons were made with a modified intention-to-treat population, including all participants randomly assigned but excluding administrative withdrawals. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03017872.

FINDINGS

1190 individuals were screened; 828 participants were enrolled between Nov 1, 2017, and Dec 31, 2021. Two participants were unable to receive their assigned regimen for administrative reasons; and 826 participants were included in analyses. Median age was 39 years (IQR 33-46), and 450 (54%) participants were female. Baseline median CD4 count was 206 cells per μL (23-354) and median HIV RNA was 15 400 copies per mL (3600-65 986). The proportion of participants with HIV RNA of less than 50 copies per mL at 48 weeks was 194 (75%) of 257 in the ritonavir-boosted darunavir plus two NRTIs group, 222 (84%) of 264 in the ritonavir-boosted darunavir plus dolutegravir group, and 227 (78%) of 291 in the dolutegravir with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus either lamivudine or emtricitabine group. Compared with ritonavir-boosted darunavir plus two NRTIs, the difference in virological suppression was 8·6% (95% CI 1·7 to 15·5; p=0·016) for dolutegravir plus ritonavir-boosted darunavir and 6·7% (-1·2 to 14·4; p=0·093) for dolutegravir with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus either lamivudine or emtricitabine. Six deaths occurred, none of which were related to treatment. 19 pregnancies (11 livebirths) occurred with no congenital defects.

INTERPRETATION

In individuals experiencing failure of an NNRTI-based first-line ART, a switch to either dolutegravir plus ritonavir-boosted darunavir or dolutegravir with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus either lamivudine or emtricitabine, without universal access to genotyping, was non-inferior in achieving viral suppression compared with ritonavir-boosted darunavir plus two NRTIs. These global data support the most recent WHO treatment guidelines.

FUNDING

UNITAID; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, USA; National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia; ViiV Healthcare; and Janssen.

Topics: Humans; Darunavir; HIV Infections; Female; Adult; Male; Oxazines; Pyridones; HIV-1; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Viral Load; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Standard of Care; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Treatment Outcome; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Tenofovir; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Treatment Failure; Lamivudine

PubMed: 38788744
DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00089-4

Authors: Jeremiah D Momper, Jiajia Wang, Alice Stek...

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate darunavir and cobicistat pharmacokinetics during pregnancy compared with postpartum and in infant washout samples after delivery.

DESIGN

Nonrandomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter phase-IV prospective study of darunavir and cobicistat pharmacokinetics in pregnant women with HIV and their children in the United States.

METHODS

Intensive steady-state 24-h pharmacokinetic profiles were performed after administration of 800 mg of darunavir and 150 mg of cobicistat orally in fixed dose combination once-daily during the second trimester, third trimester, and postpartum. Infant washout samples were collected after birth. Darunavir and cobicistat were measured in plasma by validated HPLC-UV and liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry detection (LC-MS)/MS assays, respectively. A two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test (α = 0.10) was employed for paired within-participant comparisons.

RESULTS

A total of 29 pregnant women receiving darunavir and cobicistat once-daily enrolled in the study. Compared with paired postpartum data, darunavir AUC0--24 was 53% lower in the second trimester [n = 12, P = 0.0024, geometric mean of ratio (GMR)=0.47, 90% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 - 0.68] and 56% lower in the third trimester (n = 18, P < 0.0001, GMR = 0.44, 90% CI 0.36 - 0.54), whereas cobicistat AUC0--24 was 50% lower in the second trimester (n = 12, P = 0.0024, GMR = 0.50, 90% CI 0.36-0.69) and 56% lower in the third trimester (n = 18, P < 0.0001, GMR = 0.44, 90% CI 0.35-0.55). Placental transfer of darunavir and cobicistat was limited.

CONCLUSION

Standard darunavir/cobicistat dosing during pregnancy results in significantly lower exposure during pregnancy, which may increase the risk of virologic failure and perinatal transmission.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Cobicistat; Darunavir; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Placenta; Postpartum Period; Pregnancy; Prospective Studies

PubMed: 34076612
DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002857

Authors: Kristina M Brooks, Alice K Pau, Doris Swaim...

BACKGROUND

Once-weekly isoniazid with rifapentine (HP) for 3 months is a recommended treatment for latent tuberculosis infection in persons with HIV. HP reduces exposures of certain antiretroviral medications, resulting in limited options for the concomitant use of these therapies. Here, we examined the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of darunavir/cobicistat with HP.

