Review

Authors: C Protano, V Cammalleri, V Romano Spica...

BACKGROUND

Healthcare associated infections (HAIs) represent a serious problem for public health, as they increase the morbidity and mortality rates, present a relevant financial burden, and significantly contribute to the antimicrobial resistance.

METHODS

The aim of this review was to investigate the literature about HAIs, with particular reference to hospital environments and the role of cleaning and disinfection procedures. Hospital environments are an essential reservoir for HAIs cross transmission, and the application of appropriate procedures related to hand hygiene and disinfection/sterilization of surfaces and instruments remain key strategies for controlling HAIs.

RESULTS

Different procedures, based on the risk associated with the healthcare procedure, are recommended for hand hygiene: washing with soap and water, antiseptic rubbing with alcohol-based disinfectants, antiseptic and surgical hand washing. Environmental surfaces can be treated with different products, and the mostly used are chlorine-based and polyphenolic disinfectant. The reprocessing of instruments is related to their use according to the Spaulding's classification. In addition, scientific evidence demonstrated the great relevance of the "bundles" (small set of practices performed together) in controlling HAIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Research agenda should include the improvement of well-known effective preventive procedures and the development of new bundles devoted to high-risk procedures and specific microorganisms.

Topics: Cross Infection; Disinfectants; Disinfection; Equipment Contamination; Hand Disinfection; Hospitals; Humans; Public Health

PubMed: 31304524
DOI: 10.7416/ai.2019.2305

Review

A review of Spaulding's classification system for effective cleaning, disinfection and sterilization of reusable medical devices: Viewed through a modern-day lens that will inform and enable future sustainability.

Authors: N J Rowan, T Kremer, G McDonnell...

Despite advances in medicine and innovations in many underpinning fields including disease prevention and control, the Spaulding classification system, originally proposed in 1957, remains widely used for defining the disinfection and sterilization of contaminated re-usable medical devices and surgical instruments. Screening PubMed and Scopus databases using a PRISMA guiding framework generated 272 relevant publications that were used in this review. Findings revealed that there is a need to evolve how medical devices are designed, and processed by cleaning, disinfection (and/or sterilization) to mitigate patient risks, including acquiring an infection. This Spaulding Classification remains in use as it is logical, easily applied and understood by users (microbiologists, epidemiologists, manufacturers, industry) and by regulators. However, substantial changes have occurred over the past 65 years that challenge interpretation and application of this system that includes inter alia emergence of new pathogens (viruses, mycobacteria, protozoa, fungi), a greater understanding of innate and adaptive microbial tolerance to disinfection, toxicity risks, increased number of vulnerable patients and associated patient procedures, and greater complexity in design and use of medical devices. Common cited examples include endoscopes that enable non- or minimal invasive procedures but are highly sophisticated with various types of materials (polymers, electronic components etc), long narrow channels, right angle and heat-sensitive components and various accessories (e.g., values) that can be contaminated with high levels of microbial bioburden and patient tissues after use. Contaminated flexible duodenoscopes have been a source of several significant infection outbreaks, where at least 9 reported cases were caused by multidrug resistant organisms [MDROs] with no obvious breach in processing detected. Despite this, there is evidence of the lack of attention to cleaning and maintenance of these devices and associated equipment. Over the last few decades there is increasing genomic evidence of innate and adaptive resistance to chemical disinfectant methods along with adaptive tolerance to environmental stresses. To reduce these risks, it has been proposed to elevate classification of higher-risk flexible endoscopes (such as duodenoscopes) from semi-critical [contact with mucous membrane and intact skin] to critical use [contact with sterile tissue and blood] that entails a transition to using low-temperature sterilization modalities instead of routinely using high-level disinfection; thus, increasing the margin of safety for endoscope processing. This timely review addresses important issues surrounding use of the Spaulding classification system to meet modern-day needs. It specifically addresses the need for automated, robust cleaning and drying methods combined with using real-time monitoring of device processing. There is a need to understand entire end-to-end processing of devices instead of adopting silo approaches that in the future will be informed by artificial intelligence and deep-learning/machine learning. For example, combinational solutions that address the formation of complex biofilms that harbour pathogenic and opportunistic microorganisms on the surfaces of processed devices. Emerging trends are addressed including future sustainability for the medical devices sector that can be enabled via a new Quintuple Helix Hub approach that combines academia, industry, healthcare, regulators, and society to unlock real world solutions.

