-
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry... Dec 2021Antivirals already on the market and expertise gained from the SARS and MERS outbreaks are gaining momentum as the most effective way to combat the coronavirus outbreak.... (Review)
Review
Antivirals already on the market and expertise gained from the SARS and MERS outbreaks are gaining momentum as the most effective way to combat the coronavirus outbreak. SARS-CoV-2 has caused considerable mortality due to respiratory failure, highlighting the immediate need for successful therapies as well as the long-term need for antivirals to combat potential emergent mutants of coronaviruses. There are constant viral mutations are being observed due to which world is experiencing different waves of SARS-CoV-2. If our understanding of the virology and clinical presentation of COVID-19 grows, so does the pool of possible pharmacological targets. In COVID-19, the difficulties of proper analysis of current pre-clinical/clinical data as well as the creation of new evidence concerning drug repurposing will be crucial. The current manuscript aims to evaluate the repurposing of an anti-HIV drug Darunavir Ethanolate in COVID-19 treatment with study and we discuss the therapeutic progress of Darunavir Etanolate, to prevent SARS-CoV-2 replication, which supports its clinical assessment for COVID-19 therapy.
PubMed: 36575695
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmcr.2021.100013 -
The Journal of Antimicrobial... Apr 2020Darunavir/ritonavir is better tolerated than lopinavir/ritonavir and has a higher genetic barrier to resistance. Co-administration with rifampicin has been... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Darunavir/ritonavir is better tolerated than lopinavir/ritonavir and has a higher genetic barrier to resistance. Co-administration with rifampicin has been contraindicated as a significant reduction in darunavir exposure is expected. This is a barrier to darunavir/ritonavir use where TB is endemic.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic profile of adjusted doses of darunavir/ritonavir with rifampicin.
METHODS
Virally suppressed participants on second-line lopinavir/ritonavir-based ART were switched to darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg q24h. In sequence: rifampicin was added; the dose of ritonavir was escalated; and darunavir was increased (darunavir/ritonavir 1600/200 mg q24h and 800/100 mg q12h were given in randomized sequence with rifampicin). Darunavir plasma concentrations were measured on the seventh/last day of each treatment period. To prevent viral rebound, dolutegravir (50 mg q12h) was added during rifampicin administration and for 1 week thereafter. Clinical events, ALT and bilirubin were monitored every 2-3 days during rifampicin administration.
RESULTS
A total of 17/28 participants started study treatment. Six (35.3%) were withdrawn for symptomatic hepatitis with severe ALT elevations, developing after 9-11 days of rifampicin and 2-4 days of ritonavir 200 mg. The study was stopped prematurely due to this high rate of hepatotoxicity. Only four participants completed the study. All hepatotoxicity resolved on withdrawal of study treatment. All participants were successfully re-established on their lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen. After doubling the darunavir/ritonavir doses on rifampicin, darunavir pre-dose concentrations approached those on standard doses without rifampicin for q12h doses, but not for q24h doses.
CONCLUSIONS
Adjusted doses of darunavir/ritonavir with rifampicin had unacceptable risk of hepatotoxicity. Darunavir trough concentrations were markedly reduced with the daily adjusted dose.
Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Rifampin; Ritonavir
PubMed: 31942627
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkz522 -
European Journal of Clinical... Apr 2021A variety of diagnostic methods are available to validate the performance of population pharmacokinetic models. Internal validation, which applies these methods to the...
PURPOSE
A variety of diagnostic methods are available to validate the performance of population pharmacokinetic models. Internal validation, which applies these methods to the model building dataset and to additional data generated through Monte Carlo simulations, is often sufficient, but external validation, which requires a new dataset, is considered a more rigorous approach, especially if the model is to be used for predictive purposes. Our first objective was to validate a previously published population pharmacokinetic model of darunavir, an HIV protease inhibitor boosted with ritonavir or cobicistat. Our second objective was to use this model to derive optimal sampling strategies that maximize the amount of information collected with as few pharmacokinetic samples as possible.
METHODS
A validation dataset comprising 164 sparsely sampled individuals using ritonavir-boosted darunavir was used for validation. Standard plots of predictions and residuals, NPDE, visual predictive check, and bootstrapping were applied to both the validation set and the combined learning/validation set in NONMEM to assess model performance. D-optimal designs for darunavir were then calculated in PopED and further evaluated in NONMEM through simulations.
RESULTS
External validation confirmed model robustness and accuracy in most scenarios but also highlighted several limitations. The best one-, two-, and three-point sampling strategies were determined to be pre-dose (0 h); 0 and 4 h; and 1, 4, and 19 h, respectively. A combination of samples at 0, 1, and 4 h was comparable to the optimal three-point strategy. These could be used to reliably estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters, although with fewer samples, precision decreased and the number of outliers increased significantly.
