Review

Authors: Brooke Conley, Samantha Bunzli, Jonathan Bullen...

Systematic r eview to evaluate the quality of the clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management and to provide a synthesis of high-quality CPG recommendations, highlighting areas of consistency, and inconsistency. Electronic searches of five databases and four online guideline repositories were performed. RA management CPGs were eligible for inclusion if they were written in English and published between January 2015 and February 2022; focused on adults ≥ 18 years of age; met the criteria of a CPG as defined by the Institute of Medicine; and were rated as high quality on the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument. RA CPGs were excluded if they required additional payment to access; only addressed recommendations for the system/organization of care and did not include interventional management recommendations; and/or included other arthritic conditions. Of 27 CPGs identified, 13 CPGs met eligibility criteria and were included. Non-pharmacological care should include patient education, patient-centered care, shared decision-making, exercise, orthoses, and a multi-disciplinary approach to care. Pharmacological care should include conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), with methotrexate as the first-line choice. If monotherapy conventional synthetic DMARDs fail to achieve a treatment target, this should be followed by combination therapy conventional synthetic DMARDs (leflunomide, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine), biologic DMARDS and targeted synthetic DMARDS. Management should also include monitoring, pre-treatment investigations and vaccinations, and screening for tuberculosis and hepatitis. Surgical care should be recommended if non-surgical care fails. This synthesis offers clear guidance of evidence-based RA care to healthcare providers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol for this review was registered with Open Science Framework ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/UB3Y7 ).

Topics: Adult; Humans; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Hydroxychloroquine; Methotrexate; Sulfasalazine; Practice Guidelines as Topic

PubMed: 37291382
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-023-06654-0

Authors: Ruonan Ma, Ling Fang, Lei Chen...

: Intracellular bacterial survival is a major factor causing chronic or recurrent infection, leading to the failure of both host defense and/or antibiotic treatment. However, the elimination of intracellular bacteria is challenging as they are protected from antibiotics and host immune attack. Recent studies have indicated that iron helps macrophages against intracellular bacteria, contradictory to traditional "nutritional immunity", in which iron is considered a key nutrient for bacterial survival in host cells. However, how iron facilitates intracellular bacterial death has not been fully clarified. In this study, we found that ferroptotic stress can help macrophages suppress intracellular bacteria by reversing the importation of ferrous iron into bacterial vacuoles via ferroportin and thereby inducing ferroptosis-like bacterial death. : A macrophage model of bacterial invasion was established to monitor dynamic changes in ferroptotic hallmarks, including ferrous iron and lipid peroxidation. Ferroptosis inducers and inhibitors were added to the model to evaluate the relationship between ferroptotic stress and intracellular bacterial survival. We then determined the spatiotemporal distributions of ferroportin, ferrous iron, and lipid peroxidation in macrophages and intracellular bacteria. A bacterial infection mouse model was established to evaluate the therapeutic effects of drugs that regulate ferroptotic stress. : Ferrous iron and lipid peroxidation increased sharply in the early stage of bacterial infection in the macrophages, then decreased to normal levels in the late stage of infection. The addition of ferroptosis inducers (ras-selective lethal small molecule 3, sulfasalazine, and acetaminophen) in macrophages promoted intracellular bacterial suppression. Further studies revealed that ferrous iron could be delivered to the intracellular bacterial compartment via inward ferroportin transportation, where ferrous iron induced ferroptosis-like death of bacteria. In addition, ferroptotic stress declined to normal levels in the late stage of infection by regulating iron-related pathways in the macrophages. Importantly, we found that enhancing ferroptotic stress with a ferroptosis inducer (sulfasalazine) successfully suppressed bacteria in the mouse infection models. : Our study suggests that the spatiotemporal response to ferroptosis stress is an efficient pathway for macrophage defense against bacterial invasion, and targeting ferroptosis may achieve therapeutic targets for infectious diseases challenged by intracellular pathogens.