Topics: Humans; Artificial Intelligence; Cross Infection; Disinfectants; Disinfection; Endoscopes; Equipment Contamination

PubMed: 36963674
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162976

Randomized Controlled Trial

Enhanced terminal room disinfection and acquisition and infection caused by multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridium difficile (the Benefits of Enhanced Terminal Room Disinfection study): a cluster-randomised, multicentre, crossover study.

Authors: Deverick J Anderson, Luke F Chen, David J Weber...

BACKGROUND

Patients admitted to hospital can acquire multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridium difficile from inadequately disinfected environmental surfaces. We determined the effect of three enhanced strategies for terminal room disinfection (disinfection of a room between occupying patients) on acquisition and infection due to meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, C difficile, and multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter.

METHODS

We did a pragmatic, cluster-randomised, crossover trial at nine hospitals in the southeastern USA. Rooms from which a patient with infection or colonisation with a target organism was discharged were terminally disinfected with one of four strategies: reference (quaternary ammonium disinfectant except for C difficile, for which bleach was used); UV (quaternary ammonium disinfectant and disinfecting ultraviolet [UV-C] light except for C difficile, for which bleach and UV-C were used); bleach; and bleach and UV-C. The next patient admitted to the targeted room was considered exposed. Every strategy was used at each hospital in four consecutive 7-month periods. We randomly assigned the sequence of strategies for each hospital (1:1:1:1). The primary outcomes were the incidence of infection or colonisation with all target organisms among exposed patients and the incidence of C difficile infection among exposed patients in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01579370.

FINDINGS

31 226 patients were exposed; 21 395 (69%) met all inclusion criteria, including 4916 in the reference group, 5178 in the UV group, 5438 in the bleach group, and 5863 in the bleach and UV group. 115 patients had the primary outcome during 22 426 exposure days in the reference group (51·3 per 10 000 exposure days). The incidence of target organisms among exposed patients was significantly lower after adding UV to standard cleaning strategies (n=76; 33·9 cases per 10 000 exposure days; relative risk [RR] 0·70, 95% CI 0·50-0·98; p=0·036). The primary outcome was not statistically lower with bleach (n=101; 41·6 cases per 10 000 exposure days; RR 0·85, 95% CI 0·69-1·04; p=0·116), or bleach and UV (n=131; 45·6 cases per 10 000 exposure days; RR 0·91, 95% CI 0·76-1·09; p=0·303) among exposed patients. Similarly, the incidence of C difficile infection among exposed patients was not changed after adding UV to cleaning with bleach (n=38 vs 36; 30·4 cases vs 31·6 cases per 10 000 exposure days; RR 1·0, 95% CI 0·57-1·75; p=0·997).

INTERPRETATION

A contaminated health-care environment is an important source for acquisition of pathogens; enhanced terminal room disinfection decreases this risk.

FUNDING

US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Topics: Clostridioides difficile; Clostridium Infections; Cross Infection; Cross-Over Studies; Disinfectants; Disinfection; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patients' Rooms; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Sodium Hypochlorite; Ultraviolet Rays; United States

PubMed: 28104287
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31588-4

Review

Authors: R M Dwyer

Disinfection of equine premises provides a challenge to farm managers, in view of the variety of surfaces which may be contaminated and the wide variety of horse pathogens. Of the commonly occurring infectious diseases for which disinfection and disease control are especially important, rotavirus diarrhoea, salmonellosis and strangles are the most difficult to control. Phenolic disinfectants have been scientifically demonstrated to be effective in the presence of organic matter and are also virucidal. When used after thorough cleaning and rinsing of stall surfaces, phenolics have proved effective in controlling outbreaks of disease. In addition, 10% iodophors used for washing hands and cleaning equipment are also virucidal and bactericidal. Quaternary ammonium compounds, chlorhexidine, bleach and pine oil are readily available commercially, but are ineffective disinfectants in the presence of the organic matter encountered on horse farms.

Topics: Animal Husbandry; Animals; Bacterial Infections; Disease Outbreaks; Disinfectants; Disinfection; Horse Diseases; Horses; Housing, Animal; Virus Diseases

PubMed: 7579639
DOI: 10.20506/rst.14.2.846

Review

Authors: Shuqi Xiao, Zhiming Yuan, Yi Huang...