CONCLUSIONS
Optimal sampling strategies derived from this model could be used in clinical practice to enhance therapeutic drug monitoring or to conduct additional pharmacokinetic studies.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Darunavir; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Reproducibility of Results
PubMed: 33175180
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-020-03036-2 -
The Journal of Antimicrobial... Aug 2021HIV exposure to penile tissues provides a risk of acquisition among men, yet studies evaluating penile antiretroviral (ARV) drug distribution have been lacking. We...
BACKGROUND
HIV exposure to penile tissues provides a risk of acquisition among men, yet studies evaluating penile antiretroviral (ARV) drug distribution have been lacking. We measured ARVs on urethral and glans surface swabs collected following a dose of tenofovir alafenamide, emtricitabine, elvitegravir, darunavir and cobicistat.
METHODS
Thirty-five HIV-negative male participants provided urethral swabs, glans swabs, rectal swabs, blood and urine up to 96 h following a single dose of tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine/elvitegravir/cobicistat and darunavir. ARVs were measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry with a lower limit of detection (LOD) of 1 ng/swab for swabs and 10 ng/mL for plasma and urine. Concentrations are reported as median and range.
RESULTS
Urethral swab emtricitabine and darunavir concentrations peaked at 4 h for emtricitabine (36 ng/swab; 3-307 ng/swab) and 8 h for darunavir (25 ng/swab; 2-52 ng/swab). Glans swab emtricitabine and darunavir concentrations peaked 24 h after dosing (emtricitabine 14 ng/swab,
darunavir 6 ng/swab, darunavir concentrations are between 10 and 20 μg/mL, similar to rectal secretions, 4-fold greater than in plasma, but 2-fold lower than in urine. Tenofovir and elvitegravir were detected on less than 20% of urethral or glans swabs collected within 24 h of dosing. CONCLUSIONS
We document ARV dosing in the urethra and on the glans surface with high drug concentrations noted for emtricitabine and darunavir and lower tenofovir and elvitegravir concentrations. Data suggest a potential protective role of urethral emtricitabine or darunavir against penile HIV acquisition.
Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Cobicistat; Emtricitabine; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Urethra
PubMed: 34007982
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkab155 -
Journal of Global Infectious Diseases 2022Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine (HQ), and darunavir/ritonavir are widely prescribed as an oral treatment for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)...
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Combined Ivermectin and Zinc Sulfate versus Combined Hydroxychloroquine, Darunavir/Ritonavir, and Zinc Sulfate among Adult Patients with Asymptomatic or Mild Coronavirus-19 Infection.
INTRODUCTION
Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine (HQ), and darunavir/ritonavir are widely prescribed as an oral treatment for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection despite their uncertainty of clinical benefit. The objective is to determine the safety and the efficacies of two treatment regimens against SARS-CoV-2 infection.
METHODS
We conducted an open-labeled, randomized, controlled trial to compare the efficacy between a 3-day course of once-daily high-dose oral ivermectin plus zinc sulfate (Group A) and a combination of HQ, darunavir/ritonavir, and zinc sulfate (HQ + antiretroviral, Group B) for 5 days in asymptomatic or mild SARS-CoV-2 infection. The study period was between December 2020 and April 2021.
RESULTS
Overall, 113 patients were randomized and analyzed (57 patients in Group A and 56 patients in Group B). The median duration to achieve the virological outcome of either undetected or cycle threshold (Ct) for N gene of SARS-CoV-2 by real-time polymerase chain reaction was 6 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.3-6.7) versus 7 days (95% CI: 5.4-8.6) in Group A and Group B, respectively ( = 0.419) in the modified intention-to-treat population. All patients were discharged from hospital quarantine as planned. Two patients in Group A and one patient in Group B were considered clinically worsening and received 10 days of favipiravir treatment. There was no serious adverse event found in both groups.
CONCLUSION
We demonstrated that both treatment regimens were safe, but both treatment regimens had no virological or clinical benefit. Based on this result and current data, there is no supporting evidence for the clinical benefit of ivermectin for coronavirus-19.
PubMed: 35910820
DOI: 10.4103/jgid.jgid_281_21 -
Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency... Dec 2011To investigate the pharmacokinetics of darunavir/ritonavir and raltegravir, in HIV-infected subjects, in both plasma and at the intracellular (IC) site of action. (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVES
To investigate the pharmacokinetics of darunavir/ritonavir and raltegravir, in HIV-infected subjects, in both plasma and at the intracellular (IC) site of action.