Topics: Animals; Cell Death; Ferroptosis; Iron; Macrophages; Mice; Sulfasalazine

PubMed: 35265210
DOI: 10.7150/thno.66663

Authors: Xueting Lang, Michael D Green, Weimin Wang...

A challenge in oncology is to rationally and effectively integrate immunotherapy with traditional modalities, including radiotherapy. Here, we demonstrate that radiotherapy induces tumor-cell ferroptosis. Ferroptosis agonists augment and ferroptosis antagonists limit radiotherapy efficacy in tumor models. Immunotherapy sensitizes tumors to radiotherapy by promoting tumor-cell ferroptosis. Mechanistically, IFNγ derived from immunotherapy-activated CD8 T cells and radiotherapy-activated ATM independently, yet synergistically, suppresses SLC7A11, a unit of the glutamate-cystine antiporter xc, resulting in reduced cystine uptake, enhanced tumor lipid oxidation and ferroptosis, and improved tumor control. Thus, ferroptosis is an unappreciated mechanism and focus for the development of effective combinatorial cancer therapy. SIGNIFICANCE: This article describes ferroptosis as a previously unappreciated mechanism of action for radiotherapy. Further, it shows that ferroptosis is a novel point of synergy between immunotherapy and radiotherapy. Finally, it nominates SLC7A11, a critical regulator of ferroptosis, as a mechanistic determinant of synergy between radiotherapy and immunotherapy..

Topics: Amino Acid Transport System y+; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Survival; Down-Regulation; Ferroptosis; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Immunotherapy; Interferon-gamma; Lipid Metabolism; Melanoma, Experimental; Mice; Oxidation-Reduction; Sulfasalazine; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

PubMed: 31554642
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-0338

Authors: Jingshu Meng, Xiao Yang, Jing Huang...

Malignant ascites in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a complex clinical problem that lacks effective treatments. Due to the insensitivity of advanced HCC cells to traditional chemotherapies, low drug accumulation, and limited drug residence time in the peritoneal cavity, the therapeutic effects of malignant ascites in HCC are not satisfactory. In this study, an injectable hydrogel drug delivery system based on chitosan hydrochloride and oxidized dextran (CH-OD) is designed to load sulfasalazine (SSZ), an FDA-approved drug with ferroptosis-inducing ability, for effective tumor-killing and activation of anti-tumor immunity. Compared to free SSZ, SSZ-loaded CH-OD (CH-OD-SSZ) hydrogel exhibits greater cytotoxicity and induces higher levels of immunogenic ferroptosis. In the preclinical model of hepatoma ascites, intraperitoneal administration of CH-OD-SSZ hydrogel can significantly suppress tumor progression and improve the immune landscape. Both in vitro and in vivo, CH-OD-SSZ hydrogel induces the repolarization of macrophages to an M1-like phenotype and promotes the maturation and activation of dendritic cells. Combination treatment with CH-OD-SSZ hydrogel and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immunotherapy achieves more than 50% ascites regression and generates long-term immune memory. Collectively, CH-OD-SSZ hydrogel exhibits promising therapeutic potential in the treatment of peritoneal dissemination and malignant ascites in advanced HCC, especially when combined with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy.

Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Hydrogels; Chitosan; Dextrans; Ascites; Ferroptosis; Liver Neoplasms; Sulfasalazine; Immunotherapy

PubMed: 37132587
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202300517

Review

Authors: G M Van Rosendaal

An increasing number of options are available for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease; the selection depends on the extent and severity of the disease. Experience with sulfasalazine and corticosteroids has led to a proliferation of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) compounds and experimentation with alternative corticosteroid preparations. Given rectally 5-ASA is particularly effective in the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis, and experience is accumulating with several oral formulations. Metronidazole is useful in some cases, and immunosuppressive agents have a role in some patients with chronic refractory disease. A variety of measures, such as nutritional therapy, surgery and psychosocial support, are important elements of therapy. Further therapeutic innovations are expected as the etiology and pathogenesis are clarified.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Aminosalicylic Acids; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Evaluation; Forecasting; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Mesalamine; Metronidazole; Sulfasalazine

PubMed: 2568163
DOI: No ID Found

Authors: Chenyu Zhao, Yunyuan Yu, Guangrong Yin...