The pandemic due to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as a serious global public health issue. Besides the high transmission rate from individual to individual, indirect transmission from inanimate objects or surfaces poses a more significant threat. Since the start of the outbreak, the importance of respiratory protection, social distancing, and chemical disinfection to prevent the spread of the virus has been the prime focus for infection control. Health regulatory organizations have produced guidelines for the formulation and application of chemical disinfectants to manufacturing industries and the public. On the other hand, extensive literature on the virucidal efficacy testing of microbicides for SARS-CoV-2 has been published over the past year and a half. This review summarizes the studies on the most common chemical disinfectants and their virucidal efficacy against SARS-CoV-2, including the type and concentration of the chemical disinfectant, the formulation, the presence of excipients, the exposure time, and other critical factors that determine the effectiveness of chemical disinfectants. In this review, we also critically appraise these disinfectants and conduct a discussion on the role they can play in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Topics: COVID-19; Disinfectants; Disinfection; Humans; Pandemics; SARS-CoV-2

PubMed: 36016342
DOI: 10.3390/v14081721

Review

Authors: Shefali R Parikh, Rajul S Parikh

The instrumentation used in ophthalmic clinics can be a source of epidemics in health care set up. Contact tonometry with Schiotz or Applanation tonometer is associated with nosocomial epidemic keratoconjunctivitis outbreaks. Recently identified SARS-CoV-2 (COVID -19) spreads mainly via the respiratory route and fomites and can transmit through other body fluids, including tear film. Various ophthalmic instruments can become a common source of spreading cross infections. Chemical disinfection is one of the most common methods employed to decontaminate instruments and environmental surfaces and prevent transmission of infectious pathogens to patients through medical and surgical instruments. Various chemical disinfectants are available with a varied spectrum to work on a different group of organisms. In this article, we briefly cover commonly used chemical disinfectants in ophthalmic practice like Alcohol (Ethyl Alcohol, Isopropyl Alcohol), Chlorine-based solution (mainly Sodium Hypochlorite), Glutaraldehyde, Hydrogen Peroxide, Formaldehyde, Iodophors, and Quaternary Ammonium Compounds.

Topics: COVID-19; Cross Infection; Disease Transmission, Infectious; Disinfectants; Disinfection; Humans; Ophthalmology; Pandemics

PubMed: 33595464
DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1549_20

Authors: Mengyang Zhang, Michelle Wei Leong, William A Mitch...

UNLABELLED

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic illustrates the importance of understanding the behavior and control of human pathogenic viruses in the environment. Exposure via water (drinking, bathing, and recreation) is a known route of transmission of viruses to humans, but the literature is relatively void of studies on the persistence of many viruses, especially coronaviruses, in water and their susceptibility to chlorine disinfection. To fill that knowledge gap, we evaluated the persistence and free chlorine disinfection of human coronavirus OC43 (HCoV-OC43) and its surrogates, murine hepatitis virus (MHV) and porcine transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), in drinking water and laboratory buffer using cell culture methods. The decay rate constants of human coronavirus and its surrogates in water varied, depending on virus and water matrix. In drinking water without disinfectant addition, MHV showed the largest decay rate constant (estimate ± standard error, 2.25 ± 0.09 day) followed by HCoV-OC43 (0.99 ± 0.12 day) and TGEV (0.65 ± 0.06 day), while in phosphate buffer without disinfectant addition, HCoV-OC43 (0.51 ± 0.10 day) had a larger decay rate constant than MHV (0.28 ± 0.03 day) and TGEV (0.24 ± 0.02 day). Upon free chlorine disinfection, the inactivation rates of coronaviruses were independent of free chlorine concentration and were not affected by water matrix, though they still varied between viruses. TGEV showed the highest susceptibility to free chlorine disinfection with the inactivation rate constant of 113.50 ± 7.50 mg min L, followed by MHV (81.33 ± 4.90 mg min L) and HCoV-OC43 (59.42 ± 4.41 mg min L).

IMPORTANCE

This study addresses an important knowledge gap on enveloped virus persistence and disinfection in water. Results have immediate practical applications for shaping evidence-based water policies, particularly in the development of disinfection strategies for pathogenic virus control.

Topics: Animals; Mice; Swine; Humans; Disinfection; Chlorine; Drinking Water; Disinfectants; Viruses; Murine hepatitis virus

PubMed: 38511945
DOI: 10.1128/aem.00055-24

Review

Authors: Elizabeth C Christenson, Ryan Cronk, Helen Atkinson...