METHODS
HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy received raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 21 days (period 1); darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily was added for 14 days (period 2), and patients were randomized to continue raltegravir twice daily (group 1) or to switch to 800 mg once daily (group 2), then they all stopped raltegravir intake and continued darunavir/ritonavir once daily for 14 days (period 3). Drug concentrations in plasma and cells (peripheral blood mononuclear cell) were measured, and differences in geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 90% confidence intervals (CI) between period 2 versus period 3 and period 2 versus period 1 were assessed.
RESULTS
Twenty-four patients completed the study. Group 1 GMR (90% CI) of darunavir area under the curve (AUC) with and without raltegravir was 1.24 (1.13 to 1.45) for plasma and 1.24 (1.07 to 1.73) for cells and for group 2 was 1.14 (1.07 to 1.24) and 1.03 (0.94 to 1.16). GMR (90% CI) of raltegravir AUC without and with darunavir/ritonavir (plasma and cells) for group 1 was 0.90 (0.73 to 1.44) and 1.02 (0.81 to 1.67) and for group 2 was 1.21 (1.03 to 1.77) and 1.27 (1.07 to 1.94). Geometric mean IC to plasma AUC ratios were 5.3 and 4.9 for darunavir in groups 1 and 2 when darunavir/ritonavir was given alone and 4.9 and 5.6 for raltegravir when given alone. These ratios were not altered by the coadministered drug.
CONCLUSIONS
No remarkable interactions between darunavir/ritonavir and raltegravir in plasma or cells were seen. Raltegravir IC concentrations are higher than previously reported; the difference being due to modified cell isolation procedures that reduced drug loss caused by washing.
Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Cross-Over Studies; Darunavir; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Young Adult
PubMed: 21926632
DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182364c67 -
AIDS (London, England) Jan 2021To evaluate changes in weight and BMI in adults with HIV-1 at 1 and 2 years after starting an antiretroviral regimen that included doravirine, ritonavir-boosted...
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate changes in weight and BMI in adults with HIV-1 at 1 and 2 years after starting an antiretroviral regimen that included doravirine, ritonavir-boosted darunavir, or efavirenz.
DESIGN
Post-hoc analysis of pooled data from three randomized controlled trials.
METHODS
We evaluated weight change from baseline, weight gain at least 10%, and increase in BMI after 48 and 96 weeks of treatment with doravirine, ritonavir-boosted darunavir, or efavirenz-based regimens. Risk factors for weight gain and metabolic outcomes associated with weight gain were also examined.
RESULTS
Mean (and median) weight changes were similar for doravirine [1.7 (1.0) kg] and ritonavir-boosted darunavir [1.4 (0.6) kg] and were lower for efavirenz [0.6 (0.0) kg] at week 48 but were similar across all treatment groups at week 96 [2.4 (1.5), 1.8 (0.7), and 1.6 (1.0) kg, respectively]. No significant differences between treatment groups were found in the proportion of participants with at least 10% weight gain or the proportion with BMI class increase at either time point. Low CD4 T-cell count and high HIV-1 RNA at baseline were associated with at least 10% weight gain and BMI class increase at both timepoints, but treatment group, age, sex, and race were not.
CONCLUSION
Weight gains over 96 weeks were low in all treatment groups and were similar to the average yearly change in adults without HIV-1. Significant weight gain and BMI class increase were similar across the treatment groups and were predicted by low baseline CD4 T-cell count and high baseline HIV-1 RNA.
Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Body Mass Index; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; HIV Infections; Humans; Pyridones; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; Viral Load
PubMed: 33048879
DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002725 -
AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses Dec 2018The emergence and transmission of antiretroviral drug resistance have been and remain a concern among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 infection....
The emergence and transmission of antiretroviral drug resistance have been and remain a concern among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 infection. The protease inhibitor (PI) darunavir has been approved for use in the United States for more than 10 years and has demonstrated a high barrier to resistance. Previous analyses identified significant reductions in the prevalence of samples with darunavir resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) and with phenotypic resistance to darunavir and other PIs between 2006 and 2012. This analysis extends those findings by evaluating darunavir and PI resistance among clinical samples submitted for routine drug resistance testing (combined genotyping and phenotyping) in the United States from 2010 to 2017. Frequencies of 11 darunavir and 23 primary PI RAMs, and phenotypic susceptibility, were assessed yearly among all samples and in a subset of samples with distinct phenotypic resistance to one or more PIs. Among all samples (N = 60,760), the proportion with 0 darunavir RAMs was 91.7% in 2010 and 95.8% in 2017. The proportions of all samples with phenotypic susceptibility to darunavir, atazanavir, and lopinavir were, respectively, 97.4%, 94.2%, and 94.7% in 2010 and 98.6%, 97.7%, and 97.5% in 2017. Among the 4,799 samples with phenotypic resistance to one or more PIs, the proportions with phenotypic susceptibility to darunavir, atazanavir, and lopinavir were, respectively, 73.3%, 41.5%, and 46.0% in 2010 and 70.7%, 53.7%, and 48.8% in 2017. The prevalence of darunavir RAMs among commercially tested HIV-1 samples remained low and generally stable from 2010 to 2017, and high proportions showed phenotypic darunavir susceptibility.