METHODS

This was an open-label, fixed sequence, two-period crossover study in persons without HIV. Participants received darunavir 800 mg/cobicistat 150 mg once-daily alone for 4 days, then continued darunavir/cobicistat once-daily for days 5-19 with HP coadministration on days 5, 12, and 19. Intensive PK assessments were performed on days 4, 14, and 19. PK parameters were determined using noncompartmental methods. Geometric mean ratios with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and compared between phases using mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

Thirteen participants were enrolled. Two withdrew after day 4, and one withdrew after day 14. Of the 3 withdrawals, 2 were attributed to drug-related adverse events. Darunavir area under the concentration-time curve, maximum concentrations (Cmax), and concentrations at 24 hours postdose (C24h) were reduced by 71%, 41%, and 96% ∼48-72 hours after HP administration (day 14), respectively, and 36%, 17%, and 89% with simultaneous HP administration (day 19), respectively. On day 14, 45% of the predose and 73% of C24h concentrations were below the darunavir EC50 (0.055 µg/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

Darunavir exposures were significantly decreased with HP coadministration. Temporal relationships between HP coadministration and the extent of induction or mixed inhibition/induction of darunavir metabolism were apparent. Coadministration of darunavir/cobicistat with 3HP should be avoided.

Topics: Humans; Cobicistat; Cross-Over Studies; Darunavir; HIV Infections; Isoniazid; Drug Combinations

PubMed: 37955446
DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003301

Authors: Virginia A Triant, Mark J Siedner

Topics: Atazanavir Sulfate; Cardiovascular Diseases; Case-Control Studies; Darunavir; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Risk Factors

PubMed: 31828327
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiz482

Authors: Micol Ferrara, Jessica Cusato, Elena Salvador...

AIMS

Antiretroviral (ARV) therapy reduces inflammation and immune activation in people with HIV, but not down to the levels observed in people without HIV. Limited drug penetration within tissues has been argued as a potential mechanism of persistent inflammation. Data on the inflammation role on ARV plasma/intracellular (IC) pharmacokinetics (PK) through to expression of cytochrome P450 3A/membrane transporters are limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between inflammation markers (IM) and plasma/IC PK of ARV regimen in HIV-positive patients.

METHODS

We included ART-experienced patients switching to three different ARV regimens. Plasma and IC ARV drug concentration means at the end of dosing interval (T ), IM on samples concomitantly with ARV PK determination: sCD14, CRP, IL-6 and LPS were analysed.

RESULTS

Plasma and IC drug concentrations were measured in 60 samples. No significative differences between CRP, sCD14, IL-6 and LPS values in the three arms were observed. A significant inverse correlation between tenofovir plasma concentration and sCD14 (rho = -0.79, P < .001), and between DRV IC/plasma ratio and Log IL-6 concentrations (rho = -0.36, P = .040), and a borderline statistically significant positive trend between DRV plasma concentration and sCD14 (rho = 0.31, P = .070) were suggested. Furthermore, a borderline statistically significant inverse trend between DTG IC concentrations and sCD14 (rho = -0.34, P = .090) was observed in 24 patients on DTG-based triple therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary data support the hypothesis of lower DRV and DTG IC concentrations and lower TFV plasma exposure in patients with higher plasma IM suggesting an interplay between HIV drug penetration and persistent inflammation in cART-treated HIV-positive patients.

Topics: Humans; Tenofovir; Emtricitabine; Darunavir; Anti-HIV Agents; Lipopolysaccharide Receptors; Interleukin-6; Lipopolysaccharides; HIV Infections; Inflammation

PubMed: 36115063
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15538

Authors: Owain Roberts, Saye Khoo, Andrew Owen...

Treatment of HIV-infected patients coinfected with is challenging due to drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between antiretrovirals (ARVs) and antituberculosis (anti-TB) drugs. The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of cobicistat (COBI) or ritonavir (RTV) in modulating DDIs between darunavir (DRV) and rifampin (RIF) in a human hepatocyte-based model. Human primary hepatocyte cultures were incubated with RIF alone or in combination with either COBI or RTV for 3 days, followed by coincubation with DRV for 1 h. The resultant DRV concentrations were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection, and the apparent intrinsic clearance (CL) of DRV was calculated. Both RTV and COBI lowered the RIF-induced increases in CL in a concentration-dependent manner. Linear regression analysis showed that log RTV and log COBI concentrations were associated with the percent inhibition of RIF-induced elevations in DRV CL, where β was equal to -234 (95% confidence interval [CI] = -275 to -193; < 0.0001) and -73 (95% CI = -89 to -57; < 0.0001), respectively. RTV was more effective in lowering 10 μM RIF-induced elevations in DRV CL (half-maximal [50%] inhibitory concentration [IC] = 0.025 μM) than COBI (IC = 0.223 μM). Incubation of either RTV or COBI in combination with RIF was sufficient to overcome RIF-induced elevations in DRV CL, with RTV being more potent than COBI. These data provide the first experimental insight into DDIs between RIF and COBI-boosted or RTV-boosted DRV and will be useful to inform physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models to aid in optimizing dosing regimens for the treatment of patients coinfected with HIV and .

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Cells, Cultured; Cobicistat; Darunavir; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Hepatocytes; Humans; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary

PubMed: 28193650
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01776-16