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) contribute to patient morbidity and mortality with an estimated 1.7 million infections and 99,000 deaths costing USD $28-34 billion annually in the United States alone. There is little understanding as to if current environmental surface disinfection practices reduce pathogen load, and subsequently HAIs, in critical care settings. This evidence map includes a systematic review on the efficacy of disinfecting environmental surfaces in healthcare facilities. We screened 17,064 abstracts, 635 full texts, and included 181 articles for data extraction and study quality assessment. We reviewed ten disinfectant types and compared disinfectants with respect to study design, outcome organism, and fourteen indictors of study quality. We found important areas for improvement and gaps in the research related to study design, implementation, and analysis. Implementation of disinfection, a determinant of disinfection outcomes, was not measured in most studies and few studies assessed fungi or viruses. Assessing and comparing disinfection efficacy was impeded by study heterogeneity; however, we catalogued the outcomes and results for each disinfection type. We concluded that guidelines for disinfectant use are primarily based on laboratory data rather than a systematic review of in situ disinfection efficacy. It is critically important for practitioners and researchers to consider system-level efficacy and not just the efficacy of the disinfectant.

Topics: Cross Infection; Delivery of Health Care; Disinfectants; Disinfection; Health Facilities; Humans

PubMed: 34769620
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182111100

Authors: L Brown, A Marshall, L Conway...

BACKGROUND

The role of the healthcare environment in the transmission of clinical pathogens is well established. EN 17126:2018 was developed to address the need for regulated sporicidal product testing and includes a realistic medical soil to enable validation of products that claim combined cleaning and disinfection efficacy.

AIM

To investigate the chemical stability and sporicidal efficacy of oxidizing disinfectant products in the presence of simulated clean and medical dirty conditions.

METHODS

Disinfectant stability and sporicidal efficacy were evaluated in like-for-like ratios of soil:product. Disinfectants were exposed to simulated test soils and free chlorine, chlorine dioxide or peracetic acid concentrations were measured using standard colorimetric methods. Efficacy of disinfectants against C. difficile R027 endospores was assessed as per EN 17126:2018. Comparisons of performance between clean and medical dirty conditions were performed using one-way analysis of variance. Correlation analysis was performed using Pearson product-moment correlation.

FINDINGS

Performance of chlorine-releasing agents (sodium dichloroisocyanurate, chlorine dioxide and hypochlorous acid) was concentration dependent, with 1000 ppm chlorine showing reduced stability and efficacy in dirty conditions. By contrast, peracetic acid product demonstrated stability and consistently achieved efficacy in dirty conditions.

CONCLUSION

These results have implications for clinical practice, as ineffective environmental decontamination may increase the risk of transmission of pathogens that can cause healthcare-associated infections.

Topics: Disinfectants; Chlorine Compounds; Oxides; Peracetic Acid; Spores, Bacterial; Clostridioides difficile; Humans; Disinfection; Triazines; Hypochlorous Acid

PubMed: 38705474
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.04.010

Review

Authors: Xinyu Song, Lutz Vossebein, Andrea Zille...

BACKGROUND

"Ready-to-use" disinfecting wipes (also known as pre-impregnated disinfecting wipe) are broadly used in food industry and domestic situations. Their application in hospitals and healthcare centres for decontamination of medical devices and surfaces is steadily increasing because of their convenient implementation in practice and reliable performance. Beside their acceptable compliance and easy application, literature reported the disinfection failure due to the interaction between textile substrate and active ingredients, which can highly increase the risk of an infection outbreak. This review aims to call attention to the wide range of variables affecting the disinfectant-impregnated wipes' (DIWs) disinfection performances in hospitals.

METHODS

A systematic literature search based on the five categories i. wipes, ii. disinfectants, iii. Application methods, iv. interaction between wipes and active ingredients and v. wiping strategy which can possibly influence the disinfection effectiveness of DIWs was conducted by Google scholar. Studies regarding the efficacy evaluation of DIWs in clinical applications were also reviewed from the National Centre for Biotechnology Information database.

RESULTS

Variables that impact on the disinfection performance of disinfectant-impregnated wipes in surface disinfection in hospitals were summarised and critically discussed. In addition to the information, current disinfectant-impregnated wipes' decontamination efficacy test standards were reviewed, and different standards exposed some disadvantage in their testing design.

CONCLUSION

Various parameters contribute to the impact of DIWs disinfection performance in practice. The interaction between disinfectant active ingredients and the wiping materials barricades their broad application in hospitals. More studies of the DIWs' disinfection efficacy in clinical practice are in need. Current standards evaluating the DIWs' efficacy are required to improve for more realistic condition simulation and differentiating between mechanical removal of inoculum from a surface and chemical inactivation of the test microbe.

Topics: Cross Infection; Disinfectants; Disinfection; Environmental Microbiology; Equipment Contamination; Humans

PubMed: 31452873
DOI: 10.1186/s13756-019-0595-2