OBJECTIVE

Ferroptosis has been reported to play a role in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Sulfasalazine, a common clinical treatment for ankylosing spondylitis, also exerts pathological influence on the progression of rheumatoid arthritis including the induced ferroptosis of fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs), which result in the perturbated downstream signaling and the development of RA. The aim of this study was to investigate the underlying mechanism so as to provide novel insight for the treatment of RA.

METHODS

CCK-8 and Western blotting were used to assess the effect of sulfasalazine on FLSs. A collagen-induced arthritis mouse model was constructed by the injection of collagen and Freund's adjuvant, and then, mice were treated with sulfasalazine from day 21 after modeling. The synovium was extracted and ferroptosis was assessed by Western blotting and immunofluorescence staining.

RESULTS

The results revealed that sulfasalazine promotes ferroptosis. Compared with the control group, the expression levels of ferroptosis-related proteins such as glutathione peroxidase 4, ferritin heavy chain 1, and solute carrier family 7, member 11 (SLC7A11) were lower in the experimental group. Furthermore, deferoxamine inhibited ferroptosis induced by sulfasalazine. Sulfasalazine-promoted ferroptosis was related to a decrease in ERK1/2 and the increase of P53.

CONCLUSIONS

Sulfasalazine promoted ferroptosis of FLSs in rheumatoid arthritis, and the PI3K-AKT-ERK1/2 pathway and P53-SLC7A11 pathway play an important role in this process.

Topics: Mice; Animals; Sulfasalazine; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53; MAP Kinase Signaling System; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Ferroptosis; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cells, Cultured; Cell Proliferation

PubMed: 38407703
DOI: 10.1007/s10787-024-01439-6

Authors: Svetlana F Lima, Silvia Pires, Amanda Rupert...

Sulfasalazine is a prodrug known to be effective for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-associated peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA), but the mechanistic role for the gut microbiome in regulating its clinical efficacy is not well understood. Here, treatment of 22 IBD-pSpA subjects with sulfasalazine identifies clinical responders with a gut microbiome enriched in Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and the capacity for butyrate production. Sulfapyridine promotes butyrate production and transcription of the butyrate synthesis gene but in F. prausnitzii in vitro, which is suppressed by excess folate. Sulfasalazine therapy enhances fecal butyrate production and limits colitis in wild-type and gnotobiotic mice colonized with responder, but not non-responder, microbiomes. F. prausnitzii is sufficient to restore sulfasalazine protection from colitis in gnotobiotic mice colonized with non-responder microbiomes. These findings reveal a mechanistic link between the efficacy of sulfasalazine therapy and the gut microbiome with the potential to guide diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for IBD-pSpA.

Topics: Humans; Mice; Animals; Sulfasalazine; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Colitis; Treatment Outcome; Butyrates

PubMed: 38378002
DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101431

Letter by Lu et al. regarding article, "Esomeprazole and sulfasalazine in combination additively reduce sFlt-1 secretion and diminish endothelial dysfunction: potential for a combination treatment for preeclampsia".

Authors: Zhuo Deng, Dan Lu

Topics: Esomeprazole; Female; Humans; Placenta; Pre-Eclampsia; Pregnancy; Sulfasalazine; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1