Topics: Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Protease Inhibitors; History, 21st Century; Humans; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Mutation; United States
PubMed: 30148406
DOI: 10.1089/AID.2018.0100 -
The Journal of Antimicrobial... Nov 2022In 2018, Switzerland changed its guidelines to support women living with HIV wishing to breastfeed. The exposure of antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) in breastmilk and the...
INTRODUCTION
In 2018, Switzerland changed its guidelines to support women living with HIV wishing to breastfeed. The exposure of antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) in breastmilk and the ingested daily dose by the breastfed infant are understudied, notably for newer ARVs. This study aimed to quantify ARV concentrations in maternal plasma and breastmilk to determine the milk/plasma ratio, to estimate daily infant ARV dose from breastfeeding and to measure ARV concentrations in infants.
METHODS
All women wishing to breastfeed were included, regardless of their ARV treatment. Breastmilk and maternal plasma samples were mostly collected at mid-dosing interval.
RESULTS
Twenty-one mother/child pairs were enrolled; of those several were on newer ARVs including 10 raltegravir, 1 bictegravir, 2 rilpivirine, 2 darunavir/ritonavir and 3 tenofovir alafenamide. No vertical HIV transmission was detected (one infant still breastfed). The median milk/plasma ratios were 0.96/0.39 for raltegravir once/twice daily, 0.01 for bictegravir, 1.08 for rilpivirine, 0.12 for darunavir/ritonavir and 4.09 for tenofovir alafenamide. The median estimated infant daily dose (mg/kg) from breastfeeding was 0.02/0.25 for raltegravir once/twice daily, 0.01 for bictegravir, 0.02 for rilpivirine, 0.05 for darunavir/ritonavir and 0.007 for tenofovir alafenamide, resulting in relative infant dose <10% exposure index for all ARVs.
CONCLUSIONS
ARVs were transferred to a variable extent in breastmilk. Nevertheless, the estimated daily ARV dose from breastfeeding remained low. Differential ARV exposure was observed in breastfed infants with some ARVs being below/above their effective concentrations raising the concern of resistance development if HIV infection occurs. More data on this potential risk are warranted to better support breastfeeding.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infant; Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Cohort Studies; Darunavir; HIV Infections; Milk, Human; Mothers; Prospective Studies; Raltegravir Potassium; Rilpivirine; Ritonavir; Switzerland
PubMed: 36177836
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac337 -
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jun 2022Ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r) and dolutegravir (DTG) are affected by induction of metabolizing enzymes and efflux transporters caused by rifampicin (RIF). This...
Ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r) and dolutegravir (DTG) are affected by induction of metabolizing enzymes and efflux transporters caused by rifampicin (RIF). This complicates the treatment of people living with HIV (PLWH) diagnosed with tuberculosis. Recent data showed that doubling DRV/r dose did not compensate for this effect, and hepatic safety was unsatisfactory. We aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of DRV, ritonavir (RTV), and DTG in the presence and absence of RIF in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PLWH were enrolled in a dose-escalation crossover study with 6 treatment periods of 7 days. Participants started with DRV/r 800/100 mg once daily (QD), RIF and DTG were added before the RTV dose was doubled, and then they received DRV/r 800/100 twice daily (BD) and then 1,600/200 QD or vice versa. Finally, RIF was withdrawn. Plasma and intra-PBMC drug concentrations were measured through validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods. Seventeen participants were enrolled but only 4 completed all study phases due to high incidence of liver toxicity. Intra-PBMC DRV trough serum concentration () after the addition of RIF dropped from a median (interquartile range [IQR]) starting value of 261 ng/mL (158 to 577) to 112 ng/mL (18 to 820) and 31 ng/mL (12 to 331) for 800/100 BD and 1,600/200 QD DRV/r doses, respectively. The DRV intra-PBMC/plasma ratio increased significantly ( = 0.003). DTG and RIF intra-PBMC concentrations were in accordance with previous reports in the absence of RIF or DRV/r. This study showed a differential impact of enzyme and/or transporter induction on DRV/r concentrations in plasma and PBMCs, highlighting the usefulness of studying intra-PBMC pharmacokinetics with drug-drug interactions. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT03892161.).
Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Chromatography, Liquid; Cross-Over Studies; Darunavir; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridones; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Tandem Mass Spectrometry
PubMed: 35583344
DOI: 10.1128/aac.00136-22