PubMed: 34978249
DOI: 10.1080/10641955.2021.2024224

Authors: Farrah Rasool Jaafar, Ahmed Abu-Raghif

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory disease with high mortality and morbidity worldwide. It causes inflammation in the lining of the colon, resulting in several symptoms that negatively impact the quality of life. Unfortunately, there is currently no known cure for this condition. Therefore, it is crucial to explore alternative treatment approaches. This research aimed to investigate the anti-inflammatory and antioxidative effects of a combination therapy involving Sulfasalazine+Ezetimibe compared to Sulfasalazine alone in a rat model of ulcerative colitis. Forty adult rats were divided into four groups for this study. The groups consisted of a control group (negative control), an acetic acid group (positive control), an acetic acid+Sulfasalazine (100 mg/kg per day) group, and an acetic acid+Sulfasalazine (50 mg/kg)+Ezetimibe (5 mg/kg) group. Rats were treated for one week, and colitis was induced by administering 2 ml of 4% (v/v) acetic acid inter-rectally. After sacrifice, the colonic tissue homogenate was analyzed for several markers, including proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, NF-κB), oxidative stress markers (malondialdehyde, myeloperoxidase), and adhesive molecule markers (E-selectin, ICAM-1). Sulfasalazine and the combination of Sulfasalazine+Ezetimibe significantly reduced the colonic levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, NF-κB, MDA, and E-selectin in the homogenate. However, the combination therapy of Sulfasalazine and Ezetimibe demonstrated a superior effect.

Topics: Rats; Animals; Sulfasalazine; Colitis, Ulcerative; E-Selectin; NF-kappa B; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Quality of Life; Colitis; Colon; Biomarkers; Acetates

PubMed: 38024826
DOI: 10.25122/jml-2023-0194

Meta-Analysis Review

Authors: Junmin Chen, Shaopeng Lin, Chao Liu...

BACKGROUND

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of unknown cause and affects mainly the spine, but can also affect other joints. Disease progression may result in loss of mobility and function. Sulfasalazine is a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug used in the treatment of AS. However, its efficacy remains unclear. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2005.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of sulfasalazine for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched for relevant randomized and quasi-randomized trials in any language, using the following sources: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 11); MEDLINE (2003 to 28 November 2013); EMBASE (2003 to 27 November 2013); CINAHL (2003 to 28 November 2013); Ovid MEDLINE data, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (28 November 2013); and the reference sections of retrieved articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We evaluated randomized and quasi-randomized trials examining the benefits and harms of sulfasalazine on AS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently reviewed unblinded trial reports according to the selection criteria. Disagreements on the inclusion of the studies were resolved, when necessary, by recourse to a third review author. The same authors independently assessed the risk of bias of included trials and entered the data extracted from the included trials. We combined results using mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous data, and risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data.We restructured outcome measures for this update based on recommendations from the editorial group. Major outcomes included: pain, Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI), Bath ankylosing spondylitis function index (BASFI), Bath ankylosing spondylitis metrology index (BASMI), radiographic progression, total number of withdrawals due to adverse events, and serious adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We did not add any new studies to this review following the updated search. In the original review, we included 11 studies in the analysis, involving 895 participants in total. All included studies compared sulfasalazine with placebo. We judged most of the studies as low risk of bias or unclear risk of bias in five domains (random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of outcome assessment, selective reporting, and other sources of bias). However, for incomplete outcome data, we only judged one trial at low risk of bias.None of the included trials assessed BASDAI, BASFI, BASMI or radiographic progression. Different parameters were used to assess pain. The pooled MD for back pain measured on a 0 to 100 mm visual analogue scale was -2.96 (95% confidence interval (CI) -6.33 to 0.41; absolute risk difference 3%, 95% CI 1% to 6%; 6 trials). Compared to placebo, a significantly higher rate of withdrawals due to adverse effects (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.15; absolute risk difference 4%, 95% CI 0.4% to 8.8%; 11 trials) was found in the sulfasalazine group. A serious adverse reaction was reported in one patient taking sulfasalazine (Peto odds ratio 7.50, 95% CI 0.15 to 378.16).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is not enough evidence to support any benefit of sulfasalazine in reducing pain, disease activity, radiographic progression, or improving physical function and spinal mobility in the treatment of AS. A statistically significant benefit in reducing the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and easing spinal stiffness was mentioned in the previous version. However, the effect size was very small and not clinically meaningful. More withdrawals because of side effects occurred with sulfasalazine. Further studies, with larger sample sizes, longer duration, and using validated outcome measures are needed to verify the uncertainty of sulfasalazine in AS.

Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Spondylitis, Ankylosing; Sulfasalazine

PubMed: 25427435
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004800.pub3